taylormeetstheismann
Footballguy
I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
The play calling involving him.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
They're going to continue to run the ball, that was McCarthy's gripe with Kellen Moore. Although we were scoring points and running copious amounts of Tony Pollard Wheel Routes - it isn't what McCarthy wants. For that reason, I have added Rico Dowdle. It seems like he is better suited for that Zeke role and he was getting some run before the blowout. I can see a 50/50 or 60/40 timeshare looming.The play calling involving him.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
The play calling involving him.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
They are predictable plays to Pollard, while the scoring plays are better, yes. Throwing to Lamb is a big advantage over the defense.The play calling involving him.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
So Dallas calls terrible plays for Pollard yet otherwise the team scores seven TDs and those plays are pretty good on average?
If I have a better option, I may bench him after this week. If he can’t break out vs the Giants and Carolina, when will he?He's gonna have a huge weak when no one expects it. Not sure if it's this week or not, but it's coming as soon as you throw him on your bench...
It seems like he runs the ball up the middle on about 95% of first downs and up the middle again on just about every 3rd and short. So ….yesThe play calling involving him.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
So Dallas calls terrible plays for Pollard yet otherwise the team scores seven TDs and those plays are pretty good on average?
Agreed, although it will probably come from a few big plays off 15-18 touches like last year, not the 20-25 we were banking on coming into the season. That’s obviously a big difference from a future floor perspective.He's gonna have a huge weak when no one expects it. Not sure if it's this week or not, but it's coming as soon as you throw him on your bench...
Maybe even later like 5th or 6th based on his numbers so far this year if he doesn't improve on them.If I have a better option, I may bench him after this week. If he can’t break out vs the Giants and Carolina, when will he?He's gonna have a huge weak when no one expects it. Not sure if it's this week or not, but it's coming as soon as you throw him on your bench...
If we are redrafting tomorrow, where will he go? I’m thinking 4-5th round.
YesWould you trade him for Breece?
Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
I also would.Definitely .. I’d take Mostert in that offense any day even with Achane.Reading these posts has me thinking twice about buying low.
Was thinking of offering Mostert in a deal with Achane coming back.
Curious...what would Pollard owners think of a direct swap for Mostert?
No Breece owner is doing that.Would you trade him for Breece?
Absolutely. One guy is the focal point of the offense.....one isn't.Would you trade him for Breece?
To be clear, the trade is Kyler and Pollard for Breece.Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
Still yes. Be sure to thank him for taking Kyler off of your hands while you’re at it.To be clear, the trade is Kyler and Pollard for Breece.Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
I originally offered Saquon and Murray due to the Giants being so bad. He countered with Pollard.
Breece Hall is probably a top 4 RB. I can't believe you're even asking if you should take Breece Hall for Pollard and Murray. Yes, you should. I can't believe the other guy is more willing to give up Breece over Saquon. The Giants with Danny DeVito's kid under center do not look good. I'd say the situations are equally awful and that Breece is a better player at this stage of his career.To be clear, the trade is Kyler and Pollard for Breece.Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
I originally offered Saquon and Murray due to the Giants being so bad. He countered with Pollard.
Still take the deal. I assume you have a decent QB and Murray is expendable.To be clear, the trade is Kyler and Pollard for Breece.Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
I originally offered Saquon and Murray due to the Giants being so bad. He countered with Pollard.
Assuming it's not SF, I would hurry up and accept it before he sobers up.To be clear, the trade is Kyler and Pollard for Breece.Why would any Breece owner make that trade though??Would you trade him for Breece?
I originally offered Saquon and Murray due to the Giants being so bad. He countered with Pollard.
In general, Dallas is moving the ball. However, everyone is wondering why Pollard isn’t producing…..It’s a pretty simple answer: they are not using him the same way they did last year. As Bad_Mo2 mentioned…95% of his runs are between the tackles. There have been almost no plays called to get him the ball in space. Ironically, his biggest play came on a scramble from Dak when he found him over the middle. There have been no screens, no wheel routes, no passes in the flats. They hardly ever run Pollard on sweeps or tosses. Yes, he can run between the tackles, but that‘s not his forte.I think the play calling is horrible. Still waiting for easy screens to get him involved early. Too many runs right up the middle into defenders. Horrible.
They scored 49 points. How bad can the play calling be?
Wow. Thinking of trading Mostert for him. Like Pollard's playoff schedule more than Miami.Just to give y'all an idea of how some are valuing him, I just got Pollard for James Cook
Yeah I'm thinking positive regression happens for Pollard. You'd think with Dak on fire it should open things up for him. He's been damn unlucky at the goaline.I'm hoping Mostert has a big game vs the Raiders and then I can dish him. People want to see him have a big game with Achane back before committing. I agree on playoff schedules. Hoping to see something from Pollard though - he doesn't look like the same player so I'm not sure I can pull the trigger. Has to have positive regression though, right?
A big game from Pollard seems very unlikely . He hasn’t scored a TD since week 1 and hasn’t had a big game since week 3. I have to start him this week due to injuries and bye weeks but plan on beaching him after this week. Tough to bench your first round draft pick and admit you are wrong but he’s done so little for weeks.Seems like a decent buy low. When u buy low u want guys whose value can drastically change with one game. Pollard is that guy who has one 150 yard 2 TD game and people forget his bad games. Ha ha. With that reasoning if u own no way u sell. It's bad business. I own zero shares but I'd keep rolling him out. Win or lose id die on that hill. All my opinion of course.
Yep. In this game you have to pivot quickly. Conditions in the NFL and for individual teams and players change rapidly and waiting around for "regression" usually doesn't work. This is no longer a team that runs much, and when they do they don't do it creatively, and when Pollard gets the ball he looks nothing like his old self, maybe because of his leg injury, maybe for other reasons.A big game from Pollard seems very unlikely . He hasn’t scored a TD since week 1 and hasn’t had a big game since week 3. I have to start him this week due to injuries and bye weeks but plan on beaching him after this week. Tough to bench your first round draft pick and admit you are wrong but he’s done so little for weeks.Seems like a decent buy low. When u buy low u want guys whose value can drastically change with one game. Pollard is that guy who has one 150 yard 2 TD game and people forget his bad games. Ha ha. With that reasoning if u own no way u sell. It's bad business. I own zero shares but I'd keep rolling him out. Win or lose id die on that hill. All my opinion of course.
Sure it does. More volume if Rico Suave doesn't play or is limited.Dowdle downgraded to questionable FWIW. Not sure that matters much for Pollard, however.
Yes, of course it's more volume - I said "much" in that he may not do much with that extra volume or perhaps they go even pass heavier.Sure it does. More volume if Rico Suave doesn't play or is limited.Dowdle downgraded to questionable FWIW. Not sure that matters much for Pollard, however.
Stud! My faith never wavered.I'm about ready to call this my worst call ever.
Sarcasm here?I wonder if the play calling is still bad…
That was the mindset for many against the Giants last week - sometimes you get it right, sometimes not.. If you're not going to play him against Washington, then when are you going to play him?
Am I missing something? Yes, he didn't do well against the Giants, but he got 18 week 11 against Carolina. Shouldn't that have given enough confidence to start him again in week 12?That was the mindset for many against the Giants last week - sometimes you get it right, sometimes not.. If you're not going to play him against Washington, then when are you going to play him?
I said the same thing to my brother while we were watching the game yesterday. Pollard looked quicker than he has for weeks. Maybe he had a nagging ankle or knee that healed?I don't know where it's coming from, but TP's got some pep back in his step.
It's called the threat of the backup taking your snaps.I don't know where it's coming from, but TP's got some pep back in his step.
He read my post and didn't want to disappoint me.I don't know where it's coming from, but TP's got some pep back in his step.
No, its actually better. 6 catches on 6 targets shows that they are being diverse with him. Not alot of yards but forcing defenses to respect the screens.I wonder if the play calling is still bad…
No, it’s actually better. 6 catches on 6 targets shows that they are being diverse with him. Not alot of yards but forcing defenses to respect the screens.I wonder if the play calling is still bad…