LargeMouthBass
Footballguy
That's what she said.I'm not sure how you could be going into the season without some piece of CP. It's going to be a fun ride.
That's what she said.I'm not sure how you could be going into the season without some piece of CP. It's going to be a fun ride.
Maybe, but as Patterson showed against the Ravens last year, he can take a short pass the distance. I could see the Vikings throwing a few of those WR screens to Patterson to counteract the Rams pass rush and then all he needs to do is then make one man miss and it could be off to the races.Anyone worried about the STL matchup?
While the STL secondary isn't that great, I could see Cassel flat on his back quite a bit.
Exactly. Plus they are going to hand him the ball 3-4 times. He has the ability to break one of those too.Maybe, but as Patterson showed against the Ravens last year, he can take a short pass the distance. I could see the Vikings throwing a few of those WR screens to Patterson to counteract the Rams pass rush and then all he needs to do is then make one man miss and it could be off to the races.Anyone worried about the STL matchup?
While the STL secondary isn't that great, I could see Cassel flat on his back quite a bit.
I get what you're saying, but he's not going to keep putting up 100 yard rushing games and he only had a few catches.Why does rotoworld hate Patterson so much? After the game, "there's WR2 upside."
thanks man, better than i was expecting even.
But if he has WR2 upside, what is he now a WR3? More like WR1 upside.I get what you're saying, but he's not going to keep putting up 100 yard rushing games and he only had a few catches.Why does rotoworld hate Patterson so much? After the game, "there's WR2 upside."
He looked like a tall Peterson on that run.thanks man, better than i was expecting even.
Yeah, some games, he'll catch a screen for a TD.I get what you're saying, but he's not going to keep putting up 100 yard rushing games and he only had a few catches.Why does rotoworld hate Patterson so much? After the game, "there's WR2 upside."
True, let's not lose sight of the fact that Jennings was much more productive in the passing game today - probably since so much attention was paid to CP. Can't always count on a rushing and/or kickoff return, so for him to really elevate his fantasy status, he's got to do more in the passing game.I get what you're saying, but he's not going to keep putting up 100 yard rushing games and he only had a few catches.Why does rotoworld hate Patterson so much? After the game, "there's WR2 upside."
He got 7 touches. I'll take that every week. He is capable of scoring on just about any play. I'm sure the distribution will skew more towards receptions as the weeks go by, 64 carries would be unprecedented, but as long as he touches the ball I don't care.I get what you're saying, but he's not going to keep putting up 100 yard rushing games and he only had a few catches.Why does rotoworld hate Patterson so much? After the game, "there's WR2 upside."
That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
You think it's obvious that Patterson should be ranked higher than Harvin moving forward? Not me, and I love Patterson.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
I do love Harvin too. I'd put Patterson 10 ahead of Jeffery on your list, but we're spliiting hairs. He's a top fantasy option right now.You think it's obvious that Patterson should be ranked higher than Harvin moving forward? Not me, and I love Patterson.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
His ceiling is his QB. I think people are overreacting after week 1.I'm guessing he catches it more than 3 times a game moving forward.
I'm certainly a bit worried about his touches/targets, but the seem committed to getting him the ball and I believe in his talent.
Julio/Cruz w/ Patterson in my flex...feeling pretty good about that right this moment.
He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Russell Wilson isn't that much better than Matt Cassel? Really?He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
que?He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Not to make up for 100 or so passes. This is fantasy. I don't get points for him being more efficient.Russell Wilson isn't that much better than Matt Cassel? Really?He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Wilson won the SB last year is still getting better as a passer. Cassel is one bad game from getting replaced by a rookie. Yes, he is.Russell Wilson isn't that much better than Matt Cassel? Really?He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
Which has nothing to do with my point.Wilson won the SB last year is still getting better as a passer. Cassel is one bad game from getting replaced by a rookie. Yes, he is.Russell Wilson isn't that much better than Matt Cassel? Really?He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.
I am going to go ahead and disagree with this. Not an overly controversial disagreement but the reality of Matt Cassell is that he is as good as those around him. When they are bad, he is bad, when they are good he can be good too.He's not that much better.Maybe because he's much, much better?How does having a QB who is likely to throw 100 less passes help Harvin?Harvin has Wilson and Patterson has Cassel.Harvin? Patterson is what people want Harvin to be.That's too high for me, I think. I play PPR, and I would say:He looks so good out there. There will be down games (like all WRs), but he should be ranked in the top 10 of WRs moving forward.
Dez
Calvin
Demaryius
Green
Julio
Jordy
Antonio
Harvin
Marshall
Jeffrey
Man, he's close after that, tho.