What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (5 Viewers)

hooter311 said:
jdoggydogg said:
Andy Dufresne said:
jdoggydogg said:
Scott is money in the bank. I would be very dissapointed if Body of Lies wasn't good.
he's money in the bank for studios certainly. i'm not so sure he's midas when it comes to the product itself. the last good movie he did, imo, was "blackhawk down" and that was 7 years ago. he's an increasingly commercial director and is almost indistinguishable from his brother, tony scott, at this point in his career.
That's a solid analysis. Though he generally makes movies that are entertaining to me. I don't think Gladiator is Citizen Kane, but I enjoy watching the movie. Certainly, Scott is no Scorsese. But he knows how to craft an engaging movie.
Aside from "Hannibal", Scott has had a great run this decade-
Body of Lies (2008)American Gangster (2007)A Good Year (2006)Kingdom of Heaven (2005)Matchstick Men (2003)Cinema16: British Short Films (2003) (V)Black Hawk Down (2001)Hannibal (2001)Gladiator (2000)
I even enjoyed "A Good Year".
I didn't like Matchstick Men. Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :popcorn:
:popcorn: Any movie that has someone feeding Ray Liotta his own brain is aces in my book. The part where he disembowels the guy in the library and throws him out the window was great too. I enjoyed the Hannibal Lector character much more in Hannibal then SOL, except for of course the part where he escapes his cell.
Plus, I am a big Julianne Moore fan. I know no one can replace Jodie Foster, but almost everything Moore does works for me.
 
Plus, I am a big Julianne Moore fan. I know no one can replace Jodie Foster, but almost everything Moore does works for me.
I don't get what people see in Moore.
She's a great actor.
Well I can agree with that. I guess I was just referring to the attractiveness factor.
She's pretty sexy in Boogie Nights, but yeah, she's not a beauty at all. Then again, Meghan Fox and Jessica Alba couldn't pull off a role in an elementary school play.

 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :lmao:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :eek:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
 
Movies that I have rewatched recently:

Once - Man if you watch only one indy film in your life grab this one. Just beautiful... the music, chemistry and setting are gorgeous.

Intolerable Cruelty - What an outstanding comedy. I wish that more of these kinds of movies came out for comedies rather than stupid laughs. (I'm looking at you Will Ferrell)

Fast Times at Ridgemont High - Is there any movie that captured the 80's better? Sean Penn, Forrest Whitaker and Judge Reinhold are classics in these characters. Pheobe Cates show stealer is still as great as the first time.

The Untouchables - An underappreciated ganster film in my opinion. I was suprised what a great score it had after re-viewing this. DeNiro is fantastic and Costner really holds his own with Connery. Like seeing the young Andy Garcia being apart of the film as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Once - Man if you watch only one indy film in your life grab this one. Just beautiful... the music, chemistry and setting are gorgeous.

Fast Times at Ridgemont High - Is there any movie that captured the 80's better? Sean Penn, Forrest Whitaker and Judge Reinhold are classics in these characters. Pheobe Cates show stealer is still as great as the first time.

The Untouchables - An underappreciated ganster film in my opinion. I was suprised what a great score it had after re-viewing this. DeNiro is fantastic and Costner really holds his own with Connery. Like seeing the young Andy Garcia being apart of the film as well.
:hifive:
 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :shrug:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
 
finally saw Once Upon a Time in the West. WOW. this is easily one of the best films of all time. the best western ever.

 
Rescue Dawn - 7.5/10

Pretty good movie. It can only be but so action-y as it's based on a true story.

The thing I really liked (other than the performances which are top notch) is how they shot the film to look like it was filmed with Vietnam era film stock. You know how all those old movies of the planes dropping napalm, etc. all have that bluish-green and orange-red look to them? The set design was very similar to this which set the mood very well, IMO.

 
Kabluey

3.5/5

If you enjoy Indie comedys, be sure to check this out. Its not a great film because it has a lot of fluff. Lisa Kudrow's character didn't make a lot of sense to me. This movie has a very big heart and is very touching, but I don't know if I would classify it as a family movie because it has a few very crude references in it. I'm pretty hard to impress with an ending because a lot of recent movies fall apart in the third act (Doesn't anyone read screenwriting guides anymore?), but this didn't have the typical hollywood ending and I enjoyed it.

 
Saw Arlington Road last night. I am not sure how I missed it for so long.

Jeff Bridges and Tim Robbins did a good job and the ending wasn't obvious as with most movies. It created a good air of mystery when Bridges was checking out the activities of his neighbor.

Enjoyable movie.

 
Burn after reading was absolutely hilarious. Everyone in that movie was casted just perfectly....also the type of movie that will get funnier everytime you watch it.
I thought Burn After Reading was great as well. Was still laughing about it days later, which is always a good sign.
 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :yes:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
i think this analysis is spot on.
 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :rolleyes:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
I like Norton a lot, and Fiennes is always good. That movie was well-made, but I definitely prefer Manhunter.
 
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :goodposting:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
I like Norton a lot, and Fiennes is always good. That movie was well-made, but I definitely prefer Manhunter.
Manhunter was the better movie, but Red Dragon has a stronger "obsession" theme. The scene where Fiennes goes in and eats the original painting in order to "become the Red Dragon" is one of my all time favorites. I probably wouldn't watch Manhunter again, but I usually pop in Red Dragon maybe once a year. Fiennes just totally nails his part.
 
hooter311 said:
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :homer:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
I like Norton a lot, and Fiennes is always good. That movie was well-made, but I definitely prefer Manhunter.
Manhunter was the better movie, but Red Dragon has a stronger "obsession" theme. The scene where Fiennes goes in and eats the original painting in order to "become the Red Dragon" is one of my all time favorites. I probably wouldn't watch Manhunter again, but I usually pop in Red Dragon maybe once a year. Fiennes just totally nails his part.
Manhunter is dated compared to Red Dragon. That's certain. But I think that after a few years pass, Manhunter will be more relevant than Red Dragon.
 
hooter311 said:
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :goodposting:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
I like Norton a lot, and Fiennes is always good. That movie was well-made, but I definitely prefer Manhunter.
Manhunter was the better movie, but Red Dragon has a stronger "obsession" theme. The scene where Fiennes goes in and eats the original painting in order to "become the Red Dragon" is one of my all time favorites. I probably wouldn't watch Manhunter again, but I usually pop in Red Dragon maybe once a year. Fiennes just totally nails his part.
Manhunter is dated compared to Red Dragon. That's certain. But I think that after a few years pass, Manhunter will be more relevant than Red Dragon.
I would agree with this, sadly I think a lot of people have never heard of Manhunter because Brian Cox played Hannibal Lector instead of Anthony Hopkins. If Hopkins would have been in it, it would already be more relevant. Its been a long while since I've seen it, but I remember it being a lot creepier than Red Dragon, and even Silence of the Lambs for that matter.
 
hooter311 said:
jdoggydogg said:
Maybe I'm the only guy that likes Hannibal :thumbup:
Thought it was entertaining for the most part, but it did get too hokey towards the end. IMO both the movie and the book felt like they were made just to squeeze some more money out of the series. Just didn't have the "feel" that the other two had.
There's no doubt that Silence of the Lambs is far superior. I just thought Hannibal (the book and the movie) worked as hammy suspense.
How does Red Dragon fit in for you?
I like Norton a lot, and Fiennes is always good. That movie was well-made, but I definitely prefer Manhunter.
Manhunter was the better movie, but Red Dragon has a stronger "obsession" theme. The scene where Fiennes goes in and eats the original painting in order to "become the Red Dragon" is one of my all time favorites. I probably wouldn't watch Manhunter again, but I usually pop in Red Dragon maybe once a year. Fiennes just totally nails his part.
Manhunter is dated compared to Red Dragon. That's certain. But I think that after a few years pass, Manhunter will be more relevant than Red Dragon.
I would agree with this, sadly I think a lot of people have never heard of Manhunter because Brian Cox played Hannibal Lector instead of Anthony Hopkins. If Hopkins would have been in it, it would already be more relevant. Its been a long while since I've seen it, but I remember it being a lot creepier than Red Dragon, and even Silence of the Lambs for that matter.
Aside from Miami Vice - which I thought was horrible - Michael Mann is one of my favorite modern directors.
 
watched city on fire on the strength of it reportedly being the inspiration for reservoir dogs...

really enjoyed it... the parallels were definitely there (undercover cop, jewelry heists gone bad, three way mexican standoff near the end, etc)... didn't play with the temporal sequence in flashback/forward editing ala tarantino, & the plot unfolded in a straightforward, linear manner...

a young chow yung fat (from '85 i think), with strong direction from ringo lam (?), this easily could have been a john woo film... you will probably like it a lot if you liked reservoir dogs (& who doesn't :lmao: ) along with woo's hard boiled...

very cool & infectious, circa '70s, reverb-drenched, bluesy jazz-rock sound track that is IN THE POCKET...

highly recommended...

next on deck is infernal affairs (supposed basis for scorcese's the departed)...

* i agree with manhunter being a hidden gem... i always thought cox's turn at hannibal lecter was underrated & much more believable & therefore genuinely creepy (just ZIP down that rolodex... in the chilling prison cell phone scene), compared to the over the top and almost pandering performance by hopkins (though that is probably sacrilege to say)...

also one of my favorite performances by william peterson (along with billy friedkin's to live & die in LA) in one of his first roles... my favorite dialogue was when he was talking to lecter, who points out that will graham (peterson) must have been smarter to have caught him...

"you had disadvantages."

"such as?"

"your insane." :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just watched Zodiac again last night. LOVE the movie (probably #2 or #3 fav. from last year). However there is a part of the movie that confused me both times. I haven't read the book and that would probably help, but somebody here probably could help too:

 
finally saw Once Upon a Time in the West. WOW. this is easily one of the best films of all time. the best western ever.
Claudia Cardinale = :goodposting:
:goodposting:
:rolleyes: one question for those who have seen it:

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

when Harmonica was blurting out the names of Dave Jenkins, Calder Benson, Jim Cooper, Chuck Young Blood to Frank. I took those names as the ones who were with Frank when they killed his brother. I figured Harmonica finished off those 4 guys first before going after Frank. Anyone agreed with me here or were the 4 guys previous victims of Frank. the film was never clear on this matter.

the list + Frank reminds me of Kill Bill which Tarantino im sure pay homage to for OUATITW.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Took the wife and 4 yo boy to see Igor this afternoon. Interesting story, a few lines I laughed out loud. Will probably get buried because it's not a Disney or Pixar release (the animation is a step below the big boys) but I won't mind watching this thing 20 times when my son gets it on DVD for Christmas.

The character that is voiced by Steve Buschemi is extremely unique and provided 90 percent of the good lines. In the future I really need to look at the cast list before I go and see the movie. I hate it when I hear a character, know the voice, but can't place it. It happened twice today with John Cusack and Christian Slater.

 
Ironman: Best comic book movie so far (other than Batman). Robert Downy Jr. is great. There really wasn't much about this movie I didn't like. 4/5

The Incredible Hulk: It really isn't close how much better this Hulk movie was compared to the last. The cameo by Lou Ferigno (sp?) was a nice touch as well. A couple major plot holes: 3/5

mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

The interception of the email was ridiculous. There is no way in hell the government could scan every email, including what is in an attachment.

The ending also bothered me. Hulk is kicking the guys ### then his chick tells him to stop and he ends up having to run away. What happens to the other monster? He wasn't dead and he showed earlier in the movie and during the fight scenes how fast he recovers.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Based on comments in this thread, watched Felon this weekend. Harsh movie but I was intrigued by the main characters throughout. A thumb up.

 
Since we never really got an "in-theatres now" thread off the ground, I'll just use this thread to mention I saw Redbelt yesterday and ask that if anyone else has seen it, I'd like to hear your opinion and run a couple of questions past you. :goodposting:
I love Mamet, but this is a renter. Did you like it?
I love Mamet, too. I'd give it a 4/5, so I definitely thought it was good, but didn't seem to love it as much as my boyfriend did (though I think he's an even bigger Mamet fan than I). It was unusual for a Mamet film--while the dialogue was good, this was more of an action film than I've seen him do. He did an amazing job with the fight scenes--they seemed very realistic and not-at-all silly or overly contrived. I'm a sucker for films about honor, and this was basically a very good samurai/honor-type film. Also, I think he got better performances out of the actors than he normally does--Emily Mortimer is always a favorite, and the protagonist was extremely well-acted. Even Tim Allen was quite good. Maybe it helped that Rebecca Pidgeon had only a very tiny role.All in all, I'd say worth seeing now rather than waiting on a rental.
Krista, I found your review and recall reading it. This was one of the reasons why it was so high on my list to watch on it's DVD release. I agree with you that the martial arts scenes were realistically done and knowing Mamet I'm sure he did more than his share of research but here were my problems with it, I would be very interested to see what made you like it that much more than myself. mytagid = Math.floor( Math.random() * 100 );document.write("

To start with, I despised the way that Mortimer's character was introduced. One minute she is driving in the rain and the next minute she is firing the gun through the window. I know she had the history of being raped that would make her grab for the weapon so fast, but if she was that skiddish would she have done more initially than just open the door and ask her question? It just seemed like a very big jump in character for a lawyer to grab a gun and fire it in that situation.

The scene where he puts her in a headlock and has her stab him to deal with her pain was great, and the highlight of the film.

I'm a big fan of films regarding honor as well and they usually really get my blood going, but I just couldn't understand why the cop would committ sucuide and leave his wife in debt over his martial arts dojo. He just didn't seem like a completely fleshed out character to me. I know the nuances of a Mamet film led us to believe that it was not as big of a deal initially as it turned out to be once the court case was involved, but would a cop with that much honor go try to pawn a $20,000 stolen watch without having someone in the department check it out first? It just seems like the situations that the entire plot is built are were inplausible to me.

And the biggest one, why would the martial arts master give him the most covented belt in the world without speaking to him or knowing his intentions based on a fight on a entrance walkway?

It also was a more than a little conveinent to have his wife take out a $30,000 cash loan from a loan shark over a business deal discussed over dinner the first time she met Allen's wife and her associate.

Everything was there for it to be a great movie for me, but the pieces just didn't add up and Mamet's script just didn't do it for me like he usually does.*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

Interested in your thoughts Krista or anyone else, definitely a polarizing film though.
Sorry, I kept meaning to get back to this and respond, but every time I did I realized that I didn't have a good enough memory of some of the specifics to give a good response. Suffice it to say that I agree with you about the ending of the film, but the other points didn't really strike me as so implausible. I'm hoping that someone (jdoggydogg, I'm looking at you) will see this and with it fresher in their mind, can give a better answer. BTW, I read some interesting discussion at imdb about the ending--you might want to check that out. Some people were able to give a somewhat convincing argument about why it worked, though ultimately I remain unconvinced.I have watched almost NO movies in the past few months. :shrug: First a 2-1/2 week vacation, then the Olympics, then the Democrat and Republican conventions...just too many other distractions. So I have very little to report.

Cave of the Yellow Dog: Made by the same folks who did a favorite of mine, Story of the Weeping Camel. For some reason, I just couldn't get into this one, though. It is beautifully done, but slow, slow, slow--which usually doesn't bother me, but in this case it was too much. 3/5

Also rewatched The Station Agent as I wanted my boyfriend to see it. Had been a few years, and I wasn't blown away as much as when I first saw it, but it's still solid. 4/5

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top