What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (1 Viewer)

Curiousity got the better of me. I checked out The Human Centipede trailer. :blackdot: :lmao: :lmao:
That looks awful. Not sure why that movie needed to be made, and no part of me wants to see it. Still, how could it be worse than the Twilight franchise?
Best part of Human Centipede is that it's the first in a franchise. Wanted to get people accustomed to the squeamishness before the sequel comes out.
Watching that trailer reminded me of newer Troma movies. I wish I hadn't seen it and I wish I could take out my brain and bathe it after seeing it.
 
Curiousity got the better of me. I checked out The Human Centipede trailer.

:hifive: :ph34r: :mellow:
That looks awful. Not sure why that movie needed to be made, and no part of me wants to see it. Still, how could it be worse than the Twilight franchise?
Best part of Human Centipede is that it's the first in a franchise. Wanted to get people accustomed to the squeamishness before the sequel comes out.
Watching that trailer reminded me of newer Troma movies. I wish I hadn't seen it and I wish I could take out my brain and bathe it after seeing it.
 
WATCHED "Couples Retreat" last night. I'd give it a solid 2.5 out of 5, entertaining but immediately forgetable. Problem was the disc I had (from RedBox) skipped about 5 times in the middle of a scene and went right to the next scene, so I am sure we missed some stuff.

 
TexanFan02 said:
The Man Who Would Be King is one of my favorite movies of all time. Quite possibly my favorite.
I think one of the reasons it's so great is that there are two leading men in it, Connery and Caine.

Caine is a good co - lead, films like Sleuth and Dirty Rotten Scoundrels are also very entertaining.
I was wondering if that was any good when I read about it awhile ago
 
TexanFan02 said:
The Man Who Would Be King is one of my favorite movies of all time. Quite possibly my favorite.
I think one of the reasons it's so great is that there are two leading men in it, Connery and Caine.

Caine is a good co - lead, films like Sleuth and Dirty Rotten Scoundrels are also very entertaining.
I was wondering if that was any good when I read about it awhile ago
Sleuth is excellent. It's a two man play with Olivier at his best and Caine ably trundling alongside. Just be sure you get the original and not the remake.
 
Heaven Can Wait is a very clever and entertaining movie. Charles Grodin delivers, as usual.From your list The Man Who Would Be King is hands down my favorite. It's one I can watch pretty much anytime it comes on.
Grodin is always funny. Makes me want to watch Midnight Run again.
Ever had sex with an animal, Jack?
Why aren't you friendly with the Chicago police department?
 
TexanFan02 said:
The Man Who Would Be King is one of my favorite movies of all time. Quite possibly my favorite.
I think one of the reasons it's so great is that there are two leading men in it, Connery and Caine.

Caine is a good co - lead, films like Sleuth and Dirty Rotten Scoundrels are also very entertaining.
I was wondering if that was any good when I read about it awhile ago
Sleuth is excellent. It's a two man play with Olivier at his best and Caine ably trundling alongside. Just be sure you get the original and not the remake.
Caine plays the other character in the remake and Jude Law plays Milo, it's absolutely awful.
 
An American Crime...Based on true story, reminded me of an old school Alpha Dog in how the crime could have been prevented or stopped multiple times by multiple people. Pull off the mid-60's time period easily and doesnt push it in your face. Nice to see Ellen Page in a role where she's not some strong willed teen. Catherine Keener was excellent, maybe her best performance Ive seen. Turns out she was nominated for a Golden Globe and Emmy for her performance....6.4/10
 
I finally got to see The Secret in Their Eyes last night - the Argentinian crime/mystery drama that won the oscar for best foreign film. Its a good movie for a date night - great Law/Order style crime mystery, great acting a decent twist at the end. The only criticisms might be that it is a bit heavy on the symbolism and foreshadowing, the story depends on a couple big leaps of faith and the love story is a bit hokey. Overall, highly recommended.

 
Night and the City....DeNiro movie from the early 90's that was a remake. He plays an unsuccessful & shady lawyer who decides to become a boxing promoter because he thinks thats how he'll finally make money. Since DeNiro rarely ever plays a poor schlub (maybe never?) like this, its worth watching just for his performance. Predictable, but still entertaining thanks to Bobby D....5.7/10

This Is England...Been wanting to see this movie for awhile, finally did, thought it was great...Based in 1980's around a young British boy who gets involved with skinheads. Story was brilliant and believable, cinematography made it actually feel like it was shot 20+ years ago (as did the clothing). I guess the main character about 13 years old when this was made, but he looks more like 10 years old, and Im not sure Ive ever seen a better performance by someone under 16 years old (not to mention he had never been in a film before). Stephen Graham (Tommy from Snatch) was also excellent, and it was great to see him in a large role and more outspoken, charismatic, and in-charge character. Not sure what else to really say about it, Im sure a lot of people here have seen it, but if you havent, its must see IMO....8.5/10

Fighting...For movies of this fare, much better than expected. Didnt realize it until the movie started, but it was written and directed by Dito Montiel, whose only other W&D was for arguably my favorite movie of the last 5 or so years - A Guide To Recognizing Your Saints. He brings back Channing Tatum for this movie, who no one would confuse for a great actor, but he's believable in any movie Ive seen him in. Im a big Terrence Howard fan, and although his character grew on me here, he couldve done more with it and the accent kind of bothered me. Main complaints are that a few of the fights are terribly unbelievable. The sequences are pretty good, but I have a hard time to believe this kid off the street is beating guys 100lbs heavier than him or the Chinese's best fighter (who happened to be Cung Le). Also, main character's antagonist and final fight was a terribly cheesy and turd of a character......5/10

Eight Legged Freaks...I hate spiders, let alone giant spiders. Watched this last night for laughs, and it delivered! Im pretty sure based on some of the dialogue it was actually supposed to be funny (ie Slither) than just so bad it was funny. Dewey Arquette always brings a laugh worthy performance to the screen and doesnt disappoint. Mother-daughter combo of Kari Wuhrer and an 18yr old Scarlett Johanssen was arguably the hottest family combo in the history of film. Spiders actually looked pretty real and the effects were solid. Pretty good for one of those horror-comedies if thats what youre looking for....6.3/10

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Night and the City....DeNiro movie from the early 90's that was a remake. He plays an unsuccessful & shady lawyer who decides to become a boxing promoter because he thinks thats how he'll finally make money. Since DeNiro rarely ever plays a poor schlub (maybe never?) like this, its worth watching just for his performance. Predictable, but still entertaining thanks to Bobby D....5.7/10
the original version of this, with richard widmark, is kind of a lost classic. it's such a good film too. highly recommend it to anyone that likes older films.
 
We are in a movie rut at the Dogg house. We've seen a lot of the modern films that are critically lauded, so we're going back to some of the classics we missed over the years. Here's what I have in the queue coming up:
There are a lot of good flicks in that list jdogg. Curious to hear what you have to say. A few comments:Heaven Can Wait - even though it's a cheesy movie, I still enjoy itMoonlighting - wow, blast from the past. A great movie with a young Jeremy Irons. (not to be confused with the TV series)Lenny - Dustin Hoffman was fantastic, and the movie does a great job of portraying the stupidity of our laws back thenMephisto - haven't seen this in years, will enjoy hearing your reactionThe Candidate - one of my favorite political movies of all time. Excellent film. Think of McCain while watching it. Or Obama.Shampoo - really wasn't impressed. Overrated.Nashville - if you like Altman, you'll like this film. otherwise, probably not.
 
The Girlfriend Experience

Steven Soderburgh directs real life porn star Sasha Grey in this excellent cinéma vérité piece about a high-priced prostitute. I liked it. It's not the kind of movie I'd see again, but it's very well done. Recommended to viewers that tire of ridiculously big acting performances and Hollywood formulas.
It was hard watching Sasha grey in a real movie after I've seen her take it in the exit...Goodish movie though and I thought she did a fairly good job, I was kind of confused by the end of the movie with all the jumping around. Sasha grey is pretty damn good looking.
Saw this recently and thought it was average at best. Wouldn't recommend it to anyone, and I generally enjoy Soderburgh's movies.Watched Idiocracy tonight. Awful movie, one of the worst I've ever seen. In line with Leonard Part VI.
There wasn't anything remarkable or great about The Girlfriend Experience. But I usually give a movie credit for being different.Idiocracy could have been good. All they needed to do was look to Futurama as a template on how to make a futuristic satire.
Man, I'm so far behind on this thread......Yeah, I give Soderburgh credit for doing different stuff. Like I said, his movies are usually interesting to me. This one just felt gimmicky and not very well done. But yes, it's cool that he took a risk.

Loved the concept of Idiocracy. Horrible script. Horrible directing. Didn't pay close enough attention to evaluate the acting.

 
Night and the City....DeNiro movie from the early 90's that was a remake. He plays an unsuccessful & shady lawyer who decides to become a boxing promoter because he thinks thats how he'll finally make money. Since DeNiro rarely ever plays a poor schlub (maybe never?) like this, its worth watching just for his performance. Predictable, but still entertaining thanks to Bobby D....5.7/10
the original version of this, with richard widmark, is kind of a lost classic. it's such a good film too. highly recommend it to anyone that likes older films.
The original is available on Netflix on Demand. Saw it again last night. Dated, but still worth a watch.
 
Night and the City....DeNiro movie from the early 90's that was a remake. He plays an unsuccessful & shady lawyer who decides to become a boxing promoter because he thinks thats how he'll finally make money. Since DeNiro rarely ever plays a poor schlub (maybe never?) like this, its worth watching just for his performance. Predictable, but still entertaining thanks to Bobby D....5.7/10
the original version of this, with richard widmark, is kind of a lost classic. it's such a good film too. highly recommend it to anyone that likes older films.
The original is available on Netflix on Demand. Saw it again last night. Dated, but still worth a watch.
i think it's one of the finest examples of post-war film noir. widmark gives a great performance as harry fabian. it's also beautifully shot and uses b/w cinematography to great advantage.
 
I'll post reviews as I watch these.

We are in a movie rut at the Dogg house. We've seen a lot of the modern films that are critically lauded, so we're going back to some of the classics we missed over the years. Here's what I have in the queue coming up:
There are a lot of good flicks in that list jdogg. Curious to hear what you have to say. A few comments:Heaven Can Wait - even though it's a cheesy movie, I still enjoy itMoonlighting - wow, blast from the past. A great movie with a young Jeremy Irons. (not to be confused with the TV series)Lenny - Dustin Hoffman was fantastic, and the movie does a great job of portraying the stupidity of our laws back thenMephisto - haven't seen this in years, will enjoy hearing your reactionThe Candidate - one of my favorite political movies of all time. Excellent film. Think of McCain while watching it. Or Obama.Shampoo - really wasn't impressed. Overrated.Nashville - if you like Altman, you'll like this film. otherwise, probably not.
I found Moonlighting on Ebert's best films from that year. I like Altman a lot, so that bodes well.
 
I watched two movies this weekend.

An Eduction - This one, as has already been mentioned, was good. But I was a little disappointed. The acting was very good but there was just something missing. For me, it was probably over-hyped and so when it wasn't amazing, I was disappointed.

Surrogates - Horrible. I love scifi but this was just awful. There were plot holes you could drive a truck through.

 
Daybreakers

A cool concept, but not a lot of new material here. Everything seems to be recycled from other films that were done better. Absolutely terrible character development. It was good enough to pass some time, but completely forgettable. Gattaca with vampires.

2/5

 
Four Christmases

I had too much red wine Saturday, and I wanted to sleep it off before a long night of Call of Duty. So I turned this on to help me fall asleep. Surprisingly, I laughed a few times. Mostly because of Vince Vaughn. I missed the ending, but I'd see the end some time just to see what happens.

 
In discussing A Man For All Seasons in other places people recommended Becket (no not the Ted Danson sitcom - that was Becker) - some even saying it was better than A Man For All Seasons. So last week I dvr'ed it and tried to watch it last night. I started dozing about half way in and decided to hit the sack, so I should probably wait until I finish watching it to comment, but I'll give some initial impressions.

The costumes/sets/music are pretty good, not awe inspiring. The story is probably interesting in some way, but it's been rendered somewhat boringly, with tons of scenes that dragged on insignificantly. Most noticeably though is Peter O'Toole hamming it up as Henry II. He seems to have only two methods of speaking, mumbling rapidly or yelling at the top of his lungs - most of the time for no particular reason. I was astounded that O'Toole made Richard Burton (as Thomas Becket, Henry II's pal/chancellor/arch bishop of canterbury/enemy) look reserved and restrained by comparison - which I thought was impossible. Both these guys were nominated for these performances, so maybe I just haven't seen enough Shakesperian Theater by heyday Hollywood heavies. But I've seen both turn in much better performances in other movies, so I'm thinking I'm not far off in my mehness towards them here.

Unless the 2nd half somehow becomes one of the best hours of film making ever, I doubt I could recommend this one. And there's no ####### way it's in the same ballpark as A Man For All Seasons in terms of quality films.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In discussing A Man For All Seasons in other places people recommended Becket (no not the Ted Danson sitcom - that was Becker) - some even saying it was better than A Man For All Seasons. So last week I dvr'ed it and tried to watch it last night. I started dozing about half way in and decided to hit the sack, so I should probably wait until I finish watching it to comment, but I'll give some initial impressions.

The costumes/sets/music are pretty good, not awe inspiring. The story is probably interesting in some way, but it's been rendered somewhat boringly, with tons of scenes that dragged on insignificantly. Most noticeably though is Peter O'Toole hamming it up as Henry II. He seems to have only two methods of speaking, mumbling rapidly or yelling at the top of his lungs - most of the time for no particular reason. I was astounded that O'Toole made Richard Burton (as Thomas Becket, Henry II's pal/chancellor/arch bishop of canterbury/enemy) look reserved and restrained by comparison - which I thought was impossible. Both these guys were nominated for these performances, so maybe I just haven't seen enough Shakesperian Theater by heyday Hollywood heavies. But I've seen both turn in much better performances in other movies, so I'm thinking I'm not far off in my mehness towards them here.

Unless the 2nd half somehow becomes one of the best hours of film making ever, I doubt I could recommend this one. And there's no ####### way it's in the same ballpark as A Man For All Seasons in terms of quality films.
of the "man with conscience" films that hollywood churned out back in the day, i tend to prefer "a man for all seasons" with paul scofield over "becket". pretty much the entire stable of actors from across the pond from that era were accomplished staged actors before they transitioned to film. as a result, they were all pretty hammy as a result. scofield, by contrast, went less with More (sorry, couldn't resist) and gave a subtle, intense kind of performance on film. he was a different kind of actor than those guys. not to say that there were not superb roles for those hams - o'toole is great in "the lion in winter" for example - but those films aren't always as well served by their effusive stylings.
 
In discussing A Man For All Seasons in other places people recommended Becket (no not the Ted Danson sitcom - that was Becker) - some even saying it was better than A Man For All Seasons. So last week I dvr'ed it and tried to watch it last night. I started dozing about half way in and decided to hit the sack, so I should probably wait until I finish watching it to comment, but I'll give some initial impressions.

The costumes/sets/music are pretty good, not awe inspiring. The story is probably interesting in some way, but it's been rendered somewhat boringly, with tons of scenes that dragged on insignificantly. Most noticeably though is Peter O'Toole hamming it up as Henry II. He seems to have only two methods of speaking, mumbling rapidly or yelling at the top of his lungs - most of the time for no particular reason. I was astounded that O'Toole made Richard Burton (as Thomas Becket, Henry II's pal/chancellor/arch bishop of canterbury/enemy) look reserved and restrained by comparison - which I thought was impossible. Both these guys were nominated for these performances, so maybe I just haven't seen enough Shakesperian Theater by heyday Hollywood heavies. But I've seen both turn in much better performances in other movies, so I'm thinking I'm not far off in my mehness towards them here.

Unless the 2nd half somehow becomes one of the best hours of film making ever, I doubt I could recommend this one. And there's no ####### way it's in the same ballpark as A Man For All Seasons in terms of quality films.
of the "man with conscience" films that hollywood churned out back in the day, i tend to prefer "a man for all seasons" with paul scofield over "becket". pretty much the entire stable of actors from across the pond from that era were accomplished staged actors before they transitioned to film. as a result, they were all pretty hammy as a result. scofield, by contrast, went less with More (sorry, couldn't resist) and gave a subtle, intense kind of performance on film. he was a different kind of actor than those guys. not to say that there were not superb roles for those hams - o'toole is great in "the lion in winter" for example - but those films aren't always as well served by their effusive stylings.
Yeah, The Lion In Winter is another problem for me as it's another favorite of mine that I've seen it a few times already, so I'm comparing O'Toole's performance in that against the one in Becket and it's no contest. Not only was Scofield more subtle and effective in A Man For All Seasons but much of the rest of the cast was as well with the obvious exception of Shaw and some of the bit players. In particular I liked John Hurt (as I usually do), Orson Welles and Leo McKern. The pacing was much better in that one as well.
 
Mysterious Skin

Watched this due to a recommendation in this thread. Well made, for sure. But I had a hard time sitting through this. A movie about the sexual abuse of children is a lot harder to take when you're a parent. I appreciate the art here, but I wish I hadn't seen this.

 
Surrogates - Horrible. I love scifi but this was just awful. There were plot holes you could drive a truck through.
:kicksrock: That movie was "A Vampire in Brooklyn" bad.

Those of you with kids have probably seen it multiple times, but I'd like to give a thumbs up to "How to Train Your Dragon". Caught it recently and really liked it just watching it by myself.

 
FYI - Hollywood Video is shutting down all their stores.

In their last few days, prices go from $1.98 each to .98 ea or 6 for $5, then some stores go as low as 3-4 for a dollar. I have really been expanding my collection as the stores in Austin have been shutting down, picking up around a thousand movies for 5-600 dollars.

http://connect.collectorz.com/users/cosjobs/movies/view?viewType=cover

current colelction
The Blockbuster Video Living Museum offers tourists a glimpse of how Americans rented movies in the days before Netflix and iTunes.
 
Took my daughter to see Robin Hood last night. :(

enjoyable and "intense" at times.

One of those movies where you find yourself concentrating on what is being said so you can follow the story. Couldn't believe it had been 2 hours and 20 minutes when it finished, time flew with this movie.

Now the wait for the sequel :cry:

 
Harlan County, USA - very interesting documentary about a strike in Kentucky coal country in the early 70s. Definitely not an area of the country, group of people, or issue that gets much play in the history books or in entertainment. I really liked that the director allowed the people there to tell the story rather than insert herself into it. Also enjoyed the live performances of blues/bluegrass. I'd definitely recommend it to documentary lovers, it's offered for instant streaming by Netflix.
 
Took my daughter to see Robin Hood last night. :goodposting:

enjoyable and "intense" at times.

One of those movies where you find yourself concentrating on what is being said so you can follow the story. Couldn't believe it had been 2 hours and 20 minutes when it finished, time flew with this movie.
Steal from the rich, give to the poor?
 
Took my daughter to see Robin Hood last night. :hifive:

enjoyable and "intense" at times.

One of those movies where you find yourself concentrating on what is being said so you can follow the story. Couldn't believe it had been 2 hours and 20 minutes when it finished, time flew with this movie.
Steal from the rich, give to the poor?
A lot more going on than just that.. Including the back story of his loyalty to the king, including the King that declares him an Outlaw.and the true legend of Robin Hood wasn't that he "stole from the rich to give to the poor"..

He returned that which was stolen from them to begin with.

 
finally saw The Hangover last night, good god was that great, in the end pics that old lady actually gave him a bj?

 
Took my daughter to see Robin Hood last night. :thumbup: enjoyable and "intense" at times. One of those movies where you find yourself concentrating on what is being said so you can follow the story. Couldn't believe it had been 2 hours and 20 minutes when it finished, time flew with this movie. Now the wait for the sequel :goodposting:
This is getting a lot of mediocre reviews. I think that's mostly due to the fact that Scott and Crowe made the similar Gladiator. But as was the case with Goodfellas and Casino, I am betting that the second movie is good enough to stand on it's own. I'm looking forward to seeing Robin Hood.
 
finally saw The Hangover last night, good god was that great, in the end pics that old lady actually gave him a bj?
I'm sure it was prosthetic or it wouldn't have gotten by the sensors. Probably the same technology they used in that HBO or Showtime simulated sex show last year.I watched this last week. Thought it was really funny - not the funniest movie every as some tote but very good with what I'm sure will be very good re-watchability.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top