What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (2 Viewers)

Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
;) It's already in my queue.

 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
:goodposting: It's already in my queue.
Not sure if it still is, but it was on streaming not too long ago. And +1 for liking it better than Pan's Labyrinth (but they are both really good).ETA - Still available on streaming.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.

 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
People always dog on Forrest Gump. I thought it was great. It was really funny.

 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
Okay I didn't like Awakenings and as much as I liked Billy Bob in Sling Blade I think Hoffman was infinitely better as Rain Man. Sure Hoffman doesn't look anything like Kim Peek but really did a great job with his speech and mannerism.What about DDL as Christy Brown? Is that acceptable?

 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
People always dog on Forrest Gump. I thought it was great. It was really funny.
I like Gary Sinese and Hanks a lot. But while entertaining, Gump owns the dubious distinction of winning Best Picture in a year that was littered with better movies, in my opinion:Ed Wood

Leon (The Professional)

The Shawshank Redemption

Pulp Fiction

The Ref

The Last Seduction

Quiz Show

Crumb

Clerks

Bullets Over Broadway

Once Were Warriors

 
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
And Billy Bob was far from a movie star at the time, which really helped.
I like Tom Cruise, I like Dustin Hoffman. But Rain Man is a zeitgeist.
Are you saying it does not translate well to our current time?I think some of the business and social background of the Tom Cruise character doesn't translate but Hoffman's performance is timeless.
 
Pan's Labyrinth

I've been meaning to see this for years. But since the wife and I usually watch movies together, she's been too scared to see it. Wow. What a stunning accomplishment. I loved it. My only beef was the extreme violence. I don't think the graphic gore contributed to the story. Still, what a fantastic movie. The antagonist is certainly one of the most evil in movie history, and I think the lead child actor was excellent. I could go on and on, but you've all heard the accolades before. Huge thumbs up.

Watching this movie, I couldn't help but think of some of the trash that has won best picture Oscars over the last few years. Crash, Chicago, Million Dollar Baby, Titanic, The English Patient, Forrest Gump, Driving Miss Daisy, Rain Man...these movies aren't even in the same universe as Pan's Labyrinth.
I know I'm a broken record on this, but I still think The Orphanage is better (although Pan's really is great).
Love Pan's Labyrinth but what's not to like about Rain Man?The Orphanage is excellent too and I am also a fan of The Devil's Backbone.
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
Okay I didn't like Awakenings and as much as I liked Billy Bob in Sling Blade I think Hoffman was infinitely better as Rain Man. Sure Hoffman doesn't look anything like Kim Peek but really did a great job with his speech and mannerism.What about DDL as Christy Brown? Is that acceptable?
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
 
Rain Man is a gimmicky movie. Movie stars should not play mentally challenged characters unless they're Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.
And Billy Bob was far from a movie star at the time, which really helped.
I like Tom Cruise, I like Dustin Hoffman. But Rain Man is a zeitgeist.
Are you saying it does not translate well to our current time?I think some of the business and social background of the Tom Cruise character doesn't translate but Hoffman's performance is timeless.
People loved Rain Man because Hoffman played a character we don't often see in a movie. So I understand the love.
 
People always dog on Forrest Gump. I thought it was great. It was really funny.
I like Gary Sinese and Hanks a lot. But while entertaining, Gump owns the dubious distinction of winning Best Picture in a year that was littered with better movies, in my opinion:Ed WoodLeon (The Professional)The Shawshank RedemptionPulp FictionThe RefThe Last SeductionQuiz ShowCrumbClerksBullets Over BroadwayOnce Were Warriors
I agree it wasn't the best movie that year. I just think it gets unfairly dumped on because it won when PF and Shawshank were clearly better. It's still a good movie, though.
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
 
People always dog on Forrest Gump. I thought it was great. It was really funny.
I like Gary Sinese and Hanks a lot. But while entertaining, Gump owns the dubious distinction of winning Best Picture in a year that was littered with better movies, in my opinion:Ed Wood

Leon (The Professional)

The Shawshank Redemption

Pulp Fiction

The Ref

The Last Seduction

Quiz Show

Crumb

Clerks

Bullets Over Broadway

Once Were Warriors
I agree it wasn't the best movie that year. I just think it gets unfairly dumped on because it won when PF and Shawshank were clearly better.

It's still a good movie, though.
Nothing wrong with that :rolleyes:
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
Oooooooooo me too.Gotta remember to put that in my queue.
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
Oooooooooo me too.Gotta remember to put that in my queue.
I heart Lenny Bruce, so this movie would have to be pretty bad for me not to like it.
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
i saw it many years ago and recall not coming away very impressed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
i saw it many years ago and recall not coming away very impressed.
How old were you? Lenny Bruce was certainly not for everyone.
 
Ed WoodLeon (The Professional)The Shawshank RedemptionPulp FictionThe RefThe Last SeductionQuiz ShowCrumbClerksBullets Over BroadwayOnce Were Warriors
The only movies deserving to win over Gump here are Shawshank and Pulp Fiction. Maybe The Professional, but I wouldnt. Speaking of Timeless with Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, Forrest Gump will be a timeless movie without a doubt.
 
You brought up My Left Foot and that's an excellent example because I love that movie. I don't hate Rain Man. I just think it doesn't hold up very well.
Christy wasn't mentally handicapped so I wasn't sure it counted. Pretty much anything DDL does is alright in my book.Rain Man may not hold up as a whole project but most of it does and Hoffman's performance was timeless.
Speaking of Hoffman, I really want to see Lenny.
i saw it many years ago and recall not coming away very impressed.
Dammit.
 
Ed WoodLeon (The Professional)The Shawshank RedemptionPulp FictionThe RefThe Last SeductionQuiz ShowCrumbClerksBullets Over BroadwayOnce Were Warriors
The only movies deserving to win over Gump here are Shawshank and Pulp Fiction. Maybe The Professional, but I wouldnt. Speaking of Timeless with Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, Forrest Gump will be a timeless movie without a doubt.
I fully support your love of Gump. It's not for me.
 
Ed WoodLeon (The Professional)The Shawshank RedemptionPulp FictionThe RefThe Last SeductionQuiz ShowCrumbClerksBullets Over BroadwayOnce Were Warriors
The only movies deserving to win over Gump here are Shawshank and Pulp Fiction. Maybe The Professional, but I wouldnt. Speaking of Timeless with Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, Forrest Gump will be a timeless movie without a doubt.
I fully support your love of Gump. It's not for me.
I hear ya, I just dont see how you could substantiate those other movies winning the Best Picture over it (besides those 3). Simply wouldnt happen. Gump was like a phenomenon that year, which is why it probably beat out Shawshank in the first place.Since you dont like Gump, Im not surprised you didnt like Benjamin Button.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Predators at 64% on RT...might have to check it out this weekend :lmao:

They also got a list of Fishburne's Top 10 movies on there because of it. King of New York only #10? Hoodlum and Event Horizon not even in the Top 10?! Matrix not in the Top 5? Searching for Bobby Fischer #1 over Apocalypse Now? :coffee:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand how anyone can watch Kalifornia, much less appreciate Pitt's performance in it, with Juliette Lewis portraying one of the most annoying characters in film history alongside him. From early in the movie, I was rooting for her to be killed or at least stop talking.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Predators at 64% on RT...might have to check it out this weekend :bag:

They also got a list of Fishburne's Top 10 movies on there because of it. King of New York only #10? Hoodlum and Event Horizon not even in the Top 10?! Matrix not in the Top 5? Searching for Bobby Fischer #1 over Apocalypse Now? :lmao:
Spoiler about Fishburne's character in Predators:
 
I don't understand how anyone can watch Kalifornia, much less appreciate Pitt's performance in it, with Juliette Lewis portraying one of the most annoying characters in film history alongside him. From early in the movie, I was rooting for her to be killed or at least stop talking.
Is there any movie where she isnt annoying?! Her closest role to her actual self was probably when she played a ####### in The Other SisterThat said, I like Kalifornia a good bit. Pitt and Duchovny are :bag:
 
Ed WoodLeon (The Professional)The Shawshank RedemptionPulp FictionThe RefThe Last SeductionQuiz ShowCrumbClerksBullets Over BroadwayOnce Were Warriors
The only movies deserving to win over Gump here are Shawshank and Pulp Fiction. Maybe The Professional, but I wouldnt. Speaking of Timeless with Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man, Forrest Gump will be a timeless movie without a doubt.
I fully support your love of Gump. It's not for me.
I hear ya, I just dont see how you could substantiate those other movies winning the Best Picture over it (besides those 3). Simply wouldnt happen. Gump was like a phenomenon that year, which is why it probably beat out Shawshank in the first place.Since you dont like Gump, Im not surprised you didnt like Benjamin Button.
Well, I like all those movies more than Gump, so it would seem plausible that I'd prefer they'd win over Gump.
 
I don't understand how anyone can watch Kalifornia, much less appreciate Pitt's performance in it, with Juliette Lewis portraying one of the most annoying characters in film history alongside him. From early in the movie, I was rooting for her to be killed or at least stop talking.
Is there any movie where she isnt annoying?! Her closest role to her actual self was probably when she played a ####### in The Other SisterThat said, I like Kalifornia a good bit. Pitt and Duchovny are :confused:
Lewis was decent in Woody Allen's "Husbands and Wives."
 
Scanners - Not the most cohesive movie but Cronenburg is awesome at creating a tension through sound and patience. Some of the sequences were disturbing but at the same time awesome in the gruesomeness they displayed.
 
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo:

Watched this last night and I am still digesting it. Despite it's flaws, I would say that it's one of the better movies I've seen recently (which might not be saying much considering the dreck I've been wading through). I didn't read the books, but was surprised at a couple of scenes and the level of brutality throughout the movie. I would've liked a little more back story on the main characters - especially Lisbeth, but since the books were written as a triology, maybe that is coming. I've heard the other movies aren't nearly as good, so I might skip those and just read the books. Also, it looks like an Americanized version is coming out in a couple of years (of course)

For those who don't know - the story is about a journalist and a hacker teaming up to solve a 40 year old murder in a family that seems to be the Swedish version of the Kennedys. Good suspense, and I liked the way it was shot, but I didn't buy into the relationship between Lisbeth and the journalist. Still would recommend people checking it out.

 
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo:

Watched this last night and I am still digesting it. Despite it's flaws, I would say that it's one of the better movies I've seen recently (which might not be saying much considering the dreck I've been wading through). I didn't read the books, but was surprised at a couple of scenes and the level of brutality throughout the movie. I would've liked a little more back story on the main characters - especially Lisbeth, but since the books were written as a triology, maybe that is coming. I've heard the other movies aren't nearly as good, so I might skip those and just read the books. Also, it looks like an Americanized version is coming out in a couple of years (of course)

For those who don't know - the story is about a journalist and a hacker teaming up to solve a 40 year old murder in a family that seems to be the Swedish version of the Kennedys. Good suspense, and I liked the way it was shot, but I didn't buy into the relationship between Lisbeth and the journalist. Still would recommend people checking it out.
Im pretty sure the 2nd installment just came out in theaters.
 
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo:

Watched this last night and I am still digesting it. Despite it's flaws, I would say that it's one of the better movies I've seen recently (which might not be saying much considering the dreck I've been wading through). I didn't read the books, but was surprised at a couple of scenes and the level of brutality throughout the movie. I would've liked a little more back story on the main characters - especially Lisbeth, but since the books were written as a triology, maybe that is coming. I've heard the other movies aren't nearly as good, so I might skip those and just read the books. Also, it looks like an Americanized version is coming out in a couple of years (of course)

For those who don't know - the story is about a journalist and a hacker teaming up to solve a 40 year old murder in a family that seems to be the Swedish version of the Kennedys. Good suspense, and I liked the way it was shot, but I didn't buy into the relationship between Lisbeth and the journalist. Still would recommend people checking it out.
Im pretty sure the 2nd installment just came out in theaters.
You are right - just saw the review in the USA Today. From what I've read, it's a different director/writer, etc.. and it is inferior to the quality of the one on DVD.

 
Watched 28 Weeks Later last night.

It is a decent addition to the horror/zombie genre, but not nearly as good as the first one. For lack of a better description, I just thought the movie was 'ugly'. I guess I didn't like the fact that the kids were involved so much in the movie or that the makers of the movie kept trying to hard to make the dad seem like an uber-zombie or something. Slightly above average for the genre, but I don't think I'd watch it again.
Not even close to the first one. Not bad....but like you I have no desire to watch it again and also felt it added nothing to the first story.
I think it started to do an OK job of setting up what happened during the 28 weeks and having a small part of England safe while other parts were dangerous. I thought it was good for about 30 mins - until they started getting infected again. Also - it's kinda silly that the kids were able to basically just walk out of there.
Really liked 28 Days Later, good taut thriller. 28 Weeks later was OK, but got silly at the end. I am actually waiting for the final of the trilogy, 28 Months Later.
 
Predators.....Finally, an installment in the series that does the original film justice. Grabs your attention from the opening scene and the tension is there almost the entire time until the end. Its biggest strength may in fact be the first 45 minutes or so as the people becomes more comfortable with each other, the environment, and try to figure out where they are and why they are there, which occurs with perfect pace and quite a lot of suspense despite rarely seeing a Predator. The character development was surprisingly good for this type of movie, and I thought the cast's interactions were very good. Goggins with a few funny lines that almost come out of nowhere and easily the best character besides Brody (plus badass final scene). Only complaints really would be Fishburne's character/storyline felt to me like it hurt the movie more than added to it, and all in all was unnecessary. IMO, it kind of took me out of the atmosphere and feel the movie had presented and maintained so well, and from that point on the movie felt more rushed compared to the first half for the most part. Despite that, the action sequences from that point on were quite good, and the blood and gore was not kept to a minimum, which is a good thing for me. I thought the weapons were great, and this movie distances itself from the first in that aspect and others, including how Brody and the rest of the humans decide to play "the game", which was another strength of the movie and gave certain parts more believability to me. I thought it was easily the 2nd best movie of the series, and certainly worth the price to see it up on the big screen.....8/10
 
Predators.....Finally, an installment in the series that does the original film justice. Grabs your attention from the opening scene and the tension is there almost the entire time until the end. Its biggest strength may in fact be the first 45 minutes or so as the people becomes more comfortable with each other, the environment, and try to figure out where they are and why they are there, which occurs with perfect pace and quite a lot of suspense despite rarely seeing a Predator. The character development was surprisingly good for this type of movie, and I thought the cast's interactions were very good. Goggins with a few funny lines that almost come out of nowhere and easily the best character besides Brody (plus badass final scene). Only complaints really would be Fishburne's character/storyline felt to me like it hurt the movie more than added to it, and all in all was unnecessary. IMO, it kind of took me out of the atmosphere and feel the movie had presented and maintained so well, and from that point on the movie felt more rushed compared to the first half for the most part. Despite that, the action sequences from that point on were quite good, and the blood and gore was not kept to a minimum, which is a good thing for me. I thought the weapons were great, and this movie distances itself from the first in that aspect and others, including how Brody and the rest of the humans decide to play "the game", which was another strength of the movie and gave certain parts more believability to me. I thought it was easily the 2nd best movie of the series, and certainly worth the price to see it up on the big screen.....8/10
Sweet. I want to see this.
 
For some reason I am watching Scary Movie 4. There has been one funny bit in the first hour (When the guy is chopping wood and it is duraflame logs). Other than that it is :yawn: :confused:

 
Predators.....Finally, an installment in the series that does the original film justice. Grabs your attention from the opening scene and the tension is there almost the entire time until the end. Its biggest strength may in fact be the first 45 minutes or so as the people becomes more comfortable with each other, the environment, and try to figure out where they are and why they are there, which occurs with perfect pace and quite a lot of suspense despite rarely seeing a Predator. The character development was surprisingly good for this type of movie, and I thought the cast's interactions were very good. Goggins with a few funny lines that almost come out of nowhere and easily the best character besides Brody (plus badass final scene). Only complaints really would be Fishburne's character/storyline felt to me like it hurt the movie more than added to it, and all in all was unnecessary. IMO, it kind of took me out of the atmosphere and feel the movie had presented and maintained so well, and from that point on the movie felt more rushed compared to the first half for the most part. Despite that, the action sequences from that point on were quite good, and the blood and gore was not kept to a minimum, which is a good thing for me. I thought the weapons were great, and this movie distances itself from the first in that aspect and others, including how Brody and the rest of the humans decide to play "the game", which was another strength of the movie and gave certain parts more believability to me. I thought it was easily the 2nd best movie of the series, and certainly worth the price to see it up on the big screen.....8/10
Sweet. I want to see this.
me to. i was going to wait till it came to DVD but no might have to go to the theaters

 
KarmaPolice said:
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo:

Watched this last night and I am still digesting it. Despite it's flaws, I would say that it's one of the better movies I've seen recently (which might not be saying much considering the dreck I've been wading through). I didn't read the books, but was surprised at a couple of scenes and the level of brutality throughout the movie. I would've liked a little more back story on the main characters - especially Lisbeth, but since the books were written as a triology, maybe that is coming. I've heard the other movies aren't nearly as good, so I might skip those and just read the books. Also, it looks like an Americanized version is coming out in a couple of years (of course)

For those who don't know - the story is about a journalist and a hacker teaming up to solve a 40 year old murder in a family that seems to be the Swedish version of the Kennedys. Good suspense, and I liked the way it was shot, but I didn't buy into the relationship between Lisbeth and the journalist. Still would recommend people checking it out.
Wow. This was a great movie. One of the best I have seen in a long time. I feared it was going to be talky and melodramatic, but I was wrong. It was sharp and crackling throughout its 2.5 hour length. Most films, I'll glance at the clock between the 60-70 min mark anticipating their end. I did not look at the clock in this one until the 100 min mark and it was with the hope that I was less than halfway done. This is a must see, but it has some brutal scenes of sexual violence that many may not care to watch.One thing that bothered me- I had some distinct feelings I had seen some scenes before. I do not know whether I saw some extended trailers a long time ago or what. Esp. the girl's work for the security company and the dried flowers arriving every birthday. I'd swear I'd seen those before somewhere. Weird deja vu feeling, but it did not detract from my overall love of this film.

5/5 stars

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kick-###: Very enjoyable movie. To my surprise, Nic Cage does not ruin it... gotta be a first sometime. Fun movie throughout. Having an 11 year old girl as a murdering people was a little odd but I guess it needed to be done. 4/5

Unearthed: This might actually be worse than The Happening but I'm not really sure. I think it was about an Alien trying to kill a bunch of people. I'd know better if I was actually able to see anything. About halfway through, I turned the brightness on my TV all the way up and I was still barely able to make stuff out. I really don't understand the thought behind this. Directors throw in lots of dark scenes to try and make it scary but half the time you end up not being able to see anything. This movie was set in a town with like 4 buildings in it; a big ranch, bar, gas station and something else. Never once could I tell where they were. When the alien attacked and killed someone, I had no idea who. I'd have to wait and see who was missing. A 12 year old could have directed a better movie. What an absolute disgrace. -9125915/5

 
Kick-###: Very enjoyable movie. To my surprise, Nic Cage does not ruin it... gotta be a first sometime. Fun movie throughout. Having an 11 year old girl as a murdering people was a little odd but I guess it needed to be done. 4/5

Unearthed: This might actually be worse than The Happening but I'm not really sure. I think it was about an Alien trying to kill a bunch of people. I'd know better if I was actually able to see anything. About halfway through, I turned the brightness on my TV all the way up and I was still barely able to make stuff out. I really don't understand the thought behind this. Directors throw in lots of dark scenes to try and make it scary but half the time you end up not being able to see anything. This movie was set in a town with like 4 buildings in it; a big ranch, bar, gas station and something else. Never once could I tell where they were. When the alien attacked and killed someone, I had no idea who. I'd have to wait and see who was missing. A 12 year old could have directed a better movie. What an absolute disgrace. -9125915/5
This trick usually ####es me off too. I blame The X-Files.
 
Kick-###: Very enjoyable movie. To my surprise, Nic Cage does not ruin it... gotta be a first sometime. Fun movie throughout. Having an 11 year old girl as a murdering people was a little odd but I guess it needed to be done. 4/5
I feared this was going to be another bland teenage comedy, but it was dark and I laughed out loud several times.
 
Kick-###: Very enjoyable movie. To my surprise, Nic Cage does not ruin it... gotta be a first sometime. Fun movie throughout. Having an 11 year old girl as a murdering people was a little odd but I guess it needed to be done. 4/5
Cage has plenty of ####ty movies, but he has a lot of pretty good ones as well. I never understand why people make a comment similar to that as often as they do.
 
Kick-###: Very enjoyable movie. To my surprise, Nic Cage does not ruin it... gotta be a first sometime. Fun movie throughout. Having an 11 year old girl as a murdering people was a little odd but I guess it needed to be done. 4/5
Cage has plenty of ####ty movies, but he has a lot of pretty good ones as well. I never understand why people make a comment similar to that as often as they do.
Look at his work since Adaptation and you tell me. It's like he stopped acting and decided just to personify himself on the screen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top