What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (6 Viewers)

Finally watched Downfall tonight. Really a great movie. A true look into the eyes of madness. The guy who played Hitler was amazing.
I love Downfall. And really, who the hell wants to watch a three hour Hitler movie? But I could argue that Downfall is the best WWII movie ever made.
It's too bad that the internet meme of "Hitler reacts" blunted the greatness of this movie a bit (even though many of them are quite funny). Bruno Ganz is the very definition of "spellbinding" in this movie. As are the women who play Eva Braun and Magda Goebbels.
I've said this before, but it's still fascinating to me: the best movies in the world don't seem to pass judgment on the subject matter. Yes, Nazis were evil. Blah, blah, blah. We all know that. So I don't need a movie to remind me of that. Downfall never sympathizes with Nazis, but it does attempt to show that these were still human beings. And that's why this movie is so profoundly brilliant.
 
tried watching "killer of sheep" last night. it's one of those films that film enthusiasts mention as a classic and largely unknown to most people. it was his MFA thesis at UCLA film school back in the 70's. i tried to watch it but the sound mix sucked. i was having to adjust the volume scene to scene really. i gave up after about 20 minutes.

after finishing season one of "saxondale", i started "party down". my wife lived in LA for years - giving acting a go - before moving to NYC where i met her. she says this show hits a little too close to home. it's very funny. lizzy caplan is just my type. :wub:
nearing the end of "party down" and i'm still loving it. my crush on lizzy is unabated. she has this little scene in a hot tub. just silly how good she looked.
 
Finally watched Downfall tonight. Really a great movie. A true look into the eyes of madness. The guy who played Hitler was amazing.
I love Downfall. And really, who the hell wants to watch a three hour Hitler movie? But I could argue that Downfall is the best WWII movie ever made.
It's too bad that the internet meme of "Hitler reacts" blunted the greatness of this movie a bit (even though many of them are quite funny). Bruno Ganz is the very definition of "spellbinding" in this movie. As are the women who play Eva Braun and Magda Goebbels.
I've said this before, but it's still fascinating to me: the best movies in the world don't seem to pass judgment on the subject matter. Yes, Nazis were evil. Blah, blah, blah. We all know that. So I don't need a movie to remind me of that. Downfall never sympathizes with Nazis, but it does attempt to show that these were still human beings. And that's why this movie is so profoundly brilliant.
Yea I never felt it made them sympathetic. Humanized maybe, but not sympathetic. Even as people, you could sense the madness, paranoia, fear, and evil amongst them. Fascinating film. Felt like a documentary even at times, but one you were immersed in.
 
I've said this before, but it's still fascinating to me: the best movies in the world don't seem to pass judgment on the subject matter. Yes, Nazis were evil. Blah, blah, blah. We all know that. So I don't need a movie to remind me of that. Downfall never sympathizes with Nazis, but it does attempt to show that these were still human beings. And that's why this movie is so profoundly brilliant.
Yea I never felt it made them sympathetic. Humanized maybe, but not sympathetic. Even as people, you could sense the madness, paranoia, fear, and evil amongst them. Fascinating film. Felt like a documentary even at times, but one you were immersed in.
The line that haunts me is Hitler saying "It wasn't just for Germany." These people really felt that what they were doing was for the benefit of the human race.
 
tried watching "killer of sheep" last night. it's one of those films that film enthusiasts mention as a classic and largely unknown to most people. it was his MFA thesis at UCLA film school back in the 70's. i tried to watch it but the sound mix sucked. i was having to adjust the volume scene to scene really. i gave up after about 20 minutes.

after finishing season one of "saxondale", i started "party down". my wife lived in LA for years - giving acting a go - before moving to NYC where i met her. she says this show hits a little too close to home. it's very funny. lizzy caplan is just my type. :wub:
nearing the end of "party down" and i'm still loving it. my crush on lizzy is unabated. she has this little scene in a hot tub. just silly how good she looked.
Yeah, they play down her looks. But she is hella cute.
 
Finally watched Downfall tonight. Really a great movie. A true look into the eyes of madness. The guy who played Hitler was amazing.
I love Downfall. And really, who the hell wants to watch a three hour Hitler movie? But I could argue that Downfall is the best WWII movie ever made.
It's too bad that the internet meme of "Hitler reacts" blunted the greatness of this movie a bit (even though many of them are quite funny). Bruno Ganz is the very definition of "spellbinding" in this movie. As are the women who play Eva Braun and Magda Goebbels.
I've said this before, but it's still fascinating to me: the best movies in the world don't seem to pass judgment on the subject matter. Yes, Nazis were evil. Blah, blah, blah. We all know that. So I don't need a movie to remind me of that. Downfall never sympathizes with Nazis, but it does attempt to show that these were still human beings. And that's why this movie is so profoundly brilliant.
Yea I never felt it made them sympathetic. Humanized maybe, but not sympathetic. Even as people, you could sense the madness, paranoia, fear, and evil amongst them. Fascinating film. Felt like a documentary even at times, but one you were immersed in.
Agree on all counts. When I say, "sympathetic" I'm specifically commenting on this scene:
When the families committed suicide together.
 
I've said this before, but it's still fascinating to me: the best movies in the world don't seem to pass judgment on the subject matter. Yes, Nazis were evil. Blah, blah, blah. We all know that. So I don't need a movie to remind me of that. Downfall never sympathizes with Nazis, but it does attempt to show that these were still human beings. And that's why this movie is so profoundly brilliant.
Yea I never felt it made them sympathetic. Humanized maybe, but not sympathetic. Even as people, you could sense the madness, paranoia, fear, and evil amongst them. Fascinating film. Felt like a documentary even at times, but one you were immersed in.
The line that haunts me is Hitler saying "It wasn't just for Germany." These people really felt that what they were doing was for the benefit of the human race.
Certainly. There's plenty of insanity in the world, and it's even more vexing when you consider the people engaged in this sociopathic behavior believe they are justified.
 
Glad Kubrick picked Nicholson for The Shining. DeNiro wouldve been interesting and still good, but Williams or Ford would not have worked for that role.Thank god Will Smith wasnt the star of Inception, wouldve totally ruined it. Pitt couldve handled it, but 1 of Dicaprio's greatest strengths is his ability to display his characters emotional depth and fragility.

Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.

OJ as The Terminator, Stuart Townsend/Nic Cage as Aragorn, and Borgnine as Vito Corleone :lmao:

.....Nic Cage as Neo, Cusack as Bender, and Walken as Han Solo wouldve been epic for totally different reasons :lmao:

 
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.

 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.

 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
My only complaint with the movie:The blu ray transfer is really poor. The images are sharp, but there is a lot of grain in some of the shadows. And the grain is so bad, it almost looks animated.

 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
My only complaint with the movie:The blu ray transfer is really poor. The images are sharp, but there is a lot of grain in some of the shadows. And the grain is so bad, it almost looks animated.
You're spot on.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down, and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
it's a sports movie - coach & player overcome obstacles and personal difficulties to win the Big Game. happens that it was a good one, but definitely formula.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
I hear in the director's cut he blows the speech and the Germans take over, making the film a reboot of modern history to be followed by sequels where Stalin ends up a benevolent dictator beloved by all, Mao invents Viagra, Kennedy lives a long life as a guerilla warlord and Robin Williams becomes the King of Mexico.
 
A History of Violence

Thought I would revisit this one, and probably liked this one more the second time around. Couple scenes stuck out and got a little too "Cronenbergy", but still think it's a great movie. Gotta love Maria Bello in this movie too. 8/10.

 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
I hear in the director's cut he blows the speech and the Germans take over, making the film a reboot of modern history to be followed by sequels where Stalin ends up a benevolent dictator beloved by all, Mao invents Viagra, Kennedy lives a long life as a guerilla warlord and Robin Williams becomes the King of Mexico.
:lol:
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
it's a sports movie - coach & player overcome obstacles and personal difficulties to win the Big Game. happens that it was a good one, but definitely formula.
Good point, and I rarely love sports movies so that makes sense.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
I hear in the director's cut he blows the speech and the Germans take over, making the film a reboot of modern history to be followed by sequels where Stalin ends up a benevolent dictator beloved by all, Mao invents Viagra, Kennedy lives a long life as a guerilla warlord and Robin Williams becomes the King of Mexico.
Gr00vy! can i buy advanced tickets? that's a stand-in-liner...
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
it's a sports movie - coach & player overcome obstacles and personal difficulties to win the Big Game. happens that it was a good one, but definitely formula.
I thought it held closer to the romantic comedy.Guy meets girl but don't hit it off right away.

Fall madly in love for a few scenes.

Big lie comes out that almost destroys the relationship.

Kiss, makeup, live happily ever after.

 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
I hear in the director's cut he blows the speech and the Germans take over, making the film a reboot of modern history to be followed by sequels where Stalin ends up a benevolent dictator beloved by all, Mao invents Viagra, Kennedy lives a long life as a guerilla warlord and Robin Williams becomes the King of Mexico.
:hophead:

Talking about how the big finale was him doing this over the radio with just him and Mr.Rush in the room. I don't know the actual history, but it seemed like from the opening scene it was building up to a big public speech to rally England. If it was just over the radio, it seemed anti-climatic to me since they made a point to show that he could do that easily at the beginning of the sessions - just have him listen to some music. I am sure he went on to do more stuff in public, but I just thought it was a bit of a let down to have him in a room by himself, and then walk outside and wave to everybody.
:shrug:

 
Talking about how the big finale was him doing this over the radio with just him and Mr.Rush in the room. I don't know the actual history, but it seemed like from the opening scene it was building up to a big public speech to rally England. If it was just over the radio, it seemed anti-climatic to me since they made a point to show that he could do that easily at the beginning of the sessions - just have him listen to some music. I am sure he went on to do more stuff in public, but I just thought it was a bit of a let down to have him in a room by himself, and then walk outside and wave to everybody.
:shrug:

The speech was given over radio to the entire British Empire which was considerably larger back then than it is today.
 
Talking about how the big finale was him doing this over the radio with just him and Mr.Rush in the room. I don't know the actual history, but it seemed like from the opening scene it was building up to a big public speech to rally England. If it was just over the radio, it seemed anti-climatic to me since they made a point to show that he could do that easily at the beginning of the sessions - just have him listen to some music. I am sure he went on to do more stuff in public, but I just thought it was a bit of a let down to have him in a room by himself, and then walk outside and wave to everybody.
:shrug:
The speech was given over radio to the entire British Empire which was considerably larger back then than it is today.I understand that now, but was a let down for me as I said. Since the opening scene had him out in public struggling, I just thought that was what it was building up to. Hell, just have somebody else do a radio broadcast and march him out afterward.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
it's a sports movie - coach & player overcome obstacles and personal difficulties to win the Big Game. happens that it was a good one, but definitely formula.
I thought it held closer to the romantic comedy.Guy meets girl but don't hit it off right away.

Fall madly in love for a few scenes.

Big lie comes out that almost destroys the relationship.

Kiss, makeup, live happily ever after.
:lmao:

I think they broke up about 4 times in the during the movie.

 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
One fantasy series I could never get into at all. Never read the books. Bought the first 4 DVDS for $3 a piece or something on a black friday sale. The only one that held my interest even a little was the one where they end up rewinding time (either 2 or 3?). Other than that, I'll watch LoTR trilogy a hundred times before attempting to sit through all of these.
 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
 
The King's Speech

Outstanding. Loved it. Makes me appreciate Firth as an actor even more having seen A Single Man. I'm surprised that some here weren't interested in this material. I found it charming and quite powerful at times.
Brilliantly acted but it is also the most formulaic best picture winner since Gladiator.
I think that was my main beef, and sadly I probably would have liked the movie a bit more pre-Oscars. I was a good movie and good story, but nothing that stood out as going above and beyond. Just disappointed that this movie one out over other films I liked a lot better, but I understand why it did and I am not surprised. I also thought the ending was a let down as well and that left a bad taste in my mouth as well.
it's a sports movie - coach & player overcome obstacles and personal difficulties to win the Big Game. happens that it was a good one, but definitely formula.
I thought it held closer to the romantic comedy.Guy meets girl but don't hit it off right away.

Fall madly in love for a few scenes.

Big lie comes out that almost destroys the relationship.

Kiss, makeup, live happily ever after.
:lmao:

I think they broke up about 4 times in the during the movie.
That was just some playful banter between the loving couple.
 
The Potter books/movies are a hard one to peg, especially for their target audience now. As the series went along it got darker and darker and since the kids were aging each year, there were more and more adult themes going on. I am sure this is one of the main reasons that old farts like me kept reading them and you'd see a lot of college-age people in line for the books.

It would have been a lot easier for a parent to let their kid age with the series as they were coming out and watching the movies likewise than it would be to have a 9-11 year old who wants to sit down this summer and read all the books/watch all the movies. I could see some of the movies scaring kids - especially when people start getting killed off - book 4 and after. Sounds lame, but if I had a kid that age I would consider doing maybe 2 a year or something like that.

 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
How old is your son again?

 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
How old is your son again?
47
 
A History of Violence

Thought I would revisit this one, and probably liked this one more the second time around. Couple scenes stuck out and got a little too "Cronenbergy", but still think it's a great movie. Gotta love Maria Bello in this movie too. 8/10.
This is an incredible movie. Very dark, and even funny at times. Love it.
 
A History of Violence

Thought I would revisit this one, and probably liked this one more the second time around. Couple scenes stuck out and got a little too "Cronenbergy", but still think it's a great movie. Gotta love Maria Bello in this movie too. 8/10.
This is an incredible movie. Very dark, and even funny at times. Love it.
One of the best opening scenes of the past decade or so.
 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
How old is your son again?
He just turned 8. I am guessing he'll love the movies when he's a little older.
 
A History of Violence

Thought I would revisit this one, and probably liked this one more the second time around. Couple scenes stuck out and got a little too "Cronenbergy", but still think it's a great movie. Gotta love Maria Bello in this movie too. 8/10.
This is an incredible movie. Very dark, and even funny at times. Love it.
One of the best opening scenes of the past decade or so.
I remember seeing this movie in the theater, and one couple walked out on that opening scene. THE MOVIE'S CALLED A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE! VIOLENCE IS IN THE ####ING TITLE!!!!!!!!!!!

Morons.

 
A History of Violence

Thought I would revisit this one, and probably liked this one more the second time around. Couple scenes stuck out and got a little too "Cronenbergy", but still think it's a great movie. Gotta love Maria Bello in this movie too. 8/10.
This is an incredible movie. Very dark, and even funny at times. Love it.
One of the best opening scenes of the past decade or so.
Love the credits rolling over the top of the scene...

 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
How old is your son again?
He just turned 8. I am guessing he'll love the movies when he's a little older.
How is he doing with the themes/scenes in the books? Looking forward to starting up this series with my son in a few years.
 
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'Kenny Powers said:
Im hardly a big Harry Potter fan, and I like Rickman, but Tim Roth wouldve killed in that role.
I've never seen the Potter movies. Still, Rickman is the bomb. I am a huge Tim Roth fan, so I agree. Roth is perhaps the most underrated, underutilized actor in the business.
This kind of shocks me.The books certainly aren't great works, but like Crighton books- they translate pretty easily into movies. I've actually enjoyed seeing them in theaters- and you know how rarely I get to theaters any more.
My son loves the books, but he's a bit young for the movies. Years ago, I tried to watch the first movie. But I couldn't stomach all the nonsensical gibberish. But this is certain: if my son was steeped in the movies, I'm sure I'd appreciate them. After all the stories are iconic and the actors are top notch.
What the hell is going on with this movie series?! Havent read the books, watched the first couple of movies, quit in the middle of the third because - like everything Hollywood touches - the sequels were going away from story in the name of CGI. I've looked in on the others when theyve been on the tube & it's been more of the same. Now, they got ads out for the last in the series & the previews have the look of a freakin horror movie. Did the book series similarly devolve or has the movie series resorted to this as the only remaining spectacle?
Mrs. Dogg tried to watch the movies with my son. And their complaints were that 1) They were too scary, and 2) the movies were too sensational and they didn't capture the magic of the books. Now, I understand that this is a common book-to-movie complaint. But Mrs. Dogg loves the books, and she was disappointed with the movies.
How old is your son again?
He just turned 8. I am guessing he'll love the movies when he's a little older.
How is he doing with the themes/scenes in the books? Looking forward to starting up this series with my son in a few years.
He's doing very well. If I'm recalling this correctly, Mrs. Dogg's been reading the books to him for about two or three years. He's so steeped in the books, we bought him a cheap little MP3 player loaded up with a bunch of the audio books. And what's incredible is how these audio books amp up his vocabulary.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top