Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.
You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.
who are you?You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
I'm not sure what's happening to me.Andy at his next movie.You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
I'm not sure what's happening to me.
That dame's quite a dish.Andy at his next movie.You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
I'm not sure what's happening to me.
it's okay to like musical theater, AD.:confetti:I'm not sure what's happening to me.
I've always liked theater productions. And theatrical type movies like Moulin Rouge.it's okay to like musical theater, AD.:confetti:I'm not sure what's happening to me.
cool. you should check out "hedwig" then...I've always liked theater productions. And theatrical type movies like Moulin Rouge.it's okay to like musical theater, AD.:confetti:I'm not sure what's happening to me.
You had me until you started dogging Austin Powers. Now you're a crazy man.This is not an issue of expectations and I am not really looking for believability. There are plenty of films in a similar vein that I completely enjoy. Fast Five just felt lazy, and kind of insulting, from the opening scene to the very end.I am very good at keeping appropriate expectations and suspending disbelief for movies, but this movie didn't even try. It was the action movie equivalent of an Austin Powers film, no story just a bunch of skits loosely stitched together for the sake of box office receipts. There were some good moments, I liked some of the interactions between the secondary characters and some of the 'stunts' were entertaining (I enjoyed the car going over the cliff and it didn't bother me that the landing would have easily been fatal to any human who attempted it). But for the most part even the 'stunts' and fight coordination were lazily thrown together (that whole train heist was a joke, right?). And forget continuity of any kind, Ninja Assassin had better continuity than this 'film'. The best thing going for it were the production values, clearly the film had a big budget. Despite that this film was a huge mess. I will give it credit for crossing the line from 'awful' to 'so awful it's kind of entertaining' but it took almost 90 minutes to get to that point.What the hell were you expecting out of Fast Five, Chaka? I don't usually like brainless action movies, but I had a ton of fun with the first and fifth of this series. And no, it is not any more unbelievable than the A-Team was.
The first AP film was pretty good mostly because of the novelty of the character. AP II was one of the biggest messes of a film I have ever seen. The third one was slightly better but still pretty much terrible.You had me until you started dogging Austin Powers. Now you're a crazy man.This is not an issue of expectations and I am not really looking for believability. There are plenty of films in a similar vein that I completely enjoy. Fast Five just felt lazy, and kind of insulting, from the opening scene to the very end.I am very good at keeping appropriate expectations and suspending disbelief for movies, but this movie didn't even try. It was the action movie equivalent of an Austin Powers film, no story just a bunch of skits loosely stitched together for the sake of box office receipts. There were some good moments, I liked some of the interactions between the secondary characters and some of the 'stunts' were entertaining (I enjoyed the car going over the cliff and it didn't bother me that the landing would have easily been fatal to any human who attempted it). But for the most part even the 'stunts' and fight coordination were lazily thrown together (that whole train heist was a joke, right?). And forget continuity of any kind, Ninja Assassin had better continuity than this 'film'. The best thing going for it were the production values, clearly the film had a big budget. Despite that this film was a huge mess. I will give it credit for crossing the line from 'awful' to 'so awful it's kind of entertaining' but it took almost 90 minutes to get to that point.What the hell were you expecting out of Fast Five, Chaka? I don't usually like brainless action movies, but I had a ton of fun with the first and fifth of this series. And no, it is not any more unbelievable than the A-Team was.
Please do not take this the wrong way. I am a fan of your work here and used to always look forward to your posts.Until the new avatar.You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
Between the gaping plot holes and Cate Blanchett's crapy "Southern American" accent this was not a good movie, no matter how much I wanted it to be.First 30 minutes are superb. Rest of movie doesn't measure up. Nice try but a misfire.I want to see this.Watched Hanna with next to no expectations and I genuinely enjoyed it. loved the camera-work and direction, and really liked the fairy-tale narrative and characters. Some good action thrown in too, which helped it move along and kind of cover up the cliched story-arc of the title charcter needing to get from point A to point B filling up the movie. The fairy-tale aspect also helped me forgive a ton of plausibility holes. And I would have preferred not ultimately learning who this kid was- felt like it wasn't needed at all and a bit of mystery would have helped maintain the fairy-tale... but ambiguity doesn't seem to play well in the US.
Please do not take this the wrong way. I am a fan of your work here and used to always look forward to your posts.Until the new avatar.You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
It really creeps me out.
Is there any way to block that and still see your posts?
I find Ron Jeremy much less creepy than his last avatarThis sounds really good. In theatres or on DVD?Small Town Murder Songs
Similar to Fargo in that it's a short story that deals with how the local police of a small town deal with a murder in their jurisdiction, but it's darker, less cartoony, and set in Canada. Beautiful cinematography and excellent acting make it worth the watch alone, but the score played hauntingly throughout is easily one of the best uses of music in film I've ever seen. Highly recommended.
DVD.This sounds really good. In theatres or on DVD?Small Town Murder Songs
Similar to Fargo in that it's a short story that deals with how the local police of a small town deal with a murder in their jurisdiction, but it's darker, less cartoony, and set in Canada. Beautiful cinematography and excellent acting make it worth the watch alone, but the score played hauntingly throughout is easily one of the best uses of music in film I've ever seen. Highly recommended.
why is it that actors go for either the southern accent or new york accent? they rarely ever try the midwestern nasal, for example. i think she could nail a minnesota accent and make it much more entertaining for the audience.Between the gaping plot holes and Cate Blanchett's crapy "Southern American" accent this was not a good movie, no matter how much I wanted it to be.
It's because those accents are very distinctive, highly recognizable and easy to emulate. Hugh Laurie deserves recognition for his Midwestern American accent.'saintfool said:why is it that actors go for either the southern accent or new york accent? they rarely ever try the midwestern nasal, for example. i think she could nail a minnesota accent and make it much more entertaining for the audience.'Hov34 said:Between the gaping plot holes and Cate Blanchett's crapy "Southern American" accent this was not a good movie, no matter how much I wanted it to be.
'cosjobs said:Please do not take this the wrong way. I am a fan of your work here and used to always look forward to your posts.Until the new avatar.'KarmaPolice said:'Andy Dufresne said:You know, West Side Story was pretty good.
Natalie Wood was a beauty.who are you?
It really creeps me out.
Is there any way to block that and still see your posts?
I agree, the soundtrack was another very good aspect of this film.'TexanFan02 said:Saw this last night. Fun and had a good soundtrack,Another thumb up for Attack the Block. What a fun movie.![]()
Allow it.I agree, the soundtrack was another very good aspect of this film.'TexanFan02 said:Saw this last night. Fun and had a good soundtrack,Another thumb up for Attack the Block. What a fun movie.![]()
I know you are trying to dog it, but this makes it sound kind of awesome. I do remember it being nothing like the previous Jason movies where he is a plodding, methodological, killing machine. From what I remember this dude was hauling ### around blasting bow and arrows. Cool in its own way, but I agree, just name it something else.A Nightmare On Elm Street ('09?):
Rewatched this one since I saw the original recently. Remember not really liking this one, but couldn't remember why. Have more specifics now. Mainly they didn't know what they wanted to do with Freddy. IMO we either needy scary silent Freddy or over the top joking Freddy. What we get here is creepy child molesting Freddy that can't deliver any lines. They went over the edge by having him a molester and showing those reveal scenes. Besides that, there is 0 originality to this one as they just ripped off scenes of the other one. Was probably one of my least favorite of these reboots/remakes until I watched... 4/5
Friday the 13th (00s):
WTF was this? 0 surprise that this was by the same Producers and director of the TCM remake. Despite being a completely different character and franchise, this felt like damn near the same movie as the new TCM. For some reason we decide to turn Jason from a zombie(?) who comes back to kill off camp counselors and avenge his mom's death to an inbred looking kid who grows up to be a cannibalistic (implied?) master blacksmith who has perfected booby traps and labrynthian underground mazes. He is also taking hostages for another stupid subplot. In all of them, this felt like the biggest money grab. People who didn't care about the franchise mixed TCM and Hills Have Eyes in a blender and put Friday the 13th on it. Stay away 3/10
I think I would have given it more of a pass if: a) it wasn't titled Friday the 13th or b) it wasn't so much like the the TCM and Hills movies that came before it. That #### is lazy, even for something with Mr. Bay's name attached to it.I know you are trying to dog it, but this makes it sound kind of awesome. I do remember it being nothing like the previous Jason movies where he is a plodding, methodological, killing machine. From what I remember this dude was hauling ### around blasting bow and arrows. Cool in its own way, but I agree, just name it something else.A Nightmare On Elm Street ('09?):
Rewatched this one since I saw the original recently. Remember not really liking this one, but couldn't remember why. Have more specifics now. Mainly they didn't know what they wanted to do with Freddy. IMO we either needy scary silent Freddy or over the top joking Freddy. What we get here is creepy child molesting Freddy that can't deliver any lines. They went over the edge by having him a molester and showing those reveal scenes. Besides that, there is 0 originality to this one as they just ripped off scenes of the other one. Was probably one of my least favorite of these reboots/remakes until I watched... 4/5
Friday the 13th (00s):
WTF was this? 0 surprise that this was by the same Producers and director of the TCM remake. Despite being a completely different character and franchise, this felt like damn near the same movie as the new TCM. For some reason we decide to turn Jason from a zombie(?) who comes back to kill off camp counselors and avenge his mom's death to an inbred looking kid who grows up to be a cannibalistic (implied?) master blacksmith who has perfected booby traps and labrynthian underground mazes. He is also taking hostages for another stupid subplot. In all of them, this felt like the biggest money grab. People who didn't care about the franchise mixed TCM and Hills Have Eyes in a blender and put Friday the 13th on it. Stay away 3/10
Truth.Or is it 'Troof'?Allow it.I agree, the soundtrack was another very good aspect of this film.'TexanFan02 said:Saw this last night. Fun and had a good soundtrack,Another thumb up for Attack the Block. What a fun movie.![]()
Good soundtrack or not, I can't stand chavs.I agree, the soundtrack was another very good aspect of this film.'TexanFan02 said:Saw this last night. Fun and had a good soundtrack,Another thumb up for Attack the Block. What a fun movie.![]()
Never knew this word. Cool. Kind of like the english version of "scallywag". I would probably hate them in person but love the way they talk in movies.Good soundtrack or not, I can't stand chavs.I agree, the soundtrack was another very good aspect of this film.'TexanFan02 said:Saw this last night. Fun and had a good soundtrack,Another thumb up for Attack the Block. What a fun movie.![]()
Nice. I'd consider it, but I already own the Full Metal Jacket blu ray and I don't care for Barry Lyndon.Stanley Kubrick Collection on Blu Ray on sale today at Amazon for $60
Saw this a few months ago..It seemed to really get trashed here and everywhere else, but it was better than expected and Id say better than most box office horrors these days. I actually like how they changed the backstory and made him a child molester, I thought the reveal progression was done well. I turned into a Rooney Mara fan here. I like what Ive seen from Jackie Earle Haley recently, but I thought he couldve done more (although he really didnt get much opportunity too). My biggest complaint with him actually was his makeup, thought it was pretty bad but maybe that was moreso because it reminded me of Gary Oldman's character (Mason Verger) in Hannibal...Id probably give it like a 2.75/5A Nightmare On Elm Street ('09?):
Rewatched this one since I saw the original recently. Remember not really liking this one, but couldn't remember why. Have more specifics now. Mainly they didn't know what they wanted to do with Freddy. IMO we either needy scary silent Freddy or over the top joking Freddy. What we get here is creepy child molesting Freddy that can't deliver any lines. They went over the edge by having him a molester and showing those reveal scenes. Besides that, there is 0 originality to this one as they just ripped off scenes of the other one. Was probably one of my least favorite of these reboots/remakes until I watched... 4/5
Agree on all accounts."David LoHagen cuckolded me."Crazy, Stupid Love:
Steve Carell is told by his wife that she wants a divorce. Ryan Gosling is a womanizer who is there to pick his mopey ### up and show him how to be a man again. Shenanagins ensue as lives and characters become blended together. Despite this synopsis, the wife and I enjoyed this one a bit and both of us laughed several times. You could do a lot worse in the rom/com department, and I would say this is one of the better ones that I have watched lately. The only thing that I would take out would be Steve's son in the movie - kid was annoying, creepy, and in the movie way too much. 6/10
I guess the problem I had was that for a horror movie (I guess any movie) to be good you have to either be cheering for the killer or for the victims. Up to this point Freddy was the main focus. He was bad, but his one liners and fun kills had us going in the other movies. Making him a creepy child molester makes it impossible to be on his side. However, I didn't really like any of the kids either. They were basically stock horror movie kids that we really didn't get to know well enough to care about them either. In the end I just became bored with it. And yes, the makeup seemed bad too. I think the only think I liked that they tried to introduce was the idea of micro naps as you become sleep deprived. Makes it possible to jump into dreams while doing everyday things which added a little bit more tension to it. I sure it was assumed, but my above rating was supposed to be 4/10.Saw this a few months ago..It seemed to really get trashed here and everywhere else, but it was better than expected and Id say better than most box office horrors these days. I actually like how they changed the backstory and made him a child molester, I thought the reveal progression was done well. I turned into a Rooney Mara fan here. I like what Ive seen from Jackie Earle Haley recently, but I thought he couldve done more (although he really didnt get much opportunity too). My biggest complaint with him actually was his makeup, thought it was pretty bad but maybe that was moreso because it reminded me of Gary Oldman's character (Mason Verger) in Hannibal...Id probably give it like a 2.75/5A Nightmare On Elm Street ('09?):
Rewatched this one since I saw the original recently. Remember not really liking this one, but couldn't remember why. Have more specifics now. Mainly they didn't know what they wanted to do with Freddy. IMO we either needy scary silent Freddy or over the top joking Freddy. What we get here is creepy child molesting Freddy that can't deliver any lines. They went over the edge by having him a molester and showing those reveal scenes. Besides that, there is 0 originality to this one as they just ripped off scenes of the other one. Was probably one of my least favorite of these reboots/remakes until I watched... 4/5
This is a great movie - especially when you consider that it pulled off an impressive and ambitious plot on a low budget.The Terminator:
Been a long time, so I thought I'd pop this in again. I know I have been watching too many horror movies lately, but was surprised at how much a couple scenes reminded me of a slasher movie (mainly Sarah's roommate and boyfriend getting taken out). The outdated f/x of the terminator at the end aside, this is still one hell of a movie. Impressive how thought out the plot is, and despite being a time travel movie, there really isn't any holes. Have to watch the second one soon, but one thing that I forgot is that in this movie it is dropped that they were a) winning the war vs. the terminators and b) they destroyed the time machine after sending Reese back. So did they not destroy it? How did they send Ahnold back in T2? Long story short, this movie has everything - suspense, action, love interest, sci-fi, etc. Very tough to pull that off as well as it did. 9/10
Agreed, wasted time and money. Horrible film."Stolen: Your time and money Abduction"The new film Abduction has a lot of problems, but the biggest is the fact that no one gets abducted. Ever.
i'd just keep it in here. this isn't such a heavily trafficked thread that it will get lost. you're in for a treat, regardless.Anyway, first up on my randomized list is a fitting one. I have been interested in seeing Tree of Life, but after looking at things I realized that I still have not seen a single movie (just parts of Thin Red Line) of Terrence Malick's. The plan is to at least get through Badlands and Days of Heaven by the end of next week and go from there.
Is there interest in a thread for his movies, or should I just post thoughts in here??
Not sure I could handle a marathon of Malick. I put Tree of Life in a couple nights ago, but it exhausted me in a hurry. Was really enjoying it though, I love how Malick lets a story unfold, rather than just telling it if that makes any sense.Been watching too many ####ty (mostly horror) movies lately. It was that was on purpose, but really want to start watching real movies and catching up on things I haven't seen. Just like Andy, there are a ton of older movies I haven't seen and as I look through lists there are a lot of foreign movies and directors that have interested me that I have not gotten to yet.
I am rambling b/c I didn't know if anybody else was interested in playing along. I am going to go back to doing it by director. I made a list 20 or so with 3-4 movies of theirs each that I haven't seen or it's been so long. Everybody from Spielberg to John Ford to Kubrick to Miyazaki. Don't want to make it into a full blown movie club (unless there is enough interest), but I thought if people wanted I could start a thread for each director as I go. Could talk about them, the movies, your loves and hates, etc, etc.
Anyway, first up on my randomized list is a fitting one. I have been interested in seeing Tree of Life, but after looking at things I realized that I still have not seen a single movie (just parts of Thin Red Line) of Terrence Malick's. The plan is to at least get through Badlands and Days of Heaven by the end of next week and go from there.
Is there interest in a thread for his movies, or should I just post thoughts in here??
Red State This is one I probably would never have watched if not for this thread. I didn't really care for the setup but once the main story kicks in, it's pretty good. Why did they give the movie that name?
Love stuff like this, slipped past my radar. Thanks for the recommendation I will check it out soon.Terri
I'm a big John C. Reilly fan to begin with, but he did a great job as the high school principal in this movie. The fat kid (Jacob Wysocki) was excellent in the role. If you like quirky movies you should check this one out. Also has Olivia Crocicchia (Katy from Rescue Me) but the less I say about that the betterhi: Homer).
That was pretty shocking. Doesn't happen like that in most movies.Red State This is one I probably would never have watched if not for this thread. I didn't really care for the setup but once the main story kicks in, it's pretty good. Why did they give the movie that name?Just a dig on conservatives I guess.
One thing I noticed only upon reflection that it's kind of cool that they make you think each of the three main characters is going to make it out alive, right before they are brutally murdered.
Who let that cat in here!Love Steve Martin, but don't always enjoy his movies, no problems with this one.The Man With Two Brains
Probably the most underrated Steve Martin movie. Hilarious.