Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (4 Viewers)

[jdoggydogg]

Watched Dumb and Dumber for at least the 50th time last night. Still makes me laugh out loud.

I would go so far as to call it the "funniest" movie of all time.

I dont think anyone needs to go far to call it the funniest movie ever. Just that epically timeless. Jim Carrey will be in a nursing home telling his grandkids about Freda Felcher 40 years from now.

Seriously? Think again. It would not even be in my top 50 funniest.

Well, thats just like, your opinion, man.

Hey dude, you drug me into this argument.

I also think its probably a generational thing. I am stunned that somw people here do not think Blazing Saddles is funny.

Watching Blazing Saddles in 2012 is like listening to Jimi Hendrix in 2012: it's harder to put them in the proper context as the years go by. In 1969, Jimi Henddrix wasn't just the best rock guitarist on earth, he was redefining the instrument. And in 1974, Blazing Saddles was a daring, almost shocking comedy. But in 2012, these exhibits are harder to appreciate in some ways.

Yeah, I forgot to mention this in my Generations post a few minutes ago, but niger jokes are no big deal to people my age, or people under 40 or so Id think as well. Racism, while still terrible and behind the times, is commonplace comedy these days (ie Chappelle's Show).

You're saying it's commonplace, but Chappelle's Show is very cutting edge, and most TV or films are not that bold. I'm not sure a big studio would even touch Blazing Saddles in 2012.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Watched Dumb and Dumber for at least the 50th time last night. Still makes me laugh out loud.

I would go so far as to call it the "funniest" movie of all time.

I dont think anyone needs to go far to call it the funniest movie ever. Just that epically timeless. Jim Carrey will be in a nursing home telling his grandkids about Freda Felcher 40 years from now.

Seriously? Think again. It would not even be in my top 50 funniest.

Well, thats just like, your opinion, man.

Hey dude, you drug me into this argument.

I also think its probably a generational thing. I am stunned that somw people here do not think Blazing Saddles is funny.

Watching Blazing Saddles in 2012 is like listening to Jimi Hendrix in 2012: it's harder to put them in the proper context as the years go by. In 1969, Jimi Henddrix wasn't just the best rock guitarist on earth, he was redefining the instrument. And in 1974, Blazing Saddles was a daring, almost shocking comedy. But in 2012, these exhibits are harder to appreciate in some ways.

Yeah, I forgot to mention this in my Generations post a few minutes ago, but niger jokes are no big deal to people my age, or people under 40 or so Id think as well. Racism, while still terrible and behind the times, is commonplace comedy these days (ie Chappelle's Show).

As previously mentioned, besides people watching it for the first time nearly 40 years after it came out, watching it edited on cable takes a lot out of it as well.

Again, watching an edited version of Blazing Saddles is like making Indian food without the spices.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

 

[pantagrapher]

Red Belt.

Someone needs to stop David Mamet from writing any more things.

 

[Chaka]

Watched Dumb and Dumber for at least the 50th time last night. Still makes me laugh out loud.

I would go so far as to call it the "funniest" movie of all time.

I dont think anyone needs to go far to call it the funniest movie ever. Just that epically timeless. Jim Carrey will be in a nursing home telling his grandkids about Freda Felcher 40 years from now.

Seriously? Think again. It would not even be in my top 50 funniest.

Well, thats just like, your opinion, man.

Hey dude, you drug me into this argument.

I also think its probably a generational thing. I am stunned that somw people here do not think Blazing Saddles is funny.

Watching Blazing Saddles in 2012 is like listening to Jimi Hendrix in 2012: it's harder to put them in the proper context as the years go by. In 1969, Jimi Henddrix wasn't just the best rock guitarist on earth, he was redefining the instrument. And in 1974, Blazing Saddles was a daring, almost shocking comedy. But in 2012, these exhibits are harder to appreciate in some ways.

Yeah, I forgot to mention this in my Generations post a few minutes ago, but niger jokes are no big deal to people my age, or people under 40 or so Id think as well. Racism, while still terrible and behind the times, is commonplace comedy these days (ie Chappelle's Show).

You're saying it's commonplace, but Chappelle's Show is very cutting edge, and most TV or films are not that bold. I'm not sure a big studio would even touch Blazing Saddles in 2012.

There are some black comedians who do n-word material but are the any white ones?No way, no how does a major studio touch Blazing Saddles in 2012. Too many people dying to be outraged and fauxtraged floating around out there.

 

[Chaka]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

 

[Apple Juice]

The Three Muskateers

I asked my FBG buddies here to recommend a good version of this classic for my son, and I believe Chaka recommended the 1993 version. Hard to beat a cast of Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland, Chris O'Donnell, Oliver Platt, Tim Curry, Rebecca De Mornay, Gabrielle Anwar, Michael Wincott, Paul McGann, and Julie Delpy.

My son loves it. Mission accomplished.

That said, this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

Any movie with Michael Wincott as a villain is at least a 1/5

Sure. The villains in this movie were the redeeming feature.

I saw this movie probably over 15 years ago now. I remember it had an all star cast and thats about it, but I was moreso just trying to give Wincott his well deserved credit as an actor since you mentioned him, but even moreso as a villain. The guy always brings the "ruthless" to the screen. Talk Radio, Robin Hood, Romeo is Bleeding, The Crow, Dead Man, Gunshy, Along Came A Spider, Count of Monte Cristo, Seraphim Falls. Looking back, he's made a stronger impression than I realized considering how few roles he's really had.

Talk Radio, now there's an underrated movie.

The definition of an underrated movie IMO. The tension and dread that builds up as the movie spirals into darkness is so unique given the premise. Brilliantly written movie with fabulous performances. I never hear this movie mentioned and it's just so magnificent.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Red Belt.Someone needs to stop David Mamet from writing any more things.

It wasn't bad. But yeah, it's no House of Games.Spartan was pretty good.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

I wasn't bored Haven't seen the original series yet.

 

[jdoggydogg]

The Three Muskateers

I asked my FBG buddies here to recommend a good version of this classic for my son, and I believe Chaka recommended the 1993 version. Hard to beat a cast of Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland, Chris O'Donnell, Oliver Platt, Tim Curry, Rebecca De Mornay, Gabrielle Anwar, Michael Wincott, Paul McGann, and Julie Delpy.

My son loves it. Mission accomplished.

That said, this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

Any movie with Michael Wincott as a villain is at least a 1/5

Sure. The villains in this movie were the redeeming feature.

I saw this movie probably over 15 years ago now. I remember it had an all star cast and thats about it, but I was moreso just trying to give Wincott his well deserved credit as an actor since you mentioned him, but even moreso as a villain. The guy always brings the "ruthless" to the screen. Talk Radio, Robin Hood, Romeo is Bleeding, The Crow, Dead Man, Gunshy, Along Came A Spider, Count of Monte Cristo, Seraphim Falls. Looking back, he's made a stronger impression than I realized considering how few roles he's really had.

Talk Radio, now there's an underrated movie.

The definition of an underrated movie IMO. The tension and dread that builds up as the movie spirals into darkness is so unique given the premise. Brilliantly written movie with fabulous performances. I never hear this movie mentioned and it's just so magnificent.

Just to show you how old I am, I saw Talk Radio in the movie theater when it was first released.

 

[cstu]

Red Belt.Someone needs to stop David Mamet from writing any more things.

I never watched The Unit, but he's been living on his reputation since GGR.

 

[Chaka]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

I wasn't bored Haven't seen the original series yet.

You probably enjoy watching paint dry too.Kidding. To each their own.

 

[saintfool]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

this is really the only problem with the Oldman version. it's forced to cover too much, too quickly. it sacrifices the tension and character development as a result. it's still pretty terrific but would have benefited in a different setting (HBO, PBS, whatever).

 

[Chaka]

The Three Muskateers

I asked my FBG buddies here to recommend a good version of this classic for my son, and I believe Chaka recommended the 1993 version. Hard to beat a cast of Charlie Sheen, Kiefer Sutherland, Chris O'Donnell, Oliver Platt, Tim Curry, Rebecca De Mornay, Gabrielle Anwar, Michael Wincott, Paul McGann, and Julie Delpy.

My son loves it. Mission accomplished.

That said, this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

Any movie with Michael Wincott as a villain is at least a 1/5

Sure. The villains in this movie were the redeeming feature.

I saw this movie probably over 15 years ago now. I remember it had an all star cast and thats about it, but I was moreso just trying to give Wincott his well deserved credit as an actor since you mentioned him, but even moreso as a villain. The guy always brings the "ruthless" to the screen. Talk Radio, Robin Hood, Romeo is Bleeding, The Crow, Dead Man, Gunshy, Along Came A Spider, Count of Monte Cristo, Seraphim Falls. Looking back, he's made a stronger impression than I realized considering how few roles he's really had.

Talk Radio, now there's an underrated movie.

The definition of an underrated movie IMO. The tension and dread that builds up as the movie spirals into darkness is so unique given the premise. Brilliantly written movie with fabulous performances. I never hear this movie mentioned and it's just so magnificent.

Agreed. Really good flick.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

I wasn't bored Haven't seen the original series yet.

You probably enjoy watching paint dry too.Kidding. To each their own.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I've seen negative reviews of this movie - both here and in print. And I just don't get it. To begin, I am not ashamed to say that this movie is cryptic and hard to follow. I probably should have paid closer attention. That said, the acting, writing, and costumes were all top notch. We've seen so many spy thrillers at this point, an homage to old-school British crime dramas seems kind of dull in comparison. But I don't see how anyone gave this movie less than a solid B. Outstanding.

For blu-ray viewers, this movie suffers from the same noise that plagued The King's Speech. Good movie, weak transfer.

Acting was great and I could see how it might become more interesting upon repeated viewings as the story was complicated. But it was for the most part boring.That being said I will likely be watching the 1979 BBC production with Alec Guinness because I think they could do a lot more with what should be a fascinating mole hunt in a serial format.

this is really the only problem with the Oldman version. it's forced to cover too much, too quickly. it sacrifices the tension and character development as a result. it's still pretty terrific but would have benefited in a different setting (HBO, PBS, whatever).

I can see why that'd be the case.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Red Belt.

Someone needs to stop David Mamet from writing any more things.

I never watched The Unit, but he's been living on his reputation since GGR.

No. State and Main, Heist, and Spartan were all good.

 

[Worm]

No one has watched La Casa Muda yet... I am disappoint.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

Comic-Con Episode IV: A Fan's Hope

A top flight semi-documentary directed by Morgan Spurlock that follows several people through the famous Comic-Con held annually in San Diego.

A light hearted frolic that actually delivers quite a bit of movie enjoyment. Plenty of comedy. A bit of suspense and lots of wonderment. Some solid drama (which takes away from some of the pure documentary aspects, but it doesnt care about that) and lots of noticeable faces and interviews. If you have any GEEK in you, its a must see. It may have actually been too short. And would have been nice to dive into 1 famous lead as a character, as well some deeper insights into one of the massive companies perspective of the whole carnival.

From an over all aspect, its an extremely well rounded offering that almost everybody should enjoy.

4.5/5

 

[Chaka]

Che: Part One & Che: Part Two - First one covers the Castro led revolution of Cuba and second one covers Che's attempted revolution in Bolivia. I found them interesting and, for the most part, informative but for 4+ hours of film I don't think Soderbergh really did a very good job developing any character other than Che. And even with Che we learn nothing of his life in Argentina and only that for some reason he was at a dinner party with Fidel Castro who immediately tries to recruit him. We never learn why Fidel would want Che to join the Cuban revolution in the first place, just that Fidel considers him an important piece of the puzzle.

We also get nothing about Che in the Congo.

Overall my impression was that this was a sympathetic portrayal of Che, but it did not pull away from demonstrating the extreme nature of his belief in a complete socialist ideal.

It was interesting but it is long and kind of slow. For those needing an action experience there are definitely some battles depicted, and they seem to be well done, but this is no Black Hawk Down. It is far more a character driven biography than a revolutionary epic.

 

[saintfool]

Che: Part One & Che: Part Two - First one covers the Castro led revolution of Cuba and second one covers Che's attempted revolution in Bolivia. I found them interesting and, for the most part, informative but for 4+ hours of film I don't think Soderbergh really did a very good job developing any character other than Che. And even with Che we learn nothing of his life in Argentina and only that for some reason he was at a dinner party with Fidel Castro who immediately tries to recruit him. We never learn why Fidel would want Che to join the Cuban revolution in the first place, just that Fidel considers him an important piece of the puzzle.

We also get nothing about Che in the Congo.

Overall my impression was that this was a sympathetic portrayal of Che, but it did not pull away from demonstrating the extreme nature of his belief in a complete socialist ideal.

It was interesting but it is long and kind of slow. For those needing an action experience there are definitely some battles depicted, and they seem to be well done, but this is no Black Hawk Down. It is far more a character driven biography than a revolutionary epic.

i gave this a try some months ago. i found it to be something of a slog and gave up. i didn't think SS had get touch with the military scenes and the character development wasn't doing anyone any favors. i like benecio del toro but 4+ hours might be too much.

 

[Chaka]

Che: Part One & Che: Part Two - First one covers the Castro led revolution of Cuba and second one covers Che's attempted revolution in Bolivia. I found them interesting and, for the most part, informative but for 4+ hours of film I don't think Soderbergh really did a very good job developing any character other than Che. And even with Che we learn nothing of his life in Argentina and only that for some reason he was at a dinner party with Fidel Castro who immediately tries to recruit him. We never learn why Fidel would want Che to join the Cuban revolution in the first place, just that Fidel considers him an important piece of the puzzle.

We also get nothing about Che in the Congo.

Overall my impression was that this was a sympathetic portrayal of Che, but it did not pull away from demonstrating the extreme nature of his belief in a complete socialist ideal.

It was interesting but it is long and kind of slow. For those needing an action experience there are definitely some battles depicted, and they seem to be well done, but this is no Black Hawk Down. It is far more a character driven biography than a revolutionary epic.

i gave this a try some months ago. i found it to be something of a slog and gave up. i didn't think SS had get touch with the military scenes and the character development wasn't doing anyone any favors. i like benecio del toro but 4+ hours might be too much.

Yeah I pretty much agree. The thing I liked about the battles were that they had a very haphazard nature, which is what I would expect from a bunch of out manned, out gunned, starving revolutionaries living in the jungle.The secondary character development was shockingly bad. Everyone has dark unkempt hair, a beard and is wearing green fatigues, how the hell am I supposed tell anyone apart? Let alone feel happy or sad for their character arc? Occasionally I didn't even realize I was looking at Benecio right away.

The more I think about it I think the only thing I learned from four hours of Che is that he had asthma.

 

[saintfool]

Yeah I pretty much agree. The thing I liked about the battles were that they had a very haphazard nature, which is what I would expect from a bunch of out manned, out gunned, starving revolutionaries living in the jungle.

The secondary character development was shockingly bad. Everyone has dark unkempt hair, a beard and is wearing green fatigues, how the hell am I supposed tell anyone apart? Let alone feel happy or sad for their character arc? Occasionally I didn't even realize I was looking at Benecio right away.

The more I think about it I think the only thing I learned from four hours of Che is that he had asthma.

this, coupled with the expected languid pacing of a 4-hour film, made it hard to get into. SS has ambition and is pretty much a cinematic polymath. i could describe this is flawed but not a failure.

 

[cosjobs]

I am about to head downtown to catch a Sam Fuller double feature: Shock Corridor and The Naked Kiss.

/excited

 

[Chaka]

I am about to head downtown to catch a Sam Fuller double feature: Shock Corridor and The Naked Kiss.

/excited

Makes me want to watch The Big Red One.

 

[Cliff Clavin]

Watched True Romance again the other. Easily one of my all-time favorites.

Is there any other movie that can match-up with it cast wise (depth)?

 

[jdoggydogg]

Watched True Romance again the other. Easily one of my all-time favorites.

Is there any other movie that can match-up with it cast wise (depth)?

One of my favorites. Hard to find an equal in casting.Funny, it took several years and several viewings to realize this was Tarantino's fantasy for himself put on screen.

 

[Kenny Powers]

Watched True Romance again the other. Easily one of my all-time favorites.Is there any other movie that can match-up with it cast wise (depth)?

Big fan of the ensemble cast in Sleepers. No one disappoints. Also doesnt hurt that while Id say True Romance is more fun, I think Sleepers is a better film.DeNiro (In general he's really been in a lot of deep casts)PittBaconHoffmanJason PatricMinnie DriverBilly CrudupBrad RenfroBruno KirbyJonathan TuckerAnd then of course there's Pulp Fiction which I think consensus would agree is a deeper cast (and stronger than TR in the biggest roles)TravoltaSLJWillisUmaRhamesTim RothEric StoltzKeitelRosanna ArquetteWalkenBuscemi...Sin City is sort of an under the radar one but just because its a comic adaptation Id be hard pressed to consider with the other 3 in discussionRourkeWillisDel ToroClive OwenJosh HartnettRosario DawsonMichael Clarke DuncanElijah WoodCarla GuginoPowers BootheRutger HauerMichael MadsenNick StahlIm sure there are plenty others with around 10 or so actors.. With as great as True Romance is, I think its how memorable Oldman, Walken, Hopper, Gandolfini, and Pitt are in minimal screen time that even brings it into the discussion here

 

[cosjobs]

Prometheus

Visually spectacular but seriously flawed sci-fi. By the close of the movie I was just wanting everyone to die so it would end. Scott continues to thrill with his vaginmonsters and continues to love to have them explode out of stomachs. but I really saw all of that I needed 30 years ago. Very much talent assembled here but extremely poorly developed characters. Therzon was the casting highlight and deliciously evil, but Noomi did nothing for me. The android (Fassbender) was very good and the Captain (Elba), too. Everyone else was mediocre at best.

2.18/5 stars

 

[Cliff Clavin]

Prometheus

Visually spectacular but seriously flawed sci-fi. By the close of the movie I was just wanting everyone to die so it would end. Scott continues to thrill with his vaginmonsters and continues to love to have them explode out of stomachs. but I really saw all of that I needed 30 years ago. Very much talent assembled here but extremely poorly developed characters. Therzon was the casting highlight and deliciously evil, but Noomi did nothing for me. The android (Fassbender) was very good and the Captain (Elba), too. Everyone else was mediocre at best.

2.18/5 stars

Haven't seen it yet but love the tweet from Neil Degrasse Tysonromethues goes 35 light years into space, but Clarize Theron gaffes "We're half a billion miles from Earth" - just past Jupiter.

 

[Kenny Powers]

Watched True Romance again the other. Easily one of my all-time favorites.

Is there any other movie that can match-up with it cast wise (depth)?

Big fan of the ensemble cast in Sleepers. No one disappoints. Also doesnt hurt that while Id say True Romance is more fun, I think Sleepers is a better film.

Sleepers was terrible.

Erroneous.

 

[saintfool]

"moonrise kingdom" anyone?

saw it last night and liked it. it's anderson being true to himself, which probably doesn't help him win over any new fans. it drags in a number of places but always seems to be spot on with murray's screen time (and schwartzman). mcdormand and willis just don't fit here while swinton's tiny role is tailor made for her. the kids were hit-and-miss much of the time. this film didn't seem to be trying quite so hard and isn't as "precious" moment to moment. i was amused but not in love. "rushmore" still is his most mature and fully realized film to date.

 

[cosjobs]

"moonrise kingdom" anyone?

saw it last night and liked it. it's anderson being true to himself, which probably doesn't help him win over any new fans. it drags in a number of places but always seems to be spot on with murray's screen time (and schwartzman). mcdormand and willis just don't fit here while swinton's tiny role is tailor made for her. the kids were hit-and-miss much of the time. this film didn't seem to be trying quite so hard and isn't as "precious" moment to moment. i was amused but not in love. "rushmore" still is his most mature and fully realized film to date.

Local art house theaters showed previews of this every time I attended the last couple months ( alot). I picture it as I think you describe it. Clever and entertaining, but sluggish and non-compelling. I'm waiting for the dvd.

 

[cstu]

Prometheus

Visually spectacular but seriously flawed sci-fi. By the close of the movie I was just wanting everyone to die so it would end. Scott continues to thrill with his vaginmonsters and continues to love to have them explode out of stomachs. but I really saw all of that I needed 30 years ago. Very much talent assembled here but extremely poorly developed characters. Therzon was the casting highlight and deliciously evil, but Noomi did nothing for me. The android (Fassbender) was very good and the Captain (Elba), too. Everyone else was mediocre at best.

2.18/5 stars

Haven't seen it yet but love the tweet from Neil Degrasse Tysonromethues goes 35 light years into space, but Clarize Theron gaffes "We're half a billion miles from Earth" - just past Jupiter.

Meh, it's woman.

 

[TylerRoseFan]

Chronicle

Not a bad flick. Ends quickly

Just watched this one the other day. Thought it was OK, but I am usually a sucker for the "found footage" movies. If you don't like that style, I would stay away. Thought the underlying premise of what would happen if troubled teenagers get super powers was interesting enough, but a lot of the F/X were lame - especially when they were flying around, etc... Still was above average and worth a view if you like or at least can tolerate that format. 5.5/10

The effects were average at best, but it didnt bother me here because of the overall concept and actually seemed fitting. I dont think the viewer is supposed to be visually in awe of them either, which also matters. Best part about it for me was how real it felt despite it being sci-fi, as well as the relationships between the 3 of them. I thought the found footage was so well done you didnt even notice it half the time once the story gets rolling.

Saw it last night on VOD. Enjoyed it enough. Better than most movies out there...not saying much. Thought the kid who went bad was an idiot. Lends itself to a followup movie. 2.75/5

 

[offdee]

Man On a Ledge

So many problems with the ending that I'm not even sure where to start listing them off

 

[KarmaPolice]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

 

[Time Kibitzer]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

Season 2 is out and completed.

 

[hooter311]

Goon

Good stuff. Best sports comedy I've seen in a long time. It's no Slapshot, but I'll take it.

3.5/5

 

[LHUCKS]

Prometheus - 4.5 Stars

Loved it. Easily the best film that I have seen this year. Not sure why the critics and others are being over-critical. Twice as smart as hunger games, adult dialogue, good casting(IMHO), solid acting, intriguing plot, amazing visuals, no slow spots that are unwarranted and a solid ending that leaves you wanting more.

I go to the movies to see and experience things that real life can't offer. Ridley takes you to a place of intrigue as he often does.

Of course there are things that I would change, but overall this is one of those movies that I'll never forget.

 

[jdoggydogg]

"moonrise kingdom" anyone?

saw it last night and liked it. it's anderson being true to himself, which probably doesn't help him win over any new fans. it drags in a number of places but always seems to be spot on with murray's screen time (and schwartzman). mcdormand and willis just don't fit here while swinton's tiny role is tailor made for her. the kids were hit-and-miss much of the time. this film didn't seem to be trying quite so hard and isn't as "precious" moment to moment. i was amused but not in love. "rushmore" still is his most mature and fully realized film to date.

Looking forward to it. I'll likely see it on video.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

I am a lazy reader, and this show makes me want to read the entire series. It's that good.

 

[saintfool]

"moonrise kingdom" anyone?

saw it last night and liked it. it's anderson being true to himself, which probably doesn't help him win over any new fans. it drags in a number of places but always seems to be spot on with murray's screen time (and schwartzman). mcdormand and willis just don't fit here while swinton's tiny role is tailor made for her. the kids were hit-and-miss much of the time. this film didn't seem to be trying quite so hard and isn't as "precious" moment to moment. i was amused but not in love. "rushmore" still is his most mature and fully realized film to date.

Local art house theaters showed previews of this every time I attended the last couple months ( alot). I picture it as I think you describe it. Clever and entertaining, but sluggish and non-compelling. I'm waiting for the dvd.

i felt like it was worth seeing in the theater. heck, the audience i saw it with actually clapped at the end.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I need to start a thread for "recommended movies to watch with your son or daughter." Maybe I already did and I forgot about it.

Discounting the obvious Disney movies, I would recommend the following...StardustSpiderwick ChroniclesChicken RunCoralineNanny McPheeRobotsJimmy Neutron: Boy GeniusShort Circuit (some surprisingly harsh language though)Jumanji/ZathuraPhineas & Ferb: The MovieDumaMillions

i'd add "willow", "ladyhawke", "maverick", and "hildago" off the top of my head.

Willow was a childhood favorite but remains an all time favorite for me :madmartigan:

I forgot another childhood favorite (and still is today) - The Neverending Story

 

[jdoggydogg]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

I am a lazy reader, and this show makes me want to read the entire series. It's that good.

Be prepared to wait about 20 years for the ending, if the author doesn't die first.

That's what I've heard. It's a race against time with diabetes.

 

[El Floppo]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

I am a lazy reader, and this show makes me want to read the entire series. It's that good.

abso-#######-lutely ditto on all counts.that said- I'm a sucker for fantasies.

 

[Klimtology]

Just watched Exit Through the Gift Shop as well.

Great documentary.

I recently watched Cache by director Michael Haneke.

Interesting film, but I'm not sure if I'd recommend it.

Also, jus got the documentary Forkes over Knives from Netflix. I'll probably watch it tonight.

 

[saintfool]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

I am a lazy reader, and this show makes me want to read the entire series. It's that good.

abso-#######-lutely ditto on all counts.that said- I'm a sucker for fantasies.

i am kind of in the middle of S1 and it's not as gripping for me. i appreciate what it's trying to do, which is no easy thing for tv, but it's pretty meh for me. i think my enjoyment of a scene, idea or character is in direct proportion to some of the actors. when these actors are not on-screen, i simply get bored. i love the fantasy genre - things like the arthurian stories and tolkien were seminal for me - but this isn't nearly as good as i hoped for. it's not especially good drama either. i would have liked to see what someone like ron moore (BSG) or even the "farscape" team could do with it.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Game of Thrones:

After my initial "not loving it" review of the first episode, I decided to try it again. I ended up watching the first season in 2 nights and losing sleep in the process. Really impressed with the amount of stuff going on (actually probably could have been a few episodes longer). Also, I have never seen a series with such blatant disregard for characters - people are getting offed left and right. Now I am itching for season 2 to come out - and this is why I usually stay away from series until they are 3-4 seasons in. Actually considering starting the books instead - I was breezing through the first book today at the store and it looked like the show was beat for beat with the novel.

I am a lazy reader, and this show makes me want to read the entire series. It's that good.

abso-#######-lutely ditto on all counts.that said- I'm a sucker for fantasies.

As a kid I didn't read a ton of fantasy / sci fi. Mostly Robert E. Howard and Ray Bradbury. But this series has me geeked to read the novels.

 

[jdoggydogg]

Just watched Exit Through the Gift Shop as well.Great documentary.

Loved this movie.