This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
if you aren't ready for it then it will totally suck. it is a very specific film. i remember it taking me able half the film to understand the accents. i'd probably go with it subtitled now as a precaution.
Worth a watch, IMO, especially if you don't know Greenaway's work. Worth it for his command of the visuals to tell his story- like moving/talking old-masters' painting come to life... Vermeers or some of the other Dutch masters who use color and light/darkness so well. I think you'll appreciate that aspect of it, JD.But the stories tend to be self-serving gross-outs rife with lots of sex=violence, nudity (often of people you dn't want to see nude), and bodily functions of all kinds.Funny- I didn't notice the accents... but maybe because Helen Mirren is nude for 90% of it (including a romp in offal- no joke).eta: but yeah- his films tend to be polarizing much like Solondz and Von Trier.
as opposed to the other way around? All debatableand to GPJ.. many high ranking officials want people to believe that torture wasnt used to extract information.. why do you think that is? Regardless we'll never really know the truth but I dont believe that it is necessary.
the movie was meh... they really laid it on thick with the lead character's obsessive take no prisoners attitude. decent overall but wouldnt watch it again.
I still have a problem with the whole burial at sea... just puts more doubt on what really happened and or if Bin Laden was already dead like many thought. Who knows
At first i was also like "wtf this is fishy" but after thinking about it, thats about the only thing you could do with a terrorist with so many followers.
saw Seven Psychopaths. Very different than any other movie, thats for sure. Great cast, funny scenes, but the whole over the top weirdness was a bit too much for me. This had potential to be a great film. PS they really didnt need "7" psychopaths, if they stuck to "5" it would have been a better film IMO
saw Seven Psychopaths. Very different than any other movie, thats for sure. Great cast, funny scenes, but the whole over the top weirdness was a bit too much for me. This had potential to be a great film. PS they really didnt need "7" psychopaths, if they stuck to "5" it would have been a better film IMO
This was what i was trying to say. Some hilarious scenes, like the trying to kill dog scene, but absolutely zero suspense at all. I wish they would have totally made this a comedy from beginning to end.
So I caught Dredd last night. If you like slow motion effects this is the film for you. But other than a bit heavy handed use of slo-mo, which I assume was for the 3D crowd when it was originally in theaters, it was a decent action movie. All the right people dead at the end and some good shoot em up through out. Definitely a different look and feel from Sly's take. Got the mythology a lot righter. Like never removing the helmet for example. So all in all worth the rental fee.
if you aren't ready for it then it will totally suck. it is a very specific film. i remember it taking me able half the film to understand the accents. i'd probably go with it subtitled now as a precaution.
if you aren't ready for it then it will totally suck. it is a very specific film. i remember it taking me able half the film to understand the accents. i'd probably go with it subtitled now as a precaution.
I get turning it off or hating it. I dont get thinking its the worst movie ever... unless visuals are completely unimportant to your appreciation of a movie. But actually, I dont get not appreciating visuals when watching a movie.For me, the worst movies are those cynical hollywood things that dont even try with any aspect of the produxtion.
if you aren't ready for it then it will totally suck. it is a very specific film. i remember it taking me able half the film to understand the accents. i'd probably go with it subtitled now as a precaution.
if you aren't ready for it then it will totally suck. it is a very specific film. i remember it taking me able half the film to understand the accents. i'd probably go with it subtitled now as a precaution.
GOOD, on all countsZD30 fans, Kathryn Bigelow was on Letterman last night talking about, well cinematic license in this film basically. She spinned it well but it's clearly ~75% made up.
Watch out for the Beasts of Southern Wild. The best pic as well as the little girl getting a nom is one thing but best director? The academy must really dig it.
Spielberg absolutely deserves the nom. It's his best film since, IMO, Saving Private Ryan (some will say Munich or Catch Me If You Can but I think Lincoln is better than both of those).
I actually want to revisit it at some point, it just was not what I was expecting at all when I put it on and I couldnt handle it any longer that night.
saw Seven Psychopaths. Very different than any other movie, thats for sure. Great cast, funny scenes, but the whole over the top weirdness was a bit too much for me. This had potential to be a great film. PS they really didnt need "7" psychopaths, if they stuck to "5" it would have been a better film IMO
This was what i was trying to say. Some hilarious scenes, like the trying to kill dog scene, but absolutely zero suspense at all. I wish they would have totally made this a comedy from beginning to end.
saw Seven Psychopaths. Very different than any other movie, thats for sure. Great cast, funny scenes, but the whole over the top weirdness was a bit too much for me. This had potential to be a great film. PS they really didnt need "7" psychopaths, if they stuck to "5" it would have been a better film IMO
This was what i was trying to say. Some hilarious scenes, like the trying to kill dog scene, but absolutely zero suspense at all. I wish they would have totally made this a comedy from beginning to end.
saw Seven Psychopaths. Very different than any other movie, thats for sure. Great cast, funny scenes, but the whole over the top weirdness was a bit too much for me. This had potential to be a great film. PS they really didnt need "7" psychopaths, if they stuck to "5" it would have been a better film IMO
This was what i was trying to say. Some hilarious scenes, like the trying to kill dog scene, but absolutely zero suspense at all. I wish they would have totally made this a comedy from beginning to end.
MM's plays are tremendously dark and funny. it would be hard for me to believe that he's so off his game that he cannot bring that to a script he wrote for himself.
MM's plays are tremendously dark and funny. it would be hard for me to believe that he's so off his game that he cannot bring that to a script he wrote for himself.
So I caught Dredd last night. If you like slow motion effects this is the film for you. But other than a bit heavy handed use of slo-mo, which I assume was for the 3D crowd when it was originally in theaters, it was a decent action movie. All the right people dead at the end and some good shoot em up through out. Definitely a different look and feel from Sly's take. Got the mythology a lot righter. Like never removing the helmet for example. So all in all worth the rental fee.
i rented it way back when cuz i heard Helen Mirren was naked all over it. they didnt tell me she did it mostly to have sex on garbage. those who know the great Michael Gambon as an avuncular Masterpiece Theater kinda guy should watch his performance here, cuz it speaks to the awe with which British actors consider him.
i rented it way back when cuz i heard Helen Mirren was naked all over it. they didnt tell me she did it mostly to have sex on garbage. those who know the great Michael Gambon as an avuncular Masterpiece Theater kinda guy should watch his performance here, cuz it speaks to the awe with which British actors consider him.
he's another in yet a long line of tremendous actors - like nighe, pryce, etc - that kills it in almost every movie he's in. dig his "longtitutde" miniseries.
Going old school:Eiger Sanction - Clint banging a black chick and an Indian....gunfights, fist fights, making fun of Europeans, George Kennedy and Clint sitting on a mountain drinking beer, international espionage, mountain climbing, Clint and George Kennedy slapping the asses of white women and sending them on their way, arrogant Germans, beautiful, rugged scenery, making fun of feminists,...awesome movie.Charley Varrick - decentThe Panic In Needle Park - Requiem for a Dream borrows HEAVILY from this oneThief - Heat borrows HEAVILY from this one (this is excused as they were both Michal Mann)Serpico Death Wish - loving the New York as the Wild West theme of many of the 1970's movies.
I rented "Brothers" a couple of weeks back. It was interesting; not great but better than average, I thought. Maguire was very believable and Gyllenhaal turned in a great performance. Lil' Nat was pretty much the same as she is in most of her dramatic movies; pretty and not tremendously expressive, but likeable. The script had a few surprises and the dialogue and acting were pretty strong throughout. The major problem with the film is that not much happened. There's a little bit of a trend of remaking Scandinavian film and TV that this one (based on a Danish flick) was/is a part of; I'm thinking of The Killing and Wallander, but I'm sure there are other examples. I'd give it ***1/2 out of 5, maybe borderline ****.
I rented "Brothers" a couple of weeks back. It was interesting; not great but better than average, I thought. Maguire was very believable and Gyllenhaal turned in a great performance. Lil' Nat was pretty much the same as she is in most of her dramatic movies; pretty and not tremendously expressive, but likeable. The script had a few surprises and the dialogue and acting were pretty strong throughout. The major problem with the film is that not much happened.
I really liked this, more than I expected. I guess not a lot happened in it - in present time at least - but I thought it did an excellent job at displaying family dynamics, PTSD, and just personal mind ####s. Maguire, Gyllenhaal, and Portman were all really good. I think I posted somewhere here recently I thought this was a top 3 Jake G performance, and Id probably say the same for Tobey. Im still surprised how under the radar this one is.ETA: Maguire actually did get a golden globe nom for this one
Serious question: what type of film is CTW&L?Only thing I can think of is its a play adaptation (without even knowing if it is/was a play), and thats a pretty broad genre
Small town crime brings small town drama. I loved it for a lot of reasons. I could see expectations playing a part, and I expected Pitt to have a larger role, but I found very few things about this to complain about and thoroughly enjoyed it.
A Lynchian movie-making-within-a-movie mind#### of a film about a British movie sound mixer who went to Italy to work on the sound effects of an Italian film. I really liked this one; something about it just really sticks to me. I highly recommend it to fans of David Lynch, and highly detract it to critics of David Lynch.
Going old school:Eiger Sanction - Clint banging a black chick and an Indian....gunfights, fist fights, making fun of Europeans, George Kennedy and Clint sitting on a mountain drinking beer, international espionage, mountain climbing, Clint and George Kennedy slapping the asses of white women and sending them on their way, arrogant Germans, beautiful, rugged scenery, making fun of feminists,...awesome movie.Charley Varrick - decentThe Panic In Needle Park - Requiem for a Dream borrows HEAVILY from this oneThief - Heat borrows HEAVILY from this one (this is excused as they were both Michal Mann)Serpico Death Wish - loving the New York as the Wild West theme of many of the 1970's movies.
Great take on the zombie genre, although I thought it fizzled out in the last 1/3 of the movie. Still well worth a viewing for fans of the genre.
The Grey:
Been passing by this one, but when listening to podcasts this week of top movies of 2012 it kept showing up, so I thought I'd finally give it a try. I ended up really liking this one. I didn't take it as man vs. wild, I took it as man vs. himself and his willingness to take on death. Sure the wolves looked a little silly, and the men did a couple of dumb things, but for my money that was secondary to the inner struggles. I am sure I am not the first to bring it up, but:
I started wondering how much was in his head anyway. Either he was dying from the crash and was in limbo (was very jump cut from him and his wife to the crash site - which he was oddly far away from), or based on all the flashbacks and showing them in the hospital at the end maybe he was in the hospital the whole time.
Either way, I really liked the movie but think it was really poorly marketed and could see why there was a lot of disappointment. If I remember right, there was a big difference in ratings from critics vs. Joe viewer - 20% or so.
The Divide:
Nuclear blast happens, people manage to get into their apartment's basement before the super closes the door, and all hell breaks loose. How I watched the last 1/2 of the movie: :X
Been passing by this one, but when listening to podcasts this week of top movies of 2012 it kept showing up, so I thought I'd finally give it a try. I ended up really liking this one. I didn't take it as man vs. wild, I took it as man vs. himself and his willingness to take on death. Sure the wolves looked a little silly, and the men did a couple of dumb things, but for my money that was secondary to the inner struggles. I am sure I am not the first to bring it up, but:
One of the things that makes The Grey hit home the most for me is that Neeson filmed it shortly after tha passing of his own wife so it makes me wonder how much he invested into the character personally. My guess would be a lot.
A Lynchian movie-making-within-a-movie mind#### of a film about a British movie sound mixer who went to Italy to work on the sound effects of an Italian film. I really liked this one; something about it just really sticks to me. I highly recommend it to fans of David Lynch, and highly detract it to critics of David Lynch.
Great take on the zombie genre, although I thought it fizzled out in the last 1/3 of the movie. Still well worth a viewing for fans of the genre.
The Grey:
Been passing by this one, but when listening to podcasts this week of top movies of 2012 it kept showing up, so I thought I'd finally give it a try. I ended up really liking this one. I didn't take it as man vs. wild, I took it as man vs. himself and his willingness to take on death. Sure the wolves looked a little silly, and the men did a couple of dumb things, but for my money that was secondary to the inner struggles. I am sure I am not the first to bring it up, but:
I started wondering how much was in his head anyway. Either he was dying from the crash and was in limbo (was very jump cut from him and his wife to the crash site - which he was oddly far away from), or based on all the flashbacks and showing them in the hospital at the end maybe he was in the hospital the whole time.
Either way, I really liked the movie but think it was really poorly marketed and could see why there was a lot of disappointment. If I remember right, there was a big difference in ratings from critics vs. Joe viewer - 20% or so.
The Divide:
Nuclear blast happens, people manage to get into their apartment's basement before the super closes the door, and all hell breaks loose. How I watched the last 1/2 of the movie: :X
I had similar thoughts as you did in your spoiler about The Grey.
Great pic. Can't remember who Howard Stern interviewed but some former mafioso said this was the most accurate depiction of what the "life" is really like.
Great pic. Can't remember who Howard Stern interviewed but some former mafioso said this was the most accurate depiction of what the "life" is really like.
Great pic. Can't remember who Howard Stern interviewed but some former mafioso said this was the most accurate depiction of what the "life" is really like.
Great pic. Can't remember who Howard Stern interviewed but some former mafioso said this was the most accurate depiction of what the "life" is really like.
Great pic. Can't remember who Howard Stern interviewed but some former mafioso said this was the most accurate depiction of what the "life" is really like.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.