El Floppo
Footballguy
I saw it in the theater in 3d... agree with everything you're saying here. I felt like it was a solid movie- beautifully directed and acted and kept moving right along, only suffering from it's preposterously eye-rolling escapes- but I guess that was the point of the movie, soKarmaPolice said:Gravity:
I have sooo many conflicting emotions about this movie. First of all, I will fully admit that I whiffed on this one and it really needs to be seen on the biggest screen with the best sound possible. You need to immerse yourself in this one. Why I didn't trust my gut and go see this in 3D when it came out I don't know.
My conflicts:
1. The camera work was great - there was a fantastic 12-15min opening shot that had amazing movement/switching POVs. However, it is mostly CGI, so I battle with comparing that to this other great long takes in Children of Men. It doesn't stack up because you have so many more variables when you have to coordinate actors, cameras, etc.. it increases the difficulty a bit more.
2. I fully expected to be annoyed by Bullock and I usually like Clooney, but the opposite happened for me.
3. I was very ballsy in it's choice of hardly any sound besides the soundtrack. Impressive to stick with your guns an design it so it would mimic what it might sound like in that situation. However, sometimes that put the focus on the soundtrack more than normal and does give you extended periods of just listening to Sandra breathing heavily.
4. Sometimes it really trusted the audience and their intelligence - the choice of sound, sometimes the way they expertly showed something in a different way that might have meaning vs. sometimes they beat you over the head with some dialogue or symbolism and made it seem amateurish.
5. Does a visual spectacle alone make it a great movie that should be praised so heavily, or did it lack too many things in the plot, dialogue, etc to make it a great movie?
In the end, I think the overall experience definitely outweighed my nitpicks. I was watching it on a pretty crappy setup and was still at the edge of my seat. I would put this in the realm of Avatar - IMO more of a movie experience and less a great movie. However, I think the technical talent of this movie >>> Avatar. Camera work, sound design, etc.. were amazing. In the end, no matter what I think of them, these are the kind of movies that I would love to see make a ton of money in the theater. I have had enough of fighting robots and superheroes and would like movies like Gravity and Inception make money and start seeping into the summer blockbuster season. 7.5/10
the 3d, though, was spectacular. most movies take more of the Avatar approach to immerse you spatially in what's going on (the whole point of using 3d)- which is that they include a bunch of subtle atmospherics (dust, falling leaves, petals, whatever) to wrap you in the space along with lots of stuff jumping out at you or falling away from you to make sure you haven't missed that, yes, this is a 3d movie. This movie used those things, but really took advantage of it's setting- space- to really give the viewer the contrassting feelings of claustrophobia in the tight spaces of the ships and capsules and the infinite expanse of space itself (always having objects near, middle and far to get that sense of infinite scale).
I think this and Avatar are the gold standards of the medium, but special props to Gravity for using it in a much more profound way (to me).
Last edited by a moderator: