What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (9 Viewers)

Rented Cloverfield last night. Barely made it 15 minutes before feeling motion sick.

Shut it off in hopes of finishing it maybe this weekend. Is the entire movie that shaky??

 
American Gangster - wasn't particularly excited to see this one until I remembered Russell Crowe was in it. Solid flick, solid performances. I don't know if it is the fact that they give Russell Crowe easy roles for him to play that fit him naturally, or if he is just that good, but I can't think of a movie or performance of his I didn't like. Just sells whatever character is given to him.
Speaking of Russell Crowe, I finally got around to watching Cinderella Man last night. Great movie. Great story. Great cinematography. Great acting. Crowe was great as usual, and I loved Paul Giamatti in this one. I don't know why it took me so long to see this - guess it's just one of those movies that fell through the cracks of my rental history.Also watched True Romance again this weekend. Such an entertaining movie. Say what you will about Tarrantino, but he can write some great dialog.

 
Rented Cloverfield last night. Barely made it 15 minutes before feeling motion sick.

Shut it off in hopes of finishing it maybe this weekend. Is the entire movie that shaky??
:mellow:
Does it get "better"?I think what was affecting me most was the quick, close up motions. Flipping between people at the party, etc.

Does that continue?
Gets worse. The party part is the "easy" part. When they start running around the streets it really gets "moving".

I don't get motion sickness at all so it didn't bother me

I saw it at the theater and saw more than one person leave part way through the movie looking like this guy>> :)

 
Speaking of Russell Crowe, I finally got around to watching Cinderella Man last night. Great movie. Great story. Great cinematography. Great acting. Crowe was great as usual, and I loved Paul Giamatti in this one. I don't know why it took me so long to see this - guess it's just one of those movies that fell through the cracks of my rental history.
Cinderella Man didn't get nearly the love it deserved.There are a ton of inspirational quotes to take from that one:

Jim Braddock: I have to believe that when things are bad I can change them.

Jim Braddock: I didn't always lose. I won't always lose again.

Reporter: Bob Johnson, Boston Globe. Two days ago, we ran a story about you giving your relief money back. Can you tell our readers why?

Jim Braddock: I believe we live in a great country, a country that's great enough to help a man financially when he's in trouble. But lately, I've had some good fortune, and I'm back in the black. And I just thought I should return it.

And Giamatti is great:

Joe Gould: Jesus H. Christ! Jesus Mary and Joseph! All the saints and martyrs and Jesus! Did I mention Jesus?

 
Looking forward to King of Kong.
I liked Little Dieter a lot. I hope I didn't spoil it for you.
Nah, I thought it was good. It was just that Touching the Void is such a high bar. Query: Did you see "Rescue Dawn" (the subsequent movie based on Little Deiter)? I have it on my queue, but don't know if it is worth seeing.
Haven't seen Rescue Dawn - though it was very well reviewed.
 
Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead: First of all, Marissa Tomei is worth the price of admission in this one. Add in Phillip Seymour Hoffman playing a complete ******* (How does a guy as fat as him get those veins to pop out on his forehead like that? How do you learn such a skill, or are you just born with it? )and this one is definitely worth seeing. The story is what I imagine Chevy Chase’s character would have written in Funny Farm if all his hick neighbors would have chilled out with all their shenanigans. The story of two brothers in financial trouble for different reasons looking to make a score. Ethan Hawke does a pretty good job too. The director is apparently 80 something years old, but his direction is something of a typical Indy film. I found it a bit distracting and tired (think Crash), but overall the film is good. I’d heard some chatter about how it should have been nominated for Best Picture. I don’t think I agree.

Juno: A cute, as cute as a story about a 16 year getting pregnant can be, film. Funny at times. I had a hard time buying a few of the characters though, specifically Juno and her cheerleader friend. They were too witty. Jason Bateman turns in a good, if creepy, performance. Too polished as an Indy. Not worthy of the Best Picture nomination in my opinion. Not as good as Little Miss Sunshine.

 
Rented Cloverfield last night. Barely made it 15 minutes before feeling motion sick.

Shut it off in hopes of finishing it maybe this weekend. Is the entire movie that shaky??
:pickle:
Does it get "better"?I think what was affecting me most was the quick, close up motions. Flipping between people at the party, etc.

Does that continue?
Gets worse. The party part is the "easy" part. When they start running around the streets it really gets "moving".

I don't get motion sickness at all so it didn't bother me

I saw it at the theater and saw more than one person leave part way through the movie looking like this guy>> :cry:
I had to look away- and I never get motion sick.But horrible jumpy video-cam aside- this is a painfully and embarrassingly bad movie. Well done monster effects, but the rest is pure caca.

 
For the Bible Tells Me So

This movie explores the ways that the Bible is used to attack homosexuality. It focuses on about 5 or 6 Christian families whose lives were turned upside down by a family member being gay. It doesn't have enough creepy, Bible thumpers in it to laugh at but it's still a great documentary. 4 out of 5 chigurhs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"hidden fortress" by kurosawa last night. i liked it even though it was one of his more straightforward films. it didn't have much of the psychological or personal drama that can be found in other films like "rashomon", "throne of blood" or "yojimbo". george lucas owes a serious debt to kurosawa for this film. toshiro mifune is still a bad ###. i think i have "the bad sleep well" in the netflix queue left.

planning to watch polanski's "knife in the water" and soderbergh's indie "bubble" this weekend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead: First of all, Marissa Tomei is worth the price of admission in this one. Add in Phillip Seymour Hoffman playing a complete ******* (How does a guy as fat as him get those veins to pop out on his forehead like that? How do you learn such a skill, or are you just born with it? )and this one is definitely worth seeing. The story is what I imagine Chevy Chase’s character would have written in Funny Farm if all his hick neighbors would have chilled out with all their shenanigans. The story of two brothers in financial trouble for different reasons looking to make a score. Ethan Hawke does a pretty good job too. The director is apparently 80 something years old, but his direction is something of a typical Indy film. I found it a bit distracting and tired (think Crash), but overall the film is good. I’d heard some chatter about how it should have been nominated for Best Picture. I don’t think I agree.
Just watched this one last night as well. Liked it, kept me interested, very good acting, but nothing spectacular. 4/5
 
"hidden fortress" by kurosawa last night. i liked it even though it was one of his more straightforward films. it didn't have much of the psychological or personal drama that can be found in other films like "rashomon", "throne of blood" or "yojimbo". george lucas owes a serious debt to kurosawa for this film. toshiro mifune is still a bad ###. i think i have "the bad sleep well" in the netflix queue left.
George Lucas should be sued for plagiarism. Why he gets to say that he's "paying homage" rather than "stealing" is beyond me.
 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :obc:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :wub:
this is one of my favorite movies. i think it is really well done. nolte was superb in that role. just superb. coburn was fine but i think the nolte carried that film. the familial and interpersonal dynamics within the film - as in the novel - are brutally honest.
 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :lmao:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
Speed Racer looks atrocious.
 
Watched In the Valley of Elah last night. I liked it because I love TLJ, but I am not a big fan of how the director made his political statement. The ending fizzled a little, and the flag thing at the end was as subtle as a sledgehammer - plus you saw it coming from the very beginning of the movie.

 
Sweeney Todd: Usual whimiscal,macabre tale that you would expect from Tim Burton with a musical twist. It was a pretty fun film to watch. The songs were distracting at time, especially Helena Bonham Carter's. I'm glad I watched it. 3/5
 
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead: First of all, Marissa Tomei is worth the price of admission in this one. Add in Phillip Seymour Hoffman playing a complete ******* (How does a guy as fat as him get those veins to pop out on his forehead like that? How do you learn such a skill, or are you just born with it? )and this one is definitely worth seeing. The story is what I imagine Chevy Chase's character would have written in Funny Farm if all his hick neighbors would have chilled out with all their shenanigans. The story of two brothers in financial trouble for different reasons looking to make a score. Ethan Hawke does a pretty good job too. The director is apparently 80 something years old, but his direction is something of a typical Indy film. I found it a bit distracting and tired (think Crash), but overall the film is good. I'd heard some chatter about how it should have been nominated for Best Picture. I don't think I agree.
I agree with pretty much all of that.
 
"hidden fortress" by kurosawa last night. i liked it even though it was one of his more straightforward films. it didn't have much of the psychological or personal drama that can be found in other films like "rashomon", "throne of blood" or "yojimbo". george lucas owes a serious debt to kurosawa for this film. toshiro mifune is still a bad ###. i think i have "the bad sleep well" in the netflix queue left.

planning to watch polanski's "knife in the water" and soderbergh's indie "bubble" this weekend.
The Hidden Fortress was a sweet flick.
 
Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :lmao:
this is one of my favorite movies. i think it is really well done. nolte was superb in that role. just superb. coburn was fine but i think the nolte carried that film. the familial and interpersonal dynamics within the film - as in the novel - are brutally honest.
I wouldn't watch it again, but I liked it a lot.
 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :lmao:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
Speed Racer looks atrocious.
Unwatchable.
 
Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :banned:
this is one of my favorite movies. i think it is really well done. nolte was superb in that role. just superb. coburn was fine but i think the nolte carried that film. the familial and interpersonal dynamics within the film - as in the novel - are brutally honest.
I wouldn't watch it again, but I liked it a lot.
the scene near the end where nolte uses the pliers to remove the rotten tooth is absolutely chilling. the look in his eyes!banks and schrader - no surprises there - get the personalities right. every character, every relationship is spot on. it's fantastic.

 
OK, so last night I watched The Bridge in part so that El Floppo (or maybe it was Sweet J) would have someone with whom to talk about it.

This movie really pissed me off.

What should/could have been an interesting documentary about why people are attracted to the Golden Gate Bridge as a suicide locale, or why the bridge isn't protected from such attempts, or how the people who fish these folks out of the water deal with their jobs, or simply an in-depth look at suicide and mental illness, was instead what appeared to be just a way to appeal to the basest and most prurient instincts we might have. Don't get me wrong--the documentary was compelling and kept me completely rapt, but I felt like there was no good reason that it should have been made. It was a horribly superficial look at mental illness, meant only to titillate. And watching people hurl themselves off a bridge is...well, I certainly shouldn't have watched this right before bed.

I also thought there was some very questionable musical selections--parts that were a bit too upbeat for the situation, or in some cases simply too earnest.

The cinematography of the bridge and juxtaposition of tourist and happy folks enjoying it with those who choose to end their lives there were very well done.

Can't recommend this to anyone unless you just like watching horribly troubled people kill themselves. 1/5

 
Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :goodposting:
this is one of my favorite movies. i think it is really well done. nolte was superb in that role. just superb. coburn was fine but i think the nolte carried that film. the familial and interpersonal dynamics within the film - as in the novel - are brutally honest.
I wouldn't watch it again, but I liked it a lot.
the scene near the end where nolte uses the pliers to remove the rotten tooth is absolutely chilling. the look in his eyes!banks and schrader - no surprises there - get the personalities right. every character, every relationship is spot on. it's fantastic.
No doubt. Favorite memory for me from that film: that sweet Christian lady quotes scripture to Coburn, and he yells, "Ahhhh go #### yourself."
 
krista4 said:
OK, so last night I watched The Bridge in part so that El Floppo (or maybe it was Sweet J) would have someone with whom to talk about it.

This movie really pissed me off.

What should/could have been an interesting documentary about why people are attracted to the Golden Gate Bridge as a suicide locale, or why the bridge isn't protected from such attempts, or how the people who fish these folks out of the water deal with their jobs, or simply an in-depth look at suicide and mental illness, was instead what appeared to be just a way to appeal to the basest and most prurient instincts we might have. Don't get me wrong--the documentary was compelling and kept me completely rapt, but I felt like there was no good reason that it should have been made. It was a horribly superficial look at mental illness, meant only to titillate. And watching people hurl themselves off a bridge is...well, I certainly shouldn't have watched this right before bed.

I also thought there was some very questionable musical selections--parts that were a bit too upbeat for the situation, or in some cases simply too earnest.

The cinematography of the bridge and juxtaposition of tourist and happy folks enjoying it with those who choose to end their lives there were very well done.

Can't recommend this to anyone unless you just like watching horribly troubled people kill themselves. 1/5
Yeah... that was me.I actually liked that it didn't get too much more than a lay-perspective into the mental illness. Certainly couldve gone further in depth into bi-polar disorder (the leitmotif of those killing themselves), but he seemed to make a conscious decision to just keep with the families and their perspectives, which is a more personal, less clinical approach. But I hear ya on feeling like it was an avenue that could/should've been explored, considering that leitmotif.

I think the director made the movie as a response to an article about how easy it is to jump from there, and how it has become a suicide mecca, of sorts (IIRC, it was a New Yorker article). IIRC, he started the project as a protest effort to try and get the fence built, and then it turned into what it became.

You are dead on about the music... but it almost seems like ANY music would be inapprorpirate for that movie.

I seem to recall that my main objection upon watching it was how much direction/editing went into it- particularly with the long-haired "featured actor" jumper. The pacing felt almost like a thriller... which also felt somehow inappropriate, yet still worked to tell the story.

I don't kow that I'd recommend it to anybody other than you lot- and even then only so I had somebody to discuss it with... very, very disturbing movie.

 
krista4 said:
OK, so last night I watched The Bridge in part so that El Floppo (or maybe it was Sweet J) would have someone with whom to talk about it.

This movie really pissed me off.

What should/could have been an interesting documentary about why people are attracted to the Golden Gate Bridge as a suicide locale, or why the bridge isn't protected from such attempts, or how the people who fish these folks out of the water deal with their jobs, or simply an in-depth look at suicide and mental illness, was instead what appeared to be just a way to appeal to the basest and most prurient instincts we might have. Don't get me wrong--the documentary was compelling and kept me completely rapt, but I felt like there was no good reason that it should have been made. It was a horribly superficial look at mental illness, meant only to titillate. And watching people hurl themselves off a bridge is...well, I certainly shouldn't have watched this right before bed.

I also thought there was some very questionable musical selections--parts that were a bit too upbeat for the situation, or in some cases simply too earnest.

The cinematography of the bridge and juxtaposition of tourist and happy folks enjoying it with those who choose to end their lives there were very well done.

Can't recommend this to anyone unless you just like watching horribly troubled people kill themselves. 1/5
Yeah... that was me.I actually liked that it didn't get too much more than a lay-perspective into the mental illness. Certainly couldve gone further in depth into bi-polar disorder (the leitmotif of those killing themselves), but he seemed to make a conscious decision to just keep with the families and their perspectives, which is a more personal, less clinical approach. But I hear ya on feeling like it was an avenue that could/should've been explored, considering that leitmotif.

I think the director made the movie as a response to an article about how easy it is to jump from there, and how it has become a suicide mecca, of sorts (IIRC, it was a New Yorker article). IIRC, he started the project as a protest effort to try and get the fence built, and then it turned into what it became.

You are dead on about the music... but it almost seems like ANY music would be inapprorpirate for that movie.



I seem to recall that my main objection upon watching it was how much direction/editing went into it- particularly with the long-haired "featured actor" jumper. The pacing felt almost like a thriller... which also felt somehow inappropriate, yet still worked to tell the story.

I don't kow that I'd recommend it to anybody other than you lot- and even then only so I had somebody to discuss it with... very, very disturbing movie.
The bold is an extremely good point, and I completely agree.If they started this as an argument for putting up a fence, it's interesting that they never once mention that notion in the movie. And that was something that I wanted them to talk about--are people trying to get a fence up, what are the objections against it (aesthetic, I assume), etc. To me, that would have made for a good movie rather than one that just served to be disturbing.

 
Last night caught 28 Weeks Later. I love movies about human extinction and the ultimate battle for survival. Was filmed in much the manner as 28 days. Jumpy, gritty video. It was entertaining, but there were a lot of wholes in the plot that I couldn't get over. Some of the scenes were flat out campy in the degree of gore they showed.

Overall, I'll prolly watch it again in 6 or so months. I'll give it 3/5 derricks.

 
OK, so last night I watched The Bridge in part so that El Floppo (or maybe it was Sweet J) would have someone with whom to talk about it.

This movie really pissed me off.

What should/could have been an interesting documentary about why people are attracted to the Golden Gate Bridge as a suicide locale, or why the bridge isn't protected from such attempts, or how the people who fish these folks out of the water deal with their jobs, or simply an in-depth look at suicide and mental illness, was instead what appeared to be just a way to appeal to the basest and most prurient instincts we might have. Don't get me wrong--the documentary was compelling and kept me completely rapt, but I felt like there was no good reason that it should have been made. It was a horribly superficial look at mental illness, meant only to titillate. And watching people hurl themselves off a bridge is...well, I certainly shouldn't have watched this right before bed.

I also thought there was some very questionable musical selections--parts that were a bit too upbeat for the situation, or in some cases simply too earnest.

The cinematography of the bridge and juxtaposition of tourist and happy folks enjoying it with those who choose to end their lives there were very well done.

Can't recommend this to anyone unless you just like watching horribly troubled people kill themselves. 1/5
Yeah... that was me.I actually liked that it didn't get too much more than a lay-perspective into the mental illness. Certainly couldve gone further in depth into bi-polar disorder (the leitmotif of those killing themselves), but he seemed to make a conscious decision to just keep with the families and their perspectives, which is a more personal, less clinical approach. But I hear ya on feeling like it was an avenue that could/should've been explored, considering that leitmotif.

I think the director made the movie as a response to an article about how easy it is to jump from there, and how it has become a suicide mecca, of sorts (IIRC, it was a New Yorker article). IIRC, he started the project as a protest effort to try and get the fence built, and then it turned into what it became.

You are dead on about the music... but it almost seems like ANY music would be inapprorpirate for that movie.



I seem to recall that my main objection upon watching it was how much direction/editing went into it- particularly with the long-haired "featured actor" jumper. The pacing felt almost like a thriller... which also felt somehow inappropriate, yet still worked to tell the story.

I don't kow that I'd recommend it to anybody other than you lot- and even then only so I had somebody to discuss it with... very, very disturbing movie.
The bold is an extremely good point, and I completely agree.If they started this as an argument for putting up a fence, it's interesting that they never once mention that notion in the movie. And that was something that I wanted them to talk about--are people trying to get a fence up, what are the objections against it (aesthetic, I assume), etc. To me, that would have made for a good movie rather than one that just served to be disturbing.
I guess now that were talking about it, I don't mind that the movie focused on the families and jumpers without going too much, if at all, into the larger picture. It felt more like a documentary than a polemic... which I like- kind of anti-Michael Moore. It just bordered, or breached, sensationalizing the jumps- particularly the goth's. That's something that might have been hard to avoid given the topic, but the direction- albeit well-worked- contributed to that, and that was my main sticking point.But again- I begrudge nobody for not like liking the movie... it's a tough one.

fwiw- I grew up in the town on the other side of the GG Bridge and know of at least two of my peers who have jumped to their deaths from it.

 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :mellow:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
You've never seen Beautiful Girls?One of my all-time favorites. :goodposting: :thumbup:

 
Walk Hard: Dewey Cox -- This was really bad. I thought it was going to be like a Wil Farrell movie but instead it was like a bad Naked Gun or Airplane or something. It wasn't funny at all. I didn't even finish it.

 
street kings - 4/5

anamorph - 4/5

vexille - 3/5

no blood no tears - 4/5

bank job - 4/5

vantage point - 4/5

 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :thumbup:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
You've never seen Beautiful Girls?One of my all-time favorites. :thumbdown: :thumbup:
Nope, never watched it. I think the title threw me off or I kept thinking it was that Now and Then movie with Rosie O'donnell, etc... I'll get to this movie very soon though.
 
Walk Hard: Dewey Cox -- This was really bad. I thought it was going to be like a Wil Farrell movie but instead it was like a bad Naked Gun or Airplane or something. It wasn't funny at all. I didn't even finish it.
Actually a movie I was looking forward to and it was really, really bad. Seemed like one long SNL skit (with alot more male junk shown than I needed to see). Cloverfield is good for what it is. I liked it.I looked forward to the DVD hoping for some insight as to monster. The people complaining about the jumping are probably the same people complaining about there being too much violence in a Rambo flick.
 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :shrug:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
You've never seen Beautiful Girls?One of my all-time favorites. :thumbdown: :scared:
Nope, never watched it. I think the title threw me off or I kept thinking it was that Now and Then movie with Rosie O'donnell, etc... I'll get to this movie very soon though.
Prepare to fall mildly in love with a 15-year-old Natalie Portman.
 
Caught Cloverfield last night. Good, not great but was entertained. At least I appreciate what they were trying to do if nothing else. The guy behind the camera was a doosh and needed to go though.

Watched Affliction a couple days ago. Again a good, but not great movie. There was some great acting in the movie turned in by Nolte and Coburn but the story dragged and the ending was :hot:

On some of the DVDs I've been watching the movie previews. IMO the new Indiana Jones looks terrible. It's no secret that I hate the over use of CGI and I was getting annoyed in the 45sec. preview because of it. Kinda like the Die Hard movie - probably have to spruce it up and make it look fancy for the new wave of fans and their demographic, but it annoys grumpy old farts like me. Also, the Speed Racer movie looks absolutely stupid.

ETA: going to try and stop watching 90210 on DVD long enough to watch a couple of the movies that have been shipped or I get today at the store. Have Paths of Glory, Beautiful Girls, and Diving Bell and the Butterfly on deck this weekend.
You've never seen Beautiful Girls?One of my all-time favorites. :blackdot: :hophead:
Nope, never watched it. I think the title threw me off or I kept thinking it was that Now and Then movie with Rosie O'donnell, etc... I'll get to this movie very soon though.
Prepare to fall mildly in love with a 15-year-old Natalie Portman.
Watched this last night. IMO good, not great. Was pleasantly surprised, but based on some of the comments here I was expecting a funnier movie. Couple laugh out loud moments, but mostly was most taken by Portman's character like you said above. Also watched Paths of Glory. Also a good movie. Not the most subtle anti-war movie ever, but still damn good and a classic Kubrick. I hate to admit this, but I do still have problems watching older movies sometimes b/c I tend to chuckle at the acting.

 
Rented "Before the devil knows your dead".. Actually enjoyed it more than "No country for old men".

Ms. Tomei in her Birthday suit A LOT didn't disappoint :(

But I also enjoyed the story angle of showing different parts of the story from different points of view and thought the story itself was interesting and well done.
I liked NOFOM more, but I think this was the 2nd best movie I saw for the 2007 releases. IMO it was better than TWBB, Michael Clayton, and Juno.
 
Over the weekend I watched Before the Devil Knows You're Dead and Lars and the Real Girl.

I thought Ryan Gosling was amazing in Lars and is quickly becoming the star actor of his generation. The movie was pretty good but it was sometimes a bit too silly for my taste. I think it had a really interesting premise that could have been amazing had it really explored in greater depth the things that caused his character to act the way he did. But it is definitely worth a rental if you like unique and quirky movies. 7/10

I wasn't as big of a fan of Before the Devil Knows You're Dead. The acting was very good, although Ethan Hawke's overacting really annoys me at times. I didn't like the way it played with the chronology of the story because I didn't see a really good use for it. I love movies that play with chronology when it adds to the storytelling (Memento) or when it does so in such a unique way (Pulp Fiction). I found that in this case they did it in order to jazz up a pretty standard caper-gone-wrong story. There is no need to show scenes twice if the second time adds nothing new to the story or to the viewer's understanding of what is happening. It just felt gimmicky to me. Overall, it was still a pretty good flick but not even in the same ballpark as NCFOM or TWBB. Not even close. 6/10

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top