What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (4 Viewers)

Example: Kill Bill 1 & 2 References from IMDB:

Kill Bill 1

Some of these are a real stretch, but do you honestly want to still call this original material?
Prettttttttttty sure he has fully acknowledged that it's an homage to films he loves. I must have missed the Vanilla Ice moment."There's goes dah dah dah ding ding ding ding ding. Mine goes dah dah dah ding ding dingding ding. See, that little change." :rolleyes:

Whatever. Enjoy your Hollywood suckfests.
Yeah, I've just been sitting here pimping Transporter 3 this whole thread, be sure to check it out. :rolleyes: "homage" and stealing scenes and camera angles are two completely different things, the worst part is that he always seems to think his way is so much "cooler", I said I'm a fan of his work when he takes it down a notch and focuses on a story and not something that "looks cool".
:homer: Would love it if we didn't turn this into an imdb thread. I love these discussions in this thread because they don't usually end up with the - "Well, you didn't like Kill Bill so you must like Never Back Down" comments.

 
Not sure if this was mentioned.

Watched "We Own the Night" - Mark Walhberg, Jaquin Phoenix, Robert Duval. Pretty solid popcorn flick. A bit predictable but over all decent.

Plus you get to see Eva Mendes boob
I consider Hollywood blockbuster movies popcorn flicks, but I guess if you wanna stretch this out a bit you could maybe call it one.That said, I really enjoyed this movie. Great acting all around (esp by Phoenix), and I thought the lighting, cinematography, background was excellent. I think its safe to assume family first, so that was predictable, but other than that I didnt really find it so predictable that it took anything away from everything else
Good point. I really enjoyed it as well. And when I say predictable I meant more like nothing really caught me off guard. I was hoping for some twist that didn't really come. I was just reading into the movie I guess.

 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
:thumbup:

Was just having this discussion/argument about those two with a friend a couple months ago. He blasted me because I said something on the lines of: I have trouble watching their stuff anymore b/c it seems to me they are just putting stuff together so they can watch it at home and masterbate to just how cool they think they are. Seems like all the critical acclaim has gone to their heads (I guess mostly Tarantino- not sure how "critically acclaimed" Rodriguez is).
I disagree. I think they are both at a point in their careers where they can make exactly the movies THEY want to make, not what Hollywood wants to make. Personally, I don't think big Hollywood could have an original idea if their lives depended on it. And there's Tarantino and Rodriguez, who can make contemporary samurai movies, or throwbacks to 70's grindhouse cinema, or whatever they want. And frankly, I applaud them for it, and enjoy their movies very much. You don't see either one of them remaking Halloween, or whatever Asian horror film is the latest to come along.
I do agree with you to a point. It's cool to be at that point in your career that you can do what you want, and I do respect them for making those movies. There's a difference between respecting them for doing the Grindhouse movies and actually enjoying them. Part of it might be b/c I get tired of people swinging from their junk (mostly Tarantino here) and thinking he's a God. Too many fan boys out there, and I would argue that's he's made 2 1/2 good or great movies. There are directors out there that I think are great and have to watch any movie they put out - Tarantino's not one of them anymore. Enjoy listening to him and his love for movies, and he can write great dialog, but to me the last couple movies have just felt like he thinks he's 10x cooler than he is and it comes across on the screen to me. Also be that I have little interest in cheesy kung fu, spaghetti western, 70s grindhouse movies. On your last comment - sure it's a step up from remaking horror movies. Not sure if it qualifies as original movie making just because it hasn't been done for 30 years. Not like they creating something original, they are just doing movies that nobody's paid attention to for years and so it looks original.
I can see that, and respect your opinion. And yes, as with anything, there are too many fan boys out there. I, however, lurve samurai movies and much like the spaghetti westerns, so I skeeted a little bit over Kill Bill.
 
25th Hour

I've been wanting to watch this one for years and finally had opportunity last night to view. Hmmm. I don't get why Spike Lee must make a point to go off on a racial/ethnic slur fest in every movie he makes. Honestly, it sucks. It was fine in "Do the Right Thing", but holy crap do you need to hit the hammer on this thing over, and over and over and over and over and over and ugh. Just make your movie, if you want to pout a bit so be it. I know, if I don't want to hear your poor spike lee argument, don't watch his movies. That's fine, but if it's free, I'll queue it up. I'm never going to make it a point to spend my money on another spike lee joint ever again. I think he's a pretty decent movie maker, over rated, but at least different from the norm. But until he can get over himself just a little bit, his movies are never going to be great. This one was okay, couple of parts were decent, couple of parts weren't so good. I'm not going to rate it. Just felt like venting :thumbup:

 
Holiday yesterday so lots of movie watching:

Memento: Good movie but I'm not sure I "got" what actually happened (ie. was he really Sammy? I think so..). If someone could explain it to me that would be great. I really liked how the movie was shot. I don't think I've seen anything like it. 3.5/5

The Machinist: Bale is quickly becoming my favorite actor. This movie really reminded me of Fight Club; which is a good thing. Did he really lose all that weight for the film or was it effects? 3.5/5

Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5

 
Holiday yesterday so lots of movie watching:

Memento: Good movie but I'm not sure I "got" what actually happened (ie. was he really Sammy? I think so..). If someone could explain it to me that would be great. I really liked how the movie was shot. I don't think I've seen anything like it. 3.5/5

The Machinist: Bale is quickly becoming my favorite actor. This movie really reminded me of Fight Club; which is a good thing. Did he really lose all that weight for the film or was it effects? 3.5/5

Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
Memento Spoiler- Its been quite a few years since I've seen it:I agree completely with Bale being one of my favorites and he really did lose all that weight. It was right before Batman Begins so he had to put on like 70-90 lbs of mass immedietely after that for that role. Absolutely incredible to be able to mold your body like that and takes an incredible amount of discipline.

ETA: From IMDB:

The producers of the film claim that Christian Bale dropped from about 180 pounds in weight down to about 120 pounds in weight to make this film. They also claim that Bale actually wanted to drop down to 100 pounds, but that they would not let him go below 120 out of fear that his health could be in too much danger if he did. His diet consisted of one can of tuna and an apple per day. His 63-pound weight loss is said to be a record for any actor for a movie role. He regained the weight in time for his role in Batman Begins (2005).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holiday yesterday so lots of movie watching:

Memento: Good movie but I'm not sure I "got" what actually happened (ie. was he really Sammy? I think so..). If someone could explain it to me that would be great. I really liked how the movie was shot. I don't think I've seen anything like it. 3.5/5
Yes, everything before he received the blow to the head was still stored in his long-term memory. He knew who he was, he just couldn't retain information from events after the injury.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As recommended by jdoggydogg:

Bound By Honor: Blood In, Blood Out

To put it simply, if you enjoyed Scarface, you would enjoy this movie about Mexican prison gangs. Be warned that it is 3 hours long and took me a couple of sittings to get through it. Lots of familiar faces in small roles (Delroy Lindo, Ving Rhames, and Billy Bob Thornton all stand out). Lots of cheese acting and pretty much everything you could stuff into a movie of this genre. There is gang banging, armored truck robberies, car chases, overdoses, prison shankings, everything...

Only complaint is if you are going to have something that long to build the characters you could attach a more complete or dramatic ending to it. As long as your not expecting Godfather, fans of the genre will enjoy.

3.5/5

I will probably have to call a few people "milkweed" today to get it out of my system. Best part of the movie was a white guy playing the Mexican lead, kind of like an Italian playing a Puerto Rican, it shouldn't work, but it does.
This is one of my top 10 favorite films. Probably have seen it at least 30 times, and at times, my college roommate and I could go line for line for huge stretches of the movie. The latest version they have out added some scenes and it hurts the overall flow, but still really good.
 
A few days ago, I recommended Blue Planet:Seas of Life.

I bought its sister series, Planet Earth too. Both should be owned rather than rented. Amazon has the combined set for $76.99, usually $119.99.

http://www.amazon.com/Planet-Earth-Blue-Sp...t_tv_ep_opt_001

They will show you things never before captured on film, and it's all shot in HD and available on Blu-Ray too. Planet Earth took 5 years and cost $25 million to make.

There are 11 episodes of 50 minutes each and 10 minutes of bonus footage for each episode explaining how the images were captured.

One cameraman spent about three weeks in a hide to capture the mating dance of a Bird of Paradise.

Another took a precarious trip to photograph trees over 300 feet high and 5000 years old.

This series will move you. I found myself crying often at the sheer wonder of it all.

If I could afford it, I would send you all a copy.

Here is a brief description of each episode from the BBC:

Episode 1: From Pole to Pole

The lives of animals and plants are dominated by the sun and fresh water which trigger seasonal journeys. The latest technology and aerial photography enable the Planet Earth team to track some of the greatest mass migrations.

In the Arctic spring, a mother polar bear and cubs emerge from their winter den. They have just two weeks to cross the frozen sea before it melts and they become stranded. Share the most intimate and complete picture of polar bear life ever filmed. Further south, time-lapse cameras capture the annual transformation created by the Okavango floods.

Episode 2: Mountains

Tour the mightiest mountain ranges, starting with the birth of a mountain at one of the lowest places on Earth and ending at the summit of Everest.

One of Earth's rarest phenomena is a lava lake that has been erupting for over 100 years. The same forces built the Simian Mountains where troops of gelada baboons live, nearly a thousand strong. In the Rockies, grizzlies build winter dens inside avalanche-prone slopes. The programme also brings us astounding images of a snow leopard hunting on the Pakistan peaks, a world first.

Episode 3: Freshwater

Fresh water defines the distribution of life on land. Follow the descent of rivers from their mountain sources to the sea. Watch spectacular waterfalls, fly inside the Grand Canyon and explore the wildlife in the world's deepest lake.

Planet Earth captures unique and dramatic moments of animal behaviour: a showdown between smooth-coated otters and mugger crocodiles; deep-diving long tailed macaques; massive flocks of snow geese on the wing and a piranha frenzy in the perilous waters of the world's largest wetland.

Episode 4: Caves

The Cave of Swallows in Mexico is a 400m vertical shaft, deep enough to engulf the Empire State Building. The Lechuguilla cave system in the USA is 193km long with astonishing crystal formations.

Caves are remarkable habitats with equally bizarre wildlife. Cave angel fish cling to the walls behind waterfalls with microscopic hooks on their fins. Cave swiftlets navigate by echo-location and build nests out of saliva. The Texas cave salamander has neither eyes nor pigment. Planet Earth gets unique access to a hidden world of stalactites, stalagmites, snotites and troglodytes.

Episode 5: Deserts

Around 30% of the land's surface is desert, the most varied of our ecosystems despite the lack of rain. Saharan sandstorms reach nearly a mile high and desert rivers run for a single day.

In the Gobi Desert, rare Bactrian camels get moisture from the snow. In the Atacama, guanacos survive by licking dew off cactus spines. The brief blooming of Death Valley triggers a plague of locusts 65km wide and 160km long. A unique aerial voyage over the Namibian desert reveals elephants on a long trek for food and desert lions searching for wandering oryx.

Episode 6: Ice Worlds

The Arctic and Antarctic experience the most extreme seasons on Earth. Time-lapse cameras watch a colony of emperor penguins, transforming them into a single organism. The film reveals new science about the dynamics of emperor penguin behaviour.

In the north, unique aerial images show a polar bear swimming more than 100km. Diving for up to two minutes at a time. The exhausted polar bear later attacks a herd of walrus in a true clash of the Titans.

Episode 7: Great Plains

After filming for three years, Planet Earth finally captures the shy Mongolian gazelle. Only a handful of people have witnessed its annual migration. Don't miss the bizarre-looking Tibetan fox, captured on film for the first time.

Over six weeks the team follow a pride of 30 lions as they attempt to hunt elephants. Using the latest night vision equipment, the crew film the chaotic battles that ensue at close quarters.

Episode 8: Jungles

Jungles cover roughly three per cent of our planet yet contain 50 per cent of the world's species. High-definition cameras enable unprecedented views of animals living on the dark jungle floor.

In the Ngogo forest the largest chimpanzee group in the world defends its territory from neighbouring groups. Other jungle specialists include parasitic fungi which infiltrate an insect host, feed on it, and then burst out of its body.

Episode 9: Shallow Seas

A humpback whale mother and calf embark on an epic journey from tropical coral paradises to storm ravaged polar seas.

Newly discovered coral reefs in Indonesia reveal head-butting pygmy seahorses, flashing 'electric' clams and bands of sea kraits, 30-strong, which hunt in packs. Elsewhere plagues of sea urchins fell forests of giant kelp. Huge bull fur seals attack king penguins, who despite their weight disadvantage, put up a spirited defence.

Episode 10: Seasonal Forests

The Taiga forest, on the edge of the Arctic, is a silent world of stunted conifers. The trees may be small but filming from the air reveals its true scale. A third of all trees on Earth grow here and during the short summer they produce enough oxygen to change the atmosphere.

In California General Sherman, a giant sequoia, is the largest living thing on the planet, ten times the size of a blue whale. The oldest organisms alive are bristlecone pines. At more than 4,000 years old they pre-date the pyramids. But the baobab forests of Madagascar are perhaps the strangest of all.

Episode 11: Ocean Deep

Life goes to extraordinary lengths to survive this immense realm. A 30 tonne whale shark gorges on a school of fish and the unique overhead heli-gimbal camera reveals common dolphins rocketing at more than 30km an hour.

Descending into the abyss, deep sea octopus fly with wings and vampire squid use bioluminescence to create an extraordinary colour display. The first ever time-lapse footage taken from 2,000m down captures eels, crabs and giant isopods eating a carcass, completely consuming it within three hours.

Planet Earth – The Future

Three programmes look at the environmental problems facing our planet. Is future development sustainable, and can people and wildlife co-exist?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holiday yesterday so lots of movie watching:

Memento: Good movie but I'm not sure I "got" what actually happened (ie. was he really Sammy? I think so..). If someone could explain it to me that would be great. I really liked how the movie was shot. I don't think I've seen anything like it. 3.5/5
Yes, everything before he received the blow to the head was still stored in his long-term memory. He knew who he was, he just couldn't retain information from events after the injury.
I understood that part. Hooter cleared it up in his spoiler.
 
A few days ago, I recommended Blue Planet:Seas of Life.

I bought its sister series, Planet Earth too. Both should be owned rather than rented. Amazon has the combined set for $76.99, usually $119.99.

http://www.amazon.com/Planet-Earth-Blue-Sp...t_tv_ep_opt_001

They will show you things never before captured on film, and it's all shot in HD and available on Blue-Ray too. Planet Earth took 5 years and cost $25 million to make.

There are 11 episodes of 50 minutes each and 10 minutes of bonus footage for each episode explaining how the images were captured.

One cameraman spent about three weeks in a hide to capture the mating dance of a Bird of Paradise.

Another took a precarious trip to photograph trees over 300 feet high and 5000 years old.

This series will move you. I found myself crying often at the sheer wonder of it all.

If I could afford it, I would send you all a copy.

Here is a brief description of each episode from the BBC:

<Snip>
These are amazing. The shots they get are unfreakinbelievable.
 
A few days ago, I recommended Blue Planet:Seas of Life.

I bought its sister series, Planet Earth too. Both should be owned rather than rented. Amazon has the combined set for $76.99, usually $119.99.

http://www.amazon.com/Planet-Earth-Blue-Sp...t_tv_ep_opt_001

They will show you things never before captured on film, and it's all shot in HD and available on Blue-Ray too. Planet Earth took 5 years and cost $25 million to make.

There are 11 episodes of 50 minutes each and 10 minutes of bonus footage for each episode explaining how the images were captured.

One cameraman spent about three weeks in a hide to capture the mating dance of a Bird of Paradise.

Another took a precarious trip to photograph trees over 300 feet high and 5000 years old.

This series will move you. I found myself crying often at the sheer wonder of it all.

If I could afford it, I would send you all a copy.

Here is a brief description of each episode from the BBC:

<Snip>
These are amazing. The shots they get are unfreakinbelievable.
:goodposting:
 
A few days ago, I recommended Blue Planet:Seas of Life.

I bought its sister series, Planet Earth too. Both should be owned rather than rented. Amazon has the combined set for $76.99, usually $119.99.

http://www.amazon.com/Planet-Earth-Blue-Sp...t_tv_ep_opt_001

They will show you things never before captured on film, and it's all shot in HD and available on Blue-Ray too. Planet Earth took 5 years and cost $25 million to make.

There are 11 episodes of 50 minutes each and 10 minutes of bonus footage for each episode explaining how the images were captured.

One cameraman spent about three weeks in a hide to capture the mating dance of a Bird of Paradise.

Another took a precarious trip to photograph trees over 300 feet high and 5000 years old.

This series will move you. I found myself crying often at the sheer wonder of it all.

If I could afford it, I would send you all a copy.

Here is a brief description of each episode from the BBC:

<Snip>
These are amazing. The shots they get are unfreakinbelievable.
:goodposting:
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
 
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
Thanks.I remember seeing Attenborough's Life on Earth series when I was a kid.

I'll try to catch Power of the Planet too.

 
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
Thanks.I remember seeing Attenborough's Life on Earth series when I was a kid.

I'll try to catch Power of the Planet too.
Do you guys recommend these on DVD, or do you need Blu-Ray to truely appreciate them? I love nature stuff but if I take the time to watch them, I figured it might be best to wait until I have Blu-Ray so I can immerse myself in all their glory? Your descriptions make me really want to watch them soon though.
 
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
Thanks.I remember seeing Attenborough's Life on Earth series when I was a kid.

I'll try to catch Power of the Planet too.
Do you guys recommend these on DVD, or do you need Blu-Ray to truely appreciate them? I love nature stuff but if I take the time to watch them, I figured it might be best to wait until I have Blu-Ray so I can immerse myself in all their glory? Your descriptions make me really want to watch them soon though.
I downloaded them so they were just under DVD quality and were still absolutely amazing. I'd definitely recommend getting them in Blu-Ray if you are going to purchase them but either way they are great. I will be buying them in Blu-Ray once I get a player.
 
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
Thanks.I remember seeing Attenborough's Life on Earth series when I was a kid.

I'll try to catch Power of the Planet too.
Do you guys recommend these on DVD, or do you need Blu-Ray to truely appreciate them? I love nature stuff but if I take the time to watch them, I figured it might be best to wait until I have Blu-Ray so I can immerse myself in all their glory? Your descriptions make me really want to watch them soon though.
I don't have Blu-Ray so my set is just the regular DVD set. I watch on an HDTV and I can't imagine Blu-Ray discs being that much better. The regular images seem crystal clear to me.
 
Leatherheads - I found this movie horribly boring. Not a chance I waste my time watching it again.

Bra Boys - I liked this, but at the same time found it hard to think that I was getting a true documentary view of the surfers known as the Bra Boys and the brothers that lead them since the film was made/produced by one of those brothers.

 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
:shrug:

Was just having this discussion/argument about those two with a friend a couple months ago. He blasted me because I said something on the lines of: I have trouble watching their stuff anymore b/c it seems to me they are just putting stuff together so they can watch it at home and masterbate to just how cool they think they are. Seems like all the critical acclaim has gone to their heads (I guess mostly Tarantino- not sure how "critically acclaimed" Rodriguez is).
I disagree. I think they are both at a point in their careers where they can make exactly the movies THEY want to make, not what Hollywood wants to make. Personally, I don't think big Hollywood could have an original idea if their lives depended on it. And there's Tarantino and Rodriguez, who can make contemporary samurai movies, or throwbacks to 70's grindhouse cinema, or whatever they want. And frankly, I applaud them for it, and enjoy their movies very much. You don't see either one of them remaking Halloween, or whatever Asian horror film is the latest to come along.
I do agree with you to a point. It's cool to be at that point in your career that you can do what you want, and I do respect them for making those movies. There's a difference between respecting them for doing the Grindhouse movies and actually enjoying them. Part of it might be b/c I get tired of people swinging from their junk (mostly Tarantino here) and thinking he's a God. Too many fan boys out there, and I would argue that's he's made 2 1/2 good or great movies. There are directors out there that I think are great and have to watch any movie they put out - Tarantino's not one of them anymore. Enjoy listening to him and his love for movies, and he can write great dialog, but to me the last couple movies have just felt like he thinks he's 10x cooler than he is and it comes across on the screen to me. Also be that I have little interest in cheesy kung fu, spaghetti western, 70s grindhouse movies. On your last comment - sure it's a step up from remaking horror movies. Not sure if it qualifies as original movie making just because it hasn't been done for 30 years. Not like they creating something original, they are just doing movies that nobody's paid attention to for years and so it looks original.
I can see that, and respect your opinion. And yes, as with anything, there are too many fan boys out there. I, however, lurve samurai movies and much like the spaghetti westerns, so I skeeted a little bit over Kill Bill.
To be fair, I have come around on Kill Bill. I didn't like it at first (wasn't prepared for the blender full of genres that movie crammed in), but now like them a bit. Would enjoy them more if they were one movie, as I find KB 2 to be a little talky. Most of my annoyance was towards the Grindhouse movies - I thought they were pretty damn bad.
 
Holiday yesterday so lots of movie watching:

Memento: Good movie but I'm not sure I "got" what actually happened (ie. was he really Sammy? I think so..). If someone could explain it to me that would be great. I really liked how the movie was shot. I don't think I've seen anything like it. 3.5/5

The Machinist: Bale is quickly becoming my favorite actor. This movie really reminded me of Fight Club; which is a good thing. Did he really lose all that weight for the film or was it effects? 3.5/5

Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
Memento Spoiler- Its been quite a few years since I've seen it:I agree completely with Bale being one of my favorites and he really did lose all that weight. It was right before Batman Begins so he had to put on like 70-90 lbs of mass immedietely after that for that role. Absolutely incredible to be able to mold your body like that and takes an incredible amount of discipline.

ETA: From IMDB:

The producers of the film claim that Christian Bale dropped from about 180 pounds in weight down to about 120 pounds in weight to make this film. They also claim that Bale actually wanted to drop down to 100 pounds, but that they would not let him go below 120 out of fear that his health could be in too much danger if he did. His diet consisted of one can of tuna and an apple per day. His 63-pound weight loss is said to be a record for any actor for a movie role. He regained the weight in time for his role in Batman Begins (2005).
I thought I read somewhere that they also had to rework some of the fighting scenes for Batman because of the weight issue. Something on the lines that he gained the weight back, but wasn't in "fighting shape" so they couldn't do as many close fighting shots or had to use more doubles, etc. Didn't he lose a bit of weight for Rescue Dawn as well?

Good explanation of Memento too. I was just doing a list of my top 50 movies of the 00s, and that movie would probably be #1 or #2 on the list. One of the few movies that just blew me away when I saw it- just seemed like nothing I've seen before.

ETA: another Bale film that people pass over a bit is Equilibrium. recommend that movie to fans of sci-fi/ Matrix-y movies.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good explanation of Memento too. I was just doing a list of my top 50 movies of the 00s, and that movie would probably be #1 or #2 on the list. One of the few movies that just blew me away when I saw it- just seemed like nothing I've seen before.
:thumbup: I like the subtle comedy in Memento. Much better than the dumb comedies that try to make you laugh with every line.Good job of trying to make the viewer experience what the main character is going through too. An almost impossible task.
 
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
 
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt did a good job in Burn After Reading. Truly annoying.
 
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt did a good job in Burn After Reading. Truly annoying.
I consider him to be a an above-average actor. He was quirky in Fight Club, but not sure I could envision someone playing that role better. He was solid in Seven. His performance in The Assassination of Jesse James was understated but strong.
 
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
I don't think I've ever been disappointed in his acting. Mr & Mrs Smith was a horrid movie but even the best acting job in history couldn't have saved it so I can't pin it on him. He hasn't always picked the best movie to be in but he has always been good IMO ie. Oceans' Series: Only 11 was good but Pitt was good in all of them.
 
Hellfire Snail said:
Musesboy said:
KarmaPolice said:
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt did a good job in Burn After Reading. Truly annoying.
I consider him to be a an above-average actor. He was quirky in Fight Club, but not sure I could envision someone playing that role better. He was solid in Seven. His performance in The Assassination of Jesse James was understated but strong.
I agree that Pitt is much more than a pretty face, he doesn't usually portray characters that you can relate with, but rather characters that are larger than life or outside the box. When you watch a guy like Bale or Hanks it is usually very easy to relate to their characters and how they react. Pitt's characters are still very believable particularly Tyler Durden and Jesse James as well as in Legends of the Fall to a lesser extent but he always seems to be in his own little world. He won't ever win an oscar except maybe as a supporting character, but he is always enjoyable for me to watch.ETA: Johnny Depp is also in about the same mold as an actor, you usually can't see yourself in the situations and actions of his characters, yet you are intrigued by them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hellfire Snail said:
Musesboy said:
KarmaPolice said:
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt did a good job in Burn After Reading. Truly annoying.
I consider him to be a an above-average actor. He was quirky in Fight Club, but not sure I could envision someone playing that role better. He was solid in Seven. His performance in The Assassination of Jesse James was understated but strong.
I agree that Pitt is much more than a pretty face, he doesn't usually portray characters that you can relate with, but rather characters that are larger than life or outside the box. When you watch a guy like Bale or Hanks it is usually very easy to relate to their characters and how they react. Pitt's characters are still very believable particularly Tyler Durden and Jesse James as well as in Legends of the Fall to a lesser extent but he always seems to be in his own little world. He won't ever win an oscar except maybe as a supporting character, but he is always enjoyable for me to watch.ETA: Johnny Depp is also in about the same mold as an actor, you usually can't see yourself in the situations and actions of his characters, yet you are intrigued by them.
I enjoyed Pitt's performance in Meet Joe Black too.
 
By the way, if we're allowed to submit 1990s noir as "recent", I'm going with The Last Seduction (1994). Freakin' LOVE this movie.
fiorentino hasn't done better work. i also really enjoyed "red rock west". dwight yoakam practically steals the show in that film. i would also toss in "killing zoe" of that era.
I always say the same thing about Yoakam in Sling Blade. Isn't he incredible?
 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
Excellent post. But there's a huge difference between Tarantino and Rodriguez. Rodriguez made a cool-looking movie with Sin City. But mostly, he is an absolute hack. Tarantino's Jackie Brown is a singular work and Rodriguez hasn't made even a few moments in any of his movies that compare to Brown.
I can appreciate Rodriguez for the work he has done with next to nothing budgets. El Mariachi was a prime example, he made a movie for like $15,000. Similarly, Tarantino's best work was done on a $50,000 budgets. But when they got Hollywood size budgets they took it too far for me to be able to enjoy. Jackie Brown I liked because it was so low key and based on a very good Elmore Leonard novel, Taratino stuck the source material and didn't try to put too much of his "talky talky" into it, and it worked. Duvall was especially great.
DeNiro? Yeah, good movie.
 
You may also want to check out Power of the Planet. It is a 5 part BBC series (Volcano, Atmosphere, Oceans, Ice, Rare Earth) that has some just as amazing camera work.
Thanks.I remember seeing Attenborough's Life on Earth series when I was a kid.

I'll try to catch Power of the Planet too.
Do you guys recommend these on DVD, or do you need Blu-Ray to truely appreciate them? I love nature stuff but if I take the time to watch them, I figured it might be best to wait until I have Blu-Ray so I can immerse myself in all their glory? Your descriptions make me really want to watch them soon though.
I forgot to add that the Blu-Ray edition does not include any of the extras...
 
By the way, if we're allowed to submit 1990s noir as "recent", I'm going with The Last Seduction (1994). Freakin' LOVE this movie.
I was just about to say that if anyone knows about an underappreciated noir film, it would be you Krista, I'll have to check it out sometime.
That's a good recommendation.Did you ever seen the Coens' first movie Blood Simple? That's really good.
Of course I've seen Blood Simple, great, great movie and one of the reasons why I can't appreciate Fargo as much as other people. My only gripe is that I've never seen it available on dvd and its been years since I've seen it on VHS.
Blood Simple is out on DVD.
 
OK, I had to do it. Other good to great "recent" noir not yet named, many of them very well known of course: Blue Velvet, Mulholland Drive, Hard Eight, LA Confidential, The Usual Suspects, Mona Lisa (woefully underappreciated), Sexy Beast (might or might not be noir), A Simple Plan (might or might not be noir), The Limey (probably not noir but close enough to mention since I love this movie so much), Lantana (see "The Limey"), Bound, The Man Who Wasn't There, Devil in a Blue Dress (killer soundtrack), maybe some of the David Mamet stuff like House of Games if we can count that as noir.Please see all of these if you have not.
I've seen almost all of those and strongly concur. A Simple Plan was fantastic.
 
As recommended by jdoggydogg:

Bound By Honor: Blood In, Blood Out

To put it simply, if you enjoyed Scarface, you would enjoy this movie about Mexican prison gangs. Be warned that it is 3 hours long and took me a couple of sittings to get through it. Lots of familiar faces in small roles (Delroy Lindo, Ving Rhames, and Billy Bob Thornton all stand out). Lots of cheese acting and pretty much everything you could stuff into a movie of this genre. There is gang banging, armored truck robberies, car chases, overdoses, prison shankings, everything...

Only complaint is if you are going to have something that long to build the characters you could attach a more complete or dramatic ending to it. As long as your not expecting Godfather, fans of the genre will enjoy.

3.5/5

I will probably have to call a few people "milkweed" today to get it out of my system. Best part of the movie was a white guy playing the Mexican lead, kind of like an Italian playing a Puerto Rican, it shouldn't work, but it does.
This is an odd movie. With the cheesy dialogue and amateur actors, I just assumed it would stink. I think the reason this movie works is it seems like the actors and the director were really passionate about the movie. Earnest passion for art really covers up a lot of flaws in this case.
 
OK, I had to do it. Other good to great "recent" noir not yet named, many of them very well known of course: Blue Velvet, Mulholland Drive, Hard Eight, LA Confidential, The Usual Suspects, Mona Lisa (woefully underappreciated), Sexy Beast (might or might not be noir), A Simple Plan (might or might not be noir), The Limey (probably not noir but close enough to mention since I love this movie so much), Lantana (see "The Limey"), Bound, The Man Who Wasn't There, Devil in a Blue Dress (killer soundtrack), maybe some of the David Mamet stuff like House of Games if we can count that as noir.

Please see all of these if you have not.
those are all standouts even if they aren't truly noir, imo. some of those other Mamets that fit the bill are "The Spanish Prisoner" and "Heist".
I'm not a fan of The Spanish Prisoner, but I did like Heist a lot.
 
One recent film that teetered on the line of noir and noir parody was Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang, with Robert Downey JrReally enjoyed that one, as I do most stuff by RDJVal Kilmer with a great turn as a gay detective
Oustanding movie :lmao: Who knew the writer of Loaded Weapon had a movie like Kiss Kiss in him?
 
As recommended by jdoggydogg:

Bound By Honor: Blood In, Blood Out

To put it simply, if you enjoyed Scarface, you would enjoy this movie about Mexican prison gangs. Be warned that it is 3 hours long and took me a couple of sittings to get through it. Lots of familiar faces in small roles (Delroy Lindo, Ving Rhames, and Billy Bob Thornton all stand out). Lots of cheese acting and pretty much everything you could stuff into a movie of this genre. There is gang banging, armored truck robberies, car chases, overdoses, prison shankings, everything...

Only complaint is if you are going to have something that long to build the characters you could attach a more complete or dramatic ending to it. As long as your not expecting Godfather, fans of the genre will enjoy.

3.5/5

I will probably have to call a few people "milkweed" today to get it out of my system. Best part of the movie was a white guy playing the Mexican lead, kind of like an Italian playing a Puerto Rican, it shouldn't work, but it does.
This is one of my top 10 favorite films. Probably have seen it at least 30 times, and at times, my college roommate and I could go line for line for huge stretches of the movie. The latest version they have out added some scenes and it hurts the overall flow, but still really good.
:lmao: Vatos locos forever, jefe.

 
KarmaPolice said:
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt's a guy that gets a lot of unwarranted criticism, and I believe it's because he's good looking. Silly. Watch Pitt's cameo in True Romance, then watch him in Kalifornia. Those are about as diametrically-opposed roles as you will find. He is a fantastic actor.

 
A few over the past couple of days:

The Dead Girl: Man, this was dark and grim...which means I loved it! It's a five-part movie, with each part shown from the perspective of a different person, and you don't really understand how all five stories interrelate until well into the movie. The centerpiece of the movie is a dead girl (named Krista Ann :rolleyes: ), and her death impacts each of the other characters and their stories in ways that aren't immediately obvious. Imagine Crash or Babel, except done well. Underlying themes of grief, loss and connection are played out in an intelligent, adult fashion. Unbelievably well-acted. I'd like to watch this one again to take it all in more fully. Can't recommend it highly enough. 5/5

Conversations with Other Women: Slightly too fluffy piece starring Helena Bonham Carter and the always-creeps-me-out Aaron Eckhart as former lovers who meet unexpectedly (or maybe expectedly) at a wedding years later, and decide to have another romp. Expected more from this, and was pleased with some of the direction (interesting use of split-screen and flashes to the past) and early banter was good. But it devolved into just...so...much...talking. Fairly early in the movie the characters move to Carter's room in the hotel, where they proceed to talk, and talk, and talk, to the point where I kind of tuned out and asked my boyfriend, "Wait, have they actually had sex yet?" Really would work better as a play (wonder if maybe it was based on one?). Not bad--especially for the direction--but not worth running out to see, either. 3/5

Tokyo Story: Had never seen a Yasujiro Ozu film and thought I should since he is so renowned and has influenced many of my favorite filmmakers. Might as well start with this, considered his masterpiece. Meh. I can understand why he is admired, as the techniques he was using in the early 50s were groundbreaking at the time. But really, this movie just dragged on and on for me. There were some compelling moments and interesting shots, but far too few of them in a 2-1/4 hour movie. Hasn't held up over time like Kurasawa's movies have. 3/5

 
A Guide To Recognizing Your Saints...Very well done coming of age story set in 1980's New York......very depressing but excellent performances by Chazz Palmenteri, Robert Downy Jr. and Shia LeBeuf......
I just watched this. It is excellent. The acting is outstanding and the whole movie is terrific.
Wanted to see this for a long time, but never got around to it. 4.5/5, anyone who grew up with good friends that eventually went the wrong direction in life or you were lucky enough to take the right direction will have trouble holding back tears at some parts. My only complaint was that the main character/writer of the story went a little too far by leaving that long, but he definitely had his reasons. I loved the opening line "Everyone in this movie, I left." Downey was terrific in a very understated performance, he barely said a few words but his face told the whole story. Chazz also took it down a notch and was great. I even bought Shia as a young Downey who I normally can't stand.Extremely depressing and that actor that walks in the room the last 30 seconds of the movie was a major turnoff just seeing his face, but like I said, if you grew up with close friends as a kid and some of them went the wrong way in life, you need to watch this movie.
wow, never heard of it but added and moved it to the top. :lmao:edit: just checked out the trailer. Set in 1986, the year I started dating my wife (here in Queens)A turning point for me after some less than proud moments.Add to that some major headbutting between me and my late father and this might hit too close to home.Surprised I never heard of it before.
Literally 1 of my 3 favorite movies of the last 3 years...cant knock 1 thing about itYou see LeBeaof in Indiana Jones and wonder how the hell he got the part, you watch a movie like this and realize hes got some talent.The fact this movie is a true story makes it even that much more moving. I dont know how the last 30 seconds were a turnoff though. Eric Roberts was the perfect actor for the older Antonio, and that scene was pure brilliance. As was mentioned how it opens with Shia saying "Everyone in this movie, I left", the end where he dedicates the movie to Antonio is just as spine tingling.Absolutely loved this movie, everyone and their father and their dog should watch this movieIm back!, Back in NY Groove!...
 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
Excellent post. But there's a huge difference between Tarantino and Rodriguez. Rodriguez made a cool-looking movie with Sin City. But mostly, he is an absolute hack. Tarantino's Jackie Brown is a singular work and Rodriguez hasn't made even a few moments in any of his movies that compare to Brown.
Jackie Brown is quite easily my favorite movie from Tarantino and RR, so I disagree with Hooters' pre-Dawn statement.Considereing TMWWT is a Coen's movie, I thought it was pretty bad as far as noir's go and the Coen's worst movie that I can think of

 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
Excellent post. But there's a huge difference between Tarantino and Rodriguez. Rodriguez made a cool-looking movie with Sin City. But mostly, he is an absolute hack. Tarantino's Jackie Brown is a singular work and Rodriguez hasn't made even a few moments in any of his movies that compare to Brown.
Jackie Brown is quite easily my favorite movie from Tarantino and RR, so I disagree with Hooters' pre-Dawn statement.Considereing TMWWT is a Coen's movie, I thought it was pretty bad as far as noir's go and the Coen's worst movie that I can think of
Rodriguez had nothing to do with Jackie Brown.
 
By the way, if we're allowed to submit 1990s noir as "recent", I'm going with The Last Seduction (1994). Freakin' LOVE this movie.
fiorentino hasn't done better work. i also really enjoyed "red rock west". dwight yoakam practically steals the show in that film. i would also toss in "killing zoe" of that era.
:goodposting: Just stumbled onto this movie probably 8 or so years ago on a movie channel and absolutely loved it. Stoltz played that part to a tee

For a couple other underrated/overlooked noir-ish gems, ill go to krista's list with A Simple Plan and Hard Eight (possibly my favorite PTAnderson movie)

 
I can't take Sin City seriously, I liked everything with Mickey Rourke and the Clive Owen bits but the rest was meh to me. To me there is a subtle difference between "art" and "hey this would look sweet", which is why I can't handle barely any of Tarintino's or Rodriguez's work after From Dusk Till Dawn. They just try way to hard for me to appreciate in their self indulgence. The Man Who Wasn't There would be up there for me, as well as the Talented Mr. Ripley. But there has been a few hack jobs like The Black Dahlia and The Truth about Charlie remakes the last few years, then again they are remaking everything so it can be expected for a noir piece to pop up every now and then.
Excellent post. But there's a huge difference between Tarantino and Rodriguez. Rodriguez made a cool-looking movie with Sin City. But mostly, he is an absolute hack. Tarantino's Jackie Brown is a singular work and Rodriguez hasn't made even a few moments in any of his movies that compare to Brown.
Jackie Brown is quite easily my favorite movie from Tarantino and RR, so I disagree with Hooters' pre-Dawn statement.Considereing TMWWT is a Coen's movie, I thought it was pretty bad as far as noir's go and the Coen's worst movie that I can think of
Rodriguez had nothing to do with Jackie Brown.
Sorry....meant to have an "OR" in there, instead of "AND". But yeah, JB is my favorite from QT..Quite possibly every actor in there (Jackson, DeNiro, Forster, Fonda, Grier, etc) very likely gives the best performance theyve had in the last 10-12 years
 
A Guide To Recognizing Your Saints...

Very well done coming of age story set in 1980's New York......very depressing but excellent performances by Chazz Palmenteri, Robert Downy Jr. and Shia LeBeuf......
I just watched this. It is excellent. The acting is outstanding and the whole movie is terrific.
Wanted to see this for a long time, but never got around to it. 4.5/5, anyone who grew up with good friends that eventually went the wrong direction in life or you were lucky enough to take the right direction will have trouble holding back tears at some parts. My only complaint was that the main character/writer of the story went a little too far by leaving that long, but he definitely had his reasons. I loved the opening line "Everyone in this movie, I left." Downey was terrific in a very understated performance, he barely said a few words but his face told the whole story. Chazz also took it down a notch and was great. I even bought Shia as a young Downey who I normally can't stand.Extremely depressing and that actor that walks in the room the last 30 seconds of the movie was a major turnoff just seeing his face, but like I said, if you grew up with close friends as a kid and some of them went the wrong way in life, you need to watch this movie.
wow, never heard of it but added and moved it to the top. :thumbup: edit: just checked out the trailer. Set in 1986, the year I started dating my wife (here in Queens)

A turning point for me after some less than proud moments.

Add to that some major headbutting between me and my late father and this might hit too close to home.

Surprised I never heard of it before.
Literally 1 of my 3 favorite movies of the last 3 years...cant knock 1 thing about itYou see LeBeaof in Indiana Jones and wonder how the hell he got the part, you watch a movie like this and realize hes got some talent.

The fact this movie is a true story makes it even that much more moving. I dont know how the last 30 seconds were a turnoff though. Eric Roberts was the perfect actor for the older Antonio, and that scene was pure brilliance. As was mentioned how it opens with Shia saying "Everyone in this movie, I left", the end where he dedicates the movie to Antonio is just as spine tingling.

Absolutely loved this movie, everyone and their father and their dog should watch this movie

Im back!, Back in NY Groove!...
In the latest Maxim where they have the fake "post-mortem" interviews, they asked Shia which of his movies would be playing on repeat in heaven. Guide to Recognizing Your Saints was what he named, so at least he has that much going for him. I did really like the scene, as I have good friends from high school that are now in prison and also a couple that are passed away, and I'm only 24.
 
A few over the past couple of days:

The Dead Girl: Man, this was dark and grim...which means I loved it! It's a five-part movie, with each part shown from the perspective of a different person, and you don't really understand how all five stories interrelate until well into the movie. The centerpiece of the movie is a dead girl (named Krista Ann :thumbup: ), and her death impacts each of the other characters and their stories in ways that aren't immediately obvious. Imagine Crash or Babel, except done well. Underlying themes of grief, loss and connection are played out in an intelligent, adult fashion. Unbelievably well-acted. I'd like to watch this one again to take it all in more fully. Can't recommend it highly enough. 5/5
I liked this a good bit, but went in with very high expectations after reading reviews and hearing about it on top 10 lists and such a couple years back, but came away somewhat disappointed. Ill try to watch it again, but what I remember being most disappointed with was that the 1st 45-60 min was great how they went between the characters related stories, developed the characters, and kept the story really intriguing, but then it just felt like they had a contract to keep it under 90 minutes and the rest of the movie seemed really rushed and this took away from a lot of what was so good with the first 2/3rds.Does that make sense? I only saw it once, over a year ago, so I dont remember too many details, just that that was what I thought when it ended. Kind of like, "thats it?!"

 
A Guide To Recognizing Your Saints...

Very well done coming of age story set in 1980's New York......very depressing but excellent performances by Chazz Palmenteri, Robert Downy Jr. and Shia LeBeuf......
I just watched this. It is excellent. The acting is outstanding and the whole movie is terrific.
Wanted to see this for a long time, but never got around to it. 4.5/5, anyone who grew up with good friends that eventually went the wrong direction in life or you were lucky enough to take the right direction will have trouble holding back tears at some parts. My only complaint was that the main character/writer of the story went a little too far by leaving that long, but he definitely had his reasons. I loved the opening line "Everyone in this movie, I left." Downey was terrific in a very understated performance, he barely said a few words but his face told the whole story. Chazz also took it down a notch and was great. I even bought Shia as a young Downey who I normally can't stand.Extremely depressing and that actor that walks in the room the last 30 seconds of the movie was a major turnoff just seeing his face, but like I said, if you grew up with close friends as a kid and some of them went the wrong way in life, you need to watch this movie.
wow, never heard of it but added and moved it to the top. :lmao: edit: just checked out the trailer. Set in 1986, the year I started dating my wife (here in Queens)

A turning point for me after some less than proud moments.

Add to that some major headbutting between me and my late father and this might hit too close to home.

Surprised I never heard of it before.
Literally 1 of my 3 favorite movies of the last 3 years...cant knock 1 thing about itYou see LeBeaof in Indiana Jones and wonder how the hell he got the part, you watch a movie like this and realize hes got some talent.

The fact this movie is a true story makes it even that much more moving. I dont know how the last 30 seconds were a turnoff though. Eric Roberts was the perfect actor for the older Antonio, and that scene was pure brilliance. As was mentioned how it opens with Shia saying "Everyone in this movie, I left", the end where he dedicates the movie to Antonio is just as spine tingling.

Absolutely loved this movie, everyone and their father and their dog should watch this movie

Im back!, Back in NY Groove!...
In the latest Maxim where they have the fake "post-mortem" interviews, they asked Shia which of his movies would be playing on repeat in heaven. Guide to Recognizing Your Saints was what he named, so at least he has that much going for him. I did really like the scene, as I have good friends from high school that are now in prison and also a couple that are passed away, and I'm only 24.
I did see that in that Maxim...at least he realizes what a good movie it isAnd I never understood what Hollywood exec's wife Roberts stuck it to for him to go into TV actor oblivion. He either won or was nominated for best supporting actor in "Pope of Greenwich Village", and you could see the talent there, but after that its like he was never offerred a good role. He had a somewhat famous movie here and there like "The Specialist", but if you look at his resume its like 70% TV shows and movies you never heard of. It just sucks bc he had and still has some acting skills. It was refreshing to see him in The Dark Knight for sure

 
Hellfire Snail said:
Musesboy said:
KarmaPolice said:
Snatch: This movie gets better every time I watch it. Brad Pitt and Jason Statham are both amazing. Every character in the flick was just perfect; the bumbling black guys, Bullet Tooth Tony, Boris the Blade etc. 4/5
This was another heated "discussion" that I had with a buddy. He laughs at me for thinking that Pitt is a damn good actor, but I point to movies like Snatch, Kalifornia, and 12 Monkeys. He's been in his fair share of dreck (The Mexican, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) but I still say he's got talent. Interested to see the new one coming out at Christmas time with him.
Pitt did a good job in Burn After Reading. Truly annoying.
I consider him to be a an above-average actor. He was quirky in Fight Club, but not sure I could envision someone playing that role better. He was solid in Seven. His performance in The Assassination of Jesse James was understated but strong.
I agree that Pitt is much more than a pretty face, he doesn't usually portray characters that you can relate with, but rather characters that are larger than life or outside the box. When you watch a guy like Bale or Hanks it is usually very easy to relate to their characters and how they react. Pitt's characters are still very believable particularly Tyler Durden and Jesse James as well as in Legends of the Fall to a lesser extent but he always seems to be in his own little world. He won't ever win an oscar except maybe as a supporting character, but he is always enjoyable for me to watch.ETA: Johnny Depp is also in about the same mold as an actor, you usually can't see yourself in the situations and actions of his characters, yet you are intrigued by them.
I like this analogy and its a fair assessment, but I dont think you can knock an actor for excelling roles like that either.Hes also had his share of 'relateable' roles - Babel, Sleepers, The Devil's Own, The Mexican (i found this entertaining, so sue me!), A River Runs Through It.

He's been good or more often very good in any movie Ive seen him in, and just the fact that he can take on such a wide spectrum of roles and excel at them says something about his skills.

At this point, I think in the general public's eyes his acting ability is overlooked a bit by his appearance, but I think by the time his career is done, it wont be

Im def interested in seeing Curious Case of Benjamin Button based on the book where the main character pretty much lives his life in reverse. Should be interesting, and yet another role thats different from his previous work

(And as for Depp, I agree hes a solid actor, but I think I like only a handful of his movies at best. Pitt on the other hand, I like most of his movies. That might just be genre preference and such, but just my 2 cents).

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top