What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental, Streaming, Theater etc (4 Viewers)

Winchester

Saw it Saturday night.  Didn’t see a preview for it, but was told reviews were pretty bad.  I actually thought it was a good story revolving around the house and Sarah Winchester. This movie reminded me of why I don’t value reviews that much (13th Warrior also comes to mind) 3.5/5

 
Saw Paddington 2 yesterday with my 6yo and her friends. Caveat- I went in with zero expectations, assuming another stupid kids' movie. I was pleasantly surprised- delightful and sweet ride that had a little bit of everything: humor, action, adventure, train chase, good cameos, all with the recurring theme of trying to find the best in others (feel like I needed that last bit given the political climate). 

Don't think it's a must see if you don't have young kids (probably tops out around 9 depending on the kid), but definitely worth the time/money if you do.

 
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: kind of what I expected which is disappointing. This seems like a movie where you had to be there at the time to get it.  The history is really inaccurate, it's light hearted but doesn't seem very fun. It feels like a throw away summer blockbuster. 

The original Mutiny on the Bounty: exceeded my expectations. I didn't realize it was going to be quite so deep. I pictured it more as just a fun swashbuckler, adventure film (like Butch and Sundance was). The tension between Laughton and Gable keeps the movie afloat. Textbook case of good casting there with Gable being a man's man who has no need for title because his mere presence demands respect from the world while Laughton has nothing but his title.

 
The original Mutiny on the Bounty: exceeded my expectations. I didn't realize it was going to be quite so deep. I pictured it more as just a fun swashbuckler, adventure film (like Butch and Sundance was). The tension between Laughton and Gable keeps the movie afloat. Textbook case of good casting there with Gable being a man's man who has no need for title because his mere presence demands respect from the world while Laughton has nothing but his title.
The Brando remake blows it out of the water

 
I haven't seen either in decades, but I remember really enjoying the Brando one.
Looking closer, seems like the contemporary critics panned it- especially Brando. It seems like they were really attached to the original which was a huge hit when most movie critics of the early 60s wound have been forming their love of movies. Also Gable had just died and so the critics seemed really critical of Brando's attempt at replacing him. 

Without that specific baggage, it seems like most enjoyed the film. I'll definitely check it out.

 
Get Out

Ok. So as I grow older, it becomes more difficult to enjoy the horror genre. After all, how much blood and misogyny can a dude stand? Therefore, I was avoiding this movie. Huge mistake. This movie transcends the genre. Not just a great movie, but a witty satire on race relations. Everything in this movie, from the script to the editing, is so perfect that I hope studios see what happens when you give an artist the room to do something original. I say this without any political bias: every white person in America should watch this one. Its insight into race and society is unlike anything I've seen since Spike Lee's Do The Right Thing. Brilliant.

 
Z  (1969) was incredible. How can it be so many of these movies that are 40-70 years old are so much more politically relevant than almost any films being made today? The whole bit about protecting the police/military (even though they were guilty) just so as to not tarnish their public reputation. I mean that could be ripped out of today's headlines. I am trying to think of a better political thriller...not sure I have one in mind. 
My mom took me to see that when I was 10. Freaked me the eff out. Haven't seen it since. But would like to

 
I thought white liberals, who voted for Obama, were at the forefront of issues facing the black community too.   :shrug:

Was real eye-opening that we are not post-racial.   :sadbanana:

At least the jokes about white liberals really really liking Tiger Woods were fresh. 
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or sincere.

 
You no like Get Out?
@jdoggydogg

I thought it was OK, but like I joked in the "overrated movie" thread, I think Get Out is this year's Mad Max (but not nearly to that level) in that it's the movie I just don't quite get all the critics gushing over.  

Before I go on, I will say that I find you to be an interesting case, and maybe I am misreading some of your comments in the last few years.  I grew up on horror and metal, and I ended up defending both against comments brushing them off as trash, pointless, disgusting, whatever.  Feels like they are the redhead stepchildren of the movies and music and most people I knew that loved one of them also loved the other, and still do.  You seem to have broken up with the horror genre for the most part, and even seem to go to the point of bashing it which I find interesting.  Seems like people either dug it for "fun" of watching the deaths and the gore - maybe a slasher movie or something like Final Destination, or they realize that a lot of the movies were also trying to say something while scaring you - Dawn of the Dead perhaps, or both.   I am just curious if you just tired of the blood, don't like the new wave of horror, don't think they say much anymore, or what.  I just take your comments like "After all, how much blood and misogyny can a dude stand?" almost like you generally have dismissed the genre, as that feels like something a person who never liked the genre to begin with would say.  But then you just went to the screening of The Thing...  Just curious about your stance on that or what your cutoff is now.  

Anyway, about Get Out - I watched it again and felt the same way the second time.  IMO it's fine as a satire and comment on race, but I don't think it's that great of a horror movie, so I didn't really get into it.  Ones in the genre that I think are great have some scares and then on rewatches you start to be able to pick up on things that might be a little deeper.  To me this one was the opposite - it's wearing it's commentary on it's sleeve and leading with that, but the rest is stuff I have seen before with movies like Stepford Wives, Stir of Echoes and others so I didn't find it as compelling.  In the last couple years movies like The Babadook and It Follows have also gotten a good amount of critical praise (usually the ones that have some sort of social commentary do), and I thought those were better horror movies because they delivered the scares for me and had something else.  I didn't hate Get Out, just that my rating would be more 5-6/10, and don't get it being on so many top 10 lists and being up for an Oscar is all.  

 
@jdoggydogg

I just take your comments like "After all, how much blood and misogyny can a dude stand?" almost like you generally have dismissed the genre, as that feels like something a person who never liked the genre to begin with would say.  But then you just went to the screening of The Thing

Anyway, about Get Out - I watched it again and felt the same way the second time.  IMO it's fine as a satire and comment on race, but I don't think it's that great of a horror movie
Regarding the horror genre:

I loved horror movies in my twenties. The more extreme the better. But to be fair, I was much more like a wild animal back then I am now. I don't know, I guess I'm a lot more sensitive to extreme violence now than it was back then. It makes sense when you think about it, because people in their twenties are much more feral and oblivious to the real life horrors of mankind. The metal I listen to has fairly extreme lyrics. Lyrics feel different to me than images on a screen, though. Nowadays, movies like The Thing still appeal to me because it's so great. But having seen so many giallo films and slasher films, I'm really tired of the victimization and murder of women on screen.

As for Get Out, I would say it's definitely not a horror film. It's more of a psychological thriller.

 
Regarding the horror genre:

I loved horror movies in my twenties. The more extreme the better. But to be fair, I was much more like a wild animal back then I am now. I don't know, I guess I'm a lot more sensitive to extreme violence now than it was back then. It makes sense when you think about it, because people in their twenties are much more feral and oblivious to the real life horrors of mankind. The metal I listen to has fairly extreme lyrics. Lyrics feel different to me than images on a screen, though. Nowadays, movies like The Thing still appeal to me because it's so great. But having seen so many giallo films and slasher films, I'm really tired of the victimization and murder of women on screen.

As for Get Out, I would say it's definitely not a horror film. It's more of a psychological thriller.
Cool, thanks for the reply.  I probably get a little too sensitive if I feel like I lost a fellow defender of the genre.  ;).  

I guess the bolded is the main point for you, and I probably still feel like if I could defend horror before and love it, I still can and don't see it as seeing the murder and victimization of women on screen.  It could also be a factor of me not watching the genre quite as much and when I do I have better luck filtering out the ones that are just gore for gore's sake?   When I think about the ones that I have loved from the genre in the last 15 years or so just the few off the top of my head don't have a ton of violence (Conjuring, Orphanage),  are poking a little fun at the genre while still being a great horror movie (Cabin in the Woods),  or are about women and they might be doing the killing (The Descent, Ginger Snaps, Audition).   Extreme gore doesn't bother me if I think that the movie is trying to say something too (Martyrs), but I guess the violence doesn't bother me in general and if I don't like a movie it's more because it's just a bad movie, not due to the violence (yeah Saw series, I am looking at you!!).   Like I said though - it's me being too sensitive to comments that seem to be bashing the genre as a whole or dismissing it as violent junk, and I feel the need to justify my watching it like I did as a teen or something.  Just like when wikkid was bashing the metal music and you stepped in. ;)

I see your point on the classification of Get Out.  It's one of those movies maybe like Silence of the Lambs that have horror elements, but I am not fully willing to put it in the genre. 

 
Z  (1969) was incredible. How can it be so many of these movies that are 40-70 years old are so much more politically relevant than almost any films being made today? The whole bit about protecting the police/military (even though they were guilty) just so as to not tarnish their public reputation. I mean that could be ripped out of today's headlines. I am trying to think of a better political thriller...not sure I have one in mind. 
Good post.  Even relates to the current environment with the FBI.  Should the wrongdoing of a few bad apples not be reported because it would tarnish the reputation of the whole bureau.  "Z" is fab

 
@jdoggydogg

I thought it was OK, but like I joked in the "overrated movie" thread, I think Get Out is this year's Mad Max (but not nearly to that level) in that it's the movie I just don't quite get all the critics gushing over.  

Before I go on, I will say that I find you to be an interesting case, and maybe I am misreading some of your comments in the last few years.  I grew up on horror and metal, and I ended up defending both against comments brushing them off as trash, pointless, disgusting, whatever.  Feels like they are the redhead stepchildren of the movies and music and most people I knew that loved one of them also loved the other, and still do.  You seem to have broken up with the horror genre for the most part, and even seem to go to the point of bashing it which I find interesting.  Seems like people either dug it for "fun" of watching the deaths and the gore - maybe a slasher movie or something like Final Destination, or they realize that a lot of the movies were also trying to say something while scaring you - Dawn of the Dead perhaps, or both.   I am just curious if you just tired of the blood, don't like the new wave of horror, don't think they say much anymore, or what.  I just take your comments like "After all, how much blood and misogyny can a dude stand?" almost like you generally have dismissed the genre, as that feels like something a person who never liked the genre to begin with would say.  But then you just went to the screening of The Thing...  Just curious about your stance on that or what your cutoff is now.  

Anyway, about Get Out - I watched it again and felt the same way the second time.  IMO it's fine as a satire and comment on race, but I don't think it's that great of a horror movie, so I didn't really get into it.  Ones in the genre that I think are great have some scares and then on rewatches you start to be able to pick up on things that might be a little deeper.  To me this one was the opposite - it's wearing it's commentary on it's sleeve and leading with that, but the rest is stuff I have seen before with movies like Stepford Wives, Stir of Echoes and others so I didn't find it as compelling.  In the last couple years movies like The Babadook and It Follows have also gotten a good amount of critical praise (usually the ones that have some sort of social commentary do), and I thought those were better horror movies because they delivered the scares for me and had something else.  I didn't hate Get Out, just that my rating would be more 5-6/10, and don't get it being on so many top 10 lists and being up for an Oscar is all.  
am i the only one who never understands what Karma is getting at?!

 
Good post.  Even relates to the current environment with the FBI.  Should the wrongdoing of a few bad apples not be reported because it would tarnish the reputation of the whole bureau.  "Z" is fab
it was on TMC yesterday afternoon. i caught it about a half hour in when i was setting up me ol' Ma w dinner, so there wasnt time to let anybody know. if y'all can waybackmachine your DVRs, maybe you can save it

 
not rental, but Kodi ...

""Titicut Follies"

just ... wow - a most disturbing and surreal mind #### - passage midway through focuses on inmate Jim (an ex teacher), dude is so obviously outta his mind, and the staff bullies and goads him into episodes of demented tantrums/tourettes.  yeah, they were royally getting off on torturing this poor bast.   

rest of it is similar, but presented in such a way that you start to believe that it's all fictitious - that this can't possibly be the way life goes on for these lost souls. 

now, the conditions they live in are actually quite antiseptic (nothing here along the lines of the horrific squalor of Willowbrook), but the atmosphere so belies the reality ... think "Cockoo's Nest" on 'roids - it was a tough sit. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It could also be a factor of me not watching the genre quite as much and when I do I have better luck filtering out the ones that are just gore for gore's sake?   When I think about the ones that I have loved from the genre in the last 15 years or so just the few off the top of my head don't have a ton of violence (Conjuring, Orphanage),  are poking a little fun at the genre while still being a great horror movie (Cabin in the Woods),  or are about women and they might be doing the killing (The Descent, Ginger Snaps, Audition).   Extreme gore doesn't bother me if I think that the movie is trying to say something too (Martyrs), but I guess the violence doesn't bother me in general and if I don't like a movie it's more because it's just a bad movie, not due to the violence (yeah Saw series, I am looking at you!!).   Like I said though - it's me being too sensitive to comments that seem to be bashing the genre as a whole or dismissing it as violent junk, and I feel the need to justify my watching it like I did as a teen or something. 
Well said. There was probably a shift in me when my son was born. Suddenly, if there was a child at risk or getting killed, I would say to myself, "Ok, movie, you better earn this." In general, I still love the genre. We discussed The Orphanage and The Babadook. Maybe those aren't strictly horror movies, but that's the kind of movie that still really works for me these days. I was going to say something like, "I'm old and I don't enjoy the violence like I used to." But I think it's different than that.

Have you noticed that there are now thousands of movies where a character vomits or sits on a toilet now? Well, at one point, vomiting and toilet stuff used to be taboo. But now, it's been done so many times it's cliche and dull. So while I can appreciate a violent movie (Punisher: War Zone is a recent exploitation flick I love), I think that violence is now a cliche. Not that violence doesn't belong in movies anymore. To isolate Babadook, the reason that movie works for me is it builds tremendous tension and terror with almost no violence, and that feels refreshing. Know what I mean?

 
jdoggydogg said:
Well said. There was probably a shift in me when my son was born. Suddenly, if there was a child at risk or getting killed, I would say to myself, "Ok, movie, you better earn this." In general, I still love the genre. We discussed The Orphanage and The Babadook. Maybe those aren't strictly horror movies, but that's the kind of movie that still really works for me these days. I was going to say something like, "I'm old and I don't enjoy the violence like I used to." But I think it's different than that.

Have you noticed that there are now thousands of movies where a character vomits or sits on a toilet now? Well, at one point, vomiting and toilet stuff used to be taboo. But now, it's been done so many times it's cliche and dull. So while I can appreciate a violent movie (Punisher: War Zone is a recent exploitation flick I love), I think that violence is now a cliche. Not that violence doesn't belong in movies anymore. To isolate Babadook, the reason that movie works for me is it builds tremendous tension and terror with almost no violence, and that feels refreshing. Know what I mean?
Uh, not really :oldunsure:, but I get the point you are driving at.  

Agree on the last part though, and those are still mainly the ones that get the best ratings from me, and a reason that I like a lot of foreign horror movies.  I like the tension and scares, and more often than not the best movies stick out in those areas when they show less and less your mind take over and/or the reason the bad stuff is happening isn't fully explained.   That said, the carnage in the last 1/3 of Cabin in the Woods is a blast.  

As far as violence overall, I think the horror movies take the heat and people use that phrase that I hate because I think a lot of them are still trying to say something, and some of the ultra violent action movies are worse for that than most of the horror movies.  Example - I would go to bat for Martyrs or Hostel way before I would for the newest Rambo or Hacksaw Ridge.  

 
Uh, not really :oldunsure:, but I get the point you are driving at.  

Agree on the last part though, and those are still mainly the ones that get the best ratings from me, and a reason that I like a lot of foreign horror movies.  I like the tension and scares, and more often than not the best movies stick out in those areas when they show less and less your mind take over and/or the reason the bad stuff is happening isn't fully explained.   That said, the carnage in the last 1/3 of Cabin in the Woods is a blast.  

As far as violence overall, I think the horror movies take the heat and people use that phrase that I hate because I think a lot of them are still trying to say something, and some of the ultra violent action movies are worse for that than most of the horror movies.  Example - I would go to bat for Martyrs or Hostel way before I would for the newest Rambo or Hacksaw Ridge.  
Certainly. 

With Cabin in the Woods, my favorite part was the clever plot and surprises. The gore was the least interesting part for me. But totally, I'd way rather see a creative horror film that Rambo or Hacksaw Ridge. Hacksaw Ridge was religious propaganda that was far more appropriate for 1955 than the modern era. 

 
Rewatched a few movies and attempted to watch another over the last 2 days:

Night of the Living Dead - still enjoy the hell out of the movie despite it's flaws.  Mostly I think the first bit of the movie suffers a tad because of Barbara.  The overbearing score also drives me bonkers a bit too.  That said it still doesn't take much away from the tension when the others are introduced to the story and the fantastic ending.  I see that the Criterion collection is getting this movie soon too.  

Heat - I almost forgot how much I love this damn movie and what a great ensemble it is.  I bought it the other day in a $5 bin realizing I hadn't watched it in years.  It's worth it for the bank heist alone, but there are so many other great scenes and characters in here too.  

Baywatch -  Yeah, that happened, and I made through about 20 mins and pulled the plug.  That's about what I was expecting, but I was still morbidly curious.  Just enough to realize that it's a POS and that Alexandra Daddario and her eyes are gorgeous.  I really liked 21 Jump Street, but of course that opened the can of worms of everybody trying to remakes of old shows into a movie so it jumped the shark several movies ago.  

Deadpool -  Just as funny and dark as I remembered.  I could see it getting old in a couple movies, but I am still optimistic enough about the sequel that I will try to get to it this summer.  Between this one and Logan, is the answer as easy as maybe there should be more R superhero movies in a genre that is becoming pretty stale overall?  

 
Heat - I almost forgot how much I love this damn movie and what a great ensemble it is.  I bought it the other day in a $5 bin realizing I hadn't watched it in years.  It's worth it for the bank heist alone, but there are so many other great scenes and characters in here too.  
I stumbled into the middle of this a couple month ago.  I had forgotten how young and different Danny Trejo looked in the movie.

 
Rewatched a few movies and attempted to watch another over the last 2 days:

Night of the Living Dead - still enjoy the hell out of the movie despite it's flaws.  Mostly I think the first bit of the movie suffers a tad because of Barbara.  The overbearing score also drives me bonkers a bit too.  That said it still doesn't take much away from the tension when the others are introduced to the story and the fantastic ending.  I see that the Criterion collection is getting this movie soon too.  

Heat - I almost forgot how much I love this damn movie and what a great ensemble it is.  I bought it the other day in a $5 bin realizing I hadn't watched it in years.  It's worth it for the bank heist alone, but there are so many other great scenes and characters in here too.  

Deadpool -  Just as funny and dark as I remembered.  I could see it getting old in a couple movies, but I am still optimistic enough about the sequel that I will try to get to it this summer.  Between this one and Logan, is the answer as easy as maybe there should be more R superhero movies in a genre that is becoming pretty stale overall?  
I was listening to Jordan Peele talking about Get Out, and he cited Night of the Living Dead as one of his favorite movies. I agree. Here's a movie with no stars, almost no budget, and a great plot, great lead character, and one of the most powerful endings ever seen in a movie. Movies like The Departed owe a lot to NOTLD, because it takes a lot of guts and trust in the audience to do that to your lead protagonist at the end of a movie.

Heat is one of my favorite movies. The great thing about watching Heat on DVD is the chapters are set up so perfectly that you can instantly skip the dull stuff between Pacino and his woman. But otherwise, this is a perfect movie with one of the all-time great casts. And then there's the little stuff: every single character - from Henry Rollins to Hank Azaria - is perfectly cast and makes a strong impact in just a few minutes. So many great things to talk about with Heat. The pacing, the editing, the cryptic info that is not understood that later becomes relevant. DUDE, how many iconic scenes are in this movie? 20? When Pacino interrogates that hustler and hears the word "slick." ICONIC. When Pacino follows DeNiro and then talks to him in the cafe? ICONIC. When DeNiro tells the gangster he's a dead man? ICONIC. I could go on and on because I LOVE THIS MOVIE.

Deadpool is the perfect comic book movie. It knows it's dumb, and most serious comic book movies aren't good enough to be serious. Logan did a fantastic job of writing a serious comic book movie for adults. For evidence of how to make a terrible somber comic book movie, see Batman v. Superman.

 
Ilov80s said:
DVR any movie on TCM Sunday. You can't miss. 
There are some good ones - thanks.  I need to get In Cold Blood at least, and I think that I have Barry Lyndon already set to record (I think it's the only Kubrick I haven't watched).  I see that I missed Seven Samurai early this morning though.  

 
  I see that I missed Seven Samurai early this morning though.  
I fell asleep watching The Alamo on TMC last night and then around dawn my dreams had people speaking Asian languages in em. The WTF of it woke me up and i saw that 7 Samurai was on....

Good TV on PBS tonite. The American Epic Sessions. T-Bone Burnett tries to record a number of Americana artists (Alabama Shakes, The Americans, Ana Gabriel, Ashley Monroe, The Avett Brothers, Beck, Bettye LaVette, Bobby Ingano, Elton John, Frank Fairfield, Jerron “Blind Boy” Paxton, Los Lobos, Lost Bayou Ramblers, Nas, Pokey LaFarge, Raphael Saadiq, Rhiannon Giddens, Steve Martin and Edie Brickell, Taj Mahal, Jack White, and Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard) using 1920s recording methods.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyway, about Get Out - I watched it again and felt the same way the second time.  IMO it's fine as a satire and comment on race, but I don't think it's that great of a horror movie, so I didn't really get into it.  Ones in the genre that I think are great have some scares and then on rewatches you start to be able to pick up on things that might be a little deeper.  To me this one was the opposite - it's wearing it's commentary on it's sleeve and leading with that, but the rest is stuff I have seen before with movies like Stepford Wives, Stir of Echoes and others so I didn't find it as compelling.  In the last couple years movies like The Babadook and It Follows have also gotten a good amount of critical praise (usually the ones that have some sort of social commentary do), and I thought those were better horror movies because they delivered the scares for me and had something else.  I didn't hate Get Out, just that my rating would be more 5-6/10, and don't get it being on so many top 10 lists and being up for an Oscar is all.  
Get Out has elements of several genres (comedy, drama, thriller, horror) but I wouldn't classify if as any one type; thriller would be the best label. That's why the award shows that try to shoehorn it into a category will inevitably get it wrong. I would opine that unless you've lived as a racial minority, the "horror" parts of the movie will not grab you as profoundly. But there are many lines and interactions in this movie that really sting if you aren't a white American; that's what's "scary" about it. It's the pervasive attitude of the family and relevance to current events that horrifying. The guns and gore in Get Out is not what's scary.

 
There are some good ones - thanks.  I need to get In Cold Blood at least, and I think that I have Barry Lyndon already set to record (I think it's the only Kubrick I haven't watched).  I see that I missed Seven Samurai early this morning though.  
In Cold Blood was freaking fantastic- do watch it. 

 
Three Billboards Outside Ebbing Missouri   9/10

Easily the best movie I saw this year.  (I guess dating back through 2017). 

Just a GREAT cast.  Really great dialogue and story.  People will have varying opinions on whether they like the ending and if it's satisfying, I was ok with it.

I had heard a lot about this movie and the performances, and it met every expectation.  McDormand and Rockwell are so great, but even beyond them, there wasn't a bad performance in the lot.  I couldn't recommend this movie enough.

I could go on and on about the characters in this movie.  The woman that plays the role of Rockwell's mom - was great.

Peter Dinklage has a small role, (no pun intended) but it's so great. 

One of my favorite exchanges in the movie between McDormand and her son.

Robbie:  you're an old c*nt!

Mildred:  I'm not old! 

:lmao:
I just saw this today and while I enjoyed it I found it to be all over the place. Can anyone explain the guy that goes into the gift shop and threatens McDormand? Later in the movie Rockwell has the scene with him in the bar. It just did not make any sense.

I also felt that the way they try to make you think he is the rapist was pretty cheap.

 
Watched most of Almost Famous again (caught the 2nd half)

I love this film and consider it one of the best of the 2000s.

The airplane scene alone is amazing.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top