What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental, Streaming, Theater etc (3 Viewers)

Code of Silence (1985)

Before I close the book on 80s action, I wanted to watch a movie starring the man who launched a thousand Chuck Norris jokes. Code of Silence was directed by Andrew Davis who directed Above the Law, the Steven Seagal movie I watched last month. It's a strikingly similar picture--a gritty cop movie based in Chicago with the law pitted against two separate groups of bad guys. This time it's the mob and Colombian drug dealers rather than crooked CIA agents as in Above the Law but Henry Silva again appears as the main villain. He brings some sinister gravitas to the role but is no physical match for Norris.

Norris is an incorruptible police sergeant who drives a rusted out Pontiac Firebird. He's a straight arrow of few words who loses the trust of his colleagues after testifying against one of them. This plot device allows him to take on the bad guys singlehandedly. Code of Silence has some solid stunt work including a fight on a L train (as in Above the Law) and a car chase in the underground section of Wacker Drive that ends with a massive explosion. Norris gets a gratuitous gym scene to show off his martial arts prowess and later takes on a bar full of Colombians with just his fists and feet. The movie ends with an improbable one man assault on the gang's hideout but you don't mess with Chuck Norris.

I think Above the Law is probably the better film of the two. Norris and Seagal are both competent enough actors for what they're asked to do but I think Seagal's character was just more interesting. To humanize his character, the story gives Norris a subplot where he has to protect the teenage daughter of one of the mobsters. Interestingly, the actress went on to play Walker's mother in the recent TV reboot of Walker Texas Ranger. Neither movie was a masterpiece but they're both entertaining and very efficiently paced to prevent the audience from dwelling on the plot holes.
 
Last edited:
Re-watching Batman vs Superman in preparation to watch the Snyder cut of Justice League. 20 minutes in and I've already become greatly annoyed.

You know who might be the most important person on a movie project? The editor. Yes even more than the director.

Nothing throws a movie off the rails more than giving an audience feelings of:
A) "wait, how did I get there from here". The connective tissue between scenes just doesn't work. All of a sudden I'm in a Senate hearing where Superman is somehow getting blamed for what I just saw?
B) "what am I doing here". Scenes that show up without context. All of a sudden Lex Luther is a trusted government agent?

Outside of that is flimsy character motivations. But I don't have time to catalog the amount of that that's in this movie.

Edit: I just can't watch this movie. I turned it off.
 
Last edited:
Re-watching Batman vs Superman in preparation to watch the Snyder cut of Justice League. 20 minutes in and I've already become greatly annoyed.

You know who might be the most important person on a movie project? The editor. Yes even more than the director.

Nothing throws a movie off the rails more than giving an audience feelings of:
A) "wait, how did I get there from here". The connective tissue between scenes just doesn't work. All of a sudden I'm in a Senate hearing where Superman is somehow getting blamed for what I just saw?
B) "what am I doing here". Scenes that show up without context. All of a sudden Lex Luther is a trusted government agent?

Outside of that is flimsy character motivations. But I don't have time to catalog the amount of that that's in this movie.

I usually put the blame on the director for poor continuity, pacing or flow, particularly as they relate to telling the story. Editors are more responsible for the technical arrangement of shots within a scene, e.g. exactly when to cut between characters having a conversation. They have some leeway but are typically working within a framework provided by the director's storyboards or shooting script.

If there's a disagreement between the director and editor, the editor usually loses particularly with a director as powerful as Zack Snyder. An exception would be when a director has checked out or has moved on to another project while the first film is in post-production.


ETA: Although with Snyder, there's probably another cut in the director's mind that he thinks is better than what's up on screen.
 
Re-watching Batman vs Superman in preparation to watch the Snyder cut of Justice League. 20 minutes in and I've already become greatly annoyed.

You know who might be the most important person on a movie project? The editor. Yes even more than the director.

Nothing throws a movie off the rails more than giving an audience feelings of:
A) "wait, how did I get there from here". The connective tissue between scenes just doesn't work. All of a sudden I'm in a Senate hearing where Superman is somehow getting blamed for what I just saw?
B) "what am I doing here". Scenes that show up without context. All of a sudden Lex Luther is a trusted government agent?

Outside of that is flimsy character motivations. But I don't have time to catalog the amount of that that's in this movie.

I usually put the blame on the director for poor continuity, pacing or flow, particularly as they relate to telling the story. Editors are more responsible for the technical arrangement of shots within a scene, e.g. exactly when to cut between characters having a conversation. They have some leeway but are typically working within a framework provided by the director's storyboards or shooting script.

If there's a disagreement between the director and editor, the editor usually loses particularly with a director as powerful as Zack Snyder. An exception would be when a director has checked out or has moved on to another project while the first film is in post-production.


ETA: Although with Snyder, there's probably another cut in the director's mind that he thinks is better than what's up on screen.
I guess I should have said "how a movie is edited".

I was watching the "Ultimate Edition" which has to be Snyder's. Other than Man Of Steel, I think his movies are pretty terrible.

Edit: I like 300 too I guess.
 
Last edited:
Still no decent internet, so more 90s action with Cliffhanger tonight. I saw so many pieces of glass broken last night that I am hoping to avoid that in this setting tonight.
 
Still no decent internet, so more 90s action with Cliffhanger tonight. I saw so many pieces of glass broken last night that I am hoping to avoid that in this setting tonight.

I'm waiting for Renny Harlin's turn as director of the month. I have some thoughts about Driven. :coffee:
 
Zone of Interest

Anyone who's studied The Holocaust in any depth is familiar with the phrase "banality of evil". This film makes you live it.

The incidental sounds and sights were quite menacing. Over the idyllic quietness in the house you can hear the low rumbling of the crematoria. Beyond this lovely shot of the garden is a black cloud, the contents of which you know aren't precipitation.

It's an affecting movie for sure.
 
Still no decent internet, so more 90s action with Cliffhanger tonight. I saw so many pieces of glass broken last night that I am hoping to avoid that in this setting tonight.

I'm waiting for Renny Harlin's turn as director of the month. I have some thoughts about Driven. :coffee:
Lol. Adventures of Ford Fairlane could be a fun conversation too.

Cliffhanger might have been one of the worst acted movies I've seen in a while. It's bad when it could have used the kid who plays young Van Damme in Bloodsport. About 20mins in I was also hoping for some damn breaking glass just so something broke up the long scenes of monotone deliveries.
 
Zone of Interest

Anyone who's studied The Holocaust in any depth is familiar with the phrase "banality of evil". This film makes you live it.

The incidental sounds and sights were quite menacing. Over the idyllic quietness in the house you can hear the low rumbling of the crematoria. Beyond this lovely shot of the garden is a black cloud, the contents of which you know aren't precipitation.

It's an affecting movie for sure.
I loved it and hated it and felt like I really wanted to change species so I wouldn't be human, cause humans suck.
 
Zone of Interest

Anyone who's studied The Holocaust in any depth is familiar with the phrase "banality of evil". This film makes you live it.

The incidental sounds and sights were quite menacing. Over the idyllic quietness in the house you can hear the low rumbling of the crematoria. Beyond this lovely shot of the garden is a black cloud, the contents of which you know aren't precipitation.

It's an affecting movie for sure.
I loved it and hated it and felt like I really wanted to change species so I wouldn't be human, cause humans suck.
Agree. One of the most violent movies I've ever seen and there's not a single bit of it portrayed on screen. I get why it didn't win over Oppenheimer but I think it was the best movie of 2023.
 
The Neon Highway (new on Netflix) is an understated indie drama about an aspiring songwriter whose song could be the ticket back to the big time for an old, broken down country music legend.

Beau Bridges plays the old man and he's a real piece of work; he's a drunk and a liar but is still a likeable character. The movie is at its best when he's on screen which unfortunately happens less frequently in the final 45 minutes but by then I was hooked. It's sweet, sad and sentimental like an country song.
 
Last edited:
Fly Me to the Moon is a pretty entertaining two hours. Channing Tatum and ScarJo both excellent in their roles.

The movie plays off the old conspiracy theory --- What if NASA actually shot the moon landing on a sound stage?
For me I enjoyed the late 60s cars, fashion, and definitely the music.
 
Longlegs

I was beyond excited to see this. Dragged my wife with me who was less than thrilled.
She liked it more than I did.

I was disappointed. And not because the marketing was so good that it couldn't live up to the hype.
I just thought it was an average movie. All the talk about Cage and his face was a joke.
I'm not going to spoil it, but I have no idea who these people are that thought he was scary or frightening.

The 3rd act went somewhere I'm not a fan of and this is where the movie went downhill for me.

Also, at an hour and 40 minutes, this was the first movie in a long time where I felt it could have used another 20 minutes.
 
Whiplash is such a stressful movie.
I loved it...but I played percussion back in the day so I'm not a good test case.
Same and same, but it still stresses me out. Pretty sure I heard on a pod it was shot in less than 3 weeks.

Near perfect movie to me. My nitpick is the accident was a bit too much. Miles with a bleeding head wound is a bit much.
 
Whiplash is such a stressful movie.
I loved it...but I played percussion back in the day so I'm not a good test case.
Same and same, but it still stresses me out. Pretty sure I heard on a pod it was shot in less than 3 weeks.

Near perfect movie to me. My nitpick is the accident was a bit too much. Miles with a bleeding head wound is a bit much.
I've mentioned floppinho who is a percussionist. The classical world at Juilliard precollege... Not quite my tempo.

We both loved the movie.
 
It’s on my list to watch. I caught the end of it on vacation because my kid put it on (apparently one of his fav movies he’s seen it 4 or 5 times). He plays trumpet and bass though, not percussion
 
It was on my mind because a podcast I listen to paired it with Black Swan. I had seen that recently, so I instead did a different drumming adjacent movie - Sound of Metal. Both fantastic movies for different reasons.
 
Ok so watched a ton of movies since getting back from vacation. 92 degrees with 70% humidity isn’t very good for doing much else.

Inside Out 2
A very good sequel. Not nearly as funny or sad but I was thoroughly engrossed in the story and it does such a good job building a story around how emotions work and how we grow and develop, heal, etc. Highly recommend for families.

The last couple summers, I’ve done a “movie festival”. Two years ago it was epics. Last year it was westerns. This year it’s global. So far:

Happy Together: Hong Kong-Argentina. Beautifully sad love story. As Wong Kar Wai always does, the vignettes feel like memories or dreams. There’s such a certain quality his movies have that almost no other filmmaker is able to replicate.

The Zone of Interest: Germany-Poland. This was a brilliant movie. The banality of evil is the perfect description for this. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything quite like it. It’s maybe more terrifying than Schindlers List despite having no actual violence whatsoever.

I’m No Longer Here: Mexico-NYC. This one caught me off guard with how great it was. Holy ****, it’s on Netflix. Check it out. A teen in Monterrey is accidentally caught up in the gang violence of his neighborhood and forced to sneak into America to try to start a new life. While that sounds super depressing and it is, it doesn’t leave you feeling hopeless at all. It has a real strength to it. The main character Ulises is one I will never forget.

The Proposition Australia. Absolutely brutal western. Very good if that’s your thing. Written by Nick Cave. The score he did for it is also excellent.
Kept going with the global movie festival going (though we got a puppy Monday so movie watching has really slowed down).

Port of Shadows: France. Going back to 1938 and the great Jean Gabin. This is a key movie for the development of film noir. I have to imagine the great European emigre directors who populated Hollywood in the 40s and 50s took inspiration from this. The film description screams noir: Down a foggy, desolate road to the port city of Le Havre travels Jean, an army deserter looking for another chance to make good on life. Fate, however, has a different plan for him, as acts of both revenge and kindness render him front-page news. Any fan of 40s noirs should absolutely check this out.

Yojimbo: Japan. Even though he never made a western, there are few filmamkers as important to the midcentury development of the Western than Akira Kurosawa. Seven Samurai became The Magnificnet Seven. The ultimate get the gang together, assemble the team movie that we see not just out west but in The Expendables, Avengers, etc. It's a blueprint on which hundreds of movies have been built. Then with Yojimbo, Kurosawa created the polar plan: the lone nameless "hero". This diretcly became Eastwood's Dollar's trilogy character. But it's also an archetype that we recycle endlessly. He's alone, he owes nohing to anyone but he does have a moral code. He's not a good guy but he's not bad either. He's an opportunist. It's a spin on Shane (who was very much not nameless) who wanted to to be good, wanted a simple life, wanted to sacrifice for the good. Kurosawa's nameless hero isn't looking for redemption.

The Official Story: Argentina. The 1986 Best Foreign Film winner at the Academy Awards is a tragic look into the damage done during Argentina's military dictatorship of the late 70s and early 80s. This centers on a bourgeois husband and wife during the final days of the oppressive regime. The husband has aligned himself with the military and sees their position slipping while the wife begins to ask questions about where their adopted daughter came from. Tremendous lead performance from Norma Aleandro. Anyone interested in a movie that blends family drama with historical events this is on HBO Max and well worth checking out.

Petite Maman: France. Celine Sciamma's follow-up to the much acclaimed Portrait of a Lady on Fire is such a small, sweet and tender movie. Coming in at just 72 minutes, it's a breezy warm hug of a watch. I appreciate her telling a story in that time frame (aka I could watch the whole thing during 1 puppy nap) and not feeling the to need to drag it out to hit 90 mins or some kind of arbitrary marker. This reminded me a lot of All of Us Strangers which is the only real hint I will give at the plot other than to say it's about a young girl who's grandmother passes away. I really liked this one and need to dig into more of Sciamma's movies.
and the global film fest moves forward with a long detour in France

Last Year in Marienbad: France. I knew roughly what I was getting into here. I've seen Alain Resnais' Hiroshima Mon Amour (masterpiece imo) so I knew this was going to be lacking in structure, maybe even in plot. I loved the sets, costume, hair, makeup, editing, etc. I just couldn't connect to the "story". It was successful in what it aimed to do: create a movie of the mind- thoughts and dreams but I just was not drawn to the final product. It's considered kind of a classic now but I see when it came out it was a very divisive movie. I for sure fall on the side that this thing is more mess than masterpiece.

Band of Outsiders: France. The male characters here really suck. Anna Karina is carrying them both. There are some fun scenes, creative stuff but I'm not sure the sense of whimsy that's intended always works. Not a miss for me but not a hit either.

Le Doulos: France. Director Jean Pierre Melville makes a crime film like Godard did with with Band of Outsiders but there's no whimsy here. No laughs. No smiles. Not even a smirk. I much prefer the Melville approach. Doulos is slang for a rat or a snitch and that's what this movie is all about. Fresh out of a prison, a criminal has a safe job lined up but when he's snitched on everything unravels. This is pure hardboiled noir. Melville absolutely rules.

Godzilla Minus One: Japan. The story was better than the usual Godzilla fare but in the end it's still a Godzilla movie which just doesn't move the needle much for me. It won an Oscar for FX but they didn't seem all that great (though I understand they were done on a small budget which I do appreciate). I am glad people liked this, it beats the heck out of those Zilla vs Kong things but this kind of monster movie won't ever be my thing.
 
Last edited:
Last Year in Marienbad: France. I knew roughly what I was getting into here. I've seen Alain Resnais' Hiroshima Mon Amour (masterpiece imo) so I knew this was going to be lacking in structure, maybe even in plot. I loved the sets, costume, hair, makeup, editing, etc. I just couldn't connect to the "story". It was successful in what it aimed to do: create a movie of the mind- thoughts and dreams but I just was not drawn to the final product. It's considered kind of a classic now but I see when it came out it was a very divisive movie. I for sure fall on the side that this thing is more mess than masterpiece.
+1 on mess.

I watched it when I was young and pretentious and didn't care for it much. I probably couldn't sit through it now that I'm old and pretentious.
 
Last Year in Marienbad: France. I knew roughly what I was getting into here. I've seen Alain Resnais' Hiroshima Mon Amour (masterpiece imo) so I knew this was going to be lacking in structure, maybe even in plot. I loved the sets, costume, hair, makeup, editing, etc. I just couldn't connect to the "story". It was successful in what it aimed to do: create a movie of the mind- thoughts and dreams but I just was not drawn to the final product. It's considered kind of a classic now but I see when it came out it was a very divisive movie. I for sure fall on the side that this thing is more mess than masterpiece.
+1 on mess.

I watched it when I was young and pretentious and didn't care for it much. I probably couldn't sit through it now that I'm old and pretentious.
That’s real funny. It hasn’t improved with time. It’s a weird case where I think the craft of it is excellent and they accomplished exactly what they wanted but that is an artsy mess with no real message or meaning or point. I was sure I missed some important detail or got distracted and wasn’t connecting something. After I read some recaps and analysis only to be disappointed that there’s really nothing to this at all. It’s an exercise more than a film.
 
That’s real funny. It hasn’t improved with time. It’s a weird case where I think the craft of it is excellent and they accomplished exactly what they wanted but that is an artsy mess with no real message or meaning or point. I was sure I missed some important detail or got distracted and wasn’t connecting something. After I read some recaps and analysis only to be disappointed that there’s really nothing to this at all. It’s an exercise more than a film.

It could probably be recut as a really nice Bryan Ferry video
 
Saw Robot Dreams at the theater last night. Was tough ti find a screening, had to go to Ann Arbor but I thought the kid would really enjoy it. I was right, we both loved it. It’s a Spanish animated movie but don’t worry about a language barrier because there is no dialogue. It’s cute, funny, sad, moving, trippy and a great recreation of 1980s NYC. The music rules too. One of the better animated movies I’ve seen in awhile.
 
Thursday's Game (1974)

Bob Newhart (RIP) was a big TV star but most of his movie roles were as a character actor. Thursday's Game is a made for TV movie where Bob got second billing behind Gene Wilder but ahead of Oscar winners Ellen Burstyn and Cloris Leachman. If you've watched a lot of 70s sitcoms, the supporting cast will look very familiar including Nancy Walker, Norman Fell and Valerie Harper.

It's ostensibly a buddy comedy but Newhart and Wilder lead rather sad lives. They're both in loveless marriages and Wilder faces a crisis as the TV gameshow he produces is tanking in the ratings. It's the 70s so there's lots of talking about their feelings and the sense that these 40-something characters have just missed out on the sexual revolution. Newhart is definitely the second banana in the movie; he plays deadpan in his scenes with the more manic Wilder and Newhart's nutty wife played by Leachman. But as always with Newhart there's more going on beneath the placid exterior.

The movie was written and produced by James L. Brooks who was responsible for some of the greatest television shows of the 70s and 80s. Unfortunately this isn't one of them but there are a few laughs and some funky 70s decor.

There are three prints on YouTube. This one had the best picture even though it's in eight parts.

 
Twisters is crushing it at the box office. Matching Dune 2 and just behind Oppenheimer from last year. Headed to see it this afternoon- my wife loves the first one. My expectations aren’t too high but maybe I’ll be surprised.
 
Twisters is crushing it at the box office. Matching Dune 2 and just behind Oppenheimer from last year. Headed to see it this afternoon- my wife loves the first one. My expectations aren’t too high but maybe I’ll be surprised.
Speaks more to show starved we are for something
 
Twisters is crushing it at the box office. Matching Dune 2 and just behind Oppenheimer from last year. Headed to see it this afternoon- my wife loves the first one. My expectations aren’t too high but maybe I’ll be surprised.
Speaks more to show starved we are for something

I didn't have Glen Powell box office king on my post-pandemic bingo card but good for him.
 
Twisters is crushing it at the box office. Matching Dune 2 and just behind Oppenheimer from last year. Headed to see it this afternoon- my wife loves the first one. My expectations aren’t too high but maybe I’ll be surprised.
Speaks more to show starved we are for something

I didn't have Glen Powell box office king on my post-pandemic bingo card but good for him.
Yeah he’s stepped into the Ryan Reynolds/Ryan Gosling world. Maverick, that Sydney Sweeney rom com, Hitman abd now this. Plus he announced he’s remaking The Running Man with Edgar Wright.
 
Twisters is crushing it at the box office. Matching Dune 2 and just behind Oppenheimer from last year. Headed to see it this afternoon- my wife loves the first one. My expectations aren’t too high but maybe I’ll be surprised.
Speaks more to show starved we are for something
And we are still just nostalgia obsessed. Gen X and millennials obviously carrying this movie at the box office.
 
Twisters: better than the original but only slightly. It gives you exactly what you expect- nothing more and nothing less but it’s a good ride.
 
Watching lord of the rings for the first time. I thought the ring would give you superpowers or something. You just turn invisible?
It also betrays you and tries to get back to its master, which is certainly a bigger negative than the invisibility is a positive.

There's a Galadriel scene near the end of the first movie that shows a bit of what it could do if someone decided to use it. I think it's my favorite scene in the movies.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top