Yeah, I'm going to have to agree with
@krista4 - I am one and done with Maverick and Fury Road. I don't get the hype at all.
Granted I didn't see it on a big screen (although it wasn't an in-flight selection either) but I thought Fury Road was OK. The effects were obviously more advanced but I'd still rather watch Road Warrior.
Maverick on the other hand was superior to the original Top Gun which I say begrudgingly as a big Tony Scott fan.
Not sure what your overall rating on Maverick is, but this is my take as well. However, I will add that as I think about Maverick it's also everything I detest about the barrage of sequels/remakes/reboots we get and it's rating has dropped as I watch it at home a couple more times. It's pretty cheesy, especially the end jet hotwire heist.
IMO the missing piece of the conversation about Maverick is that
honestly Top Gun isn't that great of a movie. Don't get me wrong, I still love it and it's fun as hell, but I think it's a bit overrated. So when we say, and I agree, that Maverick is superior, what are we saying? The biggest part is the way it looks and how much better the action is. IMO, the other improvement is they gave us a mission we could understand and get invested in. The first day montage and the practice runs are great ramp ups. But isn't that saying something about the original that those things weren't there to begin with? Also Maverick swung for the fences with the scene with Iceman and they pulled it off big time. That's where the high from the first watching in the theater came from. After a few rewatches there are a lot of warts that bother me more now - the end stuff is action movie cheesy, I think they lean too hard on checking off boxes from the original as most sequels/reboots do now, and the clips from the original bother me a lot more.
ETA: I forgot another improvement for Maverick - the supporting cast. With Connelly, Ed Harris, and Hamm just for starters there was more than enough to distract us from how bad some of the main crew was.