I strongly disagree with you, obviously. I’m a big believer in nuance.
But there are certain issues in which there is no nuance, and that’s where the denier claim is apt. The election of 2020 for example. If anyone thinks that Trump won, they’re just wrong. There’s no argument, no nuance, no legitimate alternative point of view. They’re a denier. Same with climate change, the theory of evolution, a few other things.
As I expressed to
@jon_mx I don’t use this term lightly. I would never use it on any issue like white privilege, for example, despite
@supermike80 once again lying about me and claiming I did. Issues of race and culture are usually far too nuanced and complicated to throw such terms around and I don’t. But on clear issues of science and fact, it’s right to use and it should be used.