What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rocky McIntosh (1 Viewer)

I haven't heard anything about how his rehab is going, but you have to assume he won't be back to 100% until 2009. He's the kind of guy who I'd find a way to keep, probably by stashing him on my FF IR in 2008.

 
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...Nfl&id=3929

Redskins coach Joe Gibbs said in his season ending presser that he expects Rocky McIntosh (torn ACL, MCL) to be ready for Week 1 in 2008.
The old Gibbs regime thought he'd be ready for the start of the '08 season. I'm a little less hopeful. My best guess is PUP list.
"Ready" means "on the active roster" - it certainly doesn't mean "operating at peak performance". The PUP at the start of 2008 is certainly a possibility, but we're guessing right now. Until I hear differently, I'm sticking with the old line about this being a two year injury.
 
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...Nfl&id=3929

Redskins coach Joe Gibbs said in his season ending presser that he expects Rocky McIntosh (torn ACL, MCL) to be ready for Week 1 in 2008.
The old Gibbs regime thought he'd be ready for the start of the '08 season. I'm a little less hopeful. My best guess is PUP list.
"Ready" means "on the active roster" - it certainly doesn't mean "operating at peak performance". The PUP at the start of 2008 is certainly a possibility, but we're guessing right now. Until I hear differently, I'm sticking with the old line about this being a two year injury.
Thanks everyone for the info!!
 
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpag...Nfl&id=3929

Redskins coach Joe Gibbs said in his season ending presser that he expects Rocky McIntosh (torn ACL, MCL) to be ready for Week 1 in 2008.
The old Gibbs regime thought he'd be ready for the start of the '08 season. I'm a little less hopeful. My best guess is PUP list.
"Ready" means "on the active roster" - it certainly doesn't mean "operating at peak performance". The PUP at the start of 2008 is certainly a possibility, but we're guessing right now. Until I hear differently, I'm sticking with the old line about this being a two year injury.
Redman, I don't disagree at all. I should of said PUP list is best case scenario in my honest opinion. We can figure out a lot by paying attention to how the Skins react in free agency as far as the position goes. The one good thing for H.B Blades fans is that Blache was around and knows him well. So we should get a quick read on the situation.
 
FWIW:

Director of sports medicine Bubba Tyer just confirmed what Zorn had said: Cornerback Carlos Rogers, who was injured in the Oct. 28 loss to the New England Patriots, isn't due back until September or October. Linebacker Rocky McIntosh, who was injured in the Dec. 16 victory over the New York Giants, is expected back in July.

Tyer said Rogers has made great strides in recent weeks, but that it's normally a 12-month recovery after tearing the ACL and MCL as he did. Since McIntosh only tore his ACL, his recovery is expected to take six months.
 
I have stuck here, any guess about 08 ranking :rolleyes: Who will be at the top in 08 series? It’s quite confusing this time; no one can say anything with surity. I'm very interested in hearing thoughts about guys performance in going season.

 
Update on McIntosh:

Weak side LB Rocky McIntosh is making a strong recovery from knee surgery - internally the team estimates for now he likely will not need to start the season on the PUP list, unlike Carlos Rogers - though both of his knees have been flagged for possible degenerative conditions, team sources said, which bears monitoring
 
bcr8f said:
Blades? Who would move up if he can't go?
Randall Godfrey and Blades filled in last year (with Godfrey getting the starts and most of the PT) for McIntosh. Godfrey was kind of 'meh' and Blades performed pretty well given the circumstances, IMO. Blades is a more natrual MLB, though. Currently, Godfrey is a FA, but that article speculates he could be brought back in soon, especially if OLB is not addressed in the draft.It's possible a LB could be added in the draft, although it's most likely to be a 2nd day pick, so I wouldn't expect much competition from that route. If forced to guess now, I'd say Blades starts at WLB if McIntosh can't go week 1. It's now been 3 months, though, and we're still hearing that he's recovering well and shouldn't end up on the PUP.
 
Blades? Who would move up if he can't go?
Randall Godfrey and Blades filled in last year (with Godfrey getting the starts and most of the PT) for McIntosh. Godfrey was kind of 'meh' and Blades performed pretty well given the circumstances, IMO. Blades is a more natrual MLB, though. Currently, Godfrey is a FA, but that article speculates he could be brought back in soon, especially if OLB is not addressed in the draft.It's possible a LB could be added in the draft, although it's most likely to be a 2nd day pick, so I wouldn't expect much competition from that route. If forced to guess now, I'd say Blades starts at WLB if McIntosh can't go week 1. It's now been 3 months, though, and we're still hearing that he's recovering well and shouldn't end up on the PUP.
:goodposting: Blades' future, possibly starting next year, is as a smallish MLB in the Tatupu, Thomas or Fletcher mold. In that sense he's got the ideal mentor in Fletcher. I think Blades holds a lot of value for that reason in IDP, and his play on the field has shown that his bloodlines don't seem to be an illusion insofar as they bode well for his future.
 
Blades? Who would move up if he can't go?
Randall Godfrey and Blades filled in last year (with Godfrey getting the starts and most of the PT) for McIntosh. Godfrey was kind of 'meh' and Blades performed pretty well given the circumstances, IMO. Blades is a more natrual MLB, though. Currently, Godfrey is a FA, but that article speculates he could be brought back in soon, especially if OLB is not addressed in the draft.It's possible a LB could be added in the draft, although it's most likely to be a 2nd day pick, so I wouldn't expect much competition from that route. If forced to guess now, I'd say Blades starts at WLB if McIntosh can't go week 1. It's now been 3 months, though, and we're still hearing that he's recovering well and shouldn't end up on the PUP.
Thanks. If they do draft a LB I may have to pick him up.
 
Blades? Who would move up if he can't go?
Randall Godfrey and Blades filled in last year (with Godfrey getting the starts and most of the PT) for McIntosh. Godfrey was kind of 'meh' and Blades performed pretty well given the circumstances, IMO. Blades is a more natrual MLB, though. Currently, Godfrey is a FA, but that article speculates he could be brought back in soon, especially if OLB is not addressed in the draft.It's possible a LB could be added in the draft, although it's most likely to be a 2nd day pick, so I wouldn't expect much competition from that route. If forced to guess now, I'd say Blades starts at WLB if McIntosh can't go week 1. It's now been 3 months, though, and we're still hearing that he's recovering well and shouldn't end up on the PUP.
:D Blades' future, possibly starting next year, is as a smallish MLB in the Tatupu, Thomas or Fletcher mold. In that sense he's got the ideal mentor in Fletcher. I think Blades holds a lot of value for that reason in IDP, and his play on the field has shown that his bloodlines don't seem to be an illusion insofar as they bode well for his future.
I doubt Blades starts in the middle before 2010. Fletcher's contract was 5 years for $25 million that includes $10.5 million in bonuses. he will earn nearly $13 million the first 2 years (2007+2008) and about $15 million the first 3 years. So that basically means in 2009 his contract is very cheap. He would have to be beat out or injured to lose his job.
 
Blades? Who would move up if he can't go?
Randall Godfrey and Blades filled in last year (with Godfrey getting the starts and most of the PT) for McIntosh. Godfrey was kind of 'meh' and Blades performed pretty well given the circumstances, IMO. Blades is a more natrual MLB, though. Currently, Godfrey is a FA, but that article speculates he could be brought back in soon, especially if OLB is not addressed in the draft.It's possible a LB could be added in the draft, although it's most likely to be a 2nd day pick, so I wouldn't expect much competition from that route. If forced to guess now, I'd say Blades starts at WLB if McIntosh can't go week 1. It's now been 3 months, though, and we're still hearing that he's recovering well and shouldn't end up on the PUP.
:bag: Blades' future, possibly starting next year, is as a smallish MLB in the Tatupu, Thomas or Fletcher mold. In that sense he's got the ideal mentor in Fletcher. I think Blades holds a lot of value for that reason in IDP, and his play on the field has shown that his bloodlines don't seem to be an illusion insofar as they bode well for his future.
I doubt Blades starts in the middle before 2010. Fletcher's contract was 5 years for $25 million that includes $10.5 million in bonuses. he will earn nearly $13 million the first 2 years (2007+2008) and about $15 million the first 3 years. So that basically means in 2009 his contract is very cheap. He would have to be beat out or injured to lose his job.
He might have a cheap contract, but in 2009 he'll also be relatively cheap to cut; it could also mean that he's cheap enough to keep as a backup while they phase Blades into the starting role. It's certainly something to watch. I agree that nothing is guaranteed, however.
 
LFB isn't going anywhere unless he gets injured. I know we love young IDP's in this forum but he isn't good enough to put McIntosh or LFB on the bench. He's worth a roster spot in deep IDP leagues only.

 
Greg Blache, the new defensive coordinator (and former d-line position coach under Williams) was asked today whether they'd have to sign a veteran if McIntosh can't go, and his first statement was, "No, we've got H.B. [blades] . . ." You can see it here on the Greg Blache video at around 11:30.

 
Put me in the camp that doesn't agree that an ACL is only a 6 month injury, especially for a position like linebacker. Carson Palmer blew his ACL and wasn't close to 100% 6 months later. Could he play? Yes. Was there a dramatic dropoff in performance? Yes. If a QB who doesn't require the mobility and start/stop of a LB struggled to perform, how can McIntosh reasonably be expected to provide significant production at the start of the season. I tend to agree with Redman here, he'll be "ready" but that simply means he won't be on IR.

 
Zorn confirmed, in his post-practice interview, that McIntosh is doing more and more on the field each day, and that he'll be ready by training camp (not by start of season, but by training camp).
 
From Skins blog

LB Rocky McIntosh, recovering from knee surgery, was working with the first-team defense in the walk-through portion of practice and continues to do more work. Zorn remains enthused about his progress; though McIntosh is not cleared for contact drills yet it continues to appear that he is on target for a return during training camp.

Zorn reiterated that RB Clinton Portis is excused from OTAs - "He has my permission to be gone," Zorn said. Zorn did not speak with Portis today but did earlier this week and I'm guessing he wont be back this week, but we shall see.

 
McIntosh's (and Rogers' for that matter) return from surgery has been nothing short of amazing to me.

We'll see how much he's "back to 100%" but he's back in workouts participating fully and looks like he'll be back in the starting lineup come game 1.

 
Huh? I missed this thread. I always assumed he'd be 100% come preseason. Thankfully, it looks like I got lucky. I drafted him in the survivor here and thought I was getting a steal. The bliss of ignorance.

 
That statline doesn't show much (1 tackle) but he was out there running around and was involved for a little while before they pulled him, which was the plan. He looked normal to me, though there wasn't a lot of opportunity to see him in action.

 
Mr Capicollo said:
That statline doesn't show much (1 tackle) but he was out there running around and was involved for a little while before they pulled him, which was the plan. He looked normal to me, though there wasn't a lot of opportunity to see him in action.
He also could not cover Keller on Favre's TD.
 
Mr Capicollo said:
That statline doesn't show much (1 tackle) but he was out there running around and was involved for a little while before they pulled him, which was the plan. He looked normal to me, though there wasn't a lot of opportunity to see him in action.
I noticed on the reverse to Brad Smith that he kinda pulled up lame chasing Smith from behind. Maybe it didn't mean anything, but he didn't appear to be running too well IMO. Definitely need to see some more action to get a better idea..
 
Mr Capicollo said:
That statline doesn't show much (1 tackle) but he was out there running around and was involved for a little while before they pulled him, which was the plan. He looked normal to me, though there wasn't a lot of opportunity to see him in action.
I noticed on the reverse to Brad Smith that he kinda pulled up lame chasing Smith from behind. Maybe it didn't mean anything, but he didn't appear to be running too well IMO. Definitely need to see some more action to get a better idea..
I have the game DVR'd, so I'll have another look when I watch again tonight.
 
Considering his injury last year, I don't know that I would expect a lot from him this year. Put him on your scout team.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top