Wouldn't Martez be the idp to grab early? Unless there is a large big play bonus pool, I would think Martez will get more table opportunities in the middle.I went with Hankerson here, although in my league it is entirely possible he falls to about 13. This part of the draft is wide open. We also have a strong IDP system, so Von Miller would be a consideration starting about now too.
Let's hear them and I'll add them on the next poll.This is silly. There is absolutely not enough options. I have 3 'others' that I would draft ahead of anyone on your list.
Which probably says something about this draft class more than he left off your particular three guys.This is silly. There is absolutely not enough options. I have 3 'others' that I would draft ahead of anyone on your list.
With all due respect, Jeter has been doing these polls for several years here and his opinion is respected. It's a bit rude and pretentious to call his poll silly because it doesn't fit your "expert" opinion. The reason many of us left FFToday is because of this kind of behavior. Don't bring it here.This is silly. There is absolutely not enough options. I have 3 'others' that I would draft ahead of anyone on your list.
I dont ever remember a draft class being this muddled in the mid first. A lot of good similar talent. Good year to have a few mid to late firsts and early seconds.seems like the more options added, the more the poll will just be spread out. Should be interesting to find out what situations do to sort this mess out
With all due respect, I think it is fair to voice my opinion that there are not enough options. I ABSOLUTELY would draft 3 other players ahead of any of the options. And you could make a case for 2 or 3 more at least. And IMHO it is not being personnally critical to Jeter to point this out. As loose circuits said just above "I dont ever remember a draft class being this muddled in the mid first. A lot of good similar talent. Good year to have a few mid to late firsts and early seconds."With all due respect, Jeter has been doing these polls for several years here and his opinion is respected. It's a bit rude and pretentious to call his poll silly because it doesn't fit your "expert" opinion. The reason many of us left FFToday is because of this kind of behavior. Don't bring it here.This is silly. There is absolutely not enough options. I have 3 'others' that I would draft ahead of anyone on your list.
Guess I'll jump in since you brought my name into it. voicing your opinion is fine, but the tone was a little rude. Takes some work to set this all up and we should be appreciative. Really all you need to do is select 'other' and ask that your selection be added.We almost need a run off for this one since it's so close and this is the counter argument to your add 3 more guys. I'd rather see people select from the top 4 rather than 10 different guys with 10+ votesWith all due respect, I think it is fair to voice my opinion that there are not enough options. I ABSOLUTELY would draft 3 other players ahead of any of the options. And you could make a case for 2 or 3 more at least. And IMHO it is not being personnally critical to Jeter to point this out. As loose circuits said just above "I dont ever remember a draft class being this muddled in the mid first. A lot of good similar talent. Good year to have a few mid to late firsts and early seconds."With all due respect, Jeter has been doing these polls for several years here and his opinion is respected. It's a bit rude and pretentious to call his poll silly because it doesn't fit your "expert" opinion. The reason many of us left FFToday is because of this kind of behavior. Don't bring it here.This is silly. There is absolutely not enough options. I have 3 'others' that I would draft ahead of anyone on your list.
Relax man, its not Jeters fault this draft class doesnt have any good players after the top 5. Lets just hope the NFL draft straightens this out a bit, which im sure it will.'madd futher said:Just for starters, you could add Carter, Powell, Vereen, Todman, Lewis. Seriously!