cantstop1999
Footballguy
why are most predictions have him at about the same numbers. the qb is a lot better and he is healthy now. i think the real question is can he stay healthy ? if he can i have him at 1200 10-13tds, whats your take ?
Preseason should have a fairly big effect on his projections.If he comes out, the offense is clicking, Kitna looks good, he'll get a boost. But for now I understand the conservative estimates.why are most predictions have him at about the same numbers. the qb is a lot better and he is healthy now. i think the real question is can he stay healthy ? if he can i have him at 1200 10-13tds, whats your take ?
Well, if you look at his career numbers, they suggest that he should get 900 yards and 9.5 TD's if he were to be healthy. Even last season, he would have been on pace for 845 and 9.8. To expect that a real offense and QB could give him an extra 10-20 yards a game and maybe a TD or two over the course of the season really isn't a lot...I think your expectations are a little high for Roy this year. He definitely has shown the most promise of the WR's in Det but he still is a headcase. I'd consider 900 yds and 8 TD's out of Roy a minor victory if I had him. I would agree he still has potential for 1200+ and 12+ TD's season but to say its likely in 2005 season w/ Detriot baring his health is asking too much.
A WR to get 1200 yds and 12 TD's is virtually a pro-bowl WR. So you're basically saying that you feel Roy W. is going to be an NFC pro-bowl WR this year? I'd say very slim chance.Well, if you look at his career numbers, they suggest that he should get 900 yards and 9.5 TD's if he were to be healthy. Even last season, he would have been on pace for 845 and 9.8. To expect that a real offense and QB could give him an extra 10-20 yards a game and maybe a TD or two over the course of the season really isn't a lot...I think your expectations are a little high for Roy this year. He definitely has shown the most promise of the WR's in Det but he still is a headcase. I'd consider 900 yds and 8 TD's out of Roy a minor victory if I had him. I would agree he still has potential for 1200+ and 12+ TD's season but to say its likely in 2005 season w/ Detriot baring his health is asking too much.
if he can stay healthy and with the new qbs i say yes pro bowl, look at what he did in just 8 games last year. its possible and he is capable.A WR to get 1200 yds and 12 TD's is virtually a pro-bowl WR. So you're basically saying that you feel Roy W. is going to be an NFC pro-bowl WR this year? I'd say very slim chance.Well, if you look at his career numbers, they suggest that he should get 900 yards and 9.5 TD's if he were to be healthy. Even last season, he would have been on pace for 845 and 9.8. To expect that a real offense and QB could give him an extra 10-20 yards a game and maybe a TD or two over the course of the season really isn't a lot...I think your expectations are a little high for Roy this year. He definitely has shown the most promise of the WR's in Det but he still is a headcase. I'd consider 900 yds and 8 TD's out of Roy a minor victory if I had him. I would agree he still has potential for 1200+ and 12+ TD's season but to say its likely in 2005 season w/ Detriot baring his health is asking too much.
I didn't say the earlier projection was a lock, just that it's not terribly unreasonable. Really it's more that I don't understand how one could consider something below his career average production when healthy a victory, like you suggested...A WR to get 1200 yds and 12 TD's is virtually a pro-bowl WR. So you're basically saying that you feel Roy W. is going to be an NFC pro-bowl WR this year? I'd say very slim chance.Well, if you look at his career numbers, they suggest that he should get 900 yards and 9.5 TD's if he were to be healthy. Even last season, he would have been on pace for 845 and 9.8. To expect that a real offense and QB could give him an extra 10-20 yards a game and maybe a TD or two over the course of the season really isn't a lot...I think your expectations are a little high for Roy this year. He definitely has shown the most promise of the WR's in Det but he still is a headcase. I'd consider 900 yds and 8 TD's out of Roy a minor victory if I had him. I would agree he still has potential for 1200+ and 12+ TD's season but to say its likely in 2005 season w/ Detriot baring his health is asking too much.
The largest factor in Roy Williams 2006 campaign is his ability to stay healthy. So his offseason conditioning program may be more important than the QB or even the system. Early reports are at least marginally encouraging, but most are at this stage. Are any Lion fans out there hearing anything new concerning Roy's offseason work ethic?1250 12 TDs is reasonable . Anyone who could produce anything above 6 TDs in back to back years with Harringblo at QB is a potential Pro Bowler with a Mediocre QB and Martz designing plays for him. Roy stays healthy for 16 games and he'll be in the running for a Pro Bowl spot. May not get it until next year as sometimes it takes an extra year to make it. But he'll have Pro Bowl type numbers this season. Anything less than 1000 yards seems like an injury projection in a Martz Offense for a true #1 WR.
Roy Williams is a talented enough receiver that he should be able to post nearly 1100-1200 yards, 80 plus receptions and 8-12 TDs every year he's healthy. Every time I've seen him he stands out and looks to be a dominant receiver. As most know, his biggest problem has been staying on the field.I wouldn't get too high on him this season because of the messy situation that has been the Lions offense, but he could very well meet or exceed your projections. I'd love to have him on my team, but with the injuries he's had the past two years I wouldn't feel comfortable with him as my top receiver starting out the season.why are most predictions have him at about the same numbers. the qb is a lot better and he is healthy now. i think the real question is can he stay healthy ? if he can i have him at 1200 10-13tds, whats your take ?
Agreed, too many fantasy owners have been burned by the Lions offense. Roy Williams has top 10 ability, but every year we look at the Lions offense and expect huge things only to be burned. Also as a Williams owner the last couple years it seems like he would go 3 games with around 50 yards and just as soon as I would put him on my bench he would go for 2 touchdowns in a game. Obviously Martz is an upgrade, but if their offensive line does not play better than I'm not sure we will see much improvement from the QB position.It's the same old story - Roy Williams looks dominant, but something goes wrong every season to keep his production down. People are catching on and projecting him accordingly.
This isn't just a Lions thing. Everyone always said he looked incredible in college, but whenever I saw OU-Texas, he was invisible for some reason.Agreed, too many fantasy owners have been burned by the Lions offense. Roy Williams has top 10 ability, but every year we look at the Lions offense and expect huge things only to be burned. Also as a Williams owner the last couple years it seems like he would go 3 games with around 50 yards and just as soon as I would put him on my bench he would go for 2 touchdowns in a game. Obviously Martz is an upgrade, but if their offensive line does not play better than I'm not sure we will see much improvement from the QB position.It's the same old story - Roy Williams looks dominant, but something goes wrong every season to keep his production down. People are catching on and projecting him accordingly.
By "every" season, you mean't last year? That was only his second year in the league.It's the same old story - Roy Williams looks dominant, but something goes wrong every season to keep his production down. People are catching on and projecting him accordingly.
No, I mean every season in college and his first two pro seasons.By "every" season, you mean't last year? That was only his second year in the league.It's the same old story - Roy Williams looks dominant, but something goes wrong every season to keep his production down. People are catching on and projecting him accordingly.![]()
2001: 5/642002: 2/68 and a 19 yard runI'm an Oklahoma fan (but I'm not biased against Texas players - I own Cedric Benson and have owned Ricky a few times in the past). When OU played Texas, Roy was always invisible. I don't know where to find his stats, but I think he had one respectable 7-90-0 game (in a 50-point blowout loss) and that was about it. For a guy as talented as he is, that's no good.Hey, I've got him projected pretty highly this year. I just put a lot of risk on him because I expect something to go wrong.I sort of understand what you're saying, but you're putting way too much weight on his first two years. 11 and 12 games, 817 / 8 and 687 / 8 for 1504 / 16 is a very nice start of a career. All Big XII each of his 4 years, tied for the record for most consecutive games with a reception (47). I admit, I didn't watch very closely for awhile, but when did he "disapear"?There's a Roy Williams thread on the front page of this forum where his projections are discussed. Repeating what I said there, Roy Williams always looks great, but something always goes wrong. He'll get injured or the offense will mysteriously suck, if history holds. I agree that if he ever ran out of excuses, he'd put up monster numbers, but after seeing him disappear for various reasons throughout college and his first two seasons in the NFL, I'll wait until he proves me wrong before projecting him so highly.
That said, I do have him showing a good statistical improvement this season. I just can't justify a top-5 showing based on his past.
Sure, they were good, but he had Simms and Young at QB, both NFL-starter quality. He had Benson (and maybe Ricky his freshman year) at RB. His linemen got drafted well. His coach has won a national title. He's a top-10 NFL pick. Wouldn't you expect more from him?Meh, maybe I'm wrong about him, but that's fine with me. If it means I don't get him in any drafts this year and am proven wrong, I'll adjust next season.dragging this over from the other Lions thread, to avoid the hijack.
2001: 5/642002: 2/68 and a 19 yard runI'm an Oklahoma fan (but I'm not biased against Texas players - I own Cedric Benson and have owned Ricky a few times in the past). When OU played Texas, Roy was always invisible. I don't know where to find his stats, but I think he had one respectable 7-90-0 game (in a 50-point blowout loss) and that was about it. For a guy as talented as he is, that's no good.Hey, I've got him projected pretty highly this year. I just put a lot of risk on him because I expect something to go wrong.I sort of understand what you're saying, but you're putting way too much weight on his first two years. 11 and 12 games, 817 / 8 and 687 / 8 for 1504 / 16 is a very nice start of a career. All Big XII each of his 4 years, tied for the record for most consecutive games with a reception (47). I admit, I didn't watch very closely for awhile, but when did he "disapear"?There's a Roy Williams thread on the front page of this forum where his projections are discussed. Repeating what I said there, Roy Williams always looks great, but something always goes wrong. He'll get injured or the offense will mysteriously suck, if history holds. I agree that if he ever ran out of excuses, he'd put up monster numbers, but after seeing him disappear for various reasons throughout college and his first two seasons in the NFL, I'll wait until he proves me wrong before projecting him so highly.
That said, I do have him showing a good statistical improvement this season. I just can't justify a top-5 showing based on his past.
2003: 7/89
Not dominant, but he didn't exactly disapear, and it might just be that Okalahoma was actually pretty good on defense?![]()
Expect more, against a national championship caliber defense? maybe. Simms wasn't anything overly special, IIRC Young wasn't a great passer while Roy was at UT. So I'm not really expecting him to have posted exceptional stats against OU.Sure, they were good, but he had Simms and Young at QB, both NFL-starter quality. He had Benson (and maybe Ricky his freshman year) at RB. His linemen got drafted well. His coach has won a national title. He's a top-10 NFL pick. Wouldn't you expect more from him?Meh, maybe I'm wrong about him, but that's fine with me. If it means I don't get him in any drafts this year and am proven wrong, I'll adjust next season.dragging this over from the other Lions thread, to avoid the hijack.
2001: 5/642002: 2/68 and a 19 yard runI'm an Oklahoma fan (but I'm not biased against Texas players - I own Cedric Benson and have owned Ricky a few times in the past). When OU played Texas, Roy was always invisible. I don't know where to find his stats, but I think he had one respectable 7-90-0 game (in a 50-point blowout loss) and that was about it. For a guy as talented as he is, that's no good.Hey, I've got him projected pretty highly this year. I just put a lot of risk on him because I expect something to go wrong.I sort of understand what you're saying, but you're putting way too much weight on his first two years. 11 and 12 games, 817 / 8 and 687 / 8 for 1504 / 16 is a very nice start of a career. All Big XII each of his 4 years, tied for the record for most consecutive games with a reception (47). I admit, I didn't watch very closely for awhile, but when did he "disapear"?There's a Roy Williams thread on the front page of this forum where his projections are discussed. Repeating what I said there, Roy Williams always looks great, but something always goes wrong. He'll get injured or the offense will mysteriously suck, if history holds. I agree that if he ever ran out of excuses, he'd put up monster numbers, but after seeing him disappear for various reasons throughout college and his first two seasons in the NFL, I'll wait until he proves me wrong before projecting him so highly.
That said, I do have him showing a good statistical improvement this season. I just can't justify a top-5 showing based on his past.
2003: 7/89
Not dominant, but he didn't exactly disapear, and it might just be that Okalahoma was actually pretty good on defense?![]()
Tick- Adjusting next year wont yield much value if he breaks out this year he'll cost more next year. Time for value is now. He has 16 TDs in less than 2 years worth of work. Very few WR EVEN Top 10 picks start a career that well. Factor in Detroit mess and Harrington and what he's done is Top 10 drafted worthy. And everything points to more this year. Get the value now especially in early drafts before people see any preseason stuff.
I disagree with the heart aspect. These "tidbits" are for your enjoyment:I see Roy W. more likely going the way of Plexiglass Burress. A perenial underacheivier w/ plenty of god given physical talent/DNA to be a top 5 NFL WR stud but has no heart/focus to get them there. Maintains average/slightly above average NFL WR stats but constantly gets overhyped and over-rated year in and out.