What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

San Francisco 49ers - link to new 2023 thread in latest post (3 Viewers)

Cmon.

Deebo, Aiyuk, Kittle, Juice,  T Williams, Warner, Bosa....Mostert when healthy, Mitchell and Greenlaw are late round gems...
There are three above average players on defense. Trent Williams is amazing but that only means so much when at least 40% of the line is awful. Mitchell is a nice starter but isn’t an instant star or anything. Kittle is probably done as a consistent superstar.  Those three and Deebo are certainly not enough to make for a good offense with a mediocre QB under center. 
 

This team was guilty of VASTLY overrating its talent level in the offseason, and made some awful strategic decisions based on that erroneous assumption that will set the franchise back for a few years. At least unless Lance proves to be a budding superstar. 

 
Cmon.

Deebo, Aiyuk, Kittle, Juice,  T Williams, Warner, Bosa....Mostert when healthy, Mitchell and Greenlaw are late round gems...
There’s def some talent, but it’s irrelevant, the leadership is clearly awful. Furthermore, we don’t have any first round picks in the near future. We’re pretty ####ed and heading further into the abyss.

 
There’s def some talent, but it’s irrelevant, the leadership is clearly awful. Furthermore, we don’t have any first round picks in the near future. We’re pretty ####ed and heading further into the abyss.


Yea I just think most of those guys listed are alright to good.  I think they do alright on the team because there is no one else.  

 
https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/49ers/article/The-404-blues-49ers-record-at-Levi-s-now-16616742.php

The 49ers’ .404 winning percentage at Levi’s matches the third-lowest among NFL teams at a home stadium since 1970 (minimum 25 games), according the Associated Press. With a loss to the Rams, the 49ers’ .397 winning percentage at Levi’s would rank 74th among the 75 qualifying team and home venue combinations over the past 51 years, trailing only the Buccaneers’ .393 percentage at Tampa Stadium from 1976-1997.


HAVE A HAPPY JED SEASON

 
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2021/11/12/49ers-getting-precious-little-through-eight-games-out-of-draft-class-of-2021/

If the 49ers were indeed better — like say the Rams, who have made a habit of trading draft picks for proven talent — then the lack of production and playing time wouldn’t seem like a big deal. But at two games under .500, it’s fair to wonder why more of the draft class of 2021 can’t join running back Elijah Mitchell and get on the field.

The most publicized pick, quarterback Trey Lance, whom the 49ers traded up to select No. 3 overall, has made just one start in place of an injured Jimmy Garappolo. He’s played sparingly in specialty packages designed to take advantage of his athleticism. Lance is so out of sight and out of mind that none other than Joe Montana opined last week that the 49ers should have taken New England Patriots starter Mac Jones in the first round.

“If I was the 49ers I’d have taken the kid from Alabama,” Montana said on ESPN’s “College Football Live.”

General manager John Lynch begs to differ with a franchise icon.

“I’m as convicted that Trey Lance is the right guy, the guy we should have taken, the guy we had conviction with, I’m even more convicted now,” Lynch said Thursday on KNBR. ” I just think it’s got to be at the right time. I think Jimmy’s played pretty well the last couple of weeks and we’re still pretty much in this, albeit on the outside looking in.


HAVE A HAPPY JED SEASON

 
I'm so hopeful around Lance but i think he was a mistake too.  Everyone got so enamored with mahones and the possibility of a qb that just runs around in the backfield for 8 seconds and then throws it 60 yards downfield.  But the most successful teams have smart pocket passers.  That won't be lance

 
I'm so hopeful around Lance but i think he was a mistake too.  Everyone got so enamored with mahones and the possibility of a qb that just runs around in the backfield for 8 seconds and then throws it 60 yards downfield.  But the most successful teams have smart pocket passers.  That won't be lance


Lance will be the new Gio Carmazzi, because the 49ers passed on Mac Jones for Lance, but worse since they traded the farm for Lance, while Gio wound up owning a goat farm up in Marin County.

HAVE A HAPPY JED SEASON

 
https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/49ers/article/City-Council-members-meetings-with-49ers-16616478.php

The disputes have mushroomed since the 2014 opening of $1.3 billion Levi’s Stadium, which was supposed to produce robust revenue streams shared by the city and 49ers. Instead, the relationship has devolved into back-and-forth allegations of misconduct and broken promises.

The city’s Stadium Authority owns Levi’s but leases the facility to the 49ers, who run it through their Forty Niners Stadium Management Co. That company makes financial reports to the city so they can split profits, which the city deploys to pay off bonds used to build the stadium.

Now the Stadium Authority is seeking to terminate the 49ers’ management contract and install professional managers to run the facility. The team sued to stop the move, and the case is awaiting trial.


NEx Systems is a flooring company that the 49ers paid $644,000 for work at the stadium. The city has accused the 49ers of violating state prevailing wage laws by underpaying workers on the project, and cited the issue as a reason for terminating the management contract. The 49ers denied wrongdoing.

“Levi’s signage” may refer to another sticking point in the lawsuit: The city has accused the 49ers of wrongly diverting $800,000 in revenue from the Redbox Bowl college football games played at Levi’s Stadium in 2018 and 2019. The 49ers denied wrongdoing, saying the team was entitled to the money to pay for “signage” at Levi’s Stadium promoting the game.

Four other meetings in July and September addressed the costs of police services at games. The 49ers have taken the city to arbitration on the issue, claiming the city has underpaid public safety costs by $1.7 million.


https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/annkillion/article/Will-49ers-corporate-bullying-turn-Santa-Clara-16618550.php

The 49ers are instead a partner in name only, one that says it has no money to share with the city from Levi’s Stadium in recent years. One that the city says is refusing to open its books to the community that actually owns the stadium. One that blames these theoretical financial problems on a curfew the team knew about and agreed to, which was put in place because the enormous stadium was built in an area close to residential housing and where sound bounces all around the neighborhood. One that has filed lawsuits against its own city.

The 49ers are not behaving as a trusted cohort in the city-owned stadium, but instead as a corporate bully. As Stanford economics Professor Roger Noll, an expert on stadium financing, says, the team wants Santa Clara to be “a 19th century company town,” bought and owned by the 49ers.

To date:

• Jed York spent $2.9 million in last fall’s City Council election, or about $200 per vote, and successfully altered the makeup of the council.

• That remade City Council fired the city attorney, who had defended the city in lawsuits filed by the team over financial concerns.

• 49ers officials met with pro-49ers members of the remade City Council constantly — 57 times in eight months — but never with more than three City Council members; four would have made a quorum and required a public meeting.

The 49ers, through a spokesperson’s responses to The Chronicle, insist all of this ethically dubious behavior is aboveboard. The team has maintained that York poured an eye-popping amount of his own money into the City Council race purely out of concerns for diversity. The team spokesperson calls the 49ers’ political opponents things like “unstable” and “dysfunctional.”

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s likely a duck. If it looks ethically problematic and sounds ethically problematic, it likely is ethically problematic. Please don’t insult the public’s intelligence by saying that a team already embroiled in lawsuits totaling millions of dollars merely wanted to load the City Council with its personal choices for diversity’s sake.


HAVE A HAPPY JED SEASON

 
nice to see us get embarrassed by the cardinals backups and then carolina just kills them.  This team really is hot garbage and it starts with the GM and coach

 
What does this mean ?


It means that since 2003 the 49ers have only 4 winning seasons since the Yorks bought the franchise. Jed is the son of the owners who is the President of the organization. He canned Harbaugh for an 8-8 season for a line coach.

Jed isn't Mark Davis or Stephen Jones. He's Eddie's nephew who wants to be Eddie but is Eddie with a Salary Cap and sleazy local politics when it comes to the stadium. He is more like Eddie before Davis suggested Bill Walsh to Eddie. Just a kid whose parents handed him a football team as a new toy.

 
https://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/Dan-Snyder-kirk-cousins-trade-kyle-shanahan-16623079.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight

According to ex-Washington Football Team coach Jay Gruden (brother of the disgraced Jon Gruden), the San Francisco 49ers were dangerously close to a franchise-altering trade that would have potentially prevented them from moving up to No. 3 in the 2021 NFL Draft.

On "The Kevin Sheehan Show," Gruden spoke openly about the bad blood between 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan and Washington Football Team's owner, Dan Snyder, as well as its former general manager, Bruce Allen. Shanahan was on his father Mike Shanahan's coaching staff in Washington from 2010 to 2013 before being summarily fired (along with his dad and others).

By 2017, Kyle Shanahan was the head coach of the Niners, and Kirk Cousins was in the final year of his contract with Washington. It was oft-rumored that Shanahan wanted to acquire Cousins, but San Francisco ended up opting for a Jimmy Garoppolo trade instead (which only cost them a second-round pick).

The alleged price for Cousins was much, much higher, Gruden says: two first-round picks and possibly two second-round picks. 

Gruden's insinuation is that San Francisco would've been comfortable sending away all those draft picks but ran into a brick wall of pettiness from Snyder and Allen. 

"Obviously, dealing with the Shanahans was something that they did not want to do," Gruden said. "I don’t think that they could stomach having Kirk Cousins be successful for Kyle Shanahan."

 
You take away anything positive from last nights game? 


Yeah I won 100 bucks taking the 49ers and the points. Games like this happen, the Cowboys soiled the bed a week ago, Tampa lost to WFT yesterday. 49ers played to their strengths, hit the keys to the game - win the turnover battle, time of possession, and 3rd down (keys they lost over the past few games they have lost) - and didn't have to put the game into Garoppolo's hands. It really doesn't change the 49er landscape, Garoppolo is who he is, he doesn't have the arm strength, down field accuracy, wheels or pocket presence to be anything above "game manager" (his stat line was like 15-19 187 yards 2tds 0ints), at least he didn't throw his usual "hospital balls" (well there were a few that were close) that gets players like Kittle on the IR last night. The 49ers played football straight outta the 70's, run the ball, play defense, which they could do by capitalizing on the Rams mistakes early. It also saved Shanahan from calling his usual boneheaded plays.

There are still a lot more questions than answers with that franchise that one game doesn't solve or point forward. I think this season was oversold as far as expectations due to 2019, I mean the Eagles won a Super Bowl recently and they are now in full rebuild, Jacksonville went to the AFCC a few years ago and they are still Jacksonville. The duo of Shanahan and Lynch are still underwater as far as overall W-L, and they are 1-3 in the division so far. Mullins tossed 5 tds against the Raiders in a prime time game a few years ago. I should had bet more on the game last night.

Edit: a friend of mine pointed out that this game saved Garoppolo's job for at least another week, and cooled the hot seats of both Shanahan and Lynch. But just a little.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm so hopeful around Lance but i think he was a mistake too.  Everyone got so enamored with mahones and the possibility of a qb that just runs around in the backfield for 8 seconds and then throws it 60 yards downfield.  But the most successful teams have smart pocket passers.  That won't be lance
I’m certainly open to the possibility they blew yet another pick, but I don’t know how you could say that with any degree of confidence at this point. 

You take away anything positive from last nights game? 
Please don’t quote him, it circumvents our ignore filters. 

 
I’m certainly open to the possibility they blew yet another pick, but I don’t know how you could say that with any degree of confidence at this point. 

Please don’t quote him, it circumvents our ignore filters. 


Well to be fair I didn't say he was a waste of pick, I said I was hopeful that he wasn't but my gut feels like he isn't going to worth the draft capital on him.  He may turn out to be the next Mahones and if that's the case then maybe (I'm still not sure about that trade) he might be worth it.   

I just think they got so enamored with a Mahones type passer that they way overbid on Lance.  You have to be a pocket passer in this league.  It's what makes you successful.  

 
Well that was fun to watch!

Let's see if they can keep that kind of focus, intensity, and execution going.


I correctly predicted this in the game thread before the game started.  It had the feeling of the Rams imploding on themselves and they sure did.

That being said it was nice to see some great play and some energy from this team.  Deebo is a beast.

 
You have to be a pocket passer in this league.  It's what makes you successful.  


At least 4 of the top 5-6 QBs in the league are mobile types who aren't traditional pocket passers.  It's a skill they need to have to succeed at the highest levels, it's a little early to say a 21 year old who has made one start won't be able to do it.

 
At least 4 of the top 5-6 QBs in the league are mobile types who aren't traditional pocket passers.  It's a skill they need to have to succeed at the highest levels, it's a little early to say a 21 year old who has made one start won't be able to do it.


Yes they are but they are all very capable pocket passers (minus LJ who good teams always figure out).   Lots of chatter this year about Mahones has to stop being so cute and running around and throwing under hand and just count to 3 go through his progressions and throw.  

I agree it's way to early.  I'm not saying cut the guy...it's just my initial gut feeling that we overpaid.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Lombardi on Twitter:

Only one drop back from under center and one play-action pass (vs the Rams Monday). The 49ers have moved Jimmy Garoppolo to 96% shotgun throws over the past 3 weeks, and they're recapturing some 2017 magic with that adjustment: He's the NFL's top-graded passer in that span.

https://t.co/TiDyhTkPfC

 
Well to be fair I didn't say he was a waste of pick, I said I was hopeful that he wasn't but my gut feels like he isn't going to worth the draft capital on him.  He may turn out to be the next Mahones and if that's the case then maybe (I'm still not sure about that trade) he might be worth it.   

I just think they got so enamored with a Mahones type passer that they way overbid on Lance.  You have to be a pocket passer in this league.  It's what makes you successful.  


They wasted a lot of capitol to pick Lance at that spot, and it's Shanahan who did it. It's like Mike Ditka trading the Saints whole draft for Ricky Williams. People eventually are going to want to see why they did it. Especially when your starting QB is playing like the bottom third tier of QB's and is too limited to cover deficiencies throughout the offense. 

From a pure physical perspective (well, maybe outside of the face, but beauty is within the eye of the beholder, or Jed), Lance is more intriguing. 49er fans have been QB starved for almost an entire generation. They see other franchises like Cincinnati land a Joe Burrow, New England land a Mac Jones, Chargers with Herbert, Jacksonville with Lawrence, and they are still the team within the division with the question at quarterback.

It was Shanahan who placed the value on Lance. His value is Franchise Quarterback, given what it cost on draft picks. He could wind up a Mahomes. Or a Tim Couch.

 
David Lombardi on Twitter:

Only one drop back from under center and one play-action pass (vs the Rams Monday). The 49ers have moved Jimmy Garoppolo to 96% shotgun throws over the past 3 weeks, and they're recapturing some 2017 magic with that adjustment: He's the NFL's top-graded passer in that span.

https://t.co/TiDyhTkPfC


They won last night despite Garopollo, he completed 15 passes for 187 yards, 2 TDs. Shaun Hill did that.

 
Best road record by QB, since 2000 (min 10 starts)

Jimmy Garoppolo 16-4 (.800)

Patrick Mahomes 24-6 (.800)

Lamar Jackson 17-5 (.773)

Tom Brady 106-49 (.684)

Peyton Manning 79-38 (.675)

 
Haters will hate, but we're looking like we've found our identity again.

Minnesota just beat Green Bay in a huge divisional game and now have to travel to the West Coast. Could be a recipe for a letdown game for them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haters will hate, but were.looking like we've found our identity again.

Minnesota just beat Green Bay in a huge divisional game and now have to travel to the West Coast. Could be a recipe for a letdown game for them.
As a Deebo fan I love this.

 
Geno Smith beat the Jags. Posted 20-24 195 yards 2 tds 0ints too

Homers gonna homer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A couple more numbers at this point in the season

5 wins, 5 losses.

Only one win against a team above .500.

 
It's weird when this thread is bumped and there are no new posts. Anyhoo....

San Francisco 49ers have turned into a playoff team over 14 days

https://www.espn.com/blog/san-francisco-49ers/post/_/id/40087/san-francisco-49ers-have-turned-into-a-playoff-team-over-14-days

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- After an embarrassing loss to a watered-down version of the Arizona Cardinals two weeks ago, the San Francisco 49ers had the look of a rudderless team headed for nowhere.

Two weeks later, the Niners look like a team that is not only capable of making a push for the NFC playoffs but one that can make some noise if they get there. Sunday's 30-10 beatdown of the Jacksonville Jaguars follows Monday night's dominant 31-10 dispatching of the Los Angeles Rams.

From the outside, the first could easily be explained away by San Francisco's apparent hex over the Rams. The second would be excused by the Jaguars' overall ineptitude. Put together and into the proper context, those two victories suggest that the Niners have finally discovered themselves.

At 5-5 with two wins in less than a week, these Niners aren't your 2-week-old neighbor's Niners.

"These past 14 days have, I don't want to say changed our team, but we're definitely moving in the right direction now," quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo said. "We have just got to keep going. There's a lot of football left to be played."

Indeed there is. While it was way too soon to kick dirt on the Niners after that Nov. 7 loss to an Arizona team without quarterback Kyler Murray and receiver DeAndre Hopkins (especially given the dearth of NFC teams pulling away with playoff spots), it was reasonable to wonder whether they had what was needed to right the ship and make a push for one of those seven postseason positions.

Instead, the 49ers have righted the ship and are moving in the direction of playing games into the middle of January.

How? There are plenty of ways in which the Niners have improved in their past two games but nowhere is it more important than the most obvious place: the turnover battle. San Francisco was minus-9 in takeaway differential in its first eight games, including minus-3 against Arizona. In the past two weeks, the 49ers are plus-4, including a pair of fumble recoveries against the Jaguars.

"We sat here after the Arizona game -- bear in the building type of stuff -- everyone is trying to solve these problems and we literally said 'We've got to stop turning the ball over, we've got to get a couple turnovers on defense or special teams,' and that's all we've done," tight end George Kittle said.

That turnover turnaround helped the 49ers soundly beat the Rams on national television and opened some eyes in the process. Doing it again to the Jaguars instead of falling into the "short week/long travel/early start time" trap six days later was exactly the kind of thing a team with legitimate playoff aspirations would do.

"I think it's coming together at the right time," linebacker Fred Warner said. "We're getting to that back half of the season and we're getting hot. I think that's just who we are. I think all along we've been trying to find that identity, trying to find ourselves and it's starting to show through."

The real test of the Niners' potential postseason hopes will come over the next seven weeks. The first, next week against the Minnesota Vikings, carries double importance. If the playoffs started today, the Niners would be out, but a home win against Minnesota would allow the Niners to leap over the Vikings and give them a meaningful victory for potential tiebreakers down the line. San Francisco follows with games against teams on the further fringes of the NFC playoff picture after that, facing the Seattle Seahawks on Dec. 5 and Atlanta Falcons on Dec. 19.

While all of that might be looking ahead a bit too far, the Niners have identified and, at least for now, corrected the issues that had them wobbling to a 3-5 start.

"After that Arizona game, it was pretty low," coach Kyle Shanahan said. "We were all embarrassed how we looked and when we watched the tape, we saw a lot of stuff that we felt we could fix. It wasn't as discouraging as it felt during that game. I was happy with the guys that instead of getting discouraged, they watched the tape and saw the stuff that we could improve on. It's a credit to the guys and the coaches that they didn't get down when it was easy to get down. They just kept focusing on trying to get better and practicing and trying to detail stuff up and I think we've done a better job of that these past two weeks."

Making a run to the postseason will be dependent on whether the 49ers of the past two weeks continue to show up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not weird when two weeks ago everyone jumped of the bandwagon.

I don't see how a team like the 49ers could lose to the Jags after a Russell Wilson less Hawks team could beat them with a Geno Smith - who cost the Hawks games that weren't against the Jags - and all of the sudden are a playoff team that has only beaten one team above .500, who they match up well against and on a new starting QB. They are still third place in the division. Geno Smith notwithstanding.

I know people here like to post articles from the Sliver Linings Playbook after a win that brings the 49ers to .500 through ten games while still looking up to the Rams and the surging Cardinals (who one another big division game with Colt McCoy at QB!), and the only reason why the 49ers are mathematically (oh boy, here is more math again) is due to the expanded post season.

I thought they would had beaten the Cards a few weeks ago. They got trounced with Colt McCoy beating them as well.

Being 1-3 in the division is one thing, being 4-4 in the NFC is even bigger due to how to get into the wild card round. Could they win out the string? Well beating the Jaguars got them to .500. But they still have only one win against an above.500 team, yet still got beat by the Seahawks who are well below .500, and while at home.

Teams with a sub par home record are still who they are. One win at home after losing many doesn't chage that either. Playoff bound teams should be able to win at home.

 
49ers are -3.5 dogs at home (which really doesn't mean much, but still given their home record of recent just needs a mention) against the Vikings, with the O/U 49.0 (which is a nice irony/touch). Good day to take the 49ers and the over, but it might be Robbie Gould time, so maybe the 3.5 spread.

 
49ers are -3.5 dogs at home (which really doesn't mean much, but still given their home record of recent just needs a mention) against the Vikings, with the O/U 49.0 (which is a nice irony/touch). Good day to take the 49ers and the over, but it might be Robbie Gould time, so maybe the 3.5 spread.
49ers are favorites, not dogs. Vikings are so banged up that it’s hard to see them stopping the 9ers on the ground, similar to the playoff game a couple of years ago. SF would also be smart to keep the Vikes O off the field as much as possible. Screams high scoring but I think long time consuming drives by SF moderates that a bit 

 
49ers are favorites, not dogs. Vikings are so banged up that it’s hard to see them stopping the 9ers on the ground, similar to the playoff game a couple of years ago. SF would also be smart to keep the Vikes O off the field as much as possible. Screams high scoring but I think long time consuming drives by SF moderates that a bit 


Yeah I saw them dogs on one site, thanks for the correction. I agree with you on keeping it on the ground, but I can also see a final score of say 31-28. But don't use me as your stone cold lock sage lulz. This game could be another "WTF Kyle?" games that have reared their ugly head earlier this season.

 
Final score: 34-26 SF. I was sweatin that one since I took the 49ers and the points. It could had wound up 30-34, if not for a missed PAT and 2 2 point conversions that failed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top