What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Seattle at Los Angeles*** (-7) O/U 46.5 Tuesday Night Football sponsored by Moderna (1 Viewer)

I think ODB is coming off CV-19 list, I don't have a clue who is actually playing tonight for both teams and hope some of you will be able to update. 

There has to be a few people out there holding something like Sony-Penny-Lockett and trying to figure out who they can play, fill out the final Flex spot, there's a lot riding tonight. 

-The Rams should be highly motivated to win their Division and move ahead or out of the Wildcard section of the 5-6-7 Seed area. 

Rams 31...Seattle 14

Just my gut before Noon, this could change but it feels like the Rams should handle their business tonight. 

 
Wonder if Lockett plays? What time do they have to activate him?

surprised no info on if he’s even traveled? 
 

I’m down 12.6 and they have Metcalf.  I have Devonta Smith and Van Jefferson. 
 

I hope Lockett plays so I can bench one of the two. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A very surprising stat I heard about wonderkid McVay.  He's awful at making adjustments. That is to say if his team is losing at half, the game is often over.  I'll put the stats up later when I have time, but suffice is to say I was very surprised by this.  And it came from a rabid Rams fan, btw, as proof of him being an overrated coach. 

I don't care one way or the other, btw, just a fact that surprised me, as I thought he was a great young coach myself, but to this point, he cannot come back on teams very often.

 
A very surprising stat I heard about wonderkid McVay.  He's awful at making adjustments. That is to say if his team is losing at half, the game is often over.  I'll put the stats up later when I have time, but suffice is to say I was very surprised by this.  And it came from a rabid Rams fan, btw, as proof of him being an overrated coach. 

I don't care one way or the other, btw, just a fact that surprised me, as I thought he was a great young coach myself, but to this point, he cannot come back on teams very often.


In fairness this is his first season with a quarterback like Stafford instead of Goff. A change like that is pretty major.

 
A very surprising stat I heard about wonderkid McVay.  He's awful at making adjustments. That is to say if his team is losing at half, the game is often over.  I'll put the stats up later when I have time, but suffice is to say I was very surprised by this.  And it came from a rabid Rams fan, btw, as proof of him being an overrated coach. 

I don't care one way or the other, btw, just a fact that surprised me, as I thought he was a great young coach myself, but to this point, he cannot come back on teams very often.
According to Stathead, the Rams are 7-22 when trailing by at least one point at halftime in regular-season and postseason games since 2017, a win percentage of 0.241. That ranks 11th in the NFL, considerably better than most people probably think.

The Steelers are a league-best 13-18 when trailing at halftime, followed by the Packers (13-20), Saints (11-18), Chiefs (9-15) and Seahawks (13-25).

When holding a lead?

Has. Never. Lost.

45-0

It’s the NFL record for most consecutive wins when leading at the half.

 
According to Stathead, the Rams are 7-22 when trailing by at least one point at halftime in regular-season and postseason games since 2017, a win percentage of 0.241. That ranks 11th in the NFL, considerably better than most people probably think.

The Steelers are a league-best 13-18 when trailing at halftime, followed by the Packers (13-20), Saints (11-18), Chiefs (9-15) and Seahawks (13-25).

When holding a lead?

Has. Never. Lost.

45-0

It’s the NFL record for most consecutive wins when leading at the half.


:goodposting:

 
Rams are just too good for Russ cooking some Penny pasta with Metcalf balls. I’m sure there are lots of fantasy playoff implications so good luck to us all. 31-23. 

 
According to Stathead, the Rams are 7-22 when trailing by at least one point at halftime in regular-season and postseason games since 2017, a win percentage of 0.241. That ranks 11th in the NFL, considerably better than most people probably think.

The Steelers are a league-best 13-18 when trailing at halftime, followed by the Packers (13-20), Saints (11-18), Chiefs (9-15) and Seahawks (13-25).

When holding a lead?

Has. Never. Lost.

45-0

It’s the NFL record for most consecutive wins when leading at the half.
This is why cherry picked negative stats are rarely accurate. On the road, vs teams with a winning record, vs teams that are favorites, etc etc. Hard to find too many that would excel in those situations.

 
BobbyLayne said:
According to Stathead, the Rams are 7-22 when trailing by at least one point at halftime in regular-season and postseason games since 2017, a win percentage of 0.241. That ranks 11th in the NFL, considerably better than most people probably think.

The Steelers are a league-best 13-18 when trailing at halftime, followed by the Packers (13-20), Saints (11-18), Chiefs (9-15) and Seahawks (13-25).

When holding a lead?

Has. Never. Lost.

45-0

It’s the NFL record for most consecutive wins when leading at the half.


Good stuff, thanks.  I wouldn't call 11th great -- top of the middle tier in the league -- but he's definitely better than what the initial stats implied.  Or maybe it's better understood that most teams don't have winning records in that situation (being down at half).  

Thanks for digging some more on it, like I said, I was curious.

 
Fox going into a commercial break with Pearl Jam earlier and now The Foo Fighters.  It''s as if the game was in Seattle, although I love the selections.

 
Unable to watch the game, what’s up with Michel?  Looked like he was doing pretty good but hasn’t done anything in the last 2.0 minutes 

 
They showed a wild card graphic that had some errors. The 49ers are 8-6, not 7-6. COVID must had got the graphics guy too.

 
This entire week has featured some of the worst NFL football that I have ever witnessed. I blame covid. 
It's been slow. I think a lot of it might actually have to do with expected passes over expectation. I saw a graph. This week the passes over expected passes is at its lowest in years. Like it's at -5%. Probably with all the COVID, teams are keeping it simple and just running. Bad QB play makes unwatchable football, and there just aren't enough good QBs in the league. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top