What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seattle @ Washington ... Pregame chatter (1 Viewer)

Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times. Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 13 of those giveaways.Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
Furthermore....Only 2 of Wilson's 11 have come in the last 8 games.
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times. Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
Now factor in each of their opponent's propensity for give-away/take-away ;)
LOL. And the turf, and the wind, and the number of players on each team who ate greasy food the night before the game.
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 13 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't.
Well duh. And you hope Matt Flynn isn't playing. The point is that Wilson has given the ball away more than all the Redskins who are playing put together.
 
I think my favorite part of this thread is going to be after the game when one team's fans start bumping old posts saying that they were right/the other fans were wrong when we're looking at both teams having very realistic odds at winning
If I'm not mistaken the winner of this game plays the Falcons next. I'll be rooting for either one against the Falcons, and I think both the Skins and the Seahawks have a decent chance of beating them.
No. The Falcons play the lowest seed left. The Vikings are the lowest seed in the NFC and play the Falcons if they win. If the Vikings lose, the winner of this game plays the Falcons.
 
I think my favorite part of this thread is going to be after the game when one team's fans start bumping old posts saying that they were right/the other fans were wrong when we're looking at both teams having very realistic odds at winning
If I'm not mistaken the winner of this game plays the Falcons next. I'll be rooting for either one against the Falcons, and I think both the Skins and the Seahawks have a decent chance of beating them.
No. The Falcons play the lowest seed left. The Vikings are the lowest seed in the NFC and play the Falcons if they win. If the Vikings lose, the winner of this game plays the Falcons.
In other words, the winner of this game plays the Falcons.
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
You think? That's probably why I implied that Clemons vs him may hasten Cousins' appearance in the game...
 
Last game of the weekend. The networks clearly think this is the most intriguing game.
I'm just happy we finally got a little bit of schedule love. I'm also hoping that *if* the Seahawks make it through to the next round that Paul Allen opens up his wallet and keeps the team on the East Coast, buying a state or something so they can practice there instead of making two additional cross-country flights...
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
You think? That's probably why I implied that Clemons vs him may hasten Cousins' appearance in the game...
I was clarifying for skin fans that didn't know he was our trash.
 
Last game of the weekend. The networks clearly think this is the most intriguing game.
I'm just happy we finally got a little bit of schedule love. I'm also hoping that *if* the Seahawks make it through to the next round that Paul Allen opens up his wallet and keeps the team on the East Coast, buying a state or something so they can practice there instead of making two additional cross-country flights...
Of all the things there are to worry about re: the Seahawks, Paul Allen opening his wallet is by far the last one.
 
Griffin has fumbled 12 times this season. Almost once a game. Where are these coming? Sacks? Designed Runs?
New Orleans: A sack with an own recovery.Cincinnati: Two recorded as sacks, but one was really an old school option (not read option) play where he was hit before he pitched. He lost that one to Cincy and recovered his own fumble on the other sack. His third fumble that game was an "aborted" fumble that was recovered by Brandon Banks. I don't recall any snap problems with Griffin, so I think this was an option related fumble. I don't remember the play exactly, but I think he pitched to Banks who didn't get it cleanly then he recovered it.Tampa: On a QB draw headed into the endzone. Garcon recovered in the endzone for a TD.Giants: "(2:22) (Shotgun) 10-R.Griffin right end to 50 for -3 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at 50. 10-R.Griffin pushed ob at NYG 42 for 8 yards (26-A.Rolle). Officially, a rush for five yards." Not really sure what that was. Probably a run of some sort, but I don't remember how he fumbled. I think I remember a bad read option exchange that he picked up and ran, but I could be making that up. His other fumble in this game was a bad read on the read option. JPP came straight at him and he kept the ball for some reason and then fumbled when he was hit. The Giants recovered. It's possible the play was supposed to be play action. Griffin clearly decided to keep the ball and tried to avoid JPP a split second later.Pittsburgh: Listed as "aborted" with an own recovery. I think this was a read option fumble on the exchange/keep. Griffin recovered it.Philadelphia: Scramble, recovered by FB Darrell Young.Giants: His read option run on MNF that he fumbled just before his knee hit while sliding and WR Josh Morgan recovered it and ran into the endzone.Baltimore: "Aborted" recovered by Morris. This play was actually very close to being a TD. On a 3rd and short in Ravens territory, the Redskins called a more traditional option play. I think Griffin did a fake handoff up the middle to the FB and then had Morris as the pitch option. But, two Ravens defenders went hard to Griffin and he didn't have enough time to make a good pitch. He didn't have the best grip on the ball and tried a two-handed shove to get the ball to Morris. The pitch was a little off and Morris recovered the ball. Had it been a good pitch, Morris had nobody to stop him.Philadephia: Officially listed as a sack. Under pressure, Griffin tried to the ball out to Moss in the flat. The pass ended up being a lateral and Moss recovered it.So, it's all really a pretty even split between sacks, runs/scrambles, and aborted plays (option fumbles that are credited to Griffin because the next guy never had full possession).
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
Irony--clemons started out on the skins...left withoutWinning a starting job...

 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
Irony--clemons started out on the skins...left withoutWinning a starting job...
Its a shame the skins were not playing him at the right position. He is a better DE than lber.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The redskins have let a lot of good players go...I didn't say they did the right thing...just ironic that Clemons and polumbus face each other now

Regarding polumbus...he may not be heralded but he's found his nitch as part of the skins..the offensive line has been good this year so you really can't call him trash...#1 rush offense and minimal sacks says otherwise...

 
The redskins have let a lot of good players go...I didn't say they did the right thing...just ironic that Clemons and polumbus face each other nowRegarding polumbus...he may not be heralded but he's found his nitch as part of the skins..the offensive line has been good this year so you really can't call him trash...#1 rush offense and minimal sacks says otherwise...
Shanahan has a very good track record of picking up late-round or undrafted FA (in Polumbus' case) and turning them into decent OL. His ZBS requires smaller, more agile OL and I'm not surprised Polumbus has found a home under Shanny. It didn't work out for Polumbus as a Bronco (or a Seahawk), but I'm glad to see he's doing pretty well as a starter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right...ditto with litchensteiger...shanahan picks guys that fit his scheme...this is also why he took Williams over okung...and why he can prosper with a guy like morris. He has a good sense of his scheme and what type of player ex cells in that scheme.

 
The redskins have let a lot of good players go...I didn't say they did the right thing...just ironic that Clemons and polumbus face each other nowRegarding polumbus...he may not be heralded but he's found his nitch as part of the skins..the offensive line has been good this year so you really can't call him trash...#1 rush offense and minimal sacks says otherwise...
Shanahan has a very good track record of picking up late-round or undrafted FA (in Polumbus' case) and turning them into decent OL. His ZBS requires smaller, more agile OL and I'm not surprised Polumbus has found a home under Shanny. It didn't work out for Polumbus as a Bronco (or a Seahawk), but I'm glad to see he's doing pretty well as a starter.
Nobody over the last 3 years have done this better than the Hawks. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think my favorite part of this thread is going to be after the game when one team's fans start bumping old posts saying that they were right/the other fans were wrong when we're looking at both teams having very realistic odds at winning
If I'm not mistaken the winner of this game plays the Falcons next. I'll be rooting for either one against the Falcons, and I think both the Skins and the Seahawks have a decent chance of beating them.
No. The Falcons play the lowest seed left. The Vikings are the lowest seed in the NFC and play the Falcons if they win. If the Vikings lose, the winner of this game plays the Falcons.
In other words, the winner of this game plays the Falcons.
best post in a great thread.
 
He has a good sense of his scheme and what type of player ex cells in that scheme.
I'm not sure Haynesworth worked out so well being forced into a 3-4 D.
that seemed more like a Snyder pickup than anything else--at least to me.But Shanahan has never been a defensive-minded coach (years of bad Bronco D was probably what did him in in Denver), and picking up quick-fix defensive Free agents who ended up busting wouldn't have been anything new for Shanny. So I suppose it wouldn't surprise me too much if he did tab Al as the guy to build a 3-4 around. That said, his innovation on offence--whether it be installing his version of the ZBS/WCO, installing a variation of the pistol/spread option, or finding unheralded guys to fit his offensive scheme/tweaking the scheme to fit his offensive personnel--has never really been an issue.

Historically, he's also been good at contriving and implementing gameplans for games like the one coming up. That's one of the things that makes this such a good matchup, imo. Shanahan's RGIII-led offence (which, apparently, Seattle has pilfered from already this year) vs. Seattle's vaunted d.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shanahan inherited the Haynesworth problem. He wanted to run a 3-4 with his new team. He wasn't going to stick with the 4-3 because of one disgruntled player who didn't want to make the transition. Shanahan's handling of Haynesworth, and his subsequent ejection from the roster, set the tone for the top-to-bottom culture change that Shanahan oversaw the past three seasons, which is a huge part of why we're as competitive as we are right now.

 
Here's another article that breaks down the Redskins tape and explains keys to the Seahawks winning the game.

For those of you following the FieldGulls articles I've been linking, this one is pretty interesting in terms of what Washington is doing on offense and what might disrupt them.

 
Man, Griffin is too good to be true. I don't mean just as a player. Was watching Inside the NFL tonight. After the game last week, instead of running off to celebrate with his team, he chases down Tony Romo and says "Hey Tony, I just wanted to say don't listen to what anyone else says about you. You're a great quarterback and this game doesn't mean anything."

Class act. :thumbup:

Almost makes me want to cry when I compare him to a BUM like JaMarcus Russell who didn't give a s##t about anything, on or off the field.

 
Man, Griffin is too good to be true. I don't mean just as a player. Was watching Inside the NFL tonight. After the game last week, instead of running off to celebrate with his team, he chases down Tony Romo and says "Hey Tony, I just wanted to say don't listen to what anyone else says about you. You're a great quarterback and this game doesn't mean anything."Class act. :thumbup: Almost makes me want to cry when I compare him to a BUM like JaMarcus Russell who didn't give a s##t about anything, on or off the field.
It reminds me of the kind words Richard Sherman had for Tom Brady as he was leaving the field.I know people outside of Seattle hate Sherman, but I love the guy. I really can't remember a time when we showed any bravado outside of "we want the ball and we're gonna score!"
 
Calling it now, the winner of this game will represent the NFC in the SB. People are going to find out that Wilson is the real deal, he's not just being carried by Lynch and the defense. He will be a top 10 QB in this league, maybe top 5-7 in a few years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the Seahawks have a major advantage with Leon Washington vs a weak-legged Kai Forbath.
I feel like I saw a quote earlier this year where Forbath said the Skins intentionally kick it to the goal line and the corners instead of through the end zone. He said something about how he could kick it through the end zone but that wasn't the "game plan." Seemed like a kind of stupid "game plan" to me, but maybe I misheard.ETA: No, I was right. Here it is. :loco:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seattle has always been soft...those day's are over.
After years and years of being soft and nice this makes me so happy. Even during the peak of the Holmgren era all I wanted was a team that would beat other teams up. Finally have that. Its so much fun to watch as a fan versus finesse.
 
Calling it now, the winner of this game will represent the NFC in the SB. People are going to find out that Wilson is the real deal, he's not just being carried by Lynch and the defense. He will be a top 10 QB in this league, maybe top 5-7 in a few years.
He is already Top 5. People just haven't accepted it yet..... QB raiting, QBR..... he is the man.
 
I think the Seahawks have a major advantage with Leon Washington vs a weak-legged Kai Forbath.
I feel like I saw a quote earlier this year where Forbath said the Skins intentionally kick it to the goal line and the corners instead of through the end zone. He said something about how he could kick it through the end zone but that wasn't the "game plan." Seemed like a kind of stupid "game plan" to me, but maybe I misheard.ETA: No, I was right. Here it is. :loco:
Can anyone find average starting field position by team after kickoffs?
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times. Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 13 of those giveaways.Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
Furthermore....Only 2 of Wilson's 11 have come in the last 8 games.
Wilson has 3 turnovers in the last 8 games, actually. You must be thinking of RGIII, who actually does only have 2 ;)Don't let the stats stand in the way of your homerism though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can anyone find average starting field position by team after kickoffs?
Well that wasn't fun, but here you go :)Games 1-5Cundiff - 25 Kickoffs - average starting field position 19.88 yard line - 15 touchbacks (60% of kicks)Games 6-16Forbath - 58 Kickoffs - average starting field position 23.2 yard line - 15 touchbacks (25.8% of kicks)Onside kicks were not included in these numbers.
 
Can anyone find average starting field position by team after kickoffs?
Are you looking for Redskins opponents starting field position? That would involve some tedious data scrubbing but I might tackle it if I get bored :)
All teams.I can use NFL.com data to estimate a starting field position (using number of touchbacks, average return, average distance of kicks), but I'm not sure how accurate it is. Using my estimated field position, I get the following regression line:EFP = 23.7 - .05*PCTEFP = Estimated Field PositionPCT = Percentage of kickoffs that are touchbacksSo, the higher the % of TBs, the lower the starting field position. Makes sense. However, R-squared is only .19 so having more touchbacks.Or, I can get:EFP = 47.5-0.4*AVGAVG = Average distance per kickThat has an R-squared of .29, so that's stronger. The longer the kick, the worse the FP. Duh.Of course, my EFP could be off a couple yards, which might make a difference.If the Redskins really are intentionally kicking the ball short to entice returns, it would be nice to know if that makes any sense at all. I've just assumed this whole time that Forbath has a weak leg.
 
Both the Redskins and Seattle have taken the ball away on fumbles or interceptions 31 times.

Seattle has given the ball away by fumble or interception 18 times. Russell Wilson is responsible for 11 of those giveaways.

Washington has given the ball away by fumble or interception 14 times, 3 of which were Kirk Cousins interceptions and 1 of which was a Brandon Banks fumble. Cousins and Banks won't be playing.
You hope he isn't. Tyler Polumbus vs Chris Clemons...
Tyler was not good enough to play for the Hawks.
You think? That's probably why I implied that Clemons vs him may hasten Cousins' appearance in the game...
I was clarifying for skin fans that didn't know he was our trash.
Chris Clemons is a Redskins cast-off. Sometimes players do well with more time and/or a new environment or scheme, right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top