Pictus Cat
Footballguy
Thank you Jeff. This should really help me in SSL 1 next year. Brady should have been J. Walker, Priest - Brooks, da Bears - Keyshawn, Engram a Def. Thank you Bass for the opportunity. This is fun and educational.QuarterbacksPictus Cat
Pick Pos Player Team BYE
03.12 QB2 Tom Brady NE 6
08.05 QB33 Daunte Culpepper Mia 8
01.12 RB8 Brian Westbrook Phi 9
04.05 RB17 Chris Brown Ten 7
06.05 RB26 Priest Holmes KC 3
11.12 RB66 Brandon Jacobs NYG 4
16.05 RB84 Maurice Morris Sea 5
02.05 WR3 Torry Holt StL 7
05.12 WR16 T.J. Houshmandzadeh Cin 5
12.05 WR42 Bobby Engram Sea 5
17.12 WR92 Bernard Berrian Chi 7
14.05 WR999 Chad Jackson NE 6
15.12 TE17 Courtney Anderson Oak 3
10.05 TE999 Marcedes Lewis Jac 6
09.12 PK2 Neil Rackers Ari 9
18.05 PK21 Phil Dawson Cle 6
07.12 DEF1 Chicago Chi 7
13.12 DEF8 Seattle Sea 5
NOTE: Number after the position (i.e. TE37) indicates relative finish in 2005, not the 37th TE selected.
03.12 QB2 Tom Brady NE 6
08.05 QB33 Daunte Culpepper Mia 8
Two solid QBs here. Brady should cover C-Pep until he returns, hopefully by Week 6(?) and then there's two solid choices. Only issue is a health concern, which Miami absolutely has with the addition of Harrington.
GRADE: A- (To an "A+" if CPep is returning healthy).
Running Backs
01.12 RB8 Brian Westbrook Phi 9
04.05 RB17 Chris Brown Ten 7
06.05 RB26 Priest Holmes KC 3
11.12 RB66 Brandon Jacobs NYG 4
16.05 RB84 Maurice Morris Sea 5
Westbrook is in PPR leagues. Priest Holmes, however, looks like a reach. He's gone at 9.02 (SSL3), 16.07 (SSL1) and 13.07 (SSL2) in the other leagues, so Round 6 was too early. Jacobs is one-dimensional, but could be valuable if Tiki gets hurt. MoMo - same thing, except better than Jacobs.
Is Chris Brown still available? That's your RB2, most likely. No bye week issues.
Westbrook + committee for RB2. Could work out fine (but 5 is maybe one too many).
GRADE: B/B+
Wide Receivers
02.05 WR3 Torry Holt StL 7
05.12 WR16 T.J. Houshmandzadeh Cin 5
12.05 WR42 Bobby Engram Sea 5
17.12 WR92 Bernard Berrian Chi 7
14.05 WR999 Chad Jackson NE 6
Holt at WR1, Housh at WR2. Sounds pretty good. Who's WR3? Engram - TD grabber, but not consistent. CJax? How many rookie WRs even get on the field in the first year? Add in that he has to learn Belichick's offense. Berrian - late pick but I don't know about WR2+ in Chicago. Add in two byes that overlap and only 5 WRs, this group needed another body. Drop Jacobs for WR59 or 60 and this team definitely improves.
GRADE: B-/C+
Tight Ends
15.12 TE17 Courtney Anderson Oak 3
10.05 TE999 Marcedes Lewis Jac 6
I like the Lewis pickup, especially with Jimmy Smith retiring. Still - lots of receivers / options in Jacksonville and they do like to run first. Anderson started strong and fizzled last year. Not much value with him.
GRADE: B-
Kickers
09.12 PK2 Neil Rackers Ari 9
18.05 PK21 Phil Dawson Cle 6
Outstanding group of kickers - last year. Who knows this year. Strong promise, and I'll rank them as high as I can - but they're still kickers. No distance bonuses either. Rackers in Round 9 was way too early.
GRADE: A+ on personnel
Defenses
07.12 DEF1 Chicago Chi 7
13.12 DEF8 Seattle Sea 5
Very solid defenses, with no bye overlaps. Chicago in Round 7???? WAY WAY WAY too early. Hurt the team in other places, notably TE and WR.
GRADE: A+
Overall
Interesting strategy - go and get your starters and don't worry about depth - interesting. I don't know if it will get this team very far, but I like the thought and guts to go with it. Clearly, though, TE and WR are lacking in depth. Lots of reliance on iffy players with health (Holmes, Culpepper), but the team should cover. TE may be lucky with Lewis in JAX without Jimmy Smith. Good effort for what I believe was a first time in Survior Drafts.
OVERALL GRADE: B/B+
Is this where the trash talk starts?
I would be glad to hold the money. When you guys drop out before me, I would be glad to keep holding it.
On Eric Johnson, I believe I would take the over on Jeff's projections at this time. Gentelman's bet. Which is to say I have nothing and no reputation to lose.
Sincerely and again, thank you.