Smack Tripper
Footballguy
well we can in brief go back to what we KNOW:If there was any actual meat on that bone about the need for an acting coach, wouldn't you think another reporter or outlet would've picked up on it? But after months, it still comes back to the one story and an unnamed source. It comes back to this.
Either:
1) Disney gave the lead roll in a massive franchise to someone who can't act, risking potentially billions of dollars if there is no parts 2 and 3 because of the substandard acting
or
2) Someone is looking for click bait
Which do you think is more likely? Keep in mind, no other outlet has decided to chase that same click bait. You're looking for a fire, but there just isn't any smoke.
1. Ron Howard was brought in take it over
2. The film promotional material was released at a date entirely unprecedented in the blockbuster era (post 1975)
3. The lead actor is probably the most minimally featured player in the trailer in the movie about him
So does that mean anything? Not in an of itself, but not exactly the path to click bait you suggest. What more is to be said until it comes out anyway which won't be long now.