austinball
Footballguy
Is this a bad idea? I can see times that it would be (all your eggs in one basket), but if you feel VERY confident in the passing potential of your team, doesn't it actually reduce risk?
Apologies but Im going to use my own team example -- I have AJ Green and Marvin Jones.
My thinking is that the Dolphins give up an average of about 275 yds to opposing teams. CINN is above average passing game, so if I could know FOR SURE that those two guys would get the majority, say 250 yds with the possiblity of a score, that locks in 25 + maybe a TD for my starting WRs.
The risk in playing just one guy is that if the other guy gets all the points, you miss out. If you pick right you do great.
Playing both assures you get the points no matter who scores. You limit your upside, but if you have confidence that you get a combined 31 pts, I may want to just take that.
Crazy talk?
Apologies but Im going to use my own team example -- I have AJ Green and Marvin Jones.
My thinking is that the Dolphins give up an average of about 275 yds to opposing teams. CINN is above average passing game, so if I could know FOR SURE that those two guys would get the majority, say 250 yds with the possiblity of a score, that locks in 25 + maybe a TD for my starting WRs.
The risk in playing just one guy is that if the other guy gets all the points, you miss out. If you pick right you do great.
Playing both assures you get the points no matter who scores. You limit your upside, but if you have confidence that you get a combined 31 pts, I may want to just take that.
Crazy talk?