ImTheScientist
Footballguy
Im Starting Taiwan Jones over Ahmad Bradshaw.
TAIWAN not TIA.... sorry.
TAIWAN not TIA.... sorry.
Last edited by a moderator:
You are smoking crack rock bro. Over Bradshaw?? Not saying he won't outscore him but that's a bad bet.Im Starting Taiwan Jones over Ahmad Bradshaw. TAIWAN not TIA.... sorry.
Dodds will rarely ever go out on a limb with an unknown player like Jones is this week. He almost always plays it safe.DD barely has him in the top40 this week.
I have the same decision in league #2 (PPR) and I'm going with Brown. He is seeing a ton of actionConsidering him or Ronnie Brown.
I think that's where I'm landing (also PPR). I just can't leave Brown's potential catches "on the table" (so to speak).I have the same decision in league #2 (PPR) and I'm going with Brown. He is seeing a ton of actionConsidering him or Ronnie Brown.
I keep going back a d forth between Thomas and Jones. Right now, I'm back on the Thomas side, but I see arguments for both. Pierre Thomas has been performing as a very low level rb3, with 8-12 points a week. Nothing more, nothing less. He really seems to have very little upside, while Jones is a more exciting prospect for a big game (with a floor that isn't much lower because of thomas' relatively low ceiling). The only reason I am currently going with Thomas is because I am playing game against the league average (we had an owner drop at the last second and didn't want to reschedule the draft), and just need to have a solid game to win. Pierre gives me most likely a guaranteed 8-12. If it was a must win or I was a playing a tough opponent, I think Jones would be an easier choice because of a better chance of a big game.I've seen a couple mentions of Pierre Thomas. If you guys are starting Jones over Thomas in a PPR, I will humbly submit that I think that's a mistake. First, I need to SEE it out of Jones. He's never shown anything but flashes here and there, and if you are in a must-win game, he's hard to trust. Secondly, Ivory was very involved last week because they were leading the Eagles wire to wire, and he is a nice hammer. Against Atlanta, there is a good chance the Saints will be trailing, which should translate into lots of action for Thomas.
Solid, ty RN'Raider Nation said:I've seen a couple mentions of Pierre Thomas. If you guys are starting Jones over Thomas in a PPR, I will humbly submit that I think that's a mistake. First, I need to SEE it out of Jones. He's never shown anything but flashes here and there, and if you are in a must-win game, he's hard to trust. Secondly, Ivory was very involved last week because they were leading the Eagles wire to wire, and he is a nice hammer. Against Atlanta, there is a good chance the Saints will be trailing, which should translate into lots of action for Thomas.
Dude, I don't get it. Thursday-ish: "I'm excited to see what he can do." Hugh; "Fastest player on the practice field, so excited to finally see him get his chance." Palmer.Invisible today. Just playing possum, or are there pictures of him and Jackson's wife?8:00 left in the 2Q. I have as many carries as Jones does.
Jackson isn't the coach anymore bro.Dude, I don't get it. Thursday-ish: "I'm excited to see what he can do." Hugh; "Fastest player on the practice field, so excited to finally see him get his chance." Palmer.Invisible today. Just playing possum, or are there pictures of him and Jackson's wife?8:00 left in the 2Q. I have as many carries as Jones does.
Sorry.Jackson isn't the coach anymore bro.Dude, I don't get it. Thursday-ish: "I'm excited to see what he can do." Hugh; "Fastest player on the practice field, so excited to finally see him get his chance." Palmer.Invisible today. Just playing possum, or are there pictures of him and Jackson's wife?8:00 left in the 2Q. I have as many carries as Jones does.
Because we know WAY more than the coaches who see these guys every day.In the end... we should have all known that the Raiders staff is awful and wouldn't want to do anything that may spark their team in a good way. It makes much more sense to get pounded and run Reece in a completely ineffective manner.
Ehhhh... thanks, but it didn't matter as it turns out. Both Jones and Thomas were invisible. :(Solid, ty RNI've seen a couple mentions of Pierre Thomas. If you guys are starting Jones over Thomas in a PPR, I will humbly submit that I think that's a mistake. First, I need to SEE it out of Jones. He's never shown anything but flashes here and there, and if you are in a must-win game, he's hard to trust. Secondly, Ivory was very involved last week because they were leading the Eagles wire to wire, and he is a nice hammer. Against Atlanta, there is a good chance the Saints will be trailing, which should translate into lots of action for Thomas.
It's simple. Either they have screwed up by not putting Taiwan Jones into the game and giving him a chance... or they have screwed up by having him on their roster when they clearly have no intention on using him. Either way... the Coaching staff loses... just like the team. What is the point of having the guy as your 3rd string RB, if you have no trust in him and have zero intention of using him? Your top 2 backs go down, so you start your full back at half back and bring up a different player who isn't even active and give him a chance after the full back didn't work out well running the ball. So... exactly what is the point of having Jones?'Raider Nation said:Because we know WAY more than the coaches who see these guys every day.'WiDDoW_MaKeR said:In the end... we should have all known that the Raiders staff is awful and wouldn't want to do anything that may spark their team in a good way. It makes much more sense to get pounded and run Reece in a completely ineffective manner.
Fair question. My guess is that they see a lot of long-term potential in him, and that's tricky with a guy who's not quite ready for the big leagues. Because if you put him on the practice squad, you risk losing him to a team which is willing to put him on their active roster.It's simple. Either they have screwed up by not putting Taiwan Jones into the game and giving him a chance... or they have screwed up by having him on their roster when they clearly have no intention on using him. Either way... the Coaching staff loses... just like the team. What is the point of having the guy as your 3rd string RB, if you have no trust in him and have zero intention of using him? Your top 2 backs go down, so you start your full back at half back and bring up a different player who isn't even active and give him a chance after the full back didn't work out well running the ball. So... exactly what is the point of having Jones?'Raider Nation said:Because we know WAY more than the coaches who see these guys every day.'WiDDoW_MaKeR said:In the end... we should have all known that the Raiders staff is awful and wouldn't want to do anything that may spark their team in a good way. It makes much more sense to get pounded and run Reece in a completely ineffective manner.
We only have room for 5 RB's in one of my dyno's (no limit on developmental squad though) but I'm keeping spot #5 open for Taiwan now that I opened a spot with a trade sending Bradshaw out for a #1. I don't know if I'll keep him around all offseason or too long into next season but this is the reason I like him as a lotto ticket. If he didn't have value and they didn't intend to use him he would have been cut loose. Clearly he has value, they just don't think he's ready. He was a very reckless and desperate start today, just a stash is all he was/is.Fair question. My guess is that they see a lot of long-term potential in him, and that's tricky with a guy who's not quite ready for the big leagues. Because if you put him on the practice squad, you risk losing him to a team which is willing to put him on their active roster.It's simple. Either they have screwed up by not putting Taiwan Jones into the game and giving him a chance... or they have screwed up by having him on their roster when they clearly have no intention on using him. Either way... the Coaching staff loses... just like the team. What is the point of having the guy as your 3rd string RB, if you have no trust in him and have zero intention of using him? Your top 2 backs go down, so you start your full back at half back and bring up a different player who isn't even active and give him a chance after the full back didn't work out well running the ball. So... exactly what is the point of having Jones?'Raider Nation said:Because we know WAY more than the coaches who see these guys every day.'WiDDoW_MaKeR said:In the end... we should have all known that the Raiders staff is awful and wouldn't want to do anything that may spark their team in a good way. It makes much more sense to get pounded and run Reece in a completely ineffective manner.
That is funny thinking.It works like that in FF - you have a guy on the bench on your roster but you will never start him, but you also won't cut him because he could be picked up and go off on someone else's roster, maybe even against your team..... so why won't you start him again?Fair question. My guess is that they see a lot of long-term potential in him, and that's tricky with a guy who's not quite ready for the big leagues. Because if you put him on the practice squad, you risk losing him to a team which is willing to put him on their active roster.It's simple. Either they have screwed up by not putting Taiwan Jones into the game and giving him a chance... or they have screwed up by having him on their roster when they clearly have no intention on using him. Either way... the Coaching staff loses... just like the team. What is the point of having the guy as your 3rd string RB, if you have no trust in him and have zero intention of using him? Your top 2 backs go down, so you start your full back at half back and bring up a different player who isn't even active and give him a chance after the full back didn't work out well running the ball. So... exactly what is the point of having Jones?'Raider Nation said:Because we know WAY more than the coaches who see these guys every day.'WiDDoW_MaKeR said:In the end... we should have all known that the Raiders staff is awful and wouldn't want to do anything that may spark their team in a good way. It makes much more sense to get pounded and run Reece in a completely ineffective manner.
You are a cartoon character, you started this thread then come Monday you post this after the fact. If Jones had gone off you would have been here telling everyone "I told you so"Someone help me get this hook out of my mouth please, ty.thank god I started Ahmad instead.