What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steppin Up or Steppin Down? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

20633

Footballguy
Last year was Burress' first as a New York Giant. He was signed to take over the lead role at WR while the aging Amani Toomer settled into more of a #2 role. He responded with one of the best seasons of his career: 76 receptions, 1214 yards and 7 TDs.

He started the year with a bang. Just eleven games in he already amassed 60 receptions (5.45/game) for 928 yards (84.36/game) and 6 TDs. At that rate, with 5 games left in the season, Burress was on pace to finish the year with 87 receptions, 1350 yards and 10 TDs. After Week 12 however, his production dropped significantly.

Over the next 4 games Burress caught just 11 passes and didn't have more than 47 yards receiving in any of them. He didn't score either. In Week 17 he managed to rebound with a 5 catch, 128 yard and 1 TD performance against the Oakland Raiders, but by that time it was too late for most fantasy owners. While Burress' numbers took a hit down the stretch, it's hard to blame him soley for the drop off.

After Week 12 Eli Manning began having some serious accuracy issues. In the 4 game span that Burress slumped, Manning completed just 54% of his passes and threw 7 interceptions. In 3 of the 4 games his completion percentage was right around 50%, and in the one game he managed to complete over 60%, he still ended up throwing 3 picks.

It's clear that Manning's miscues played a part in Burress' numbers dropping so significantly. When Manning's on, it's safe to expect some good outings from Burress, but when he's off, there's no garauntee on anything.

Will Burress be able to build on his numbers from last season on his way to a career year, or will Manning find it difficult to shake off the way last season ended and as a result hinder Burress' production?

 
I see as staying stable. With the addition of Sinorice Moss stretching the field, Shockey being healthy = more spread out offense. I expect similar numbers.

 
I see as staying stable. With the addition of Sinorice Moss stretching the field, Shockey being healthy = more spread out offense. I expect similar numbers.
I haven't looked at the Giants schedule, but apparently people are expecting it to be tough this year. That aside, I agree that Burress should at least match his numbers from last season. It really depends on the developement of Eli Manning though.He started the season off doing pretty well for himself. Later in the year though his accuracy problems got the best of him and he really didn't look good at all. Being an Eagles fan and living in the area we tend to see a good share of Giants games. Early in the year I couldn't believe how impressive Manning was, but by the end of the season he just didn't look quite the same.

I know I saw quite a few times late in the season where Manning just completely missed him. Burress would be open and Manning would manage to toss the ball out of reach of a 6'6" wide receiver. Wether it was defenses playing him differently or he just lost focus I don't know. One thing was rather impressive about him though - he managed to throw at least 1 TD pass in all but 1 game last year. That's impressive from any QB, but especially one that was in just his second season.

Manning needs to iron some things out before Burress could truly have a monster year, but if he does I think you better watch out. Burress could then approach 80-90 receptions, 9-12 TDs and roughly 1300-1450 yards. The upside is definetly there, but he'll need his QB to help him out.

 
^

Buress has the potential to be a Top 12 WR this year, anyone see it happening?
I think he'll hover around the 10-12 mark actually, with his upside being top 7 or 8 IMO.
 
^

Buress has the potential to be a Top 12 WR this year, anyone see it happening?
I think he'll hover around the 10-12 mark actually, with his upside being top 7 or 8 IMO.
I tend to agree with this. And has been said earlier, with Shokey and Moss, Barber getting his action in the passing game. . . I think that Plax will have a similar line as last year and be similarly streaky. For this reason I will not reach for Plax as my #1 WR, but would gladly add him as a #2 should he slide.All this coming from someone who traded for Plax in the middle of last year and got a little burned down the stretch. . .

 
^

Buress has the potential to be a Top 12 WR this year, anyone see it happening?
He was last year.
I had him on my dynasty league last year and while I knew he played well the majority of the season, I'd be a little surprised if he was Top 12 in it.I guess his slump at the end of the season made more of an impression on me about his final rankings then I may have thought.

 
^

Buress has the potential to be a Top 12 WR this year, anyone see it happening?
He was last year.
I had him on my dynasty league last year and while I knew he played well the majority of the season, I'd be a little surprised if he was Top 12 in it.I guess his slump at the end of the season made more of an impression on me about his final rankings then I may have thought.
#11 in a standard scoring league, 2 points behind Ward at #10.
 
Burress will bust, just like he did a few years back.

He is by far the most inconsistent speculative talent.

Stepping Down.

I bought into him and Koren after their great years, and both busted. Both were consider top 5 WRs.

Burress is a solid #2 fantasy WR anything more is very risky.

 
Burress will bust, just like he did a few years back.

He is by far the most inconsistent speculative talent.

Stepping Down.

I bought into him and Koren after their great years, and both busted. Both were consider top 5 WRs.

Burress is a solid #2 fantasy WR anything more is very risky.
If he's a solid #2 WR he can't really be a huge bust -- most people are treating him as a #2, not a #1.
 
Burress will bust, just like he did a few years back.

He is by far the most inconsistent speculative talent.

Stepping Down.

I bought into him and Koren after their great years, and both busted. Both were consider top 5 WRs.

Burress is a solid #2 fantasy WR anything more is very risky.
Him busting had as much to do with Pitt's shortcomings on offense as it did his own. The Giants offense on the other hand seems to be a nice fit, has stability at the QB spot, and he has little competition from the other WRs.
 
Just traded Plax, Pittman, and Rocky Bernard in a PPR dynasty league for Ernest Wilford, pick 17 in 2006 rookie draft and 2007 1st. I like Plax but he's inconsistent, and I like Wilford's upside.

 
Hey Young Nirvana...

We have a series of threads similar to what you are trying to get at...called the Player Spotlights. We roll out 10+ threads each week for 14 weeks in the offseason, with the thread commentary and projections summarized and brought into a finished article and analysis by a staff writer on the website.

Plaxico Burress was a feature a few weeks ago, and the finished article will be on the site shortly. We'd love to have your input in these threads, clearly you have a passion for in depth player analysis.

Plaxico Burress Player Spotlight Thread

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top