What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Stock Thread (38 Viewers)

dkp993 said:
I’m betting we don’t get any results tomorrow.  No real reason why (other then a lack of faith in NP), just a gut instinct. 
Click to expand...
I feel the same way.  Wouldn't be surprised at all if no news tomorrow.  This would probably generate another short attack.  A hit article is probably already written and in the chamber waiting somewhere.  

 
I can’t see there not being an announcement of some kind before the shareholders meeting on Wednesday.  
 

he didn’t have to volunteer Tuesday I think it was deliberate. 

 
The Ref said:
I can’t see there not being an announcement of some kind before the shareholders meeting on Wednesday.  
 

he didn’t have to volunteer Tuesday I think it was deliberate. 
Click to expand...
I certainly hope so, just saying I won’t be surprised if there isn’t. 

 
chet said:
Anyone else waiting for the opening in Germany?
Click to expand...
Sure thing. Working and keep flipping through this. Still only with my 530 shares at 2.82. Hoping this thing a) helps sick people and b) makes a ton of money for you guys.

and c) pays my mortgage for a year or 2.

 
Don Hutson said:
Reasons Schwab is the bee's knees:

1. Site isn't glitchy.  I've never had problems with Schwab whereas people regularly complain about Fidelity and TDAmeritrade not working

2. Zero atm fees anywhere in the world (checking account is automatically linked to brokerage account)

3. Zero foreign transaction fees when using debit card

4. Zero account fees

5. Zero trade fees

6. I can buy and sell OTC's like CYDY with market orders (others can only use limit orders)

7. $100 bonus if you deposit $1,000 with this link when opening account (I get a bonus, too) https://www.schwab.com/public/schwab/nn/refer-prospect.html?refrid=REFERXYMXZRNX
Click to expand...
Nice bonus-fishing job bud who complains regularly about Fidelity not working? :lol:  

Mansion thread is down the hall, guy 

 
Who else woke up early to count their gold?

Still have no idea what’s happening in here. But it’s kinda like craps for me. I have no idea how it works but usually I can tell by everyone else’s reactions if we’re winning. 

 
These are not the results I was looking for.

Positive for sure, but more of a house salad than the main course.  Maybe some chips and salsa to tide us over until the real food comes...not bad, but bring on the entrees!

 
adonis said:
These are not the results I was looking for.

Positive for sure, but more of a house salad than the main course.  Maybe some chips and salsa to tide us over until the real food comes...not bad, but bring on the entrees!
Click to expand...
We need more, but there is certainly some serious clinical benefit shown in top line data here.

5 out of 56 with an SAE in control versus 6 out of 28 in placebo. That’s a major statistical benefit, no?

 
fantasycurse42 said:
We need more, but there is certainly some serious clinical benefit shown in top line data here.

5 out of 56 with an SAE in control versus 6 out of 28 in placebo. That’s a major statistical benefit, no?
Click to expand...
Our cousins on another message board pointed out how usually those with the treatment show more side effects. Seems good. 

 
I was just watching some of BPs interview from last night.  Sounds like he thinks Leronlimab should be used every time a new pandemic hits until a more specific treatment is available.  Seems significant.

 
So did 39% or 21% in placebo have SAE’s? PR has both numbers.

Looks like it’s 21...they better change that headline before Adam F sees the discrepancy 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
djmich said:
So did 39% or 21% in placebo have SAE’s? PR has both numbers.

Looks like it’s 21...they better change that headline before Adam F sees the discrepancy 
Click to expand...
Yeah I can’t figure out where the headline stats are coming from in relation to the actual discussion. 
 

eta:  the 39% is 11/28 - the same person can have multiple SAEs. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
fantasycurse42 said:
adonis said:
These are not the results I was looking for.

Positive for sure, but more of a house salad than the main course.  Maybe some chips and salsa to tide us over until the real food comes...not bad, but bring on the entrees!
Click to expand...
We need more, but there is certainly some serious clinical benefit shown in top line data here.

5 out of 56 with an SAE in control versus 6 out of 28 in placebo. That’s a major statistical benefit, no?
Click to expand...
I agree with Adonis.  

Also this doesn't sound good...Of the 84 patients treated, one patient died 33 days after enrollment due to an event unrelated to leronlimab.  If one of of the leronlimab patients died and none of the placebo patients died, that will not be good news.  My question is did the placebo patients receive any other treatment or were they just left to suffer through Vovid with zero treatment?

 
Dr. Yo

@YoDoctorYo

You see why I put my professional credibility and been insulted by many physicians for talking about #leronlimab- a drug with NO publications and just anecdotal evidence. I trust Patterson's research Bruce Patterson 4 President 2020 #itsRANTESnotpanties #bruceforprez2020 #cydy

9:45 PM · Jul 20, 2020·Twitter Web App

 
BassNBrew said:
I agree with Adonis.  

Also this doesn't sound good...Of the 84 patients treated, one patient died 33 days after enrollment due to an event unrelated to leronlimab.  If one of of the leronlimab patients died and none of the placebo patients died, that will not be good news.  My question is did the placebo patients receive any other treatment or were they just left to suffer through Vovid with zero treatment?
Click to expand...
he got hit by a bus

 
BassNBrew said:
I agree with Adonis.  

Also this doesn't sound good...Of the 84 patients treated, one patient died 33 days after enrollment due to an event unrelated to leronlimab.  If one of of the leronlimab patients died and none of the placebo patients died, that will not be good news.  My question is did the placebo patients receive any other treatment or were they just left to suffer through Vovid with zero treatment?
Click to expand...
Said it was unrelated death. Could have been anything for all we know. 

 
This is very promising is my take.

Need the efficacy data, I’d be very surprised if not positive.

The S-C trial results probably needed for the Big Bang.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Andrew74
2025 FBG Stock Contest
2
Replies
77
Views
4K
Andrew74
Andrew74
Andrew74
2024 FBG Stock Contest
2 3
Replies
127
Views
8K
McBokonon
McBokonon
Wingnut
Pluribus TV show discussion thread
2 3
Replies
124
Views
2K
the moops
the moops

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 2 more.
    • Total: 30 (members: 7, guests: 23)
    Back
    Top