Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
There have been times (the Jan 2 & Jan 7 trades are examples but there are a few more this year) where I get a confirmed trend...and then the trend reverses before it reaches the 15pt gain or 10pt loss.Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
I've been looking at your 2014 history and many of your exit points, especially early on, are not 10 point losers or 15 point winners. Are these instances where your exit points happened off hours and you are selling first thing in the morning; is a case of trusting the current charts more than the entry point charts and and choosing to get out; or just that you didn't want open positions because you would not be able to monitor them for personal reasons? Are you setting up automatic stop losses and limiting profits on your exit points?
Take the first trade for example...
entry date = 1/2
exit date = 1/7 at 7:30am
type = bear
point gain/loss = 9.5
Entry point is 1826.75
exit point is 1827
Did this 9.5 point jump coupled with charts get you to cancel your order early that morning?
Question 2:
Along those same lines...why is the average pt loss not -10? Is there another criteria for exiting before hitting that 10 point loser that's not detailed on SH.com
Thanks for the time and effort you put into all of this!
Great read, as always.I have an update to my blog. You can read it here:
http://steelhedge.com/2014/11/12/you-never-can-really-know-the-future-until-its-past/
Comments, questions and criticisms are always welcome.
Thanks for the response, good to hear I'm understanding things.There have been times (the Jan 2 & Jan 7 trades are examples but there are a few more this year) where I get a confirmed trend...and then the trend reverses before it reaches the 15pt gain or 10pt loss.Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
I've been looking at your 2014 history and many of your exit points, especially early on, are not 10 point losers or 15 point winners. Are these instances where your exit points happened off hours and you are selling first thing in the morning; is a case of trusting the current charts more than the entry point charts and and choosing to get out; or just that you didn't want open positions because you would not be able to monitor them for personal reasons? Are you setting up automatic stop losses and limiting profits on your exit points?
Take the first trade for example...
entry date = 1/2
exit date = 1/7 at 7:30am
type = bear
point gain/loss = 9.5
Entry point is 1826.75
exit point is 1827
Did this 9.5 point jump coupled with charts get you to cancel your order early that morning?
Question 2:
Along those same lines...why is the average pt loss not -10? Is there another criteria for exiting before hitting that 10 point loser that's not detailed on SH.com
Thanks for the time and effort you put into all of this!
When I open these trades - it's a set it and forget it...win 15 pts OR lose 10pts. And sometimes the trade closes during regular trading hours and sometimes it closes overnight (One order filled cancels the other). But if I wake up and see that the trend has flipped, or the trend flips during regular market hours - I'll manually cancel the order - in the Jan 2nd trade example Flip from a Bearish Trade to a Bullish Trade.
Typically this occurs when the market is directionless - $VIX is really low. It does happen. You may notice there have been some trades that get within 1-2 pts of winning the 15pts only to turn into losers. #### happens...and a lot of time it happens overnight (that's why I call them the "night monkeys")
The average loss isn't 10pts exactly because of some of those trades...meaning not every trade that has lost - has lost 10pts. In looking at the spreadsheet I see at least 1 winning trade that didn't achieve 15 pts either...so I need to correct the "Average Win"...which will be a tad less than 15pts.
Understand - I'm just a one man show, and definitely not a mathematician..nor a spelling-bee champion.
With all that said - a quick note: I went back to the Top Weekly Sector Rotation and adjusted the spreadsheet to include Fidelity's $7.95 commission. I've also put together a NEW Bi-Weekly (every 2 weeks) Top Sector from the Largest 100 ETFs that I'll add to the page later on today. I sincerely appreciate the comments to help make this better for all.
Analyzing your results further, it looks like you're already doing a pretty good job of limiting the losses when it turns red. There are only 2 or 3 significant losses where you didn't exit of your own free will.jason12vb said:Thanks for the response, good to hear I'm understanding things.siffoin said:There have been times (the Jan 2 & Jan 7 trades are examples but there are a few more this year) where I get a confirmed trend...and then the trend reverses before it reaches the 15pt gain or 10pt loss.jason12vb said:Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
I've been looking at your 2014 history and many of your exit points, especially early on, are not 10 point losers or 15 point winners. Are these instances where your exit points happened off hours and you are selling first thing in the morning; is a case of trusting the current charts more than the entry point charts and and choosing to get out; or just that you didn't want open positions because you would not be able to monitor them for personal reasons? Are you setting up automatic stop losses and limiting profits on your exit points?
Take the first trade for example...
entry date = 1/2
exit date = 1/7 at 7:30am
type = bear
point gain/loss = 9.5
Entry point is 1826.75
exit point is 1827
Did this 9.5 point jump coupled with charts get you to cancel your order early that morning?
Question 2:
Along those same lines...why is the average pt loss not -10? Is there another criteria for exiting before hitting that 10 point loser that's not detailed on SH.com
Thanks for the time and effort you put into all of this!
When I open these trades - it's a set it and forget it...win 15 pts OR lose 10pts. And sometimes the trade closes during regular trading hours and sometimes it closes overnight (One order filled cancels the other). But if I wake up and see that the trend has flipped, or the trend flips during regular market hours - I'll manually cancel the order - in the Jan 2nd trade example Flip from a Bearish Trade to a Bullish Trade.
Typically this occurs when the market is directionless - $VIX is really low. It does happen. You may notice there have been some trades that get within 1-2 pts of winning the 15pts only to turn into losers. #### happens...and a lot of time it happens overnight (that's why I call them the "night monkeys")
The average loss isn't 10pts exactly because of some of those trades...meaning not every trade that has lost - has lost 10pts. In looking at the spreadsheet I see at least 1 winning trade that didn't achieve 15 pts either...so I need to correct the "Average Win"...which will be a tad less than 15pts.
Understand - I'm just a one man show, and definitely not a mathematician..nor a spelling-bee champion.
With all that said - a quick note: I went back to the Top Weekly Sector Rotation and adjusted the spreadsheet to include Fidelity's $7.95 commission. I've also put together a NEW Bi-Weekly (every 2 weeks) Top Sector from the Largest 100 ETFs that I'll add to the page later on today. I sincerely appreciate the comments to help make this better for all.
Are you considering any modifications to your strategy for 2015? The set it and forget it approach seems to be working, but I'm wondering if there's a way to limit those losses after they start out well in the black? By my count there are 7 instances (out of your 23 losses)where you were up 10 or more points before losing in the end....what would the difference be if you could change your stop loss to break even if it hit 10? Would it result in any less 15 pt wins? (i.e. ES_ runs up 10, down to -1, then back to +15 for a winner) Clearly this would be tough to do without spending a lot of time on it, but perhaps changing the stop loss every 24 hours to 10 points below the current might yield even better results?
I appreciate the real time log of this, it allows me a much better understanding of the strategy.
That $7.95 commission really prevents someone with a small bankroll from trying out the weekly strategy. If you started with $500, you'd be negative before you new it just because the commissions would eat up your money.siffoin said:There have been times (the Jan 2 & Jan 7 trades are examples but there are a few more this year) where I get a confirmed trend...and then the trend reverses before it reaches the 15pt gain or 10pt loss.jason12vb said:Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
I've been looking at your 2014 history and many of your exit points, especially early on, are not 10 point losers or 15 point winners. Are these instances where your exit points happened off hours and you are selling first thing in the morning; is a case of trusting the current charts more than the entry point charts and and choosing to get out; or just that you didn't want open positions because you would not be able to monitor them for personal reasons? Are you setting up automatic stop losses and limiting profits on your exit points?
Take the first trade for example...
entry date = 1/2
exit date = 1/7 at 7:30am
type = bear
point gain/loss = 9.5
Entry point is 1826.75
exit point is 1827
Did this 9.5 point jump coupled with charts get you to cancel your order early that morning?
Question 2:
Along those same lines...why is the average pt loss not -10? Is there another criteria for exiting before hitting that 10 point loser that's not detailed on SH.com
Thanks for the time and effort you put into all of this!
When I open these trades - it's a set it and forget it...win 15 pts OR lose 10pts. And sometimes the trade closes during regular trading hours and sometimes it closes overnight (One order filled cancels the other). But if I wake up and see that the trend has flipped, or the trend flips during regular market hours - I'll manually cancel the order - in the Jan 2nd trade example Flip from a Bearish Trade to a Bullish Trade.
Typically this occurs when the market is directionless - $VIX is really low. It does happen. You may notice there have been some trades that get within 1-2 pts of winning the 15pts only to turn into losers. #### happens...and a lot of time it happens overnight (that's why I call them the "night monkeys")
The average loss isn't 10pts exactly because of some of those trades...meaning not every trade that has lost - has lost 10pts. In looking at the spreadsheet I see at least 1 winning trade that didn't achieve 15 pts either...so I need to correct the "Average Win"...which will be a tad less than 15pts.
Understand - I'm just a one man show, and definitely not a mathematician..nor a spelling-bee champion.
With all that said - a quick note: I went back to the Top Weekly Sector Rotation and adjusted the spreadsheet to include Fidelity's $7.95 commission. I've also put together a NEW Bi-Weekly (every 2 weeks) Top Sector from the Largest 100 ETFs that I'll add to the page later on today. I sincerely appreciate the comments to help make this better for all.
Pro-Tip: Don't attempt anything I post here with a bankroll of $500. Lets call these posts "educational".That $7.95 commission really prevents someone with a small bankroll from trying out the weekly strategy. If you started with $500, you'd be negative before you new it just because the commissions would eat up your money.siffoin said:There have been times (the Jan 2 & Jan 7 trades are examples but there are a few more this year) where I get a confirmed trend...and then the trend reverses before it reaches the 15pt gain or 10pt loss.jason12vb said:Couple questions for your Piker run here Siff...I have been strongly considering giving this a go. As someone with less than two years in trading experience and no previous futures experience I'm trying to learn as much as I can before jumping in.One thing I've been surprised is that more folks haven't shown an interest in the Piker $10k -> $1M idea. Overall this has been a successful "live trading" concept, and one I'm moving more towards (along with the SH Sector Rotation Strategy) in 2015.
I've posted those trades faithfully and mostly in real time throughout the year. Results can be seen on this page of my blog.
http://steelhedge.com/current-portfolio/
I've been looking at your 2014 history and many of your exit points, especially early on, are not 10 point losers or 15 point winners. Are these instances where your exit points happened off hours and you are selling first thing in the morning; is a case of trusting the current charts more than the entry point charts and and choosing to get out; or just that you didn't want open positions because you would not be able to monitor them for personal reasons? Are you setting up automatic stop losses and limiting profits on your exit points?
Take the first trade for example...
entry date = 1/2
exit date = 1/7 at 7:30am
type = bear
point gain/loss = 9.5
Entry point is 1826.75
exit point is 1827
Did this 9.5 point jump coupled with charts get you to cancel your order early that morning?
Question 2:
Along those same lines...why is the average pt loss not -10? Is there another criteria for exiting before hitting that 10 point loser that's not detailed on SH.com
Thanks for the time and effort you put into all of this!
When I open these trades - it's a set it and forget it...win 15 pts OR lose 10pts. And sometimes the trade closes during regular trading hours and sometimes it closes overnight (One order filled cancels the other). But if I wake up and see that the trend has flipped, or the trend flips during regular market hours - I'll manually cancel the order - in the Jan 2nd trade example Flip from a Bearish Trade to a Bullish Trade.
Typically this occurs when the market is directionless - $VIX is really low. It does happen. You may notice there have been some trades that get within 1-2 pts of winning the 15pts only to turn into losers. #### happens...and a lot of time it happens overnight (that's why I call them the "night monkeys")
The average loss isn't 10pts exactly because of some of those trades...meaning not every trade that has lost - has lost 10pts. In looking at the spreadsheet I see at least 1 winning trade that didn't achieve 15 pts either...so I need to correct the "Average Win"...which will be a tad less than 15pts.
Understand - I'm just a one man show, and definitely not a mathematician..nor a spelling-bee champion.
With all that said - a quick note: I went back to the Top Weekly Sector Rotation and adjusted the spreadsheet to include Fidelity's $7.95 commission. I've also put together a NEW Bi-Weekly (every 2 weeks) Top Sector from the Largest 100 ETFs that I'll add to the page later on today. I sincerely appreciate the comments to help make this better for all.
i think you could get away with doing the monthly sector rotation starting at $500 b/c you can avoid the fee after 30 days![]()
Couple of question for ya Siff for those of us following or considering your Piker method.
1) If someone were not able to get an entry point when you did...is there a technical chart or two you can suggest that would help us determine if it's still worth getting in or not? I realize your charting methods are your own technical formulas and not standard, but are there widely accepted ones you put some faith in?
I'm not sure. You can put up a 200 period Moving Average line (or something similar- like I mentioned on Twitter)...and trade on the correct side of that line. With that said there'd be multiple periods where you'd get a whipsaw loss after whipsaw loss. The only results I feel confident in are the ones I use. I'm posting pretty much the trades in real time.
2) How long does it generally take for one of your trends to break down? An hour, 4 hours, overnight... (i.e. how long after you enter a position is it not even worth looking at?)
The market is always different. Sometimes we have a fast market with a lot of volatility. And sometimes a slow market that just drifts along. It seems on average most trades open and close within 24 hours.
I find it interesting that your wins, on average, take a dip of 3.5 points before going up 15 points in the end. Also, roughly 33% of your wins take a dip of 5 points or more at some point. (shows how important dedicated technical trading is and gives us wanting to learn by following a time cushion we can get in)
When a trend flips typically it will make a move back towards support (in a bull trend) or resistance (in a bear trend). But I don't know how far those dips will be. I can only say "the trend confirmed at $_____. At that point the race to 15pts is on.
I'm thinking in the case if I were to get in at a better price than you (what the max is is TBD, thinking that 3.5 specified above), I'd set my limit at 15 from my entry point, but my loss at 10 from yours (so my loss might be 8 instead of 10)...I just can't decide what the best strategy would be from the other side of your entry. Even if I were to get in 10 minutes after you, that might be 2 points...so I lean towards setting my limit at yours, then setting my loss at 2/3s of my limit. My thinking is to take the 15 even if your trend says I can get a few more, but limit the losses.
To me this is ethically like a broker front running. If I knew that's what people were doing from my information it would really piss me off. In reality - at a 3.5 pt entry off mine - I think you would find that you would not get filled on the best and easiest of trades...but would absolutely get filled on every loser.
From a spreadsheet this looks easy. I can tell you in real life with money on the line it's not. And one thing I've really come to appreciate about the piker is the set it and walk away system - actually minimizes some of the internal stress. It's also one that has built on it's own success. The information has been posted in real time with close to 1 year of data. The results are good. As mentioned on twiter - I will be making an adjustment to the Piker system (as a result of our conversations so props to you)...but all I can say is the signal at that price point is THE signal.
Thanks for all, but in response to this...my intentions are not to try to get in at a better price than you, just realizing that it's not very likely that I get in at the same time you do as the swing can be +/- a couple points pretty quickly. Just trying to define clear rules and not be greedy. I certainly don't want to rub you the wrong way, so if your opinion is that we should go after that same 15/10 split even if we're 2 points off your entry point then so be it...but you hit the nail on the head with yesterday's peak and if one got in two points later than you they'd be sitting on a possible loser right now instead of a 13 point winner. Just seemed logical to me to that if I were to cap the wins on one side, I'd also need to cap the losses on the other side. Ideally I'd get in at the same parameters as you...but that's not going to happen every time.I'm thinking in the case if I were to get in at a better price than you (what the max is is TBD, thinking that 3.5 specified above), I'd set my limit at 15 from my entry point, but my loss at 10 from yours (so my loss might be 8 instead of 10)...I just can't decide what the best strategy would be from the other side of your entry. Even if I were to get in 10 minutes after you, that might be 2 points...so I lean towards setting my limit at yours, then setting my loss at 2/3s of my limit. My thinking is to take the 15 even if your trend says I can get a few more, but limit the losses.
To me this is ethically like a broker front running. If I knew that's what people were doing from my information it would really piss me off. In reality - at a 3.5 pt entry off mine - I think you would find that you would not get filled on the best and easiest of trades...but would absolutely get filled on every loser.
LHUCKS? That you?Great read, as always.I have an update to my blog. You can read it here:
http://steelhedge.com/2014/11/12/you-never-can-really-know-the-future-until-its-past/
Comments, questions and criticisms are always welcome.
I'm now all-in on DOG.
I'll be using this post like shuke uses the milker later.And I won't be selling a single Amaya share either. I staunchly believe this will be a $50 stock in 2015.
My linkI'll be using this post like shuke uses the milker later.And I won't be selling a single Amaya share either. I staunchly believe this will be a $50 stock in 2015.
I'm not sure I can explain it any better than that.For those of us doing siff's sector rotation, he posted a series of tweets last night that he was modifying the rotation rules going forward.
I'll let him come in here and give the details as he'll explain the context a whole lot better than I could, but the basic gist is that 50% of the rotation will go to $SPY (and 50% to that month's top sector), provided the market signals an overall bull market.
SH Sector Rotation has underperformed (slightly) the $SPY for the past 3 years. When you add in the capital gains on ST moves it diminishes the return even more. This adjustment essentially keeps pace with the $SPY in this current market environment while giving it an opportunity to participate if one sector gets really hot.Good info Siff, thanks!
Just curious, have you backtested the new strategy against the prior returns? Wondering how it would have changed things.
Did anyone do this? We've got about a double at this point on theThe trader in me likes this idea:why don't you buy a put then?For a few sentences that must have been pretty compelling as the thought of shorting entered my head immediately after reading it.They will not exist in a few years. Period.I have never been high on NFLX, unfortunatelyCould be priced at 0 in a few years. Seriously.![]()
But I don't know about the valuation of 0. The price point is still light years ahead of what these others are offering. Imagine a standalone HBO, then Showtime, then Skinamax... The costs for NFLX will still keep a loyal following.
They'll end up being like the MetroPCS of TV services. At some point when their stock is priced more into reality, somebody will prob scoop them up.
They rely on the studios to feed them movies. First HBO starts this streaming, then the studios realize they can just stream the stuff themselves and undercut HBO on everything but their originals. Studios charge higher rates, the ISPS (controlled by the studios) charge higher rates to pass through, plus competition from networks and other outlets content to give away programming for free, and boom. It's over. HBO was way out in front of this trend a decade ago with original stuff. Now, it's payday.
Think blockbuster. Because that's where they will be sharing a place with soon enough.
I would be too scared though, getting caught on the wrong side of this is devastating. I've actually posted numerous times in the last few months about how I would love to short Tesla (although I think their future is different than what you outline for NFLX) just due to an insane valuation right now. But my feelings there are the same as this one and the end result of getting caught on the wrong side is devastation.
I'd want a some kind of bounce towards $380ish. I have a target of $220-$270. Will have to see how they price the options in the morning and over the next few days if it does move higher- I'd be willing to risk $1 and hope to make $4+ - the pricing is key - the option game ain't what it used to be.
So if for example $NFLX moved to $380...and the Jan $350 Put was priced at $15 or less - I'm in at that point because my expectation of an $80+ move (price at $270 or lower) gives me a risk reward of $1 to make $5+ (my $15 put will be worth $80+)
Be looking at a Jan or March 2015 expiration.
I basing the $220-$270 target on support levels over multiple time frames in conjunction with a bearish trend for NFLX (which has been bearish since late Sept at around $440) and a bearish trend for the overall markets.
So that's the plan now we just need to exercise a little patience and see if the plan unfolds accordingly.
One clarifying question on the cash position, siff. Isn't a bear market partly what the IEF sector is for? Going through your backtesting, during the 2008-09 crash the rotation was making money (or at least, heavily reducing equity losses) by being in bonds/IEF.With the bull/bear "line in the sand" as the first test, when would you ever rotate into IEF?SH Sector Rotation has underperformed (slightly) the $SPY for the past 3 years. When you add in the capital gains on ST moves it diminishes the return even more. This adjustment essentially keeps pace with the $SPY in this current market environment while giving it an opportunity to participate if one sector gets really hot. Will still go 100% to cash in a bear market. That's why I'll provide a "line in the sand" price point each month.Good info Siff, thanks!
Just curious, have you backtested the new strategy against the prior returns? Wondering how it would have changed things.
Found your tweet buried a bit. I see you are saying IVV at the moment.So Sif, what are you thinking for December? My simple analysis shows EFA with IVV, maybe IJH coming up 2nd depending on the last couple of trading days.
Another way of looking at it shows me ADRE or IJR but I think that method is too dependent on the rebound from their poor numbers in September.
$IEF tends to be the default sector in a bear market but I said "Cash" in a bear market to be open to the possibility that one day all of the Sector ETFs are in a bear trend including $IEF. The back testing is great, but we're investing moving forward in time. This is one reason for the adjustment into a 50% position in SP500 ETF ($SPY or $IVV). I don't have a great understanding of the bond market in general, but I can foresee a scenario where if the market actually turned bearish - the bond market would play a heavy role in that turn of the trend. I hope that answers your question - I'm not trying to be vague. Just stating that in real life with this strategy there are 7 honest potential holdings ($ADRE; $EFA; $IEF; $IJH; $IJR; $IVV & Cash). I don't view this as a departure in any way from all that I've written about the strategy.One clarifying question on the cash position, siff. Isn't a bear market partly what the IEF sector is for? Going through your backtesting, during the 2008-09 crash the rotation was making money (or at least, heavily reducing equity losses) by being in bonds/IEF.With the bull/bear "line in the sand" as the first test, when would you ever rotate into IEF?SH Sector Rotation has underperformed (slightly) the $SPY for the past 3 years. When you add in the capital gains on ST moves it diminishes the return even more. This adjustment essentially keeps pace with the $SPY in this current market environment while giving it an opportunity to participate if one sector gets really hot. Will still go 100% to cash in a bear market. That's why I'll provide a "line in the sand" price point each month.Good info Siff, thanks!
Just curious, have you backtested the new strategy against the prior returns? Wondering how it would have changed things.
ETA- not against adding "cash" as a rotation sector in theory (I believe I floated that idea out there many pages ago), but I always looked at it as an emergency "every sector looks bad" ejector seat option. Maybe you're saying the same thing but I wanted to make sure.
Yes. I've 99% confident that this will rotate into $IVV on Friday.Found your tweet buried a bit. I see you are saying IVV at the moment.So Sif, what are you thinking for December? My simple analysis shows EFA with IVV, maybe IJH coming up 2nd depending on the last couple of trading days.
Another way of looking at it shows me ADRE or IJR but I think that method is too dependent on the rebound from their poor numbers in September.
Im watching COP looking for the time to get in......when does your crystal ball tell you to pull the trigger?In other news, still looking at XOP drop like a ####### rock. This can't continue forever, but I'm not catching a falling knife... yet.
Down almost 15% today???I'm 100% invested right now, but will be getting some cash into the portfolios around year-end. I have one name and one name only that I'm going to be adding to aggressively and it's Vogogo. I know there's a bunch of smart folks that think crypto-currency is a fraud or a Ponzi scheme destined to crumble, but as far as I know, Vogogo is the only publicly traded processor of these goofy things and there's a chit ton of money pouring into the sector by Silicon Valley and other deep pockets looking for ways to play in this space. I think there's some catalysts ahead that will take the stock higher and at $3.50 a throw, I'm likely to take a nice sized swing at this one when cash comes in. Currently a 4% position for me personally and a nice sized position for our funds.
And I won't be selling a single Amaya share either. I staunchly believe this will be a $50 stock in 2015.
Wow. Saw HSBC mixed up in this. Shocker - they got booted out of the drug cartel money laundering business, so they had to do something to keep their profit margins up.Platinum stocks down something like 30-40% the last couple days due to this lawsuit alleging price fixing.
He's wired differently than most, that's for sure. What he pulled off was incredible, IMO.Just read the Forbes article about your boy, GM. Not sure if I'm impressed or if I want to sell all.
There's no doubt about that, but it's hard to tell if he's operating at such a different level than everybody else that there's no way to stop him or if he's just an incredibly tenacious dog who's looking to chase the next squirrel until he kills it, with no idea where he's going long-term.He's wired differently than most, that's for sure. What he pulled off was incredible, IMO.Just read the Forbes article about your boy, GM. Not sure if I'm impressed or if I want to sell all.
I'll start to worry if/when HE sells stock. For a kid who didn't come from money, slept on park benches in outdoor hockey venues and quit college, I find it astonishing that he hasn't cashed in at least some of his chips for personal gain. We asked him why and he simply said "now is not the time to sell". Good enough for me to hang on and my firm is doing the same.There's no doubt about that, but it's hard to tell if he's operating at such a different level than everybody else that there's no way to stop him or if he's just an incredibly tenacious dog who's looking to chase the next squirrel until he kills it, with no idea where he's going long-term.He's wired differently than most, that's for sure. What he pulled off was incredible, IMO.Just read the Forbes article about your boy, GM. Not sure if I'm impressed or if I want to sell all.
Link guys? Thanks. Just now dipping toes in this thread.I'll start to worry if/when HE sells stock. For a kid who didn't come from money, slept on park benches in outdoor hockey venues and quit college, I find it astonishing that he hasn't cashed in at least some of his chips for personal gain. We asked him why and he simply said "now is not the time to sell". Good enough for me to hang on and my firm is doing the same.There's no doubt about that, but it's hard to tell if he's operating at such a different level than everybody else that there's no way to stop him or if he's just an incredibly tenacious dog who's looking to chase the next squirrel until he kills it, with no idea where he's going long-term.He's wired differently than most, that's for sure. What he pulled off was incredible, IMO.Just read the Forbes article about your boy, GM. Not sure if I'm impressed or if I want to sell all.
And it is probably going to win you the stock contest.I'll start to worry if/when HE sells stock. For a kid who didn't come from money, slept on park benches in outdoor hockey venues and quit college, I find it astonishing that he hasn't cashed in at least some of his chips for personal gain. We asked him why and he simply said "now is not the time to sell". Good enough for me to hang on and my firm is doing the same.
I have my eye on both CVX and VZ. Already added some CVX a little early (~111)Bought more CVX. Can't pass up a rock solid 4% dividend. This is a fire sale. I hope it goes down to 90 so I can back up the truck.