Subscriber Contest to be Unveiled by Wednesday Morning (1 Viewer)

[Warrior]

I'm sure many of us are anxiously awaiting Josh Gordon. It will be interesting to see if he lives up to the hype or is just another mid-level WR.

You're looking pretty smart right about now.

Because he said it will be interesting?

Have to admit I'm making a series of assumptions there.

When I read his comment I took it to understand that he was one of the ones interested to see if Gordon would work out or not. I further assumed that meant he had selected him as part of his team for this contest. My implication that he looked pretty smart was simply meant to say that anyone who selected him for their team (including presumably EPL) looks smart as Gordon appeared to show potential and could end up outperforming his value.

It was a very ineffective/confusing way of recognizing Gordon's performance this week.

 

[Wadsworth]

If P. Manning keeps up anything close to his current pace, does this become a contest between people that own Manning with everyone else on the outside?

I doubt it with the new scoring. I'd rather have a QBBC plus Jordon. You could probably say the same thing about Graham. Of course there are teams with all of these guys but their RBs are thin.

P. Manning, Graham, Cook, J. Thomas, Shady, Forte, MJD, B. Powell, J. Bell.... it is my WRs that are thin.

 

[SeniorVBDStudent]

My guess is 138.6.

 

[Organized Chaos]

I've got 133.45, we'll see how close that is.. If a player loses a fumble on a muffed punt or kickoff, I'm counting those points for the D, I don't believe the official FBG scoring does. I never got confirmation from turk on that though.

 

[The Kerminator]

I've got 133.45, we'll see how close that is.. If a player loses a fumble on a muffed punt or kickoff, I'm counting those points for the D, I don't believe the official FBG scoring does. I never got confirmation from turk on that though.

Cut line is 132.5

 

[ochawkeye]

My $5 Geno Smith flyer pick gets on the board this week and helps lead me to 205.95 points and a date with week 4 destiny.

Christian Ponder & Scott Chandler get on the board for the week for 191.7. With Kenny Britt being my most expensive WR it's only a matter of time though...

 

[steveski]

Looks like I somehow survived this week. You know you're in bad shape when David Wilson and Roy Helu with a combined 10 points are counting towards your score.

 

[Papa Schnay]

Survive and advance, fellas. Survived with a 177.95 this week.

I've now used 21 of my 23 players in a span of 3 weeks.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

I barely survived this week, and don't expect to last much longer. My team sucks. I guess the only reason to have any hope is that my top WR Roddy White hasn't counted for me yet due to injury, and my top TE Gronkowski hasn't even played yet. I suppose if both of those guys get back on the field and start playing to the level I paid for, my outlook won't be as bad as it looks now. It would also help if Lacy gets back on the field and/or David Wilson starts living up to the hype.

Oh well, I'm pretty much at peace with the fact that my team isn't long for this contest. I just don't have as much time to invest in it this year.

Did anyone download my DB and plan to post some updates now that we've made it through our first elimination week? I could post some of the usual stats (e.g. survival rate by roster size) but probably won't get to it until the end of the week.

 

[Chicago Hooligan]

Middle of the pack, used EJ Manuel and 4 RBs. Whatever works, I guess.

 

[culdeus]

Waiting for a mercy kill.

 

[Cliff Clavin]

TE Luke Stocker, TB/5 - Not sure how this guy is getting no love. He is the clear starter for the Bucs. Reserve the last round of your FPC drafts for this guy and remember me when you win your league.

Thanks Dodds <_<

Stocker and Brown are my only busts so far. Every other player has scored.

 

[shader]

Boy do I hate my team. I survived, but only through the miracle of Donnie Avery, Jason Avant and Kenbrell Thompkins. The 1-2-3 punch of Lacy-Mathews-Wilson is not doing too well.

 

[cstu]

Boy do I hate my team. I survived, but only through the miracle of Donnie Avery, Jason Avant and Kenbrell Thompkins. The 1-2-3 punch of Lacy-Mathews-Wilson is not doing too well.

Gio, Lacy and Wilson ain't a whole lot better. I have good enough WR's and TE's but without decent days from two of those guys I'll be out soon. My #2 RB this week was Blount.

 

[Spin]

Boy do I hate my team. I survived, but only through the miracle of Donnie Avery, Jason Avant and Kenbrell Thompkins. The 1-2-3 punch of Lacy-Mathews-Wilson is not doing too well.

Gio, Lacy and Wilson ain't a whole lot better. I have good enough WR's and TE's but without decent days from two of those guys I'll be out soon. My #2 RB this week was Blount.

$88 spent on my rbs, 18 points last week. The position I felt strongest at is the one that is now looking to be my weak link. Rice / Spiller / Wilson / Pierce. Woops.

Squeeked by this week, now that the junk entries are gone, not liking my chances moving forward.

I've used 22 fo my 24 spots now. I have not used Forbath or Saints Def.

Still eyeing week 8 as my final week, not sure the Spiller/Wilson combo is gonna get me past it.

 

[JB Breakfast Club]

The good:

Choosing Charles and McCoy over Spiller and T Richardson...went back and forth on these pairs, and decided to go with the players from the better overall offenses.

Investing in Jimmy Graham and Calvin Johnson...I was going to use all cheap WR, but I decided to tick up to Calvin and assume he'd play every week...that paired with another big success:

- $2 WR: Hankerson, Avant, and Thompkins have all counted already

- $2 TE: Julius Thomas

The not so good:

David Wilson

Markus Wheaton

Dwayne Allen - Cameron instead of Allen and McCluster would be sooooo sweet right now.

Kai Forbath - is he going to come back, I suppose I should look that up.

211-196-224 so far with no scores from David Wilson, Vincent Brown, Dwayne Allen, Helu, Wheaton, McCluster, Forbath, and the Eagles D.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Gonna have to DM the Turk - that Bengals fumble return TD didn't count apparently?

-QG

 

[QuizGuy66]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

 

[QuizGuy66]

I know that Dodds is more active on the boards but alas his DM box is full (you figure the owner would get like a deluxe super-box wouldn't you? )

-QG

 

[Modog814]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

I believe official scoring is that once the ball changes possession, the team with the ball becomes the "offense". So once Cincy fumbled and recovered its own fumble, it no longer is a defensive recover but instead an offensive recovery.

And to take it further, I believe if Green Bay had somehow recovered the Cincy fumble and ran it in for a score, it would have been credited with a Defensive TD.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

I believe official scoring is that once the ball changes possession, the team with the ball becomes the "offense". So once Cincy fumbled and recovered its own fumble, it no longer is a defensive recover but instead an offensive recovery.

And to take it further, I believe if Green Bay had somehow recovered the Cincy fumble and ran it in for a score, it would have been credited with a Defensive TD.

That's not the way the contest rules seem to read. I've sent a copy to Joe B as well (Dodds has a full e-mail box). Scoring isn't final until tonight at 11:59pm.

I'm fine either way, contest-wise. But that was a defensive score by the Bengals. Whatever they decide they decide but I wanted to alert them given what the rules state.

-QG

 

[Sinn Fein]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

I believe official scoring is that once the ball changes possession, the team with the ball becomes the "offense". So once Cincy fumbled and recovered its own fumble, it no longer is a defensive recover but instead an offensive recovery.

And to take it further, I believe if Green Bay had somehow recovered the Cincy fumble and ran it in for a score, it would have been credited with a Defensive TD.

Perhaps, but then "technically" if the Bengals had returned the original fumble for a TD, wouldn't that mean the Bengal's "offense" scored? So, under that interpretation, defenses can never score.

 

[dbc925]

T-Rich, Spiller, Bush and Lacy. Beat the cutoff by five points. Probably looking at an early exit.

 

[BroadwayG]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

I believe official scoring is that once the ball changes possession, the team with the ball becomes the "offense". So once Cincy fumbled and recovered its own fumble, it no longer is a defensive recover but instead an offensive recovery.

And to take it further, I believe if Green Bay had somehow recovered the Cincy fumble and ran it in for a score, it would have been credited with a Defensive TD.

Perhaps, but then "technically" if the Bengals had returned the original fumble for a TD, wouldn't that mean the Bengal's "offense" scored? So, under that interpretation, defenses can never score.

Exactly. The 'becomes the offense' line is a bunch of hoo haa

 

[Raiderfan32904]

Only my second year doing this. Already beat last year's results getting into the mid 160's. Feel like I'm playing with house money. See if I can last another week.

 

[donkshow]

Barely survived this week. Doesn't help that 2/4 RBs are down for me.

 

[stbugs]

192.1 this week, so easily on to next week. Just need 1 more week since Gronk and Blackmon are still on the bench. Those two, plus Kaep, M.Austin, Kerley, D.Wilson, and Forbath have given me 2 scores in 3 weeks. Still mad about not realizing that the 1st two weeks meant nothing, because no way I would have gone Kerley and Austin had I known I could have had Gordon instead. I figured Gordon, Gronk and Blackmon was way too risky, but that was pretty dumb of me. I would have had another $4 left over and might not have made the David Wilson error.

Glad I went TE heavy with Gronk, Graham and J.Thomas, I think when Gronk is healthy, that could be a boon for the 2 flex spots.

 

[Modog814]

Text of my DM to The Turk about the Cincy scoring play:

I was surprised to see that the Cincinnati game-winning touchdown (where our defense recovered a fumble and then fumbled it again and then another defender for us scored the touchdown) didn't count in the contest scoring this week when I looked at my results. (I'm still alive in the contest either way but was curious about this).

From the rules: "Defensive/ST TD = 6 points (Kickoff return, punt return, blocked FG return, blocked punt return, interception return, fumble recovery return, etc. Note: ALL fumble recoveries and non-offensive TDs will count)"

That would seem to include the case where a defender fumbles the ball while returning it and then his teammate picks up and runs it in for a touchdown.

I know you have a lot on your plate but appreciate a response when you have a chance. Thanks for all you guys do

-QG

I believe official scoring is that once the ball changes possession, the team with the ball becomes the "offense". So once Cincy fumbled and recovered its own fumble, it no longer is a defensive recover but instead an offensive recovery.

And to take it further, I believe if Green Bay had somehow recovered the Cincy fumble and ran it in for a score, it would have been credited with a Defensive TD.

Perhaps, but then "technically" if the Bengals had returned the original fumble for a TD, wouldn't that mean the Bengal's "offense" scored? So, under that interpretation, defenses can never score.

This is exactly it. It's a technicality. Not saying it's right or wrong. Personally I think Cincy should get credited for a Defensive TD.

If they do decide to change the scoring, it looks like the cut line would move up to 133.1.

This would cause 52 teams who are currently safe to drop below the cut. And 47 teams below the cut would rise above it.

 

[stubby]

Eli Manning 14

Vick 9

Manuel 7

Charles 31

Wilson 21

Bernard 16

Lacy 16

Julio Jones 27

Dez 26

Givens 10

Heyward-Bey 7

Thompkins 2

Graham 31

Cameron 12

Thomas 2

Bullock 3

Forbath 3

Brown 3

Lions 3

Panthers 3

Redskins 3

Like my QB trio. Hope Charles and Lacy can carry RB until Wilson stops fumbling and Bernard takes over for BGE. WR is a minor weakness, but I only need 2 each week. TE is a strength. I feel like I'll get at least 1 flex from the TE every week. Always have 3 kickers and 3 Def/ST.

196 last week. 243 this week (#33 overall). However, Lacy hurt, Wilson still not getting the carries. Think Bernard will get more touches every week. Bullock is awful, Forbath hurt, Redskins Def/ST blows. This is why I always take 3/3 .

Dez,Julio, and my TE trio carrying my team so far. Still like my QBs as long as Vick is healthy.

222.35 this week. Eli blows, but Vick keeps saving the day, even on an off week. Charles and Bernard getting good points at RB, which is a good thing with Lacy hurt/on a bye and Wilson sucking. Julio and Dez still the WR anchor, but we had a Kembrell Tompkins sighting, so I didn't even need Dez this week, as my dynamic TE trio once again accounted for my two flex scores. Panthers had a big week, but they are off week 4. No points from Forbath (inj) or Brown (Giants blow), so again glad I took 3 kickers and 3 def/ST.

 

[Jayrod]

This RB fail seems to be an annual occurrence for me in this contest.

I'm averaging 22.7 pts per week from the RB spots combined, and have gotten worse each week...I haven't even had an RB break 15 pts.

For some reason I do pretty well at QB and WR every year, but struggle with RB and TE. However, this year my TE spots are pretty solid (except I missed the boat on Thomas).

 

[jdoggydogg]

This RB fail seems to be an annual occurrence for me in this contest.

Given injuries and erratic production, RB seems like the hardest position to predict for this contest.

 

[joffer]

Who is Travis Kelce and why is he on my team?

 

[BassNBrew]

Who is Travis Kelce and why is he on my team?

#1's on FBG pre-season depth chart for $600 Alex.

 

[Pigskin Fanatic]

Survive with 134 :golfclap:, man my RB's sucking. Wilson, Bush, Ridley and CJ. Had Vernon Davis as a scratch and didn't help to have Desean Jackson also have a bad week. Hope this is my worst week.

 

[rustycolts]

Never would have thought this team would be eliminated in the first cuts. Team 108077

But this one made it so the K offense is still alive and kicking. Team 109657

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

21 QB Guy! 100833

13 RB Guys! 108067, 103311

17 WR Guy! 110854

14 TE Guy! 107602

23 KICKER GUYS!!! 107462, 109040

20 Def Guy! 109284

 

[Modog814]

Here are some basic stats for week 3:

Row		Alive	Surv%	AvgScore	MinScore	MaxScore	StdDev18	5519	4844	87.77%	 171.10 	 132.50 	 261.20 	 22.86 19	2017	1797	89.09%	 171.73 	 132.50 	 246.70 	 22.80 20	1619	1475	91.11%	 171.21 	 132.50 	 246.30 	 22.80 21	1148	1049	91.38%	 172.79 	 132.85 	 236.30 	 21.99 22	1029	949	92.23%	 173.07 	 132.55 	 239.75 	 22.06 23	823	773	93.92%	 174.36 	 132.60 	 247.60 	 21.86 24	620	580	93.55%	 174.35 	 132.95 	 237.00 	 21.30 25	483	458	94.82%	 176.01 	 133.85 	 244.60 	 21.85 26	327	314	96.02%	 175.48 	 132.75 	 241.50 	 21.36 27	252	243	96.43%	 176.15 	 133.60 	 231.25 	 20.91 28	165	156	94.55%	 175.16 	 132.75 	 241.50 	 22.31 29	158	153	96.84%	 179.11 	 135.85 	 228.85 	 20.14 30	233	215	92.27%	 176.49 	 135.30 	 237.95 	 20.36 Total	14393	13006	90.36%	 172.42 	 132.50 	 261.20 	 22.47

 

[rustycolts]

Here are some basic stats for week 3:

Row Alive Surv% AvgScore MinScore MaxScore StdDev18 5519 4844 87.77% 171.10 132.50 261.20 22.86 19 2017 1797 89.09% 171.73 132.50 246.70 22.80 20 1619 1475 91.11% 171.21 132.50 246.30 22.80 21 1148 1049 91.38% 172.79 132.85 236.30 21.99 22 1029 949 92.23% 173.07 132.55 239.75 22.06 23 823 773 93.92% 174.36 132.60 247.60 21.86 24 620 580 93.55% 174.35 132.95 237.00 21.30 25 483 458 94.82% 176.01 133.85 244.60 21.85 26 327 314 96.02% 175.48 132.75 241.50 21.36 27 252 243 96.43% 176.15 133.60 231.25 20.91 28 165 156 94.55% 175.16 132.75 241.50 22.31 29 158 153 96.84% 179.11 135.85 228.85 20.14 30 233 215 92.27% 176.49 135.30 237.95 20.36 Total 14393 13006 90.36% 172.42 132.50 261.20 22.47

29 man rosters rule woo hoo.

 

[BassNBrew]

Here are some basic stats for week 3:

Row Alive Surv% AvgScore MinScore MaxScore StdDev18 5519 4844 87.77% 171.10 132.50 261.20 22.86 19 2017 1797 89.09% 171.73 132.50 246.70 22.80 20 1619 1475 91.11% 171.21 132.50 246.30 22.80 21 1148 1049 91.38% 172.79 132.85 236.30 21.99 22 1029 949 92.23% 173.07 132.55 239.75 22.06 23 823 773 93.92% 174.36 132.60 247.60 21.86 24 620 580 93.55% 174.35 132.95 237.00 21.30 25 483 458 94.82% 176.01 133.85 244.60 21.85 26 327 314 96.02% 175.48 132.75 241.50 21.36 27 252 243 96.43% 176.15 133.60 231.25 20.91 28 165 156 94.55% 175.16 132.75 241.50 22.31 29 158 153 96.84% 179.11 135.85 228.85 20.14 30 233 215 92.27% 176.49 135.30 237.95 20.36 Total 14393 13006 90.36% 172.42 132.50 261.20 22.47

29 man rosters rule woo hoo.

Good to see this many 18 man rosters trimmed this early. Usually they do better in the non-bye weeks.

 

[Kasparov]

So they don't show the cut line anymore?

 

[rustycolts]

So they don't show the cut line anymore?

Yea they show it right under your score it was 132.50.

 

[renesauz]

If I can hold on a couple more weeks. I'll be in good shape, but running with Reggie Bush, Veereen, Lacy, and Amendola has had me worried the first few weeks. Luckily, I made a ton of great cheap adds: Cameron, Alex Smith, Avant, and Joique Bell have all helped a lot

 

[Pigskin Fanatic]

So they don't show the cut line anymore?

Yea they show it right under your score it was 132.50.

I think he means in the rankings page, literally a line to the right of the teams that are at the cutoff. If so, they are not there so far this year.

 

[rustycolts]

So they don't show the cut line anymore?

Yea they show it right under your score it was 132.50.

I think he means in the rankings page, literally a line to the right of the teams that are at the cutoff. If so, they are not there so far this year.

Duh my bad sorry.I see what you mean.

 

[QuizGuy66]

Maybe they didn't get a chance to re-code where the lines are with the change in the number making the cut each week yet, so they took 'em out?

-QG

 

[Hybrid]

Still alive here at 149.50 with my outstanding core group of running backs: Spiller, MJD, David Wilson. Hey, at least I have Forte.

 

[Warrior]

Come back Gronk! :( I'm treading water.

 

[Balco]

My team reeks, not sure how I scored 185 last week. Ryan Mathews and Darryl Richardson are my top backs.

 

[jabarony]

So, I did the fanduel subscription thing and I should be in the pool for the additional 35k prize pot. My question is, how do I know/confirm that I'm in the running for that? Should there be an asterisk or something else showing I'm fanduel pool eligible?

Probably won't matter too much as I've never gotten past week 10, but who knows?!

 

[apalmer]

So, I did the fanduel subscription thing and I should be in the pool for the additional 35k prize pot. My question is, how do I know/confirm that I'm in the running for that? Should there be an asterisk or something else showing I'm fanduel pool eligible?

Probably won't matter too much as I've never gotten past week 10, but who knows?!

Subscribers have until Week 4 to deposit to Fanduel and qualify, so I wouldn't expect to see any designation until after that.