Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.
Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.
Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the precedent for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Edit: typoYes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
I believe you to work on your reading comprehension.Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the president for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
It has also gone to a player on the losing team if I remember correctly. Do you want to argue for a Patriot?Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the president for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
A case could be made for Welker. He played well. I don't think Manning played that well. I think he threw up plenty of ducks for grabs off his back foot. That big play to Tyree was a prayer. Could have just as easily been intercepted. If that happens people question the decision making process and he gets compared to Favre. In a case like that I think the outcome is a poor metric. No way his coach wants him throwing up prayers like that every down. The duck that hit Samuel in the hands was even worse. I agree he made several nice throws, but it wasn't anything special that tons of other players couldn't have done.It has also gone to a player on the losing team if I remember correctly. Do you want to argue for a Patriot?Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the president for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
I disagree. Evading that sack won them the game. He did toss up a couple of ducks but when it really mattered he came through with an incredible play. That's what the MVP award is all about.A case could be made for Welker. He played well. I don't think Manning played that well. I think he threw up plenty of ducks for grabs off his back foot. That big play to Tyree was a prayer. Could have just as easily been intercepted. If that happens people question the decision making process and he gets compared to Favre. In a case like that I think the outcome is a poor metric. No way his coach wants him throwing up prayers like that every down. The duck that hit Samuel in the hands was even worse. I agree he made several nice throws, but it wasn't anything special that tons of other players couldn't have done.It has also gone to a player on the losing team if I remember correctly. Do you want to argue for a Patriot?Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the president for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
Harvey Martin and Randy White tied in the voting as individuals, so they were co-MVPs. They were not voted in as a group option such as you are proposing be done with the Giants D-line.Are you denying that it has gone to multiple players before? 1978 set the president for this when it went to Harvey Martin and Randy White.Yes, and leave out Tuck?Super bowl MVP has gone to multiple players several times. Could have easily gone to Strahan and Osi.It is not the Most Valuable Unit award. This poll makes no sense.Most Valuable PLAYER. Not Unit. Make a new award if you want the entire D-Line to get it.
Really? If they scored 45 points I might agree, but 17? Do you really feel your offense deserves more credit for this win than the defense?... there has never been more of a Locky Lockerton from Lockville for this award than Elisha Manning tonight.
I could buy into this. IMO giving it to one of the guys on the DL would have been better than giving it to Manning.I would have given it to Jason Tuck. He completely obliterated the interior of the Pats' offensive line.
As a unit, no. If you told me pick the most outstanding unit, I would vote the D. I think if Tuck picks up that final sack, he might have snuck in for a co-MVP. Its hard to give it to 4 guys and hard to narrow down to just 2. But when you narrow these awards down to one player, and really look at what Eli dialed up, I think its clear.Either way, I'm happy to have this debate!Really? If they scored 45 points I might agree, but 17? Do you really feel your offense deserves more credit for this win than the defense?... there has never been more of a Locky Lockerton from Lockville for this award than Elisha Manning tonight.
dcgangstas said:I would have given it to Jason Tuck. He completely obliterated the interior of the Pats' offensive line.
Same here. Guy made two of the three or four most important plays of the night.Jimmy James said:I go for Tyree, so that's a none of the above.
I've read your posts in the FFA a few times so I guess I'm not surprised at your response. Anyone not a copy of you is "dumb".Who was more deserving?Eli Manning [ 29 ] [42.03%]NY Defensive line [ 40 ] [57.97%]Apparently more than half of the people voting in here are dumb in your eyes.Eli deserved it. Giving the award of most valuable player to a unit is dumb.
I wouldnt call it dumb, but it is a little silly. Its not the Most Valuable Players award. Picking multiple people is a complete contradiction of the point of the award. I'll take Justin Tuck, David Tyree, Eli Manning, and RW McQuarters. Why not?I've read your posts in the FFA a few times so I guess I'm not surprised at your response. Anyone not a copy of you is "dumb".Who was more deserving?Eli Manning [ 29 ] [42.03%]NY Defensive line [ 40 ] [57.97%]Apparently more than half of the people voting in here are dumb in your eyes.Eli deserved it. Giving the award of most valuable player to a unit is dumb.
Eli is the only choice because it is an individual player award. As I told you in the other thread, the only time that there have been co-MVPs is when individual players tied for the top spot. There is no group vote.If you want to ask who should win a vote for MVP, and give Eli and the D-line as the choices, Eli should win the poll with 100% of the vote since MVP voters cannot vote for the other option.If you want to ask whether Eli or the Giants D-line played the bigger role in the victory, then that doesn't have anything to do with choosing a Super Bowl MVP, but could be a good poll.Enforcer said:I made my opinion know in another thread. Curious to know what the majority feels would have been the better choice.
Agreed. They kinda actually cancelled each other out. If either of those guys had the same game without the other lineman being equally dominant, the one guy probably gets the MVP. But since at least those 2 deserve it its hard to pick one over the other. I think Eli is a really safe, reasonable choice though. All the defense goes to waste if he doesnt lead 2 drives to take the lead... and honestly the most classic moments of this SB will be his. It also doesnt hurt that i think Steve Smith and David Tyree have a respectable case for MVP, which obviously they cant do without Manning.I thought Yumeniora and Tuck were unstoppable. But Manning drove them down the field for the win. Tough call. Unfortunately, QBs often get credit for team wins (see Brady, Tom)
Eli is the only choice because it is an individual player award. As I told you in the other thread, the only time that there have been co-MVPs is when individual players tied for the top spot. There is no group vote.If you want to ask who should win a vote for MVP, and give Eli and the D-line as the choices, Eli should win the poll with 100% of the vote since MVP voters cannot vote for the other option.If you want to ask whether Eli or the Giants D-line played the bigger role in the victory, then that doesn't have anything to do with choosing a Super Bowl MVP, but could be a good poll.Enforcer said:I made my opinion know in another thread. Curious to know what the majority feels would have been the better choice.
I think that the issue was there were SO MANY deserving defensive players that it was not really possible to choose one (or even two).
I think Tuck, Umenyiora, and Strahan played very well, as did Butler, Pierce, and Mitchell. Several of those played better than Eli did, IMHO.
But the Most Valuable Giant award goes to Spagnuolo by a landslide.
GregR said:Eli is the only choice because it is an individual player award. As I told you in the other thread, the only time that there have been co-MVPs is when individual players tied for the top spot. There is no group vote.If you want to ask who should win a vote for MVP, and give Eli and the D-line as the choices, Eli should win the poll with 100% of the vote since MVP voters cannot vote for the other option.If you want to ask whether Eli or the Giants D-line played the bigger role in the victory, then that doesn't have anything to do with choosing a Super Bowl MVP, but could be a good poll.Enforcer said:I made my opinion know in another thread. Curious to know what the majority feels would have been the better choice.
I can't disagree with the concept, but I still think that Manning's play wasn't worthy. He got lucky on several plays instead of "making" a great play. Is this really in dispute? Did he not throw up prayers late in the game that could have had disastrous results?The D-Line would've won MVU, but this is a poll about MVP![]()
Sorry. Appreciate the heads up on my typo.And it's "precedent", not "president"
Coulda woulda shoulda, if ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a very merry christmas.The pressure of driving down the field to win the superbowl has to be enormous. Much more than that of a group or unit of defenders. The D line fed off each others play and no doubt a dominating performance. But the ball in your hands is another matter entirely.ELI =I can't disagree with the concept, but I still think that Manning's play wasn't worthy. He got lucky on several plays instead of "making" a great play. Is this really in dispute? Did he not throw up prayers late in the game that could have had disastrous results?The D-Line would've won MVU, but this is a poll about MVP
Sorry. Appreciate the heads up on my typo.And it's "precedent", not "president"