What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Taliaferro & Crowell - The 2 most important waiver wire players in (1 Viewer)

Who makes the biggest fantasy impact in 2014 a-la Zac Stacy?

  • Taliaferro

    Votes: 83 22.5%
  • Crowell

    Votes: 182 49.3%
  • I don't think either will become viable fantasy players this year

    Votes: 104 28.2%

  • Total voters
    369
ponchsox said:
Pierce and Forsett proving they're scrubs tonight. Only a matter of time before Taliaferro gets a shot as the featured back.
I didn't catch the game, but I guess they really came on in the second half, huh? 22/96 and 8/56 in a big win certainly don't suggest that Pierce and Forsett are going anywhere.

 
ponchsox said:
Pierce and Forsett proving they're scrubs tonight. Only a matter of time before Taliaferro gets a shot as the featured back.
I didn't catch the game, but I guess they really came on in the second half, huh? 22/96 and 8/56 in a big win certainly don't suggest that Pierce and Forsett are going anywhere.
Pittsburgh, crap run d on the road In a short week. Forsett broke a long one, all the credit and good run but it was against a tired d. Pierce was 19 for 72 at one point so he padded with a couple of nice runs. Can't really say either one impressed and I don't own any of these guys but I'm debating taliaferro In a few leagues. Would have liked to see A carry though

 
Neither back looked good. Adequate at best.

Pierce was running like a JAG until PIT tired down at the end killing the clock.

Forsett looked like a 3rd down back being forced to play a bigger role. His big run had a monstrous hole that any good back would have taken it the whole way.

Bottom line. Taliaferro is the stash and wait. It was a short week and I'm sure he'll get his shot to unseat the journey man 3rd down back and the JAG.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ponchsox said:
Pierce and Forsett proving they're scrubs tonight. Only a matter of time before Taliaferro gets a shot as the featured back.
I didn't catch the game, but I guess they really came on in the second half, huh? 22/96 and 8/56 in a big win certainly don't suggest that Pierce and Forsett are going anywhere.
Pittsburgh, crap run d on the road In a short week. Forsett broke a long one, all the credit and good run but it was against a tired d. Pierce was 19 for 72 at one point so he padded with a couple of nice runs. Can't really say either one impressed and I don't own any of these guys but I'm debating taliaferro In a few leagues. Would have liked to see A carry though
Just saying, all the conditions in the world might have made this a favorable matchup, but this certainly doesn't do anything to push Taliaferro closer to getting work or moving up the timeline for his ascendance. It doesn't matter if guys looks ordinary if they average over 5 ypc on 30 carries, pick up lots of first downs, don't turn the ball over, and ultimately help their team win a game by 20 points. Fantasy football is all about opportunity and last night's game moved the needle in the wrong direction for Taliaferro. He would be in a much better position had Pierce played like he did in week 1 and Forsett failed to break his couple of big runs. It appears one or both of them will have to fail hard for Taliaferro to even get on the field.

 
ponchsox said:
Pierce and Forsett proving they're scrubs tonight. Only a matter of time before Taliaferro gets a shot as the featured back.
I didn't catch the game, but I guess they really came on in the second half, huh? 22/96 and 8/56 in a big win certainly don't suggest that Pierce and Forsett are going anywhere.
Pittsburgh, crap run d on the road In a short week. Forsett broke a long one, all the credit and good run but it was against a tired d. Pierce was 19 for 72 at one point so he padded with a couple of nice runs. Can't really say either one impressed and I don't own any of these guys but I'm debating taliaferro In a few leagues. Would have liked to see A carry though
Just saying, all the conditions in the world might have made this a favorable matchup, but this certainly doesn't do anything to push Taliaferro closer to getting work or moving up the timeline for his ascendance. It doesn't matter if guys looks ordinary if they average over 5 ypc on 30 carries, pick up lots of first downs, don't turn the ball over, and ultimately help their team win a game by 20 points.Fantasy football is all about opportunity and last night's game moved the needle in the wrong direction for Taliaferro. He would be in a much better position had Pierce played like he did in week 1 and Forsett failed to break his couple of big runs. It appears one or both of them will have to fail hard for Taliaferro to even get on the field.
Yes. I find it funny that people are trying to spin last night's game to a favorable result for Taliaferro (and I own him in a dynasty). Nothing about last night's game puts him any closer to seeing significant carries. In fact last night showed quite the opposite; Pierce is the feature back and Forsette is the 3rd down/CoP option. Without an injury to either, Taliaferro has not use in a redraft league.

 
I agree that last night was a step in the wrong direction for taliaferro in redraft leagues for the most part.

The one silver lining is that apparently the ravens had the ball inside the five yard line SIX times and failed to convert on running plays.

So, if I'm harbaugh, I'm spending this week searching for answers to the short yardage game, and taliaferro seems to fit the bill for that.

If he can get on the field in short yardage and gl situations moving forward, he can carve out some value and be even more valuable if pierce struggles or gets injured.

In redraft, I view him as a tentative hold. If there is someone else in the wire that is intriguing to you I wouldn't think you were crazy for dropping him for that player. He's really just a deep stash at this point.

Jordan Reed Iain the wire in my league. If it wasn't for the intrigue about his potential gl and short yardage role going forward I'd drop him for Reed in a heartbeat and I still might.

Dynasty is a different story. He's a hold.

 
I have neither of these guys, but was watching closely because I reccomended a friend asking for advice to start Pierce.

I thought it was kind of funny that Forsette got that long 41 yard run on a play right after Pierce tapped himself out for being winded.

Not saying that Pierce would have gotten 41 yards, but that was a HUGE hole and he would have broken 100 yards total if he kept himself in that play.

Either way. You have to be more comfortable if you are the Pierce owner here. 22 carries to 8 carries is pretty telling that the coaching staff trusts him.

 
I agree that last night was a step in the wrong direction for taliaferro in redraft leagues for the most part.

The one silver lining is that apparently the ravens had the ball inside the five yard line SIX times and failed to convert on running plays.

So, if I'm harbaugh, I'm spending this week searching for answers to the short yardage game, and taliaferro seems to fit the bill for that.

If he can get on the field in short yardage and gl situations moving forward, he can carve out some value and be even more valuable if pierce struggles or gets injured.

In redraft, I view him as a tentative hold. If there is someone else in the wire that is intriguing to you I wouldn't think you were crazy for dropping him for that player. He's really just a deep stash at this point.

Jordan Reed Iain the wire in my league. If it wasn't for the intrigue about his potential gl and short yardage role going forward I'd drop him for Reed in a heartbeat and I still might.

Dynasty is a different story. He's a hold.
A (potential*) goal-line back has very little value in a redraft. You can't start a guy hoping he gets a short yardage TD each week unless you are in a very deep league or a TD only league.

* as of now he isn't even a goal-line back.

 
I agree that last night was a step in the wrong direction for taliaferro in redraft leagues for the most part.

The one silver lining is that apparently the ravens had the ball inside the five yard line SIX times and failed to convert on running plays.

So, if I'm harbaugh, I'm spending this week searching for answers to the short yardage game, and taliaferro seems to fit the bill for that.

If he can get on the field in short yardage and gl situations moving forward, he can carve out some value and be even more valuable if pierce struggles or gets injured.

In redraft, I view him as a tentative hold. If there is someone else in the wire that is intriguing to you I wouldn't think you were crazy for dropping him for that player. He's really just a deep stash at this point.

Jordan Reed Iain the wire in my league. If it wasn't for the intrigue about his potential gl and short yardage role going forward I'd drop him for Reed in a heartbeat and I still might.

Dynasty is a different story. He's a hold.
A (potential*) goal-line back has very little value in a redraft. You can't start a guy hoping he gets a short yardage TD each week unless you are in a very deep league or a TD only league.

* as of now he isn't even a goal-line back.
I agree with that. But my point is that if you have a bog roster and can afford to stash taliaferro, he might seize a gl and short yardage role and if pierce struggles or goes down that can grow to a feature role. If you have the roster spot to stash and wait, he could pay off. Personally, for me, I dropped him to pick up jordan reed. I might revisit picking him up again if I get a feeling that his role could grow, but my roster has no room for a guy who doesn't even see the field.

Being great at fantasy football is all about being malleable and knowing when to hold em and when to fold em (especially on your stances on every player). Gotta stay objective and realize when your analysis was wrong or too early.

Now let's see what Crowell has in store for us this week!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couldn't add this to the week 2 waiver wire thread?
I could have and I apologize if the new thread annoys some people, but that thread is also full of conjecture on other players. I REALLY do think that one of these guys is going to prove to be the waiver wire pickup of the year. Like a zac stacy or moreno of 2013.

It deserves some serious discussion and was hoping to bounce my opinions off some of the other sharks.
tolia who? didn't seem to be used but we are waiting for your big prediction to come true.

 
West is the man IN Cleveland also...

both of these guys won't do didly for redraft and are dynasty guys ONLY until further notice.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.
So you expect Crowell to leapfrog West and Ben Tate ... Why?

Tate looked great before getting injured (it's only a 2-4 week injury) and West looked great replacing him.

Granted Crowell looked good but he only had 5 carries and he is 3rd in the pecking order.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.
So you expect Crowell to leapfrog West and Ben Tate ... Why?

Tate looked great before getting injured (it's only a 2-4 week injury) and West looked great replacing him.

Granted Crowell looked good but he only had 5 carries and he is 3rd in the pecking order.
That's not what I said, but yeah, I do think Crowell has a shot and becoming nasty this season. He burst off the screen with very limited touches last week. He looked markedly better than Tate or West to me in those few touches. Let's at least see what he does with a few more this week before we say this thread is a waste.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.
So you expect Crowell to leapfrog West and Ben Tate ... Why?Tate looked great before getting injured (it's only a 2-4 week injury) and West looked great replacing him.

Granted Crowell looked good but he only had 5 carries and he is 3rd in the pecking order.
That's not what I said, but yeah, I do think Crowell has a shot and becoming nasty this season. He burst off the screen with very limited touches last week. He looked markedly better than Tate or West to me in those few touches. Let's at least see what he does with a few more this week before we say this thread is a waste.
Anyone who thinks this thread is a waste is the equivalent of a fantasy football rookie. Period. Whether or not one or both of these guys pans out is irrelevant.

What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.

Taking that approach is bound to give you some misses. But when you hit, you hit big. That's how you win championships.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.
So you expect Crowell to leapfrog West and Ben Tate ... Why?Tate looked great before getting injured (it's only a 2-4 week injury) and West looked great replacing him.

Granted Crowell looked good but he only had 5 carries and he is 3rd in the pecking order.
That's not what I said, but yeah, I do think Crowell has a shot and becoming nasty this season. He burst off the screen with very limited touches last week. He looked markedly better than Tate or West to me in those few touches. Let's at least see what he does with a few more this week before we say this thread is a waste.
Anyone who thinks this thread is a waste is the equivalent of a fantasy football rookie. Period. Whether or not one or nothing these guys pans out is irrelevant.

What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.

Taking that approach is bound to give you some misses. But when you hit, you hit big. That's how you win championships.
Basically this. My last bench slot is purely for rotating in a bye week QB, bye week TE, and guys who are 1 injury away from being a RB2 or WR3 or better. I don't need a 2nd or 3rd Flex option on bye weeks. I want guys who are close to a path to starting for me. Right now Crowell is 1 injury away from a feature back roll on a team who looked good running the ball week 1. That's all I need to know.

Guys like Crowell, CJ Anderson, Kniles Davis. They are good for add ins to trades as well. Helps grease the wheel to the guy who wants the handcuff and helps in negotiating a move up at a position or move up at a different position. Dez for Bell is probably a decent trade. It's much more likely to happen if you try Dez and CJ Anderson for Bell if they also own Ball in my experience.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Hate to tell you Qim, but the fact it that not all of us are in 8 team friend and family leagues, where yes, this would be a useless thread.

My main league is a 16 teamer, hyper competitive, money league. A thread like this can make or break our season.

There is ZERO big name talent on the WW and anyone in that league who drafted Rice or Tate is watching this stuff like a hawk.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Hate to tell you Qim, but the fact it that not all of us are in 8 team friend and family leagues, where yes, this would be a useless thread.My main league is a 16 teamer, hyper competitive, money league. A thread like this can make or break our season.

There is ZERO big name talent on the WW and anyone in that league who drafted Rice or Tate is watching this stuff like a hawk.
So, 1 or 2 guys?

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Hate to tell you Qim, but the fact it that not all of us are in 8 team friend and family leagues, where yes, this would be a useless thread.

My main league is a 16 teamer, hyper competitive, money league. A thread like this can make or break our season.

There is ZERO big name talent on the WW and anyone in that league who drafted Rice or Tate is watching this stuff like a hawk.
16 teamer i could certainly understand ... but I don't get the feeling that the majority are in the same boat.

 
I feel like every year, some scrub RB becomes valuable, if even for a short while.

Might be the two listed here, could be Latavius Murray, Dion Lewis, or Damien Williams. Never know.

 
What an absolutely useless thread !

Nonsensical discussion about two 3rd string RBs on bad teams !!!!

Who started this BS? That ####### @ RotoExperts that calls himself The King !?!?!?
Let's see if Crowell does anything before we draw conclusions.
So you expect Crowell to leapfrog West and Ben Tate ... Why?Tate looked great before getting injured (it's only a 2-4 week injury) and West looked great replacing him.

Granted Crowell looked good but he only had 5 carries and he is 3rd in the pecking order.
That's not what I said, but yeah, I do think Crowell has a shot and becoming nasty this season. He burst off the screen with very limited touches last week. He looked markedly better than Tate or West to me in those few touches. Let's at least see what he does with a few more this week before we say this thread is a waste.
Anyone who thinks this thread is a waste is the equivalent of a fantasy football rookie. Period. Whether or not one or both of these guys pans out is irrelevant.

What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.

Taking that approach is bound to give you some misses. But when you hit, you hit big. That's how you win championships.
Bingo

 
What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.
The problem is that every guppy in the Shark Pool wants to be the guy who predicted a breakout, so there are literally dozens of threads dedicated to 3rd and 4th string scrubs.

 
What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.
The problem is that every guppy in the Shark Pool wants to be the guy who predicted a breakout, so there are literally dozens of threads dedicated to 3rd and 4th string scrubs.
Personally I don't see this as a problem. I don't have time to analyze every single player (especially 3rd stringers) so when I see a thread like this one I'll give it the time of day. If I see a rationale about a player and a situation that makes sense I might choose to take it serious enough as to drop the last guy on my bench to take a shot. I still think the door is not closed for taliaferro or Crowell this season. I have one stashed in my dynasty league and one stashed in my redraft (deep bench).

Happy to change course and cut bait if/when I feel the opportunity is absolutely not there for either or if I have a need elsewhere.

Damien Williams is another one. A thread in the sp alerted me to him. I love that stuff.

We all know how awesome the top players are. We don't need threads on them.

And we certainly don't need 10 ap and ray rice threads that have nothing to do with fantasy football

 
rickyg said:
Mr. Retukes said:
What IS relevant is that threads like these help us to acquire potential season changers BEFORE they break out.
The problem is that every guppy in the Shark Pool wants to be the guy who predicted a breakout, so there are literally dozens of threads dedicated to 3rd and 4th string scrubs.
Personally I don't see this as a problem. I don't have time to analyze every single player (especially 3rd stringers) so when I see a thread like this one I'll give it the time of day. If I see a rationale about a player and a situation that makes sense I might choose to take it serious enough as to drop the last guy on my bench to take a shot. I still think the door is not closed for taliaferro or Crowell this season. I have one stashed in my dynasty league and one stashed in my redraft (deep bench).

Happy to change course and cut bait if/when I feel the opportunity is absolutely not there for either or if I have a need elsewhere.

Damien Williams is another one. A thread in the sp alerted me to him. I love that stuff.

We all know how awesome the top players are. We don't need threads on them.

And we certainly don't need 10 ap and ray rice threads that have nothing to do with fantasy football
I think what frustrates people is that by the end of the day, every 3rd string RB has someone pimping them. So you end up with a bunch of white noise.

You see it in every "sleeper" thread, every "breakout" thread, every "bust" thread. If it runs long enough, everyone will be on it. So, yeah, someone in the thread will be right. But a lot of someones will be wrong.

All that said, it's a free message board where everyone is free to post. So there isn't a a fix for it.

 
Interesting..
The Baltimore Sun suggests Saturday's signing of RB Fitzgerald Toussaint points to the Ravens "potentially having concerns about their depth in the backfield" with Bernard Pierce nursing a thigh injury.
We tentatively expect Pierce to play after he practiced fully on Friday, but he is still listed as questionable, and the Toussaint move was an eyebrow raiser. If Pierce were inactive or aggravated the injury early Sunday against the Browns, the Ravens would figure to give Justin Forsett lead back work with rookie Lorenzo Taliaferro handling increased playing time off the bench.
 
I wonder if in redraft leagues it's smart to drop Crowell for taliaferro rt now. I'm not saying that I think taliaferro is more talented. I have no clue if he is or isn't.

But Crowell definitely has way more standing in front of him becoming a real factor THIS year.

If taliaferro gets some real work in today's game against Cleveland and impresses, I don't think the ravens coaching staff will hesitate to give him more chances to take the feature back role with pierce and forsett being the only roadblocks for him.

Crowell on the other handbags 2 talented backs in front of him.

 
Shoot this is probably the week talliaferro becomes a must grab. To think I wasted one of my allotted pick ups for the week on Damian Williams.

 
Taliaferro might get a shot this weekend with Pierce dinged up.
I am kinda wondering about this too.
I picked him up again to hold for this week. Couldn't hurt with my deep benches. I probably wouldn't do it if my bench space was valuable though.
Yeah, roster space is tight. In a deeper league I'm trying to find room.
LOL It took me over an hour, and it hurt so much, I cant say who I cut..

If ya really wind up in trouble deciding, we may need a few to vouch for his combine numbers ie. 33 in Vert sounded kinda rough I mean I understand players "train /practice" for best performance, and its noticeable when they don't.. But 33 sounds like No Burst..

Im onboard for this w/e! WooHoo

 
If forsett dominates touches today and taliaferro gets no love he will be immediately droppable in next weeks waivers. If he gets love and does some good stuff he can carve out a serious role. Worth the risk.

 
Remember when people were calling this a useless thread and saying that taliaferro and Crowell were 3rd stringers with no fantasy value? Yeah, me too.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top