tombonneau
Footballguy
Results were meh due to inept offense, but I was very pleased with his usage. I think he is possibly #2 target when OBJ comes back. B-Marsh was non-factor.
No idea but it sure wasn't a positive for him today.so in redraft, all these WR injuries a positive or a negative for Engram?
Yeah. Seemed odd in second half with all the wr injuries he did nothing. I saw they were so desperate for bodies that he was spread out wide at the end so maybe that was part of the problem.No idea but it sure wasn't a positive for him today.
I'm a Giants fan who was watching the game, so I thought I'd chime in. The Giants were down to 1 WR and had to line up Engram and 3rd TE Jerrell Adams at WR, which meant he was either a) doubled with a LB and safety or b) single covered by top CB Casey Heyward. The fact he couldn't line up at TE or in the backfield (where the Giants can scheme mismatches for him) really hurt him.Yeah. Seemed odd in second half with all the wr injuries he did nothing. I saw they were so desperate for bodies that he was spread out wide at the end so maybe that was part of the problem.
I don't know when but I expect Evan Engram to be the #1 overall TE for a couple of years during his career.What is the general consensus going forward now that they won't have their top2-3 wr's out on the field. Bonanza of targets or waste away in coverage?
Superstar in the making.So Engram did really well against the Denver defense, when they should have known the ball was probably going his way. Engram appears to be poised for a potentially great season now with OBJ and Marshall out. I'm wondering what his performance last night says about his dynasty prospects? Next season, the Giants will probably field OBJ, Shepard and Engram as their 3 top passing options. How is everyone viewing his long-term potential at this stage? He currently sits as TE #5 in my league.
#1. Who was over?Engram played on 38 offensive snaps (70%) 7 targets 5 receptions 82 yards 1 TD
Rhett Ellison played on 35 offensive snaps (65%) no targets.
Adams played on 11 offensive snaps (20%) 1 target 1 reception 6 yards
LaCosse played on 9 offensive snaps (17%) 1 target 0 receptions
I am guessing that Engram split out as a WR on a lot of these plays while Ellison played more in line TE. Both were on the field for about 1/3 of the offensive plays and two other TE played significant snaps as well.
The Giants were more effective running the ball in this game than they have been in the previous five games and the additional use of TEs may be part of that.
I only saw the end of the game as we had company last night and were watching something else.
Cousins and Jackie Chan. Some of my relatives don't like football (some do).#1. Who was over?
#2. What was more important to watch than Football?
Tex
Really nice to see my YouTube highlight scouting abilities finally pay off.The kid looks like the 2nd coming of Jordan Reed. Without the health issues (at least not yet).
According to the ubiquitous Verizon commercials you should have been watching the game on your phone while Chan was on the TV...Cousins and Jackie Chan. Some of my relatives don't like football (some do).
I’m proud to say that I did!Really nice to see my YouTube highlight scouting abilities finally pay off.
To me he looked like a Reed/Hernandez move guy who would flourish on the right team. So far so good. Props to anyone else out there who took him over OJ in dynasty.
This seemed like a no-brainer to me on draft day. OJ was never dominant and went to a team with an established TE and Mike Evans already in place. Tack on that he's a good blocker and he's much more likely to kept in when they play 12. I took Engram over OJ in three dynasty leagues and never really considered not doing so.tombonneau said:Really nice to see my YouTube highlight scouting abilities finally pay off.
To me he looked like a Reed/Hernandez move guy who would flourish on the right team. So far so good. Props to anyone else out there who took him over OJ in dynasty.
Yeah Howard might have been the better allround NFL prospect, but in fantasy it's about catching passes and Engram was way more polished in that regard. Plus it's not that he can't block, most scouting reports described him as servicable in that regard (and it turned out to be pretty accurate) and he had a crazy 40 time - no idea why there wasn't more hype. Probably because Howard is 6'6" so everybody assumed he would be the next Gronk - which he still can become, but maybe he just ends up a really good player like Bennett but nothing to get excited about for fantasy purposes. But Engram is more like a rich man's Jimmy Graham, which is just as good if not better.This seemed like a no-brainer to me on draft day. OJ was never dominant and went to a team with an established TE and Mike Evans already in place. Tack on that he's a good blocker and he's much more likely to kept in when they play 12. I took Engram over OJ in three dynasty leagues and never really considered not doing so.
Are you talking from a dynasty perspective? I'd probably hold regardless. Sure, his market share over the past two weeks (31%, 37%) is likely unsustainable in the very long-term but I think he could benefit from someone else drawing attention. I have to assume he's drawing a lot of attention from opposing defenses right now although I don't have the numbers to back that up.Someone talk me out of considering Engram a sell high. Obviously sell high is relative ... you would want a pretty penny. Engram's on a record setting pace for a rookie TE. He tested extremely well from a metrics perspective, and was a 1st round pick. These are all big check marks in his favor.
However, the Giants are without OBJ right now, who's by far their biggest offensive playmaker. They're also missing their WR2 and WR3 in Marshall and Shepard, the latter of which is due back soon. The RB position for the Giants isn't exactly demanding touches.
It's plausible to me that Engram's market share of the offense is at its peak. Now he's 23, and producing incredibly well, but ... would you entertain sell high offers, or would you hold on for dear life?
Its going to totally depend on if they hit with there next qb or not. Him, Odell, & Sheppard will be a huge part of that qbs growth but some quarterbacks just suck.Are you talking from a dynasty perspective? I'd probably hold regardless. Sure, his market share over the past two weeks (31%, 37%) is likely unsustainable in the very long-term but I think he could benefit from someone else drawing attention. I have to assume he's drawing a lot of attention from opposing defenses right now although I don't have the numbers to back that up.
Yeah - that's the flip side of the argument. He's producing now with a huge market share and a lot of defensive attention. The market share likely drops when OBJ returns and the Giants field a competent running game, but Engram could also be more efficient with a smaller share when he's not the focus of the defense.Are you talking from a dynasty perspective? I'd probably hold regardless. Sure, his market share over the past two weeks (31%, 37%) is likely unsustainable in the very long-term but I think he could benefit from someone else drawing attention. I have to assume he's drawing a lot of attention from opposing defenses right now although I don't have the numbers to back that up.
Hold! I drafted him at the end of the 1st because I wanted him on my team so I could bring home that trophy not to sell.Someone talk me out of considering Engram a sell high. Obviously sell high is relative ... you would want a pretty penny. Engram's on a record setting pace for a rookie TE. He tested extremely well from a metrics perspective, and was a 1st round pick. These are all big check marks in his favor.
However, the Giants are without OBJ right now, who's by far their biggest offensive playmaker. They're also missing their WR2 and WR3 in Marshall and Shepard, the latter of which is due back soon. The RB position for the Giants isn't exactly demanding touches.
It's plausible to me that Engram's market share of the offense is at its peak. Now he's 23, and producing incredibly well, but ... would you entertain sell high offers, or would you hold on for dear life?
I have Kelce, ASJ, Eifert, Walker, and Fleener and I still can’t see myself selling. He could have a Gates type of career.Hold unless u have a tight end above him
Sorry. Meant redraftI have Kelce, ASJ, Eifert, Walker, and Fleener and I still can’t see myself selling. He could have a Gates type of career.
Tex
Hold at all costs.JFS171 said:Someone talk me out of considering Engram a sell high. Obviously sell high is relative ... you would want a pretty penny. Engram's on a record setting pace for a rookie TE. He tested extremely well from a metrics perspective, and was a 1st round pick. These are all big check marks in his favor.
However, the Giants are without OBJ right now, who's by far their biggest offensive playmaker. They're also missing their WR2 and WR3 in Marshall and Shepard, the latter of which is due back soon. The RB position for the Giants isn't exactly demanding touches.
It's plausible to me that Engram's market share of the offense is at its peak. Now he's 23, and producing incredibly well, but ... would you entertain sell high offers, or would you hold on for dear life?
What did you pay for him in trade?I own him in dynasty, and I just traded for him in a blockbuster trade in my standard scoring redraft league. Dude is a BALLER and seems pretty much uncoverable on his routes. Very excited to watch him the rest of this year and his career. He's only going to get better. Which is scary...
Standard scoring redraft: I traded michael thomas and mccaffery for Jordan howard and Engram.What did you pay for him in trade?
Could be ueful for folks thinking about buying or selling.
Thats pretty strong. Basically McCaffrey or Thomas for him although from your point of view Howard upgrading from McCaffrey and giving up Thomas for Engram as perhaps a downgrade.Standard scoring redraft: I traded michael thomas and mccaffery for Jordan howard and Engram.