That's crazy, lol.barackdhouse said:Yeah, probably. Hindery already has him as the overall #1 dynasty TE.
That's crazy, lol.barackdhouse said:Yeah, probably. Hindery already has him as the overall #1 dynasty TE.
I bet a lot of experts (and others) will do the same when they seem him start to show signs of stardom, which could be right away. I think it's a bit premature for it right now.barackdhouse said:Yeah, probably. Hindery already has him as the overall #1 dynasty TE.
That's crazy, lol.
It is crazy in terms of what to expect production wise, but in terms of market value, right now he really is probably the #1 TE asset. You could get more in return for him than anyone right now. And Waller and Hockenson are almost untouchable right now. Kittle gets moved a lot and Kelce is too old for his price so there is no market for him. Andrews gets moved a lot and is generally viewed below those guys even though I think he should be closer. The problem is those other guys are likely to hold their value a year from now whereas Pitts value is still built on shine.I bet a lot of experts (and others) will do the same when they seem him start to show signs of stardom, which could be right away. I think it's a bit premature for it right now.
Julio Jones didn't have a Julio Jones year as a rookie.
To be fair he did put up just under 1000 yards and 8 TDs as a rookie which if I'm not mistaken would be the 2nd best rookie TE season ever.Julio Jones didn't have a Julio Jones year as a rookie.![]()
As long as FFB keeps him @ TE position - I don't give a s### if he plays quarterback, running back, tight end, wide receiver. More opps the better.He will become amazing. I don’t think they play him at TE.
*Supreme* longshot? I'd call it a minor upset if Pitts hit 1000 yards.To be fair he did put up just under 1000 yards and 8 TDs as a rookie which if I'm not mistaken would be the 2nd best rookie TE season ever.
But yes, even that is a supreme longshot for Pitts as a rookie. If he somehow hits it he will be untouchable though.
...but his position will be TE, especially for financial reasons.He will become amazing. I don’t think they play him at TE.
Not if he files a grievance and they see he plays x% amount of snaps out wide....but his position will be TE, especially for financial reasons.
Seems unlikely to me that he'll be any more successful than someone like Jimmy Graham was in that appeal case. Pitts just went to the TE camp, so I think it's safe to say he considers himself a TE, anyway.Not if he files a grievance and they see he plays x% amount of snaps out wide.
You may be correct with the unbolded part, I don't recall how those grievances ended up. As far as the bolded, he may think of himself as a TE now, but if they try to franchise tag him when that time comes and he thinks he deserves WR money, he'll change his tune.Seems unlikely to me that he'll be any more successful than someone like Jimmy Graham was in that appeal case. Pitts just went to the TE camp, so I think it's safe to say he considers himself a TE, anyway.
It probably won't matter what he thinks. They will play him enough at the TE position to justify keeping him at TE, at least through his rookie contract.You may be correct with the unbolded part, I don't recall how those grievances ended up. As far as the bolded, he may think of himself as a TE now, but if they try to franchise tag him when that time comes and he thinks he deserves WR money, he'll change his tune.
I only remember the Graham case. But iirc part of the reason they ruled in favor of the saints was that Graham called himself a TE and met with the TE position group for the saints.You may be correct with the unbolded part, I don't recall how those grievances ended up. As far as the bolded, he may think of himself as a TE now, but if they try to franchise tag him when that time comes and he thinks he deserves WR money, he'll change his tune.
I hear you. I guess I didn't mean to say "what he thinks", it's more about the % of snaps played as a TE. But as others pointed out, it seems Graham tried that and failed.It probably won't matter what he thinks. They will play him enough at the TE position to justify keeping him at TE, at least through his rookie contract.
I will officially spend the rest of the offseason praying this dude is right.
Long odds, but I’m right there with you.He is such a can’t miss prospect. With Julio gone I think he has a great chance to have a historic season.
I can't see a Mike Ditka reference and NOT think of Saturday Night Live.Complete list of rookie Tight Ends who exceeded 900 yards in a season:
Mike Ditka, 1961
(in the last 60 NFL seasons, five other players topped 700 yards; only five more topped 600 yards)
Complete list of rookie Tight Ends who had double digit Touchdowns in a season:
Mike Ditka, 1961
Rob Gronkowski, 2010
In the last 32 seasons, the only TE1s (top 12) were Shockey 2002, Gronk 2010, Engram 2017.
He is such a can’t miss prospect. With Julio gone I think he has a great chance to have a historic season.
It does make me wonder how Ditka would have done in his rookie season against a defense made up entirely of mini-Ditkas. Probably 1 catch for 1 yard & 1 TD, because that’s the game Ditka was also at QB.I can't see a Mike Ditka reference and NOT think of Saturday Night Live.
Ditka, indirectly, hooked me on the game for life. All because of one play I read about in a book called Great Paas Receivers of the NFL. I was like 7 or 8, the play happened 5-6 years before, and it would be another 45 years or so before I actually saw it.It does make me wonder how Ditka would have done in his rookie season against a defense made up entirely of mini-Ditkas. Probably 1 catch for 1 yard & 1 TD, because that’s the game Ditka was also at QB.
Pretty sure I saw that play you described on an ESPN Ditka special. So good. he was the definition of a hard-nosed player.Ditka, indirectly, hooked me on the game for life. All because of one play I read about in a book called Great Paas Receivers of the NFL. I was like 7 or 8, the play happened 5-6 years before, and it would be another 45 years or so before I actually saw it.
Dang it…can’t find it on YouTube today.
The way Dave Anderson wrote it, ‘twas like King Kong caught a short pass on 3rd and long but just refused to go down. Should have been a punt, Ditka broke 7 or 8 tackles to gain 50 yards to set up the tying FG. Yeah, for a tie. In a meaningless game for a losing team. Because Ditka only knew how to play one way.
Iron Mike was Gronk 45+ a years before Gronk. Watch his highlights. It’s unreal how many times guys just bounced off him, he just trucks them likes he’s playing against Pop Warner players.
I’d know it if I saw it…black & white film, might have been against Philly. It might have been “only” 5-6 broken tackles, he breaks in the clear but he gets caught from behind, lays out spreadeagled bc he’s totally gassed.Pretty sure I saw that play you described on an ESPN Ditka special. So good. he was the definition of a hard-nosed player.
I agree until it comes down to when they want to resign him after 4 or 5 years. If he's close to as good as people think and he is being used as much as a WR as Waller then I think he very well could say to the Falcons and all other NFL teams, "I am a WR, I want WR money as well as WR designation in my contract". I suppose Atlanta could just say, "screw you we will just franchise you twice". That doesn't seem like how you should treat a star of your team in his prime though.It probably won't matter what he thinks. They will play him enough at the TE position to justify keeping him at TE, at least through his rookie contract.
Can't blame them for that. Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered about noon Eastern time on that day. Probably right about the time the Bears-Steelers game was getting ready to start.Oh wow…never knew WHY it’s so hard to find the footage.
"Camelot" and "The New Frontier" were over. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the nation's 35th President, had been gunned down in Dallas roughly 48 hours before the Bears and Steelers would begin trading punches.
There is an irony here that must be addressed. "The play" turned in by Ditka, so stellar - so ferocious, went basically unseen and, for that reason, unheard. CBS chose not to show the game as all three major networks logically chose to follow the aftermath of the Kennedy tragedy. Chicago's WGN, the Bears' flagship station, also elected to stay with the evolving stories, updates and rumors emerging out of Dallas.
I was just a toddler but I have read often it was very controversial the NFL went ahead and played the games. Often noted as one of the few missteps Pete Rozelle had as Commissioner.Can't blame them for that. Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered about noon Eastern time on that day. Probably right about the time the Bears-Steelers game was getting ready to start.
ETA:I was just a toddler but I have read often it was very controversial the NFL went ahead and played the games. Often noted as one of the few missteps Pete Rozelle had as Commissioner.
Thanksgiving must have sucked that year, like the way it was so gloomy and nobody laughed or told jokes for weeks after 9/11.
Here it isOh wow…never knew WHY it’s so hard to find the footage.
"Camelot" and "The New Frontier" were over. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the nation's 35th President, had been gunned down in Dallas roughly 48 hours before the Bears and Steelers would begin trading punches.
There is an irony here that must be addressed. "The play" turned in by Ditka, so stellar - so ferocious, went basically unseen and, for that reason, unheard. CBS chose not to show the game as all three major networks logically chose to follow the aftermath of the Kennedy tragedy. Chicago's WGN, the Bears' flagship station, also elected to stay with the evolving stories, updates and rumors emerging out of Dallas.
Bill Wade took the center snap and dropped back to throw. It was clear that Mike was not his primary option. But as Wade's pocket began to collapse, he did throw to Ditka in the flat. History was about to be made. Ditka immediately shrugged off two would-be Steelers tacklers. A third, a fourth, and a fifth would all fail to bring Iron Mike down. A sixth tried in vain.
Finally, after a play that covered 63 yards, Ditka fell to the turf where he lay prone, his chest heaving with exhaustion.
Shortly after Ditka's catch and run, Roger Leclerc boomed an 18 yard field goal to salvage a tie for the Bears, 17-17.
One man. One play. Together they defined the resolve of the 1963 Chicago Bears.
_____________
Loved the punt, pass & kick series the league put out in the late 60s / early 70s.
Thank you! WTG man.
That’s the one - they showed this on a Ditka biopic. So good.
Yeah well it's pretty dang good. I forget what their top 10 was and I'm sure most of them are ranked based on nostalgic value more than pure football value. But for me the #1 football play I have ever seen is hands down James Harrison's pick 6 against the Cardinals and Kurt Warner before halftime.
Steve Young’s TD/Belly Flop has to be in the list too - likely bottom 15%This thing had it as #2 I don't know what they're calling #1 probably the stupid immaculate reception.
Same.But for me the #1 football play I have ever seen is hands down James Harrison's pick 6 against the Cardinals and Kurt Warner before halftime.
Ya love to see it. And is it a forced perspective thing, or does Pitts make Kelce look like a normal-sized human?
If he hits these projections as a rookie, I will be very pleased. Especially if the TDs are in the 8+ range.Faust said:
No, it’s not. He’s a rookie.If we don't get Jimmy Graham in his prime production, this is going to be very disappointing.
Stop trolling me. I meant in his career. Are you always this obtuse?No, it’s not. He’s a rookie.
Having realistic expectations means tempering against unrealistic disappointment like “Jimmy Graham in his prime”.