The Real Hipster Doofus
Footballguy
Trent Richardson - Rivals 5*, #2 RB, #6 player nationallyMark Ingram - Rivals 4*, #17 ATH, #186 nationally (rankings deflated due to qualifying concerns)I don't agree with the guy's take on Ingram (I like him, and hope the Fins take him), but you're clearly misunderstanding it.He wasn't saying that he was lucky that he played for the University of Alabama Crimson Tide. He was saying that he was lucky that he played on the 2008-2010 Alabama team.Now Ingram is a fraud.. WOWThe difference is that Peterson jumped off the page and was clearly the best player on the field, he had more size, speed, power, vision, balance, etc then Ingram could ever dream of.Ingram fit into the team, Peterson was the team.As was Adrian Peterson. What does that have to do with Ingram's pro prospects?You could be right but I'd be shocked to see him go in the top 15 or so picks. Many mocks are now showing him falling into the 2nd, which I think is where he belongs regardless of his knee issues. With knee issues he's a late 2nd/early 3rd round prospect IMO.He's very fortunate to have played on one of the most dominant college teams of the past couple years.If Ingram falls to mid 2nd round, I'd be worried. But I don't see him falling past mid 1st.
When the NFL draft happens and Ingram falls into the 2nd round my ability to filter out the frauds will be proven once again. Ingram is a good prospect, but not close to a great one. Put him on an average college team and he would have been an afterthought when discussing the best rb's in the class. He better donate a lot of money to Bama as they are what has given him a chance at a nice payday.
So if he's a fraud, then either he isn't the #1 RB this year, or they're all frauds.. So which is it?
BTW, not every RB coming out of Alabama is figured to be a 1st round pick. So when you say it's only because he played in bama, then the rest of these bama backs should have been early picks as well.. Right? Should be a bama back picked first day every year right? Cause after all, all it takes is to play for Alabama..
And more to his point, the other running backs who got time running the ball on that team are all future or current early draft picks as well. Coffee went in the 3rd, Richardson is a future 1st rounder, and Upchurch probably is as well.
Now, they could have just happened to recruit four studly running backs, or they could have happened to recruit four regular running backs who were running behind the best run-blocking line of the last decade from a team not named USC. I remember the 2009 SEC championship game against the top rushing defense in the nation when the Gators were lucky if their D-linemen were within 5 yards of the LoS before the running backs hit the hole.
Personally, I think it's a combination of the two, but you can't really blame someone for thinking it leans towards the latter. I'm fairly positive that any running back in division 1 college football would have put up great numbers on that 2009 Alabama team. Would they have been as good as Ingram's? Probably not, but that's the point of contention.
Roy Upchurch - Rivals 4*, #8 RB, #73 nationally
Eddie Lacy - Rivals 4*, #13 RB, #116 nationally
Glen Coffee - Rivals 3*, #29 RB
What evidence do you have to suggest Bama just recruits regular running backs? Looks to me like except for Coffee, they were all considered to be extremely talented well before they set foot on Bama's campus. Kind of odd to me that Bama would recruit elite talent all over the field but just go for average RB's.