Palmer was perfectly happy to split the (vast) majority of targets between Ocho and Housh, I don't see why Matt Jones/Bryant would interfere with that if TO looked good to him.If he signs in New York, I have to wonder if Braylon Edwards is long for the team. And this would still be a run first team with Cotchery and Holmes on the roster. Hard for me to see 900/8 in that environment. In Cincinnati I'm more open to the possibility because I think, for all the talk of the depth they have at the WR position, TO and Chad would get a tremendous amount of the targets.
I agree...and said as much. I'm talking about if he goes to the Jets, pure chaos would ensue.Palmer was perfectly happy to split the (vast) majority of targets between Ocho and Housh, I don't see why Matt Jones/Bryant would interfere with that if TO looked good to him.If he signs in New York, I have to wonder if Braylon Edwards is long for the team. And this would still be a run first team with Cotchery and Holmes on the roster. Hard for me to see 900/8 in that environment. In Cincinnati I'm more open to the possibility because I think, for all the talk of the depth they have at the WR position, TO and Chad would get a tremendous amount of the targets.
Only 2 receivers in history have been 37 years old when the season ended and had over 900 yards receiving:Jerry Rice x 2Charlie JoinerYes, history would suggest that this is a nutty prediction.Guys what stat line do you see if TO ends up in either Cinci or with the NYJ....Am I nuts for thinking 900 and 8 TD's?
Sorry to be unclear- I was agreeing with you on the Bengals side of it- just wanted to mention the receiving splits during the healthy Palmer years.I agree...and said as much. I'm talking about if he goes to the Jets, pure chaos would ensue.Palmer was perfectly happy to split the (vast) majority of targets between Ocho and Housh, I don't see why Matt Jones/Bryant would interfere with that if TO looked good to him.If he signs in New York, I have to wonder if Braylon Edwards is long for the team. And this would still be a run first team with Cotchery and Holmes on the roster. Hard for me to see 900/8 in that environment. In Cincinnati I'm more open to the possibility because I think, for all the talk of the depth they have at the WR position, TO and Chad would get a tremendous amount of the targets.
Terell Owens is in good enough shape and is still a good enough receiver to post 900, easily. It all depends on where he ends up. The stats of old in terms of age doesn't mean as much. Today's players are in better shape than ever before and many take care of their bodies much better than they do 30 years ago or more. We have 40 year old QB's throwing for 4k yards.Terell Owens is in elite shape and given the right situation he'll post 900 yards.Only 2 receivers in history have been 37 years old when the season ended and had over 900 yards receiving:Jerry Rice x 2Charlie JoinerYes, history would suggest that this is a nutty prediction.Guys what stat line do you see if TO ends up in either Cinci or with the NYJ....Am I nuts for thinking 900 and 8 TD's?
I disagree. When he left the Cowboys he had plenty left, that's not why they got rid of him. The Bills offense/passing game was one of the worst in the league. See Randy Moss in Oakland on what a poor offense can do to any WR.TO has more in the tank than many give him credit for.At TO's age, I think Bryant (when/if) healthy is the far superior player. I don't think the Cowboys, and a year later the Bills, both passed on Owens thinking he has a lot left.
He may be a gym rat and built like Atlas, but if you watch him play, it's clear he no longer gets the separation that once made him an elite receiver. Upside is 900 yards, and sure he possibly could get there with the right situation. I just don't see it happening.Terell Owens is in good enough shape and is still a good enough receiver to post 900, easily. It all depends on where he ends up. The stats of old in terms of age doesn't mean as much. Today's players are in better shape than ever before and many take care of their bodies much better than they do 30 years ago or more. We have 40 year old QB's throwing for 4k yards.Terell Owens is in elite shape and given the right situation he'll post 900 yards.Only 2 receivers in history have been 37 years old when the season ended and had over 900 yards receiving:Jerry Rice x 2Charlie JoinerYes, history would suggest that this is a nutty prediction.Guys what stat line do you see if TO ends up in either Cinci or with the NYJ....Am I nuts for thinking 900 and 8 TD's?
Sorry to be unclear- I was agreeing with you on the Bengals side of it- just wanted to mention the receiving splits during the healthy Palmer years.I agree...and said as much. I'm talking about if he goes to the Jets, pure chaos would ensue.Palmer was perfectly happy to split the (vast) majority of targets between Ocho and Housh, I don't see why Matt Jones/Bryant would interfere with that if TO looked good to him.If he signs in New York, I have to wonder if Braylon Edwards is long for the team. And this would still be a run first team with Cotchery and Holmes on the roster. Hard for me to see 900/8 in that environment. In Cincinnati I'm more open to the possibility because I think, for all the talk of the depth they have at the WR position, TO and Chad would get a tremendous amount of the targets.
At TO's age, I think Bryant (when/if) healthy is the far superior player. I don't think the Cowboys, and a year later the Bills both passed on Owens thinking he has a lot left. With well-regarded rookie Shipley needing to play, Caldwell supposedly showing the most improvement and having 'the best offseason of anyone on the offense' and Matt Jones around with half again TOs' urrent sped to fill the Chris Henry bomber role. I don't see a big role for Terrell unless Bryant is completely down and out. And even then in a Benson-driven offense and with Ocho the clear leader ... 500-600 yards would be pretty amazing to me. That's why they are offering him a nickle and a handful of incentives - and why he is looking everywhere else for a better opportunity.
As a Jets fan my greatest worry is that one of these guys (Holmes, Edwards, Cotchery, and most likely Cotchery) walk away with the majority of the looks and all hell breaks loose when the other two (or three if you throw TO in there) get squat. A couple of years back, Coles and Cotchery got almost identical stats (literally off by a couple TDs, catches, and yards), but that is not likely to happen again. I could see Cotchery with 850 yards and 2 TDs, Edwards with 650 yards and 6 TDs and Holmes with 700 yards and 5 TDs...just a fantasy disaster and bad feelings all around to boot. Numbers seem low as I am accounting for Keller and LT.If he signs in New York, I have to wonder if Braylon Edwards is long for the team. And this would still be a run first team with Cotchery and Holmes on the roster. Hard for me to see 900/8 in that environment. In Cincinnati I'm more open to the possibility because I think, for all the talk of the depth they have at the WR position, TO and Chad would get a tremendous amount of the targets.
OK, but you said Bryant as a "far superior" player to TO in your last post, and that's a hard argument to make. Now if you want to argue that Bryant, by virtue of only being 29, can maintain his productivity while TO will further decline, that's a bit easier to digest. Either way, TO has been as good as Bryant over the last two years, and that includes Bryant's one and only strong fantasy season. The credit Bryant gets mystifies me.I think TO is in clear decline (most evidently the inability to get seperation above mentioned) and Bryant isn't - except as his knee holds him back. As I said, absent injury I think Bryant is worth a LOT more going forward. They are on way different paths. People seem to think that TO is going to somehow get younger and return to a faster speed by working out a lot - he already worked out like a demon. he is going to be even slower this year than last, and was slower last than with the Cowbotys. And he had 1,052 two full years ago as the Cowboys' #1 with Romo? I would put a LOT of stuff on TO not getting 900 yards in a Bengal uniform.
TO is on a decline, he's certainly not on the upswing but his current ability level is still better than Bryant's. I'd be willing to put a lot of "stuff" on TO outperforming Bryant if he lands in Cinci, without a doubt.I think TO is in clear decline (most evidently the inability to get seperation above mentioned) and Bryant isn't - except as his knee holds him back. As I said, absent injury I think Bryant is worth a LOT more going forward. They are on way different paths. People seem to think that TO is going to somehow get younger and return to a faster speed by working out a lot - he already worked out like a demon. he is going to be even slower this year than last, and was slower last than with the Cowbotys. And he had 1,052 two full years ago as the Cowboys' #1 with Romo? I would put a LOT of stuff on TO not getting 900 yards in a Bengal uniform.
Can there ever even BE enough popcorn for this show?bring your popcorn... heavily buttered
Palmer up..... Ocho Cinco down?Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
Purely theoretical I know, but I like Palmer more with a healthy Bryant over TO.Having said that, the spotlight that is the TO show probably bumps Palmer's ADP.Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
owens can still play.he had 'decent' numbers considering where he played last season.Avery said:Purely theoretical I know, but I like Palmer more with a healthy Bryant over TO.Having said that, the spotlight that is the TO show probably bumps Palmer's ADP.Macdaddy_2004 said:Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
Yup. He sure can. I also think that Bryant, with a healthy knee, would have made the offensive more dynamic as he is a more complete package at WR than Owens at this point is his career. All a moot point, however, for Bryant's knee doesn't appear to be healthy.owens can still play.he had 'decent' numbers considering where he played last season.Avery said:Purely theoretical I know, but I like Palmer more with a healthy Bryant over TO.Having said that, the spotlight that is the TO show probably bumps Palmer's ADP.Macdaddy_2004 said:Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
It's a solid signing, but I'm not sure I see wholesale changes in how defenses play the Bengals with or without Owens.BENSON IS GOING TO BE A BEAST THIS YEAR WITH THE 7 MAN FRONTS!
first thing i thought of when I heard this news. Lewis loves to run the ballBENSON IS GOING TO BE A BEAST THIS YEAR WITH THE 7 MAN FRONTS!
I'll go 1050yds and 7tds.What would be a reasonable projection for TO?
True. If we "assume" that Bryant is also out there and Gresham is pretty good then I think that would really open things up for Benson, a lot would have to happen obviously.It's a solid signing, but I'm not sure I see wholesale changes in how defenses play the Bengals with or without Owens.BENSON IS GOING TO BE A BEAST THIS YEAR WITH THE 7 MAN FRONTS!![]()
70 balls 1000 yards 7 TD'sNice WR2 numbers.Great move by the Bengals.What would be a reasonable projection for TO?
70 balls 1000 yards 7 TD'sNice WR2 numbers.Great move by the Bengals.What would be a reasonable projection for TO?
Look at what he had to work with last year...then look at 2008. That will be more like the TO we will see. The guy is still a beast. Amazing he did not get many offers despite his rep. a future HOF.70 balls 1000 yards 7 TD'sNice WR2 numbers.Great move by the Bengals.What would be a reasonable projection for TO?Some unbridled optimism here.That would put him at WR18 in my PPR league last year. Wowsers.
I'd agree with that logic.but It is still gonna be a gong show in Cincy. I think TO and Ocho will be one upping each other in the showboating department.I'm guessing they may set a record for excessive celebration penalties by year end.owens can still play.he had 'decent' numbers considering where he played last season.Avery said:Purely theoretical I know, but I like Palmer more with a healthy Bryant over TO.Having said that, the spotlight that is the TO show probably bumps Palmer's ADP.Macdaddy_2004 said:Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
As long as they win, it won't matter. The bigger problem is if goodell takes exception to it all and starts suspending. One year deal, Owens knows this is a trial run and it might be his last real chance.I'd agree with that logic.but It is still gonna be a gong show in Cincy. I think TO and Ocho will be one upping each other in the showboating department.I'm guessing they may set a record for excessive celebration penalties by year end.owens can still play.he had 'decent' numbers considering where he played last season.Avery said:Purely theoretical I know, but I like Palmer more with a healthy Bryant over TO.Having said that, the spotlight that is the TO show probably bumps Palmer's ADP.Macdaddy_2004 said:Carson Palmer's ADP is going to jump now.
I would say at this point in his career that Rice is probably the best comp for TO.Only 2 receivers in history have been 37 years old when the season ended and had over 900 yards receiving:Jerry Rice x 2Charlie JoinerYes, history would suggest that this is a nutty prediction.Guys what stat line do you see if TO ends up in either Cinci or with the NYJ....Am I nuts for thinking 900 and 8 TD's?