Yenrub
Footballguy
"If I don't like it, I don't like it, that don't mean that I'm hating" - CommonHaving a different opinion is not hate. Christ, I hate that word.
"If I don't like it, I don't like it, that don't mean that I'm hating" - CommonHaving a different opinion is not hate. Christ, I hate that word.
Rice is without peer IMO.I know I would take Rice, Hutson, Moss, Warfield, over him. I would be quite comfortable taking Harrison, Allworth and Sharpe over him, not to mention Calvin Johnson, Steve Largent, and Larry Fitzgerald. Others may differ. There are total stats in a pass happy era, and then there are guys that lifted their teams to championships. His teams were not without accomplishment, and I do credit him somewhat for maybe elevating their play. I also note that he had a good game in his one chance at a championship. Still no rings and a constant distraction. That said I don't see the slight in him not being a first ballot guy in an era of ballot backlog. To some this is a big issue, to me, not so much either way.
What I was really interested I was your take that him missing what for most would be a seminal event as being a brilliant move. I fail to see the advantage to him in fame or wealth. I sincerely allow that I may be missing something and would welcome your perspective.
I agree with everything you have written, stats-wise. Yet having seen all of those players except Hutson I like them better. They improved their teams and didn't tear them apart, except for maybe Moss and to a lesser extent Warfield who was a bit a of a prima donna himself. One could also, I suppose, question Bambi's attitude a bit. Still all different by several degrees from The Media Whore, Mr. I loves me some me. In a team sport this matters, to me at least. This is, however, not something where I would assert other's opinions are not valid, not in the least. Those that love Owens have cause, they just look for different things than I do, or give lesser weight to the negatives than I do and concentrate more on numbers than I. If playing in a team sport is all about individual stats there is no question Owens has those. If it is about his impact on his team, well I find some negatives there.Rice is without peer IMO.
Moss played on just as many teams as Owens did in his career. Owens played in the same era as Moss, yet Owens had more receptions. More yards. Higher yards per game. Higher receptions per game. Both finished with 156 total TDs (Owens had 3 rushing). Both were selected to 6 ProBowls. Moss was a 1st team All Pro 4 times, Owens was one 5 times. Also, Moss never won a Superbowl either.
Alworth, Hutson and Warfield are different eras, so it's pointless to try and compare.
Guys like Calvin Johnson and Sharpe could have been better than Owens, but they didn't have the longevity, IMO. They are the Terrell Davis' of the WR. HOF worthy, but don't have the overall numbers to be considered an all-time, all-timer.
Harrison is a notch below Owens. More receptions and Pro Bowls. Less yards, TDs, All Pros.
Largent and Fitzgerald, 1 first team All Pro (neither won anything either). I mean, if you're going to use a current player, Antonio Brown would be a guy to cite, not Fitz. Already had 6 Pro Bowls and 4 All Pros. Plus, he's piling up yards and receptions and is just turning 30. He probably had 4-5 more good years left and a couple compiler years. He could hit 1500 receptions and 20,000 yards.
I do, and I have managed to never once have an emotional personal reaction one way or the other regarding a player.Don’t you really enjoy watching football? Does that seem weird to you? It doesn’t to me.
"Man that dude is one of the best wide receivers we have ever seen!"
"Yea but I can tell from watching him on TV that he is a jackass/dumb/idiot/selfish/bad teammate/me-first-and only attitude/15 year old girl/2 cent brain."
The worst I said was it was weird to be emotionally invested in a former football player.Bronco Billy said:For a guy so derisive of people making judgments, you sure seem to make enough of them yourself.
It's hard to think of a more opposite player of TO than Larry Fitzgerald. Has never said anything negative about a teammate and no one has had anything negative to say about him. He gives everything he has to his team year around. I've seen highlights of Lance Allworth and am convinced he's dominate in any era. He's probably make Antonio Brown look like a 4th WR in today's game.Ditkaless Wonders said:I know I would take Rice, Hutson, Moss, Warfield, over him. I would be quite comfortable taking Harrison, Allworth and Sharpe over him, not to mention Calvin Johnson, Steve Largent, and Larry Fitzgerald. Others may differ. There are total stats in a pass happy era, and then there are guys that lifted their teams to championships. His teams were not without accomplishment, and I do credit him somewhat for maybe elevating their play. I also note that he had a good game in his one chance at a championship. Still no rings and a constant distraction. That said I don't see the slight in him not being a first ballot guy in an era of ballot backlog. To some this is a big issue, to me, not so much either way.
What I was really interested I was your take that him missing what for most would be a seminal event as being a brilliant move. I fail to see the advantage to him in fame or wealth. I sincerely allow that I may be missing something and would welcome your perspective.
"I would like to thank me some ME".Bojang0301 said:Who was he going to thank anyway, himself?
That's not what they said. They said they would have no further comment about his decision. They will of course honor him as they honor any other enshrinee, they aren't some bush league organization like the White House.Da Guru said:The HOF has said they will not talk about Owens again after he made his decision and rightly so as he is refusing to attend his induction. Is it possible that Owens was having a hard time finding someone to speak on his behalf?
So at the end of the ceremony will they say "Oh and by the way Terrell Owens was also inducted today..hope you had a nice day and drive safe on the way home"
You're joking I hope. The HOF has disrespected TO for years like pretentious little babies. He's as first ballot as anyone yet personality clashes make him wait as they bash him personally. Wah wah, get over yourself.That's not what they said. They said they would have no further comment about his decision. They will of course honor him as they honor any other enshrinee, they aren't some bush league organization like the White House.
This is the theory being floated but if he declines it taints the rest of this HOF class and it would hurt future 'quirky' players as candidates because the voters would discuss whether or not they would get the 'TO' treatment if they vote in the next diva WR or whatever.Bankerguy said:There is a theory that after meeting Canton officials he realized the costs involved and THIS is the reason why he won’t attend. Since non of his old teams are likely to be willing to shell out for him. Many suspect that he is having financial issues.
Food for thought...
I completely understand that theory but the people you should implore to be better are the voting committee and executives at the HoF.This is the theory being floated but if he declines it taints the rest of this HOF class and it would hurt future 'quirky' players as candidates because the voters would discuss whether or not they would get the 'TO' treatment if they vote in the next diva WR or whatever.
Terrell Owens, please gracefully accept the honor being bestowed upon you for the benefit of people who will be hurt if you decline.
Guys like him get away with their behaviour cause guys like you fall for it.Of course to himself.
He isn't going because the voters made it personal. As the world reacts in yet further personal insults, it sure looks like he nailed it.
He seems good with it, weird to watch everyone else be bothered by it. Ironic.
I’m just not seeing how the Hall it Fame disrespected him. I mean they are inducting him after all. It took many many players multiple years to finally get in - mostly because there is a backlog. Only five players/coaches/excutives can get in with each class. He wait was relatively short all things considered. He’s still a young man and will now be a HoFer for a long long time.You're joking I hope. The HOF has disrespected TO for years like pretentious little babies. He's as first ballot as anyone yet personality clashes make him wait as they bash him personally. Wah wah, get over yourself.
It should be mandatory to show up to get the jacket. Being inducted into the HOF isn't a right, it's a priveledge and an honor, and he should treat it as such or forego being a member.
No show, no jacket (unless a medical issue prevents them from being there). That simple.
No jacket until you kiss the ring?It should be mandatory to show up to get the jacket. Being inducted into the HOF isn't a right, it's a priveledge and an honor, and he should treat it as such or forego being a member.
No show, no jacket (unless a medical issue prevents them from being there). That simple.
Seriously, we heard enough from this clown over his career.I think he’s doing everyone a favor. Let it go.
That was the voters, not the organization itself. You do realize that all of the voters are media members, not people affiliated with the HOF?You're joking I hope. The HOF has disrespected TO for years like pretentious little babies. He's as first ballot as anyone yet personality clashes make him wait as they bash him personally. Wah wah, get over yourself.
Right and the writers regularly blasted him. Since they're the voters, they're an extension of the HOF. The 53 or so employees at the HOF mean little really.Hankmoody said:That was the voters, not the organization itself. You do realize that 46/48 of the voters are sportswriters, not people affiliated with the HOF?
You can't see it because there is nothing to see. Of course the HOF didn't disrespect Terrell Owens, and it is asinine for anyone to suggest that they did.I’m just not seeing how the Hall it Fame disrespected him. I mean they are inducting him after all. It took many many players multiple years to finally get in - mostly because there is a backlog. Only five players/coaches/excutives can get in with each class. He wait was relatively short all things considered. He’s still a young man and will now be a HoFer for a long long time.
Except that the HOF employees, not the voters, are the ones that put on the presentation.Right and the writers regularly blasted him. Since they're the voters, they're an extension of the HOF. The 53 or so employees at the HOF mean little really.
I'm done here.Except that the HOF employees, not the voters, are the ones that put on the presentation.
Pretend for a moment it's not someone you despise. That's how true professionals work. They don't hold petty grudges. Of course the invite isn't rescinded it would be bush league to do so and only a buffoon would uninvite someone out of spite to try to save face. There are 7 other guys being inducted, they can proceed with all of the activities as normal and announce TO at every step. If he's not there the only difference is there's no one standing there waving to the crowd or putting on a jacket or giving a speech. If this was your brother that declined coming to a family reunion you're not going to accept him if he later determines he can? What would you expect, that he calls you up and asks you to formally re-extend the invite so he can formally accept? And under what supernova black hole would you refuse to do so? C'mon man.I don't understand the reconsider argument. He declined the invitation. To me that means the invitation is no longer open.
If I invite you to something and you R.S.V.P. that you are not attending you do not then get to decide that yes, after all you are coming. the invitation is no longer open. It is not up to you, it is now up to me to re-extend the invitation if I care to do so. Is this invitation open after being declined?
Agreed and I don't think the lack of ring is necessarily his fault. He played his guts out in the Super Bowl vs the Pats, on one good leg. Had McNabb shown the same intestinal fortitude they'd likely both have rings.I love TO. His biggest problem is he can't stand people that don't put in the effort he does. That's also his right. He won't have many friends but the few he has will be gold.
He doesn't beat women, do drugs or anything close. He just worked hard and gets more hate for his attitude than anything else. He's confused inside because he knows he hasn't done anything terrible but is perceived as a total jerk by so many. Sad but that's how it is.
I see what you did there.Agreed and I don't think the lack of ring is necessarily his fault. He played his guts out in the Super Bowl vs the Pats, on one good leg. Had McNabb shown the same intestinal fortitude they'd likely both have rings.
you dont care enough to skip the only thread weve had on him i 4 years?As a 49er fan, I just don't care...............
This is all sorts of wrong. When you have to reach to "he doesnt best women or do drugs" to justify that he wasn't a bad guy, you know something is off. Guy threw so many people under the bus and broke so many teams apart it isn't funny. Complete lack of loyalty to anyone around him. That's why he's all alone. And even now, he still doesn't get it. You can play the victim card all you want for him. Skipping the ceremony is yet another example of TO.I love TO. His biggest problem is he can't stand people that don't put in the effort he does. That's also his right. He won't have many friends but the few he has will be gold.
He doesn't beat women, do drugs or anything close. He just worked hard and gets more hate for his attitude than anything else. He's confused inside because he knows he hasn't done anything terrible but is perceived as a total jerk by so many. Sad but that's how it is.
Nah. Everywhere he's been there's been drama but there's also been a lot of people that liked him. His detractors are just louder and they're probably 65/35. You obviously put a ton more into who he is rather than what he did to prepare for the game or what he did on the field.This is all sorts of wrong. When you have to reach to "he doesnt best women or do drugs" to justify that he wasn't a bad guy, you know something is off. Guy threw so many people under the bus and broke so many teams apart it isn't funny. Complete lack of loyalty to anyone around him. That's why he's all alone. And even now, he still doesn't get it. You can play the victim card all you want for him. Skipping the ceremony is yet another example of TO.
oh what a monumental shocker