What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Texans at Packers** (-3, 48.5) 1:00 (1 Viewer)

I haven't seen Tank Dell with any targets since the opening drive, did he get hurt?
Dell dropped a TD first series. Then they tried a couple passes his way in the first half that weren't close. He can't get off press coverage, which is a terrible combination with an offensive line that can't pass protect longer than one second. I wouldn't count on Dell doing anything. He's not the player we thought he was before the season.
 
Not many QBs I'd rather have than CJ in the last few minutes of a close game. Dude is so calm and collected :thumbup:
 
Houston played like a turtle and played for the FG so I hope GB wins. You don't play for the FG when it only gives you a 1 point lead with over 100 seconds left.

They had ball at the 13 and could tried to get a TD.

Really want GB to win this now for that BS play calling.
 
Slowik special again. Going full turtle playing for a FG instead of the win. Refs missed some massive holds on that last drive but the Texans’ coaches earned that L.
 
Good Houston lost that is what you get when you play for a FG down 2
With the pass protection issues, that's exactly what they should have done. I have Stroud for fantasy too and I hate it, but trusting this offensive line to NOT commit a penalty or give up a sack (or worse) would've been idiotic. Their best play was to trust Fairbairn and hope the defense could bail them out one more time
 
Slowik special again. Going full turtle playing for a FG instead of the win. Refs missed some massive holds on that last drive but the Texans’ coaches earned that L.
If you're blaming coaching for this pitiful OL, I'm down. Slowik's offense sucks. Whoever coaches this OL sucks.

As far as playing for the FG, I'd have run Mixon 3 times. I can't trust this OL to not false start, hold, or give up a sack (or worse).

This team's not going anywhere if they can't drop back to pass. Stroud had 86 freaking yards. Slowik is garbage. It looked like early 90s Tecmo Bowl when they call your play... On EVERY play
 
Slowik special again. Going full turtle playing for a FG instead of the win. Refs missed some massive holds on that last drive but the Texans’ coaches earned that L.
If you're blaming coaching for this pitiful OL, I'm down. Slowik's offense sucks. Whoever coaches this OL sucks.

As far as playing for the FG, I'd have run Mixon 3 times. I can't trust this OL to not false start, hold, or give up a sack (or worse).

This team's not going anywhere if they can't drop back to pass. Stroud had 86 freaking yards. Slowik is garbage. It looked like early 90s Tecmo Bowl when they call your play... On EVERY play
Yeah just seems like they cannot figure out how to zig when they should zag and vice versa. Play to win. Slowik loves to just turtle with a lead and it drives me nuts.

It’d be one thing if I believe he was being strategic like you suggest. I think it’d have been him being safe vs running to make them burn TOs.
 
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
 
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
It would be tough for Love to make out his receivers
DBs might have problems as well
I hope we see it
Nice old fashioned Green Bay snowy day
Wear the Tidy Whities
Great t.v.
 
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
I did. They called it “winter warning”. Not sure if that means winter is coming or that they plan on wearing them again in the winter. Stay tuned I guess.
 
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
I did. They called it “winter warning”. Not sure if that means winter is coming or that they plan on wearing them again in the winter. Stay tuned I guess.
They have to declare what jerseys they are wearing for each game before the season begins. Plus any alternate jerseys are not allowed in the playoffs. The all white was for this game only.
 
Last edited:
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
I did. They called it “winter warning”. Not sure if that means winter is coming or that they plan on wearing them again in the winter. Stay tuned I guess.
They have to declare what jerseys they are wearing for each game before the season begins. Plus any alternate jerseys are not allowed in the playoffs. The all white was for this game only.
Thank god
 
@Man In The Box
Did you get a look at the Packers' All White uniforms and All White helmets?
I don't know if that's a possible preview of when they play in the snow but I don't see how you could see them against a snowy backdrop
I did. They called it “winter warning”. Not sure if that means winter is coming or that they plan on wearing them again in the winter. Stay tuned I guess.
They have to declare what jerseys they are wearing for each game before the season begins. Plus any alternate jerseys are not allowed in the playoffs. The all white was for this game only.
Somehow they got an exemption and are planning to wear the all whites again this week at Seattle.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top