What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The AAF and XFL (1 Viewer)

No I doubt that is the case and even so, most Americans are extremely stupid. Who cares what the public thinks. 
Then you'd be wrong, this is the consensus.

"NFL players are considered overpaid for multiple reasons. Players get paid a ridiculous amount of money for a job that is not really important, like teachers, firefighters, or doctors. ... NFL players make less than half of the profits that the league and owners make. They get 47% while the owners get 53%.Nov 1, 2017"

Where did you get most American are extremely stupid at?  Thr NFL cares what the public thinks, ya reckon?

 
This isn't even remotely true
So what is the truth?

Which sports have the shortest and longest offseasons? (Shock: The NHL has neither.)

NCAA football: 235 days. (AP) ...

NCAA basketball: 222 days. (USA TODAY Sports Images) ...

NFL: 215 days. (Photo: Brad Penner, USA TODAY Sports) ...........that's  seven months.  Jan-Aug.

MLB: 152 days. ...

NBA: 136 days. ...

NHL: 118 days. ...

NASCAR: 95 days. ...

ATP Tour: 51 days.

Yes yes yes,  I know there are things to do football wise in that time but more or less. Hell. lets just say 4 months, who gets a 4 month vacation every year?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PDFTT

You're responding to a user who is more interested in agitating others than engaging in worthwhile conversation.
That has never been true.  I have an opinion based on a lot of experience, I simply back what that experience has taught me.  I don't try to agitate anyone, so cool that silliness.

I am having a worthwhile conversation. 

Most people do think NFL players make too much, check anything that talks about it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ZenoRazon said:
I think most people get this one.

They work 40 hours maybe more a week every week of the year, (couple weeks vacation maybe)  making a tiny fraction of what NFL players make.  Guys who only work from around Aug to late Dec and only really work one day a week. Yet they are making millions and millions and millions of dollars.  Joe Public will have some problems with that.

And a lot of guys like myself remember back before it got totally crazy like that. So it does work for a lot less $$$$$$$$ going to the players.


This is getting so dumb that I'll stop following the thread after this.

1. If you think being a top 1% of the human race professional athlete in the most profitable American sport (or close to it) is a "one day a week" job, there's no discussing this with you. 

2. You don't understand supply and demand. Or the fact that the NFL is probably 1000x more profitable than it was in the 70s-80s when the players had like, off-season ice cream-scooping jobs. Also ignoring how high the health risk is for modern day players compared to back then--I know, I know, I've read your posts about the rules changes you'd like to see, you clearly see them as modern day gladiators and don't care about the health risk. Which is fine on a consumer level if not a human one.

3. I don't get why you think the billionaires deserve an even LARGER slice of the pie than they already receive. Player salaries are a drop in the bucket compared to what the owners are making (and what the figurehead commissioner is making even!), why do they deserve even more and players even less? Besides the "employee" numbers just being too high for your brain to rationalize, I mean. Maybe it would help more if you thought of the players as entertainers or independent contractors with extremely rare and in-demand skills, rather than thinking of them as manual laborers. 

Knowing how old you are, and that you grew up and lived the prime of your life in an America where unions were strong and the gap between the average american family man and the wealthy elite businessman was much much less than it is now--it makes your stance here even more shocking. You have been ####### duped, my man. Sticking up for the 1% billionaire owners to hoard even more wealth because the top percentage of star players happen to be skilled enough to be millionaires themselves--in a league where the vast majority of players actually DO make the salary you would consider reasonable ($200k-$1M a year). 

4. The fact that you bring up the tired and frankly ignorant argument about teachers and soldiers making less than professional athletes really shows you know little about economics, or are trolling. Millions of people in this country alone can do those jobs, and do. Untold tens of millions COULD do those jobs, but are doing something different. I'm not saying they would be the best at those jobs. Or the most fitting to do them. Or the most heroic. But they could do them. They are qualified. Hell, that's what the entire point of the existence of a military Draft is. But we don't need to use the draft, because so many people can and do take those jobs. 

Meanwhile, there are less than 1,700 total human beings in the NFL. 32 of them are starting QBs and probably only half of them "should" be starters in an ideal world with more talent. This isn't that world. That's why they make a lot of money for being uniquely talented in a skill that the rest of the population will pay a lot of money to watch. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is getting so dumb that I'll stop following the thread after this.

1. If you think being a top 1% of the human race professional athlete in the most profitable American sport (or close to it) is a "one day a week" job, there's no discussing this with you. 

2. You don't understand supply and demand. Or the fact that the NFL is probably 1000x more profitable than it was in the 70s-80s when the players had like, off-season ice cream-scooping jobs. Also ignoring how high the health risk is for modern day players compared to back then--I know, I know, I've read your posts about the rules changes you'd like to see, you clearly see them as modern day gladiators and don't care about the health risk. Which is fine on a consumer level if not a human one.

3. I don't get why you think the billionaires deserve an even LARGER slice of the pie than they already receive. Player salaries are a drop in the bucket compared to what the owners are making (and what the figurehead commissioner is making even!), why do they deserve even more and players even less? Besides the "employee" numbers just being too high for your brain to rationalize, I mean. Maybe it would help more if you thought of the players as entertainers or independent contractors with extremely rare and in-demand skills, rather than thinking of them as manual laborers. 

Knowing how old you are, and that you grew up and lived the prime of your life in an America where unions were strong and the gap between the average american family man and the wealthy elite businessman was much much less than it is now--it makes your stance here even more shocking. You have been ####### duped, my man. Sticking up for the 1% billionaire owners to hoard even more wealth because the top percentage of star players happen to be skilled enough to be millionaires themselves--in a league where the vast majority of players actually DO make the salary you would consider reasonable ($200k-$1M a year). 

4. The fact that you bring up the tired and frankly ignorant argument about teachers and soldiers making less than professional athletes really shows you know little about economics, or are trolling. Millions of people in this country alone can do those jobs, and do. Untold tens of millions COULD do those jobs, but are doing something different. I'm not saying they would be the best at those jobs. Or the most fitting to do them. Or the most heroic. But they could do them. They are qualified. Hell, that's what the entire point of the existence of a military Draft is. But we don't need to use the draft, because so many people can and do take those jobs. 

Meanwhile, there are less than 1,700 total human beings in the NFL. 32 of them are starting QBs and probably only half of them "should" be starters in an ideal world with more talent. This isn't that world. That's why they make a lot of money for being uniquely talented in a skill that the rest of the population will pay a lot of money to watch. 
Stop acting as  if I'm the only one thinking NFL players make too much $$$$$.  You are in the minority, not me, most people agree with me.

That was a good read but doesn't change the FACT most people think NFL players make too much $$$$$.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stop acting as  if I'm the only one thinking NFL players make too much $$$$$.  You are in the minority, not me, most people agree with me.

That was a good read but doesn't change the FACT most people think NFL players make too much $$$$$.
People thinking things doesn't make those things reality. People are wrong about a lot of things, in every era. By your logic the majority of the western world at one point believing that the sun was being pulled across the sky by a god driving a chariot made them correct--because almost everyone believed it. That logic doesn't hold, sorry. The masses believe a lot of dumb things. Me included I'm sure. 

That isn't even getting into the irrational/emotional response to someone else's fame and fortune that most average humans (again, myself included) exhibit. We can't be trusted on this topic, for the most part. Even when we do understand economics on a basic level, we might still be too jealous or incredulous to really think about it. 

I'll bow out now. I'm glad you found my post to be a good read but fail to see how you could go through life being interested in other viewpoints while not letting them influence the apparently unshakeable foundations of your own viewpoint.

 
People thinking things doesn't make those things reality. People are wrong about a lot of things, in every era. By your logic the majority of the western world at one point believing that the sun was being pulled across the sky by a god driving a chariot made them correct--because almost everyone believed it. That logic doesn't hold, sorry. The masses believe a lot of dumb things. Me included I'm sure. 

That isn't even getting into the irrational/emotional response to someone else's fame and fortune that most average humans (again, myself included) exhibit. We can't be trusted on this topic, for the most part. Even when we do understand economics on a basic level, we might still be too jealous or incredulous to really think about it. 

I'll bow out now. I'm glad you found my post to be a good read but fail to see how you could go through life being interested in other viewpoints while not letting them influence the apparently unshakeable foundations of your own viewpoint.
I know a lot of people who get the NFL, most see it differently than you do. I also see it differently than you do.

 
Again, the XFL already has deals with FOX and ESPN.  Which means they will be showing games on ESPN, ABC, FOX and FS1.  When the AAF was on CBS, it beat every other live sporting event it went against, including the NBA.  And considering the AAF did zero marketing, I'd imagine with the weight of those two heavyweights behind the promotion, more people will be watching.

What I don't understand is the XFL is saying they'll be paying kids coming out of college in hopes to lure them away for actual money.  But why didn't the AAF do this?  Or why is the XFL allowed to do this but the AAF wasn't?  

 
Again, the XFL already has deals with FOX and ESPN.  Which means they will be showing games on ESPN, ABC, FOX and FS1.  When the AAF was on CBS, it beat every other live sporting event it went against, including the NBA.  And considering the AAF did zero marketing, I'd imagine with the weight of those two heavyweights behind the promotion, more people will be watching.

What I don't understand is the XFL is saying they'll be paying kids coming out of college in hopes to lure them away for actual money.  But why didn't the AAF do this?  Or why is the XFL allowed to do this but the AAF wasn't?  
Xfl has big big money. AAF didn’t. 

 
Huh??

This seems like a bad idea for three very obvious reasons:

1. because the vast majority of high school kids are not ready (physically) for the pros. They would get destroyed.

2. the high school kids who ARE ready (physically) are ultimately going to make way more money by showcasing their talents on a major college football program.

3. why would any high school kid risk ruining his career to join the XFL? If the XFL disbands midseason (like the AAF just did), then the kid would have nowhere meaningful to go. He couldn't go play in college, and he couldn't join the NFL for 2 1/2 more years. Without the ability to play and practice in high-level situations, his body and mind would slowly fall out of shape. That's a very high risk for such a modest short term reward.
I was telling you how in my opinion that was the only way the business will work long term.  Just because the AAF's business plan revolved solely around getting bought out by the NFL or selling their technology doesn't mean the XFL has the same plan.  It's hard to imagine how the AAF got off the ground in the first place seeing they had to bring in Dundon to bail them out in the middle of their first season.  The XFL may fail again, but at least McMahon has his first failure to hopefully learn from.  He also has the resources to bank roll a startup and is reportedly willing to spend $500 million in the first three years.

1.  Maybe.  This won't be the NFL.  A great majority of these players will be cast offs.  If there are only 8 teams it could actually be a shorter season than college.

2.  2% of Division 1 players make it to the NFL.  Of that 2% most players don't make it to year 4.  

3.  Initially that is a legitimate concern that the league could fold like any startup.  Most would still go to college until it shows it can work.  Like the AAF, I am sure the XFL has a goal of being a farm system to the NFL like the NFL Europe was.  Kids and their families are going to have a tougher decision, take the $$ from Saban and go to school or take $75k from the XFL and be a pro.    Even if the kids choose to go to school for the first year, they could decide they are sick of playing for free.  If the XFL was operational this year and offered a decent amount of money to Justin Fields, Tate Martell, or Jalen Hurts they may be not going to the current teams this fall.

 
Again, the XFL already has deals with FOX and ESPN.  Which means they will be showing games on ESPN, ABC, FOX and FS1.  When the AAF was on CBS, it beat every other live sporting event it went against, including the NBA.  And considering the AAF did zero marketing, I'd imagine with the weight of those two heavyweights behind the promotion, more people will be watching.

What I don't understand is the XFL is saying they'll be paying kids coming out of college in hopes to lure them away for actual money.  But why didn't the AAF do this?  Or why is the XFL allowed to do this but the AAF wasn't?  
Well one reason we know is that the AAF didn’t have very much money.

 
They were also strongly affiliated with the NFL who probably didn’t like the idea of that.
Were they affiliated with the NFL?  Serious question.  Seems odd that the NFL wouldn't want them to succeed if they were affiliated with them.

 
LAUNCH said:
It may happen, but I imagine that if players like Trevor Lawrence or Tua decided to play when the XFL starts I would be willing to bet you whatever you'd like that people would be lining up to get their autographs, even if it's just for a bag of Funions....I assume Nike is just paying Odell Beckham all that money because they like to hang out with him.   :lmao:
Let me fill you in...it WON'T EVER HAPPEN.  As @[scooter] mentioned, no kid is going to skip a (relatively) free ride to college to be one of Vince McMahon's employees in a start-up when he can wait 3-4 years to pull the serious money on the NFL can provide.

I can guarantee you Vince McMahon can't match wallets with Jerry Jones, the Rooney family, the Krafts, etc.  They consider him a shuckster and a snake oil salesman who is all talk and no action.

 
Again, the XFL already has deals with FOX and ESPN.  Which means they will be showing games on ESPN, ABC, FOX and FS1.  When the AAF was on CBS, it beat every other live sporting event it went against, including the NBA.  And considering the AAF did zero marketing, I'd imagine with the weight of those two heavyweights behind the promotion, more people will be watching.

What I don't understand is the XFL is saying they'll be paying kids coming out of college in hopes to lure them away for actual money.  But why didn't the AAF do this?  Or why is the XFL allowed to do this but the AAF wasn't?  
XFL 1.0 was on NBC - a broadcast network. That's not a selling point.

 
Let me fill you in...it WON'T EVER HAPPEN.  As @[scooter] mentioned, no kid is going to skip a (relatively) free ride to college to be one of Vince McMahon's employees in a start-up when he can wait 3-4 years to pull the serious money on the NFL can provide.

I can guarantee you Vince McMahon can't match wallets with Jerry Jones, the Rooney family, the Krafts, etc.  They consider him a shuckster and a snake oil salesman who is all talk and no action.
True, but he can go to the NFL after the XFL.  The XFL would just be a place to play instead of college.  Put two years in for the XFL while cashing a pay check, then declare for the NFL draft.  I'm pretty sure that's how McMahon is selling it.  He's not thinking he'll steal talent from the NFL pool.  He's counting on players deciding to play for the XFL instead of college.

 
True, but he can go to the NFL after the XFL.  The XFL would just be a place to play instead of college.  Put two years in for the XFL while cashing a pay check, then declare for the NFL draft.  I'm pretty sure that's how McMahon is selling it.  He's not thinking he'll steal talent from the NFL pool.  He's counting on players deciding to play for the XFL instead of college.
But why would you? To get $75-100k from VKM and risk injury that dooms your NFL chances?  I'm not buying it.  Could it happen?  Probably, but I'd bet against it.

 
But why would you? To get $75-100k from VKM and risk injury that dooms your NFL chances?  I'm not buying it.  Could it happen?  Probably, but I'd bet against it.
Are you not risking injury in college?  Did I miss the part where college football was injury free?  :confused:

 
So what's going to make XFL 2.0 any better?
A better product.  That was kind of my point.  The AAF had good numbers in TV and had ZERO promotion.  If it's on ESPN and FOX, they will promote it because they have a desire to make it succeed.  ESPN will want the XFL to succeed, therefore do more to make that happen.  People love to say that no one will watch inferior football, but college football is a multi-billion dollar industry.  And while I'm not saying the XFL will be anywhere near that, the demand to watch sub-NFL level football is there.

While there is a chance that the XFL will fail just like the AAF, I don't think the two are anywhere near similar.  The XFL has enough money to run for 3 years without making a profit.  That's the plan.  So if it's losing money in week 6, they can weather the hard times to try and work out the kinks.  Having a large coffer, two huge sports television partners and the knowledge of a previous failed experience give the XFL a huge leg up.  

 
Let me fill you in...it WON'T EVER HAPPEN.  As @[scooter] mentioned, no kid is going to skip a (relatively) free ride to college to be one of Vince McMahon's employees in a start-up when he can wait 3-4 years to pull the serious money on the NFL can provide.

I can guarantee you Vince McMahon can't match wallets with Jerry Jones, the Rooney family, the Krafts, etc.  They consider him a shuckster and a snake oil salesman who is all talk and no action.
Let me fill you in...they aren't competing.  The NFL stands to gain if the XFL succeeds.  For all their money, they just didn't want to sink a bunch of money themselves to make a feeder league work again.  Assuming they allow players out of high school to come in and play, they are competing against college coaches for talent.  To say that no one would make the jump is naive at best.  If the money is right people will go.  If in 2020 Vince offers Trevor Lawrence $5,000,000 (Or whatever the magic number is/ or whatever player has that kind of marquee name) for one year in the XFL, can anyone say there is no way they'd leave?  

 
A better product.  That was kind of my point.  The AAF had good numbers in TV and had ZERO promotion.  If it's on ESPN and FOX, they will promote it because they have a desire to make it succeed.  ESPN will want the XFL to succeed, therefore do more to make that happen.  People love to say that no one will watch inferior football, but college football is a multi-billion dollar industry.  And while I'm not saying the XFL will be anywhere near that, the demand to watch sub-NFL level football is there.

While there is a chance that the XFL will fail just like the AAF, I don't think the two are anywhere near similar.  The XFL has enough money to run for 3 years without making a profit.  That's the plan.  So if it's losing money in week 6, they can weather the hard times to try and work out the kinks.  Having a large coffer, two huge sports television partners and the knowledge of a previous failed experience give the XFL a huge leg up.  
A better product...how? Because there are whatever 53 X 32 equals, the best available player is (53 X 32) +1. Why would I expect passable (no pun intended) football from guys who can't make a roster in the NFL? You'll have a hard time convincing me that a high school kid is going to pass up college to hone his skills to get killed in the WWXFL for peanuts what he could make?

Think about this logically, as well. Most of the kids coming out of school will not be out of school when the XFL starts each season. If they hang on until April, then they can see if they get drafted. If not, then they have to wait until at least the fall to see if the XFL picks them up. The guys you're going to get are the UPS drivers, insurance salesmen and bartenders that wash out of every NFL camp every summer. And they wash out because they can't hack the NFL playing style. 

 
Let me fill you in...they aren't competing.  The NFL stands to gain if the XFL succeeds.  For all their money, they just didn't want to sink a bunch of money themselves to make a feeder league work again.  Assuming they allow players out of high school to come in and play, they are competing against college coaches for talent.  To say that no one would make the jump is naive at best.  If the money is right people will go.  If in 2020 Vince offers Trevor Lawrence $5,000,000 (Or whatever the magic number is/ or whatever player has that kind of marquee name) for one year in the XFL, can anyone say there is no way they'd leave?  
Except the NFL is the standard for players, not the XFL. The XFL talent pool is going to be exactly the same as any other minor league football team - NFL rejects and wannabees.

 
A better product...how? Because there are whatever 53 X 32 equals, the best available player is (53 X 32) +1. Why would I expect passable (no pun intended) football from guys who can't make a roster in the NFL? You'll have a hard time convincing me that a high school kid is going to pass up college to hone his skills to get killed in the WWXFL for peanuts what he could make?

Think about this logically, as well. Most of the kids coming out of school will not be out of school when the XFL starts each season. If they hang on until April, then they can see if they get drafted. If not, then they have to wait until at least the fall to see if the XFL picks them up. The guys you're going to get are the UPS drivers, insurance salesmen and bartenders that wash out of every NFL camp every summer. And they wash out because they can't hack the NFL playing style. 
You keep saying "pass up college to play in the XFL" like that means something.  Let's try to break this down to simpler terms.

There is a chance, in 2 years, you can do your job for $1 million.  There are two roads you can go to get there.  A) Become an unpaid intern for two years or B) become a paid intern for two years.  Which would you choose?

A player can "hone" skills in the XFL, too.  

And the drop off from NFL player to UPS driver is incorrect.  About 96% of college football players don't make the NFL.  Yet people watch those games just fine.  

No offense, GB, but your argument isn't grounded in reality.

 
Except the NFL is the standard for players, not the XFL. The XFL talent pool is going to be exactly the same as any other minor league football team - NFL rejects and wannabees.
Hence feeder system...and I just gave you a scenario where the talent pool wouldn't be the same as as any other minor league football team....  

 
But why would you? To get $75-100k from VKM and risk injury that dooms your NFL chances?  I'm not buying it.  Could it happen?  Probably, but I'd bet against it.
Are you not risking injury in college?  Did I miss the part where college football was injury free?  :confused:
If you're injured in college, then you've got access to top-notch rehab facilities. If you're injured in the AAF or XFL, you have access to nothing.

Also, many colleges will provide players with free insurance policies to cover loss of future income. As far as I know, that option was not offered by the AAF or the XFL.

Let me put it another way:

PLAYER A has the following:

- elite practice facilities
- elite rehab facilities
- highest-quality field conditions
- upper-level coaches
- does not get paid in cash, but receives free meals and free education
- free insurance policy covering future lost wages
- no risk of league disbanding midseason
- even if he's cut from the team, he can always transfer to another college team
- all games receive maximum national TV exposure
- maximum exposure to NFL scouts (practices, pro day, combine, etc.)
 

PLAYER B has the following:

- substandard practice facilities
- no post-injury rehab facilities
- less-than-ideal field conditions
- lower-level coaches
- does not get free meals or free education, but is paid $75,000/year
- NO free insurance policy covering future lost wages
- constant risk that team or league could fold
- if league folds, he can't transfer to a college team
- TV exposure is spotty at best
- minimal exposure to NFL scouts

Does anyone really think that Player B is in a better (or even equal) situation than Player A? The only "plus" is the $75K. But with all the minuses, that $75K just isn't worth it.

 
If you're injured in college, then you've got access to top-notch rehab facilities. If you're injured in the AAF or XFL, you have access to nothing.

Also, many colleges will provide players with free insurance policies to cover loss of future income. As far as I know, that option was not offered by the AAF or the XFL.

Let me put it another way:

PLAYER A has the following:

- elite practice facilities
- elite rehab facilities
- highest-quality field conditions
- upper-level coaches
- does not get paid in cash, but receives free meals and free education
- free insurance policy covering future lost wages
- no risk of league disbanding midseason
- even if he's cut from the team, he can always transfer to another college team
- all games receive maximum national TV exposure
- maximum exposure to NFL scouts (practices, pro day, combine, etc.)
 

PLAYER B has the following:

- substandard practice facilities
- no post-injury rehab facilities
- less-than-ideal field conditions
- lower-level coaches
- does not get free meals or free education, but is paid $75,000/year
- NO free insurance policy covering future lost wages
- constant risk that team or league could fold
- if league folds, he can't transfer to a college team
- TV exposure is spotty at best
- minimal exposure to NFL scouts

Does anyone really think that Player B is in a better (or even equal) situation than Player A? The only "plus" is the $75K. But with all the minuses, that $75K just isn't worth it.
I think you're assuming a lot here for Player B.  And again, it doesn't mean everyone will choose the XFL over college.  But we see kids in basketball leave college all of the time to go play in the G League.  Or Europe.  Why would this be any different?

 
But we see kids in basketball leave college all of the time to go play in the G League.  Or Europe.  Why would this be any different?
Partly because the risk of injury is lower, but mainly because those players have hundreds of foreign options if the G League falls through.

 
Partly because the risk of injury is lower, but mainly because those players have hundreds of foreign options if the G League falls through.
The need and desire to make money will lure people to the XFL.  Not everyone.  But enough people.  They don't need everyone to forgo college.  Just a couple.  A million dollars is hard to turn down when your bank account says zero. 

 
I just think it's funny that for the past decade, people have been complaining about college kids not being paid.  And now that a league is coming around for kids to get paid, people are like, "Why would they choose that over college when college offers them SO MUCH FREE stuff?!?!"

 
I just think it's funny that for the past decade, people have been complaining about college kids not being paid.  And now that a league is coming around for kids to get paid, people are like, "Why would they choose that over college when college offers them SO MUCH FREE stuff?!?!"
All young people need college, a degree means everything, football doesn't last forever.

 
:lmao:  you must be a bot composed entirely to have the same takes as a 55 year old white guy. 
What parent gives this advice?

son....hey dad, I can tryout for an XFL team.

dad....what about UCLA?

son...I can do that later I could  sure use some money now dad.

dad...ok, sounds good.

Would you?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You keep saying "pass up college to play in the XFL" like that means something.  Let's try to break this down to simpler terms.

There is a chance, in 2 years, you can do your job for $1 million.  There are two roads you can go to get there.  A) Become an unpaid intern for two years or B) become a paid intern for two years.  Which would you choose?

A player can "hone" skills in the XFL, too.  

And the drop off from NFL player to UPS driver is incorrect.  About 96% of college football players don't make the NFL.  Yet people watch those games just fine.  

No offense, GB, but your argument isn't grounded in reality.
When the argument is "well, a kid could forgo college for the XFL", you're saying he goes straight from high school to being a professional. Alright, is there a draft for HS kids or is this a free-for-all? Secondly, these kids that are proverbially going from HS to the XFL STILL wouldn't be allowed in the NFL, so how good are they going to be?  Most of these kids are filling out in that college-age timeframe; heck, baseball players drafted out of high school are considered lower (but with a bigger potential upside) than a college kid.

If you're going after college kids, when are you getting them? After their fall semester? After their bowl games? If the XFL season starts in February right after the Super Bowl, then it would follow you'd want a good 4-6 weeks of camp beforehand. This backs you right into the end of the regular season/bowl season. Are you going to ask a kid to forego a bowl game for the XFL?  We've seen kids sit out bowl games to keep themselves injury-free for a high NFL draft spot; what type of player is going to hold out or leave their college team and hope like heck Vince McMahon offers him a contract?  The timing of the league runs counter to the current flow of the football system. To go from college to the XFL means you're crimping the kids last year, or hoping he doesn't get drafted/invited to a camp. Otherwise, he's waiting through the fall hoping to get signed/drafted by the XFL.

That's a big ask for a 20-something kid.

 
Bear in mind @TheIronSheik and everyone else supporting the XFL:

For your sakes, I hope it succeeds and you enjoy every single game you watch. I really do. While I have no desire to watch; I'm not going to be some kind of scold and tell you shouldn't watch. It's you're free time and you should spend it as you wish.  I just don't believe it's going to work; yinz do. And in the end, that's OK by me.

I'd rather discuss something like this than wade into the PSF.  :yucky: :yucky:

 
When the argument is "well, a kid could forgo college for the XFL", you're saying he goes straight from high school to being a professional. Alright, is there a draft for HS kids or is this a free-for-all? Secondly, these kids that are proverbially going from HS to the XFL STILL wouldn't be allowed in the NFL, so how good are they going to be? 
I think the rule states that as long as you are 3 years removed from your high school graduation, you can enter the NFL.   Here is what wiki says (I don't know if this is exact or not but sounds about right)

==========

Players who have been out of high school for at least three years are eligible for the NFL draft. The rules do not state that a player must attend college, but virtually all of the players selected in the NFL draft have played college football, usually in the United States but occasionally from Canadian universities as well. A few players are occasionally selected from other football leagues like the Arena Football League (AFL), the Canadian Football League (CFL), and the German Football League (GFL). A small handful of players have also been drafted from colleges who played other sports than football.

Rules state only that a player must be three years removed from high school graduation, regardless of what the prospective draftee did during that time. A year as a redshirt player in college counts toward eligibility even though the player was not allowed to participate in games during that year, therefore players who have completed their redshirt sophomore year can enter the NFL draft.

 
As someone mentioned above, what happens if the XFL makes a big time offer for some true college sophomores that still need to wait a year before being NFL bound? Built in “stars” could be on the field with an approach like that.

if you’re Trevor Lawrence, 5 million to play in XFL or 0 to play junior year at Clemson when you are probably 1.01 either way barring. Injury.. could be intriguing. 

 
A lot of people are not college material and don't deserve to be there!  They're just being saddled with debt cause they're being lied too, by people like you, who say they deserve to go to college.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top