What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Birther Conspiracy Thread (1 Viewer)

OK, so I haven't followed this very closely. FTR I'm right leaning. When the idea of his birth certificate first came out I dismissed it as absurd...assuming he provided one. So now they are saying that he didn't provide the right one? There's a long form that is more official? Am I missing something? If it's not a big deal to him, shouldn't he just have the state provide the long form? I seriously thought this was settled last year....

What am I missing?
He's not showing because he enjoys watching the fools rant and rave about it as much as we do.
I manage to find enjoyment laughing at fools without having to spend over $2M to do it.
Link?
 
OK, so I haven't followed this very closely. FTR I'm right leaning. When the idea of his birth certificate first came out I dismissed it as absurd...assuming he provided one. So now they are saying that he didn't provide the right one? There's a long form that is more official? Am I missing something? If it's not a big deal to him, shouldn't he just have the state provide the long form? I seriously thought this was settled last year....

What am I missing?
He's not showing because he enjoys watching the fools rant and rave about it as much as we do.
I manage to find enjoyment laughing at fools without having to spend over $2M to do it.
That is twice you bring this up... source? ETA - nevermind - I found it. World Net Daily :lmao:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
 
I have two crucial questions....

1) Why in the name of all that is holy is this thread still active?

2) How in the wide, wide world of sports did it get to 30 pages?

Inquiring minds want to know.

 
So bueno appears to be a voice of reason in the Japan nuclear reactor thread, and I'm totally with him in that one.And then he seems to be a complete lunatic in this thread, and I couldn't be more misaligned.My view must be totally jacked on one of these two issues.
Well, it isn't about whether Obama is a natural born citizen or not to me. 99.99% sure he is. It is about whether we should have a neutral party making that determination and whether that neutral party should have published rules as to what evidence is acceptable and what isn't.Don't know why that makes me unreasonable. It just seems like a logical thing that should be in place.
 
I'm seeing reports that Obama's decision to fight this in court has shaved $2 billion off the deficit. Also, polls are showing this issue has endeared republican voters to Obama.

 
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Obama hopes you keep this issue alive for another couple years. Keep up the good fight!
 
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Except that Obama and Hawaii produced it, but people are still #####ing.
 
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Except that Obama and Hawaii produced it, but people are still #####ing.
The point is that if there were a pre-existing regulation stating that the short form certificate was acceptable as proof of being a natural-born citizen, this issue would never have gotten legs. So instead of the birthers going nuts and the liberals laughing at them why not just fix this little problem? Why is this so hard to do? It can be done by clarifying instructions on a single FEC form. Or having a separate form for POTUS. Problem solved.
 
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Except that Obama and Hawaii produced it, but people are still #####ing.
The point is that if there were a pre-existing regulation stating that the short form certificate was acceptable as proof of being a natural-born citizen, this issue would never have gotten legs. So instead of the birthers going nuts and the liberals laughing at them why not just fix this little problem? Why is this so hard to do? It can be done by clarifying instructions on a single FEC form. Or having a separate form for POTUS. Problem solved.
When did we define, definitively, that natural born citizen even means born in this country. Seems to me that if you're born American, then you're a natural born American. Lets' solve that riddle first before tackling the next one.
 
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Except that Obama and Hawaii produced it, but people are still #####ing.
COLB is not proof of Hawaii birth as anybody can apply for that.
 
Who posted in: The Birther Conspiracy continues to grow

timschochet 123

Sam Quentin 103

bigbottom 81

jon_mx 64

bueno 54

pantagrapher 49

Road Dogg 36

Bronco Billy 35

Statorama 31

How many birthers do we have in this list?

 
When did we define, definitively, that natural born citizen even means born in this country. Seems to me that if you're born American, then you're a natural born American. Lets' solve that riddle first before tackling the next one.
The Supreme Court has already declined to hear that argument with regard to this situation, but that is the other Birther argument.
 
Who posted in: The Birther Conspiracy continues to growtimschochet 123Sam Quentin 103bigbottom 81jon_mx 64bueno 54pantagrapher 49Road Dogg 36Bronco Billy 35Statorama 31How many birthers do we have in this list?
Not sure exactly but I'd bet we'd find a 1:1 hillbilly/redneck to birther ratio.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Birther or not, I seriously doubt Abercrombie remembered when Obama was born. I mean, his parents were hardly as well-known as the Kennedys or even some TV celebrity.
He was a friend of Obama's parents.
Well so he says, but if he were a fried of Obama's he would have advised him to release the long form birth certificate and we wouldn't have this stupid issue.
This is the most ridiculous argument I've heard in the past month. That's quite an accomplishment.
I'm not sure why it is ridiculous. This issue wouldn't exist if Obama released his long form certificate.What it has shown us though, is that we need a procedure for vetting Presidential eligibility. If I want a passport, there is a list of documents that are accepted as valid identification and valid proof of citizenship. Why not have a published list for Presidential candidates too?
I can only repeat again.. this "issue" only helps Obama.You guys couldn'y hurt yourselves more.
Not sure who "you guys are." Are you against having a published procedure for determining eligibility to run for President? How hard could that be?For the record, I don't think this issue helps or hurts Obama, and I think McCain should have produced his birth certificate too.Nor do I think anecdotal evidence from another politician proves anything. we need for this issue to go away, and there is only one way that is going to happen.
Except that Obama and Hawaii produced it, but people are still #####ing.
The point is that if there were a pre-existing regulation stating that the short form certificate was acceptable as proof of being a natural-born citizen, this issue would never have gotten legs. So instead of the birthers going nuts and the liberals laughing at them why not just fix this little problem? Why is this so hard to do? It can be done by clarifying instructions on a single FEC form. Or having a separate form for POTUS. Problem solved.
When did we define, definitively, that natural born citizen even means born in this country. Seems to me that if you're born American, then you're a natural born American. Lets' solve that riddle first before tackling the next one.
Well be careful. You might come around to my way of thinking. But it is a good question.We have had Presidents who were born in territories before those territories became states. McCain was born in the Canal Zone to two American parents when the Canal zone was technically part of America.What would we do with a presidential candidate born of foreign parents in a US embassy (technically US soil). I just think the ambiguity on what constitutes a natural-born citizen (hopefully we don't have to get into the C-section versus both canal argument because it is ridiculous) and what constitues proof of natural-born citizenship.It seems that enough evidence exists to suggest that Obama is natural-born, but he took advantage of his father's non-citizenship to receive scholarship money as a foreign student (unless that has been clarified). It also seems that maybe, just maybe he had a foreign passport at some time in his early adulthood.Those kinds of things create doubt. A good leader, IMO would clean up that doubt.
 
When did we define, definitively, that natural born citizen even means born in this country. Seems to me that if you're born American, then you're a natural born American. Lets' solve that riddle first before tackling the next one.
The Supreme Court has already declined to hear that argument with regard to this situation, but that is the other Birther argument.
I think it's the argument that should be settled first before we worry about public vetting, even though it's already investigated. It's not like they swear someone in because he told them he was an American.
 
but he took advantage of his father's non-citizenship to receive scholarship money as a foreign student (unless that has been clarified).
:lmao:
It also seems that maybe, just maybe he had a foreign passport at some time in his early adulthood.
:lmao: Do you even bother to look any of this crap up before you post?
They are arguments that have been used in the past that I have not seen addressed. I thought I couched them in substantially less than certain terms in order to show that there was a body of evidence out there to shed doubt in some people's minds. Under those circumstances, I would have gladly released my long form birth certificate if I was him.
 
but he took advantage of his father's non-citizenship to receive scholarship money as a foreign student (unless that has been clarified).
:lmao:
It also seems that maybe, just maybe he had a foreign passport at some time in his early adulthood.
:lmao: Do you even bother to look any of this crap up before you post?
They are arguments that have been used in the past that I have not seen addressed. I thought I couched them in substantially less than certain terms in order to show that there was a body of evidence out there to shed doubt in some people's minds. Under those circumstances, I would have gladly released my long form birth certificate if I was him.
These arguments have been addressed over and over.Obama recieved financial aid as a foreign student? False

Obama had a foreign passport? False

 
COLB is not proof of Hawaii birth as anybody can apply for that.
Can you flesh this out a bit? Is a Certificate of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii insufficient proof of Hawaii birth for purposes other than POTUS?
Besides being President, who is required to be a natural born citizen?
What's that got to do with it? What other purposes are a COLB not sufficient for proof of being born in HI?
 
Regardless of the actual number, I'm sure defending 18 different legal actions over the course of 2 years is not cheap.
Thats the reply now? :lmao: Hack.

Ive read of two of the court proceedings, including the biggest (Oreily Taitz sideshow) costing the defense $500 and $250.

In fact, nobody even has to show up for the defense, they are sending in the basic attorney letters/replies and seeing the cases dismissed.

As if no legal groups would be willing to defend the President free of charge.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can you flesh this out a bit? Is a Certificate of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii insufficient proof of Hawaii birth for purposes other than POTUS?
Besides being President, who is required to be a natural born citizen?
No one, as far as I'm aware. But that wasn't my question.
I realize that. But that is what makes your question irrelevant to the issue. You can get a birth certificate from sworn statements from friends and relatives. That is sufficient to get a passport. My grandma had to do this to travel to Europe. But if she wanted to be President, is that conclusive proof? Obama who had a foreign father and a mother who traveled, it raises questions that the COLB does not conclusively answer. Yes, he is recognized as a citizen because of some unrevealed recorded document so he can get a passport and attend school. But does that make him a natural born citizen?
 
but he took advantage of his father's non-citizenship to receive scholarship money as a foreign student (unless that has been clarified).
:lmao:
It also seems that maybe, just maybe he had a foreign passport at some time in his early adulthood.
:lmao: Do you even bother to look any of this crap up before you post?
They are arguments that have been used in the past that I have not seen addressed. I thought I couched them in substantially less than certain terms in order to show that there was a body of evidence out there to shed doubt in some people's minds. Under those circumstances, I would have gladly released my long form birth certificate if I was him.
These arguments have been addressed over and over.Obama recieved financial aid as a foreign student? False

Obama had a foreign passport? False
At the time these arguments were brought up though, there was still doubt that had not been addressed. I did not say they have not been addressed since. Big difference. Had they not been arguments at the time and had Obama released his long form birth certificate, this issue would have never gotten legs. But he didn't and it has. Entirely his fault this matter is still being discussed.I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?

 
Can you flesh this out a bit? Is a Certificate of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii insufficient proof of Hawaii birth for purposes other than POTUS?
Besides being President, who is required to be a natural born citizen?
No one, as far as I'm aware. But that wasn't my question.
I realize that. But that is what makes your question irrelevant to the issue. You can get a birth certificate from sworn statements from friends and relatives. That is sufficient to get a passport. My grandma had to do this to travel to Europe. But if she wanted to be President, is that conclusive proof? Obama who had a foreign father and a mother who traveled, it raises questions that the COLB does not conclusively answer. Yes, he is recognized as a citizen because of some unrevealed recorded document so he can get a passport and attend school. But does that make him a natural born citizen?
You assume too much from my question. I was simply asking for Sam to flesh out his statement that:
COLB is not proof of Hawaii birth as anybody can apply for that.
His statement was not "COLB is not proof of Hawaii birth for purposes of becoming President as anybody can apply for that." It was a categorical statement about a COLB not constituting proof of Hawaii birth. That's why I asked for clarification as to whether the COLB is insufficient proof of Hawaii birth for other purposes. Indeed, it's entirely possible that it is insufficient proof for other purposes, which, again, is why I asked.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?
I agree with this 100%. Might as well make it clear. That said, the standard that I think should be ultimately codified would be met by what information has been produced by Obama.
 
I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?
I agree with this 100%. Might as well make it clear. That said, the standard that I think should be ultimately codified would be met by what information has been produced by Obama.
That may be. I'll defer to experts on that point.
 
I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?
I agree with this 100%. Might as well make it clear. That said, the standard that I think should be ultimately codified would be met by what information has been produced by Obama.
If a recorded document exists which clarifies the particulars of the location of birth, why would should it be codified it to protect that? If the information flat out did not exist, it is one thing. But we are fairly certain that something was filed at the time Obama was born, we are just not certain what that is. You know, transparency and all that good stuff.
 
I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?
I agree with this 100%. Might as well make it clear. That said, the standard that I think should be ultimately codified would be met by what information has been produced by Obama.
If a recorded document exists which clarifies the particulars of the location of birth, why would should it be codified it to protect that? If the information flat out did not exist, it is one thing. But we are fairly certain that something was filed at the time Obama was born, we are just not certain what that is. You know, transparency and all that good stuff.
If the code provides that you can present A, B or C as proof of being a natural born citizen, I don't see a need to produce A, if B or C has already been provided.
 
I stand by my position that what constitutes proof of a natural born citizen needs to be codified and included as part of the FEC vetting process. Why do you have a problem with that position?
I agree with this 100%. Might as well make it clear. That said, the standard that I think should be ultimately codified would be met by what information has been produced by Obama.
If a recorded document exists which clarifies the particulars of the location of birth, why would should it be codified it to protect that? If the information flat out did not exist, it is one thing. But we are fairly certain that something was filed at the time Obama was born, we are just not certain what that is. You know, transparency and all that good stuff.
If the code provides that you can present A, B or C as proof of being a natural born citizen, I don't see a need to produce A, if B or C has already been provided.
I don't think we should codify legal protection from the facts. I have yet to hear a convincing argument why A is not being produced.
 
The point is that if there were a pre-existing regulation stating that the short form certificate was acceptable as proof of being a natural-born citizen, this issue would never have gotten legs.
Apparently, that issue is pretty well settled outside of birther-land.Janice Okubo, a spokesperson for the Hawaiian Department of Health, is quoted here explaining some of the "short form" versus "long form" stuff. (She says that there is no "short form" versus "long form" stuff. But what is being called the "short form" contains all the information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions requiring a birth certificate, and has been recognized by the US Supreme Court as an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other requirements.)

 
COLB is not proof of Hawaii birth as anybody can apply for that.
Can you flesh this out a bit? Is a Certificate of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii insufficient proof of Hawaii birth for purposes other than POTUS?
He may be referring to thishttp://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.HTM
[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.© The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
 
Interesting. It seems that such certificates would be used for purposes of establishing residency and/or parental rights. I wonder whether such certificates would state that the individual was born in a particular county in Hawaii when they weren't.

 
but he took advantage of his father's non-citizenship to receive scholarship money as a foreign student (unless that has been clarified).
:lmao:
It also seems that maybe, just maybe he had a foreign passport at some time in his early adulthood.
:lmao: Do you even bother to look any of this crap up before you post?
They are arguments that have been used in the past that I have not seen addressed. I thought I couched them in substantially less than certain terms in order to show that there was a body of evidence out there to shed doubt in some people's minds. Under those circumstances, I would have gladly released my long form birth certificate if I was him.
These arguments have been addressed over and over.Obama recieved financial aid as a foreign student? False

Obama had a foreign passport? False
Can I request a No Snopes link rule for this thread?

The truth really takes the fun out of this. I mean, if a comedian is up on stage doing a hilarious rant, and everyone is rolling in the aisles laughing at him, you wouldn't stop him in the middle of the routine point out that most white people don't really dance like that, or that data shows that Asians drive as well as the rest of us. You just keep laughing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top