What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The "I can't believe I'm doing one this early but (1 Viewer)

While Barron has been disappointing at times, BUST is terribly strong. He'll be a starter for a long time there. He does need to get motivated though.
No he won't. As one of the players called out by Bulger, and compounding it with a wretched performance last night AFTER being called out, I don't think you can reasonably expect him to be a cornerstone. There's lots of talented yet unmotivated failures that have come through the league. Barron is one of them. It was the knock on him when he was drafted, and he's still not improved on it.
 
Down & dirty revision

1. Detroit - Brady Quinn

Although AP is now a serious consideration with both KJ and Calhoun dealing with serious injuries.

2. Oakland - Adrian Peterson

Lamont is obviously on his way out.

3. Tampa Bay - Calvin Johnson

4. Arizona - Joe Thomas

5. Houston - JaMarcus Russell

The David Carr era is over. He simply cannot get the ball down the field.

6. Washington - Gaines Adams

7. Cleveland - Alan Branch

8. St. Louis - Jake Long

Alex Barron is a bust.

9. San Francisco - Leon Hall

10. Green Bay - Marshawn Lynch

11. Minnesota - Laron Landry

Cornerback is not a first round concern since rookie Griffin has performed well.

12. Carolina - Reggie Nelson

13. Miami - Justin Blalock

14. Pittsburgh - Lemarr Woodley

Moves to OLB in the 3-4.

15. Buffalo - Dwayne Jarrett

16. Tennessee - Ted Ginn

17. Atlanta - Michael Griffin

18. New York Jets - DeMarcus Tyler

19. Philadelphia - Paul Posluszny

Deal with it.

20. Kansas City - Quinn Pitcock

Ryan Sims is a bust.

21. Denver - Ray McDonald

22. New York Giants - Levi Brown

23. New England - Patrick Willis

24. Dallas - Amobi Okoye

Plays for a year or two behind Furgeson to mature.

25. Jacksonville - Buster Davis

26. Cincinnati - Zach Miller

27. New Orleans - Rufus Alexander

28. New England - Darrelle Revis

29. Baltimore - Troy Smith

30. Indianapolis - Justin Harrell

31. Chicago - H.B. Blades

32. San Diego - Eric Weddle
Quick thoughts. From the bottom up. Weddle would be perfect in SD (I like him earlier). Blades is not a first rounder (I'm now positive). Harrell isn't a Tampa 2 lineman. Playing only two games this year makes him very hard to judge. I see an excellent 3-4 DE and a decent 43 DT in a standard system. He did expect a first round grade. He blew out his biceps and his workouts will be very important. He NEEDS an invite to the Senior Bowl. My boy Dorsey at LSU is often compared to Tommie Harris and Warren Sapp. I still think he declares, and he's your Tampa 2 one gapper who won't slip past Dungy.

Revis should go MUCH sooner. I still doubt the Bengals are interested in a pass catching TE and focus on defense again. I'll puke if Dallas drafts Okoye, but they made me puke last year and it wouldn't surprise me... just that Stanley (same position, same school) busted for them this year.

Reggie Nelson seems way too high. I know he was great and gets his hands on a lot of balls, but he's also very inexperienced. I commented very early in the season that a bunch of his plays seemed "fortunate" and that put him on the map. No doubt he kept up the playmaking, but top 15 is really high.

Would there be a riot in Houston if they draft a QB first this year? :lol:

Nice mock Andy. Some random thoughts. I researched and contemplated this class quite a bit this past weekend. I am bumping DLs and dropping LBs. This LB class is sorry. Willis before Puz and Puz late+ in the first is my expectation. I guess a couple underclassmen could sneak in and I expect Siler, Beason and Timmons to all declare. I would. Beason could do an Ernie Sims with a fast enough 40.

Despite being dismissed from the team for wielding a helmet as a weapon... :lol: ... I'm starting to think some team will use a first rounder on Meriweather. I don't know of any other real character concerns and that brawl was just out of control. If Meriweather passes the psyche sniff test, he's got first round talent.

 
Quick thoughts. From the bottom up. Weddle would be perfect in SD (I like him earlier). Blades is not a first rounder (I'm now positive).
You're probably right. But if Chicago lets Briggs go, they may have to reach.
Harrell isn't a Tampa 2 lineman. Playing only two games this year makes him very hard to judge. I see an excellent 3-4 DE and a decent 43 DT in a standard system. He did expect a first round grade. He blew out his biceps and his workouts will be very important. He NEEDS an invite to the Senior Bowl. My boy Dorsey at LSU is often compared to Tommie Harris and Warren Sapp. I still think he declares, and he's your Tampa 2 one gapper who won't slip past Dungy.
The later in the round teams are tough as need doesn't match with talent all that well. If Sidney Rice weren't going back to school, I can see the Colts taking a chance as they need a good #3 for now with the potential for #1 as Harrison ages.
Revis should go MUCH sooner.
Probably so. Buffalo would be a good spot if Clements leaves. Still, the teams where he'd go higher seemed to have other more pressing needs.
I still doubt the Bengals are interested in a pass catching TE and focus on defense again.
I had a hard time tracking down the criminal record of the remaining picks.
I'll puke if Dallas drafts Okoye, but they made me puke last year and it wouldn't surprise me... just that Stanley (same position, same school) busted for them this year.
:shrug: The Cowboys perplex me every year.
Reggie Nelson seems way too high. I know he was great and gets his hands on a lot of balls, but he's also very inexperienced. I commented very early in the season that a bunch of his plays seemed "fortunate" and that put him on the map. No doubt he kept up the playmaking, but top 15 is really high.
And top 10 was high for Donte Whitner. There's going to be some reaches for fast rising stars. Jacksonville has a track record in such regards.
Would there be a riot in Houston if they draft a QB first this year? :lol:
There may be a riot if they don't. I feel bad for Carr. I think in the right situation, he would have made it but I believe his psyche is too damaged now to be an effective NFL QB.
Nice mock Andy. Some random thoughts. I researched and contemplated this class quite a bit this past weekend. I am bumping DLs and dropping LBs. This LB class is sorry. Willis before Puz and Puz late+ in the first is my expectation. I guess a couple underclassmen could sneak in and I expect Siler, Beason and Timmons to all declare. I would. Beason could do an Ernie Sims with a fast enough 40.
I think Poz will be this year's DeMeco Ryans. As in a guy that doesn't have top measurables, but makes plays all over the field.
Despite being dismissed from the team for wielding a helmet as a weapon... :lol: ... I'm starting to think some team will use a first rounder on Meriweather. I don't know of any other real character concerns and that brawl was just out of control. If Meriweather passes the psyche sniff test, he's got first round talent.
Hey! There's the Bengal I was looking for!
 
1. Detroit - Brady Quinn

2. Oakland - Joe Thomas

3. Tampa Bay - Calvin Johnson

4. Arizona - Leon Hall

5. Houston - LaRon Landry

6. Cleveland - Adrian Peterson

7. Washington - Alan Branch

8. St. Louis - Paul Posluszny

9. Minnesota - Reggie Nelson

10. San Francisco - Darrelle Revis

11. Carolina - Gaines Adams

12. Green Bay - Ray McDonald

13. Miami - Quinn Pitcock

14. Atlanta - DeMarcus Tyler

15. Kansas City - Levi Brown

16. Pittsburgh - Anthony Spencer

17. New York Giants - Marcus McCauley

18. Buffalo - Dwayne Jarrett

19. Tennessee - Ted Ginn

20. New England - Patrick Willis

21. New York Jets - Marshawn Lynch

22. Philadelphia - Daymeion Hughes

23. Denver - Michael Griffin

24. Jacksonville - JaMarcus Russell

25. Cincinnati - Amobe Okoye

26. Dallas - Adam Carriker

27. New Orleans - Rufus Alexander

28. New England - Antoine Cason

29. Baltimore - Buster Davis

30. Indianapolis - Frank Okam

31. Chicago - Zach Miller

32. San Diego - Eric Weddle

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne said:
1. Detroit - Brady Quinn2. Oakland - Joe Thomas 3. Tampa Bay - Calvin Johnson4. Arizona - Leon Hall5. Houston - LaRon Landry6. Cleveland - Adrian Peterson7. Washington - Alan Branch8. St. Louis - Paul Posluszny9. Minnesota - Reggie Nelson10. San Francisco - Darrelle Revis 11. Carolina - Gaines Adams12. Green Bay - Ray McDonald13. Miami - Quinn Pitcock14. Atlanta - DeMarcus Tyler 15. Kansas City - Levi Brown16. Pittsburgh - Anthony Spencer17. New York Giants - Marcus McCauley 18. Buffalo - Dwayne Jarrett19. Tennessee - Ted Ginn20. New England - Patrick Willis21. New York Jets - Marshawn Lynch22. Philadelphia - Daymeion Hughes23. Denver - Michael Griffin24. Jacksonville - JaMarcus Russell25. Cincinnati - Amobe Okoye26. Dallas - Adam Carriker27. New Orleans - Rufus Alexander 28. New England - Buster Davis 29. Baltimore - Buster Davis 30. Indianapolis - Frank Okam31. Chicago - Zach Miller32. San Diego - Eric Weddle
Nice work.At first glance I would have Houston taking Branch instead of Landry, Washington taking Adams instead of Branch, and heck, let's give Carolina Landry.NE takes Buster Davis WR and Balitmore takes Buster Davis LB?I think Posluszny is too high.Love Spencer to the Steelers. Any 3-4 team looking for an OLB will be happy this year.Russell will go way higher than 24 if he comes out.Do the Boys need another DE with Spears, Canty, and Hatcher?I think Lynch is better than #21, but I can see a scenario where he falls that far, and the Jets would have to elated to get him.More thoughts on this later...Im getting close to doing my first mock, but the middle of the first is so muddled that I want to wait one more week to see how things will sort out.
 
If Landry goes ahead of Branch and Peterson, I will eat my Astros hat.

I was initially hoping the Titans would lose enough to get Calvin, then I was hoping they would lose enough to get Landry (which now may be a stretch).

(You have Buster Davis playing for the New England Ravens)

 
At first glance I would have Houston taking Branch instead of Landry, Washington taking Adams instead of Branch, and heck, let's give Carolina Landry.
Maybe. And probably. Went a bit too fast on that one.
NE takes Buster Davis WR and Balitmore takes Buster Davis LB?
Ooops. Give the Patriots Cason instead.
I think Posluszny is too high.
A reach? Yes. But they're starting Brandon Chillar. Read that twice.
Love Spencer to the Steelers. Any 3-4 team looking for an OLB will be happy this year.
It seems like every DE in the nation is now characterized as a "tweener" that translates better to the OLB in a 3-4. Aggrivating.
Russell will go way higher than 24 if he comes out.
Probably. But with this draft order, I have a had time saying to who.
Do the Boys need another DE with Spears, Canty, and Hatcher?
Yes. Everything I've seen and read says that they are VERY disappointed with their DE's this year. They could use a FS, but the options are Weddel or Merriweather, which I can't see them taking in the first.
I think Lynch is better than #21, but I can see a scenario where he falls that far, and the Jets would have to elated to get him.
So do I. But again, given this order, I can see him falling too.
 
If Landry goes ahead of Branch and Peterson, I will eat my Astros hat.
you're probably right. I went through this pretty quickly. But at the same time, their safeties are WRETCHED. It would be a surprise, but it wouldn't shock me.
I was initially hoping the Titans would lose enough to get Calvin, then I was hoping they would lose enough to get Landry (which now may be a stretch).
Landry won't get by the Vikings if he's available.
(You have Buster Davis playing for the New England Ravens)
Stupid copy and paste buffer.
 
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where is Quentin Moses, DE Georgia? As you have your mock currently, I think the Titans would take Moses there. I don't even see him on your entire first round.

Collosal mistake for the Titans to take Ginn, period, especially in the first round.

 
Where is Quentin Moses, DE Georgia? As you have your mock currently, I think the Titans would take Moses there. I don't even see him on your entire first round.Collosal mistake for the Titans to take Ginn, period, especially in the first round.
Moses stock has fallen a lot this year. I don't expect him to go in the top 20 unless he absolutely aces the pre-draft period.
 
Russell will go way higher than 24 if he comes out.
Probably. But with this draft order, I have a had time saying to who.
I have him going higher then what I'm about to suggest in the Mock I'm posting later today, but Carolina at 11 would be a good spot.

Do the Boys need another DE with Spears, Canty, and Hatcher?
Yes. Everything I've seen and read says that they are VERY disappointed with their DE's this year. They could use a FS, but the options are Weddel or Merriweather, which I can't see them taking in the first.

They need a pass rush. They really miss Ellis in this regard and as good as Ware is, he isn't much of a QB rusher. Spears and Canty are solid at DE against the run and in containing the pocket, but the don't get in to the backfield much. Even a 3rd down rush end would be a good addition.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They need a pass rush. They really miss Ellis in this regard and as good as Ware is, he isn't much of a QB rusher. Spears and Canty are solid at DE against the run and in containing the pocket, but the don't get in to the backfield much. Even a 3rd down rush end would be a good addition.
I agree with that, but Carriker is not a rush end, he's a classic 3-4 DE.
 
Russell will go way higher than 24 if he comes out.
I have him going higher then what I'm about to suggest in the Mock I'm posting later today, but Carolina at 11 would be a good spot.
I toyed with that. But I can't see them cutting bait with Delhomme after one down year. It's a definite possibility though. I have thought the Eagles may take him as well, depending on Donovan's rehab.
 
They need a pass rush. They really miss Ellis in this regard and as good as Ware is, he isn't much of a QB rusher. Spears and Canty are solid at DE against the run and in containing the pocket, but the don't get in to the backfield much. Even a 3rd down rush end would be a good addition.
I agree with that, but Carriker is not a rush end, he's a classic 3-4 DE.
The Cowboys befuddle me. They always seem to be drafting at a spot that has no value for their needs. Carriker was put in there more for discussion than anything, I guess.
 
Collosal mistake for the Titans to take Ginn, period, especially in the first round.
I think Ginn does have a bust risk, but man it would be interesting for VY to have someone that can get behind a defense effortlessly when he scrambles. We know VY can flick the ball 50+ yards on the run with little exertion. If he has a guy that can just run under anything he flings up there, that will be scary - Ginn's bust risk seems to be concentrated on things like getting off the line against the jam, routes, and generally the physical/contact side of being a WR - if a team drafts him to be the designated streaker in the scramble drill and otherwise occupy the minds of the safeties, and that team has a QB that has the arm to use him to his fullest capacity in that role, the risk would be minimized, imo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Collosal mistake for the Titans to take Ginn, period, especially in the first round.
I think Ginn does have a bust risk, but man it would be interesting for VY to have someone that can get behind a defense effortlessly when he scrambles. We know VY can flick the ball 50+ yards on the run with little exertion. If he has a guy that can just run under anything he flings up there, that will be scary - Ginn's bust risk seems to be concentrated on things like getting off the line against the jam, routes, and generally the physical/contact side of being a WR - if a team drafts him to be the designated streaker in the scramble drill and otherwise occupy the minds of the safeties, and that team has a QB that has the arm to use him to his fullest capacity in that role, the risk would be minimized, imo.
:thumbdown:Joe Thomas to the Raiders mixes things up a bit, eh? And the Cardinals are really screwing themselves with all this winning nonsense.
 
(You have Buster Davis playing for the New England Ravens)
There are two Buster Davis's that could be first rounders. Im curious as to whether this was intentional or not.
I disagree.
I don't think either will be a first rounder, but I wouldnt automatically scoff at a mock for having them at the end of the first. What specifically did you disagree with?
I didn't mean to scoff. Apologies if it came across that way. I think that Buster the Linebacker has a good chance to go near the top of round 2, so "no," round 1 is not out of reach. However, I happen to think Buster the Receiver will be lucky to go on Day 1 and has no chance to be taken ahead of Robert Meachem.
 
Andy Dufresne said:
1. Detroit - Brady Quinn
I like this pick and would mock it exactly the same. If you're gonna break the bank on a #1, might as well be a QB, and we know the cupboard is bare at the position in Motown.
4. Arizona - Leon Hall
This is definitely possible (Hall breaking the top 5), but he will have to be impeccable in the pre-draft period. Otherwise, I see them looking at Branch or Adams.
5. Houston - LaRon Landry9. Minnesota - Reggie Nelson
This will one of the best debates of the pre-draft period - who will be the first FS off the board?
12. Green Bay - Ray McDonald13. Miami - Quinn Pitcock14. Atlanta - DeMarcus Tyler
Glenn Dorsey will be the 2nd DT taken if he comes out. McDonald's versatility is nice, but I dont think he's a first rounder as a DE or a DT - will the fact that he's a first day talent at both vault him into the first - it will if a 3-4 team is looking for an end. I really like Pitcock, but I wonder if his lack of any elite measureable or aspect of his game will hurt his draft stock. Tyler will be a terrific run stuffer. It's just nuts that the 05 NC State line could produce four first rounders.
 
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
Quinn. I don't think they're sold on Simms or Gradkowski (sp?) and would love to add a franchise QB.
 
I didn't mean to scoff. Apologies if it came across that way. I think that Buster the Linebacker has a good chance to go near the top of round 2, so "no," round 1 is not out of reach. However, I happen to think Buster the Receiver will be lucky to go on Day 1 and has no chance to be taken ahead of Robert Meachem.
Agreed on Meachem making the first if he comes out. Buster the receiver shouldnt go earlier than the 3rd, but his value is more in his measureables than his actual performance, so some team could fall in love with the athlete and see what he *could* be at WR with some polish and toughness, and get him into the 2nd round.
 
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
Quinn. I don't think they're sold on Simms or Gradkowski (sp?) and would love to add a franchise QB.
I think you're on to something... :rolleyes:
 
Andy Dufresne said:
1. Detroit - Brady Quinn2. Oakland - Joe Thomas 3. Tampa Bay - Calvin Johnson4. Arizona - Leon Hall5. Houston - LaRon Landry6. Cleveland - Adrian Peterson
Good guesses on the top 6 teams... The picks certainly aren't locked in yet, but this is about as best as you could guess it will fall out.Also I agree that Detroit will take Quinn. His value will only go up after scouts see his measurables.I think Oakland will either take Joe Thomas or Calvin Johnson. With Jake Long and Sam Baker both likely coming back for their Senior seasons it will weaken a class of O Lineman and make it less likely Oak-town can find a stud OT later in the draft. Thomas and Johnson are both sure things in an offense that definitly needs one. Reaching on JaMarcus Russell here would be a mistake IMO. This offense is an O Line and capable WR away from doing anythnig.Tampa Bay could reasonably take whichever player listed above that Oakland does not take, considering they have a need for both. I could see them trying to get Gaines Adams if they are unhappy with Simeon Rice.Arizona would kill for Joe Thomas, but I don't think he falls. I don't think the right pick would be another DB. I've seen this trend of taking back to back 1st Round CB's and I can't say I'm a fan. The biggest hole for the Cards is Safety opposite Adrian Wilson. Im' a big fan of Landry, but I think they'll go with either Levi Brown or Gaines Adams.Houston will take Adrian Peterson if he is available. There are two schools of thought as to why they didn't take Bush...1) Kubiak thinks he can plug anyone back there (ala the Denver Broncos)2) The Texans brass didn't feel as if Bush could be an everydown RBI'm going with #2... Given this year's horrific running game, I would think at the very least Kubiak would want to avoid being fired for passing on this stud... after all, there are no stud O Linemen here and their D is very young and solid.Cleveland will take A-Pete if he's on the board... if not Alan Brach or Leon Hall.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
Quinn. I don't think they're sold on Simms or Gradkowski (sp?) and would love to add a franchise QB.
Ah! Very true. Good thinking. :banned:
 
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
Quinn. I don't think they're sold on Simms or Gradkowski (sp?) and would love to add a franchise QB.
I think you're on to something... :banned:
It's very very early, but I see a storyline emerging with four teams needing a QB in the worst way (DET, OAK, HOU, TB), but only one franchise QB (Quinn). So we can open up two big questions:1) We know that Detroit or Oakland will get the #1. One of them will lose both remaining games, and both have a weaker schedule than TB. So, would they trade down (seems smart considering that strategy got SD to where they are today), and if so, who would they trade down with? My current prediction is that Tampa re-signs Simms, Houston trades for Plummer, and whichever of DET/OAK picks first ends with Quinn because they can't move the pick. 2) This also opens up the possibility that Russell moves into the top 5 because there are so many teams that need a franchise QB. How far-fetched is it that JaMarcus is looked at as a franchise QB once teams get a good look at him? He definitely has the kind of tools that could make a team only see the best-case scenario when evaluating him.
 
4. Arizona - Leon HallThis is definitely possible (Hall breaking the top 5), but he will have to be impeccable in the pre-draft period. Otherwise, I see them looking at Branch or Adams.
Even after drafting Gabe Watson & Jon Lewis last year?
Lewis is a negligible part of their future plans.Watson is good depth in a rotation, but he hasn't lived up to his potential - it seems like the league did the right thing letting him fall out of the first day.Adams does seem more likely than Branch, because Berry and Okeafor are both on the wrong side of 30. On Branch - he's the kind DT that you can build your defense around (think Richard Seymour), so I wouldnt hesitate to slot him to a team with anything less than outstanding DTs. He's definitely one of the top 6 or 7 players in this draft if he comes out, and the kind of talent that you take regardless of your current state at his position.
 
It's very very early, but I see a storyline emerging with four teams needing a QB in the worst way (DET, OAK, HOU, TB), but only one franchise QB (Quinn). So we can open up two big questions:1) We know that Detroit or Oakland will get the #1. One of them will lose both remaining games, and both have a weaker schedule than TB. So, would they trade down (seems smart considering that strategy got SD to where they are today), and if so, who would they trade down with? My current prediction is that Tampa re-signs Simms, Houston trades for Plummer, and whichever of DET/OAK picks first ends with Quinn because they can't move the pick. 2) This also opens up the possibility that Russell moves into the top 5 because there are so many teams that need a franchise QB. How far-fetched is it that JaMarcus is looked at as a franchise QB once teams get a good look at him? He definitely has the kind of tools that could make a team only see the best-case scenario when evaluating him.
And why in the world would Brian Brohm go back to school? :loco: :doh: :D
 
4. Arizona - Leon HallThis is definitely possible (Hall breaking the top 5), but he will have to be impeccable in the pre-draft period. Otherwise, I see them looking at Branch or Adams.
Even after drafting Gabe Watson & Jon Lewis last year?
Lewis is a negligible part of their future plans.Watson is good depth in a rotation, but he hasn't lived up to his potential - it seems like the league did the right thing letting him fall out of the first day.Adams does seem more likely than Branch, because Berry and Okeafor are both on the wrong side of 30. On Branch - he's the kind DT that you can build your defense around (think Richard Seymour), so I wouldnt hesitate to slot him to a team with anything less than outstanding DTs. He's definitely one of the top 6 or 7 players in this draft if he comes out, and the kind of talent that you take regardless of your current state at his position.
And if Denny is still there ( :D ) he is absolutely NOTORIOUS for taking BPA.
 
I like the adjusted mock, but I'm betting that the Lions trade down a few spots. Possibly with Tampa or Houston.
I would love to see Houston trade up to take Quinn. But it's more likely that they get a starting QB in free agency (read: Jake Plummer).Who would Tampa be trading up for?
Quinn. I don't think they're sold on Simms or Gradkowski (sp?) and would love to add a franchise QB.
I think you're on to something... :D
It's very very early, but I see a storyline emerging with four teams needing a QB in the worst way (DET, OAK, HOU, TB), but only one franchise QB (Quinn). So we can open up two big questions:1) We know that Detroit or Oakland will get the #1. One of them will lose both remaining games, and both have a weaker schedule than TB. So, would they trade down (seems smart considering that strategy got SD to where they are today), and if so, who would they trade down with? My current prediction is that Tampa re-signs Simms, Houston trades for Plummer, and whichever of DET/OAK picks first ends with Quinn because they can't move the pick. 2) This also opens up the possibility that Russell moves into the top 5 because there are so many teams that need a franchise QB. How far-fetched is it that JaMarcus is looked at as a franchise QB once teams get a good look at him? He definitely has the kind of tools that could make a team only see the best-case scenario when evaluating him.
It would be just like Detroit to F this up and win a game. But even with their obvious QB need I think recent history plays against the Lions selecting a QB at the #1 slot. That's why I think they'll trade out of the number one spot, if they get it.Marianelli is a defensive minded coach and the recent flops of offensive 1st round picks have been devestating on this franchise. Add to that the enormous amount of money a #1 overall QB costs and I think you'll see Detroit doing everything it can to trade out of this spot.My feeling right now is that it will be Tampa stepping up to make this trade. I'm sure they feel like this season was an abberation and that this will be their best opportunity in a long time to select a QB like Quinn in the draft.Detroit will use Tampa's 1st rounder on a defensive player and any extra picks to fill the numerous holes on the team.
 
And why in the world would Brian Brohm go back to school? :loco: :doh: :D
Well...1) He hasn't proven that he can stay healthy2) He still has some identifiable flaws, especially his performance under duress3) His family has a long connection with Louisville and he may have a strong loyalty to the program4) Louisville has to feel like they were *this close* to playing for the title when they reflect on the loss at Rutgers. Brohm coming back could get Bush to come back, and they will be returning most if not all of their major pieces.5) If Brohm has a good year in 2007 at Louisville, he would be poised to be the #1 overall pick - there aren't any Junior QBs I see that would rival him for #1 QB next year.If I were advising Brohm, I'd tell him to come back, but your point is well taken. Brohm has the arm, the frame, and the brain to be a franchise QB. The fact that so many bottom dwellers need a QB could get him into the top 5 despite his flaws - he would be just as likely as Russell to get into the top 5 based on that factor - although I would like him for Tampa a lot more than I would like him for Houston.
 
And why in the world would Brian Brohm go back to school? :sarcasm: :doh: :goodposting:
Well...1) He hasn't proven that he can stay healthy2) He still has some identifiable flaws, especially his performance under duress3) His family has a long connection with Louisville and he may have a strong loyalty to the program4) Louisville has to feel like they were *this close* to playing for the title when they reflect on the loss at Rutgers. Brohm coming back could get Bush to come back, and they will be returning most if not all of their major pieces.5) If Brohm has a good year in 2007 at Louisville, he would be poised to be the #1 overall pick - there aren't any Junior QBs I see that would rival him for #1 QB next year.
I meant OTHER than those reasons.... ;)
 
They need a pass rush. They really miss Ellis in this regard and as good as Ware is, he isn't much of a QB rusher. Spears and Canty are solid at DE against the run and in containing the pocket, but the don't get in to the backfield much. Even a 3rd down rush end would be a good addition.
I agree with that, but Carriker is not a rush end, he's a classic 3-4 DE.
The Cowboys befuddle me. They always seem to be drafting at a spot that has no value for their needs. Carriker was put in there more for discussion than anything, I guess.
Assuming that quality players are available (big assumption), I see Dallas' draft board to be: 1) NT; very close #2) pass rusher; distant #3) interior offensive lineman; close #4) free safety.Dallas has no legit backup NT. Ferguson is 30+. Parcells loves collecting defensive front seven guys with first rounders.

Colin is dead on that they really miss Ellis. He and Ware formed a very good pair of edge rushers. Once Ellis went down, teams could concentrate on Ware. There is some hope that Carpenter will develop here. He had 1.5 sacks his last game. But I don't know that he has the athleticism to be an elite passrusher.

Dallas has been getting decent passrush out of their backup DEs, Ratliff and Hatcher. Both have been prominent on the nickle. Hatcher, especially, looks like he could turn into a real beast with a couple of years in the weightroom. But these guys are more interior rush linemen. Not edge rushers like Ellis and Ware.

I mention an interior o-lineman. Rivera is 30+. Gurode will be re-signed but Al Johnson is likely to be let go. No backup center for next year. Everyone talks about OT. Pat McQuistan is your future starting left tackle. Columbo is here to stay at RT.

Everyone knows the problems at FS. But rookies aren't likely to provide the solution. They need a QB of the defense, a guy who knows offenses, pass routes, etc. Not a guy who will bite on playfakes. Dallas already has a physical specimen they are trying to develop the mental game for in Pat Watkins. I really doubt they add another raw, talented guy like that.

 
And why in the world would Brian Brohm go back to school? :loco: :doh: :hangover:
Well...5) If Brohm has a good year in 2007 at Louisville, he would be poised to be the #1 overall pick - there aren't any Junior QBs I see that would rival him for #1 QB next year.
I disagree. Russell, Ainge, Brennan, Henne, Woodson, and Booty could all put together a season in 07 that would endear them to being the #1 selection overall just as easily as Brohm could.
 
And why in the world would Brian Brohm go back to school? :thumbup: :2cents: :thumbup:
Well...5) If Brohm has a good year in 2007 at Louisville, he would be poised to be the #1 overall pick - there aren't any Junior QBs I see that would rival him for #1 QB next year.
I disagree. Russell, Ainge, Brennan, Henne, Woodson, and Booty could all put together a season in 07 that would endear them to being the #1 selection overall just as easily as Brohm could.
Ok, Russell could definitely rival him for #1 - I am just assuming he's coming out this year. The rest of the guys would have to greatly step up their game to pass Brohm. Henne has been too streaky and doesnt have an ideal frame. Ainge, I just can't get that excited about - he's got a lanky mantis-like frame and just hasn't really made a big impression in the games Ive seen. Brennan is interesting... but hard to see him having a better year than this year, and he's still not on the Brohm/Russell level. Booty has terrific intangibles but is just not a franchise QB physically. He could be another Brees (without Brees hyperaccuracy of course). Woodson is the most interesting name you brought up. Unlike the rest of the others you named (except Russell), he does have the physical profile of a franchise QB. He came out of nowhere this year, and I think the NFL scouts could fall in love with him if he has a great 2007.But can we at least agree that Brohm is the most likely to put together a 2007 to vault him to #1 overall in 08? If Brohm comes back and has a good 2007, then any of those other guys would have to have an astronomical year to pass him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top