Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
White Sox mail in the season... film at 11.
Does he still refer to the Red sox as the "Carmine's"?Pat Patriot said:I'm a big Ken Harrelson fan and it was painful listening to him
Yes.Does he still refer to the Red sox as the "Carmine's"?Pat Patriot said:I'm a big Ken Harrelson fan and it was painful listening to him
I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influenceRed Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:
2004 - WS
1978 -
1946 - AL
1915 - WS
1912 - WS
I don't think team K/9 should be a big factor. I would say top 3 starters + top 3 relievers K/9 would be more accurate, as the #5 guy will not see any real action (especially with the new playoff format), and the #4 guy will only see 2-3 gamesI'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influenceRed Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:
2004 - WS
1978 -
1946 - AL
1915 - WS
1912 - WS
Team K/9
Closer WXRL
Team Defensive Efficiency
NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
I'm just passing along what the guys who wrote Baseball Between the Numbers said. I think they did break out some top 3 starters stuff. i think what winds up happening is a big part of your staff pitches in the playoffs, with #5 starters filling in innings here and there.What it comes down to, is that teams who are able to control their own destiny (don't let batters put balls into play (K/9), turn a high % of balls in play into outs (defensive eff), and close games effectively (WXRL)) are at an advantage in the playoffs.I don't think team K/9 should be a big factor. I would say top 3 starters + top 3 relievers K/9 would be more accurate, as the #5 guy will not see any real action (especially with the new playoff format), and the #4 guy will only see 2-3 gamesI'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influenceRed Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:
2004 - WS
1978 -
1946 - AL
1915 - WS
1912 - WS
Team K/9
Closer WXRL
Team Defensive Efficiency
NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
Red Sox are currently #4 in defensive efficiency.They are also 5th in total Ks. Don't know k/9 but it stands to reason they'd be up near the top.I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influenceRed Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:
2004 - WS
1978 -
1946 - AL
1915 - WS
1912 - WS
Team K/9
Closer WXRL
Team Defensive Efficiency
NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
I would take it easy with the 'sox offense isn't good enough'. They lost two games to the Yankees by a collective 3 runs. These were very close games...This Boston team has little heart. I know some jackhole will come in here and say that since Bill James can't come up with a formula to measure clutchibility.....clutchibility doesn't exist. The fact remains though that in the last three Yank-Sox series......when the Sox could have nailed the lid on the coffin of their number one division rival...they've lost 2 out of three. I've said it before.....this lineup isn't that good and they have to be winning games in order to fully utilize the key componenets of their vaunted bullpen.
i was screaming at the tv the entire inning. beckett's getting hit all over the place & tito trots him out there to face jeter, abreu, & arod. lame.Francona sleeping there...what the hell was Beckett pitching to ARod for?
# NAME TEAM WXRL1. J.j. Putz SEA 6.0622. Takashi Saito LAN 5.7173. Rafael Betancourt CLE 5.2204. Tony Pena ARI 4.6205. Hideki Okajima BOS 4.4546. Jonathan Papelbon BOS 4.316Let the debate begin.And closer? Papelbon is one of the 3 best in the league, and it's not up for debate.
Technically he said in the league and top 3 closers.# NAME TEAM WXRL1. J.j. Putz SEA 6.062And closer? Papelbon is one of the 3 best in the league, and it's not up for debate.
2. Takashi Saito LAN 5.717
3. Rafael Betancourt CLE 5.220
4. Tony Pena ARI 4.620
5. Hideki Okajima BOS 4.454
6. Jonathan Papelbon BOS 4.316
Let the debate begin.
I am pretty pissed at their half-assed, we have an 8 game lead approach to this thing. They have TWO OFs with an injury yet are doing nothing about it, playing Hinske who sucks as a starter, with no OF on the bench for late game PHit is much too complacentSo if Manny is really hurt, do they go out and get another OF before the Sept 1?
Technically he said in the league and top 3 closers.# NAME TEAM WXRL1. J.j. Putz SEA 6.062And closer? Papelbon is one of the 3 best in the league, and it's not up for debate.
2. Takashi Saito LAN 5.717
3. Rafael Betancourt CLE 5.220
4. Tony Pena ARI 4.620
5. Hideki Okajima BOS 4.454
6. Jonathan Papelbon BOS 4.316
Let the debate begin.
/debateAgreed 100%While the sky is HARDLY falling with boston still looking good wtih a 5g lead and a cakewalk down the stretch, I'm failing to see much urgency or intensity during this series. We have the best pen in baseball, yet we leave starters out there too long. What are we saving papelbon/okajima/gagne for? Today? I realize Curt is unlikely to go past the 5th but come on... we have 2 games held close and we let them blow open due to using the grady-leash on the starters. Frustrating. C'est la vieI am pretty pissed at their half-assed, we have an 8 game lead approach to this thing. They have TWO OFs with an injury yet are doing nothing about it, playing Hinske who sucks as a starter, with no OF on the bench for late game PHit is much too complacentSo if Manny is really hurt, do they go out and get another OF before the Sept 1?
Knowing Manny's heart and dedication, I'm sure he will do everything in his power to get back soon.I heard Manny out for 10 games, but the official word is "indefintiely."
10 games wouyld be smart...reg season really doesn't matter now, it is all about prepping for the playoffs. I would like to see Ortiz get some time off tooI heard Manny out for 10 games, but the official word is "indefintiely."
With the injuries mounting and this team looking like they were starting to backpedal, this was huge. Hopefully they can get some momentum off this.
With the Yankees getting a W today, this win was huge.So we have 100 pitches as the magic number, and now 160 innings as the rookie ceiling? I respect these guys for not riding these guys like government mules, but come on, these are also young, presumbably healthy, men. There to my knowledge, has been no history or threat of injury and when they could contribute, they are getting the hook. And my frustrtion here is born of seeing the Yankees do the same thing. Ian Kennedy hangs a pretty good game up yesterday, nothing elite or dominant, but a workmanlike outing that they've been lacking from that spot in the rotation but there's trepidation given his innings cap. Why are they locking into these seemingly arbitrary figures? If 100 pitches is good, isn't 80 better? If 160 innings is good, isn't 100 bettter? Better yet, if you don't pitch them at all, they'll never get hurt. And before the onslaught of the obvious, I'm not talking about 200 pitches and 300 inning seasons in their early 20's or at any point today realistically, but the market may over corrected.Good Buchholz info---http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/09/02/team_will_be_patient_before_scheduling_date_for_encore/
Epstein said last night that Buchholz, who had not thrown more than 98 pitches in a game this season, would have been pulled from his no-hitter if his pitch count had reached 120 and he had batters left to face.....
"Tito called up a couple of times. We were talking about it. We knew that he hadn't thrown more than 98 pitches in a game . . . If we had taken this guy out, after 120 pitches with one out to go, we would have unwittingly become the poster boys for pitch counts and stuff we don't want to be known for. I'm glad it didn't get to that point.
"We have a plan," Sox general manager Theo Epstein said last night. "We're not necessarily going to articulate it [publicly]. This [no-hitter] can't change that. We've got to do what's right for the team and for Clay for the long term.Last night was the first time this season Buchholz had pitched past the seventh inning. In eight starts with Triple A Pawtucket after being promoted from Double A Portland July 12, he threw as many as seven innings just once, and threw more than 90 pitches just twice. In 15 starts for the Sea Dogs, he threw as many as seven innings just twice. In all, he's thrown 140 1/3 innings on three professional levels, 15 with the Sox, including six in his big league debut Aug. 17.
I thought I read when he 1st came up that the Sox were capping his innings at 160 this season
Yes, right now the best comparison I can find for Buchholz outing is Phil Hughes. And wasnt it a 6 inning no hitter that Hughes was involved in.Wow Phil Hughes also threw a no-hitter threw 7 innings in his 2nd start. Congrats to Buckholz.
Yes technically he got hurt in the 7th inning with 1 out.Yes, right now the best comparison I can find for Buchholz outing is Phil Hughes. And wasnt it a 6 inning no hitter that Hughes was involved in.Wow Phil Hughes also threw a no-hitter threw 7 innings in his 2nd start. Congrats to Buckholz.
Well the current thinking as it relates to young pitchers and injuries is that you don't want to increase innings and pcs more than 10-15% from year to year. I have no clue if there is any real data to support that thinking, but that's what the vast majority of teams are doing these days. Call it a reaction to Prior and Wood.So we have 100 pitches as the magic number, and now 160 innings as the rookie ceiling? I respect these guys for not riding these guys like government mules, but come on, these are also young, presumbably healthy, men. There to my knowledge, has been no history or threat of injury and when they could contribute, they are getting the hook. And my frustrtion here is born of seeing the Yankees do the same thing. Ian Kennedy hangs a pretty good game up yesterday, nothing elite or dominant, but a workmanlike outing that they've been lacking from that spot in the rotation but there's trepidation given his innings cap. Why are they locking into these seemingly arbitrary figures? If 100 pitches is good, isn't 80 better? If 160 innings is good, isn't 100 bettter? Better yet, if you don't pitch them at all, they'll never get hurt. And before the onslaught of the obvious, I'm not talking about 200 pitches and 300 inning seasons in their early 20's or at any point today realistically, but the market may over corrected.Good Buchholz info---http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/09/02/team_will_be_patient_before_scheduling_date_for_encore/
Epstein said last night that Buchholz, who had not thrown more than 98 pitches in a game this season, would have been pulled from his no-hitter if his pitch count had reached 120 and he had batters left to face.....
"Tito called up a couple of times. We were talking about it. We knew that he hadn't thrown more than 98 pitches in a game . . . If we had taken this guy out, after 120 pitches with one out to go, we would have unwittingly become the poster boys for pitch counts and stuff we don't want to be known for. I'm glad it didn't get to that point.
"We have a plan," Sox general manager Theo Epstein said last night. "We're not necessarily going to articulate it [publicly]. This [no-hitter] can't change that. We've got to do what's right for the team and for Clay for the long term.Last night was the first time this season Buchholz had pitched past the seventh inning. In eight starts with Triple A Pawtucket after being promoted from Double A Portland July 12, he threw as many as seven innings just once, and threw more than 90 pitches just twice. In 15 starts for the Sea Dogs, he threw as many as seven innings just twice. In all, he's thrown 140 1/3 innings on three professional levels, 15 with the Sox, including six in his big league debut Aug. 17.
I thought I read when he 1st came up that the Sox were capping his innings at 160 this season
yep, he will be seeing regular time both while Manny is outDoes anyone know if Ellsbury is supposed to see regular AB's while Manny is out?
I'm not trying to be a smartass, but could you explain the bolded sentence above? What do you mean by "both"? Is he going to see regular AB's both while Manny is injured and when he comes back? TIAyep, he will be seeing regular time both while Manny is outDoes anyone know if Ellsbury is supposed to see regular AB's while Manny is out?
sorry...he will definitely see regular time with Manny out. My speculation is that he continues to see regular time even with Manny back as they give guys rest - speculation only thoughI'm not trying to be a smartass, but could you explain the bolded sentence above? What do you mean by "both"? Is he going to see regular AB's both while Manny is injured and when he comes back? TIAyep, he will be seeing regular time both while Manny is outDoes anyone know if Ellsbury is supposed to see regular AB's while Manny is out?
Agreed... Ellsbury is insanely quick. Loving this kid...Crisp-Ellsbury-Lugo hitting 8-9-1. I don't think the Red Sox have EVER batted three guys in a row with that much speed in their entire team history.
Excuse my ignorance, but how long is Manny out for? Just picked up Ellsbury.yep, he will be seeing regular time both while Manny is outDoes anyone know if Ellsbury is supposed to see regular AB's while Manny is out?