What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The OFFICIAL 2007 Boston Red Sox Thread (1 Viewer)

one thing i liked about yesterday's win, was that we started cora, cash & kielty & still had a great offensive day.

kielty's looked pretty damn good so far. i'm happy with the pick up.

 
Someone just beat me to the edit on my subtitle.. had a busy weekend.

Yudkin.. that you helping me keep it current? :shrug:

Glad to see we have an offense :lmao:

 
Tuesday, August 28 7:05 PM ET

BOS Daisuke Matsuzaka, RHP (13-10, 3.76)

NYY Andy Pettitte, LHP (11-7, 3.69)

Scouting Report:

Red Sox: Dice-K held the Rays to a single hit through his first 5 1/3 innings then watched as his hard work went to waste in the form of a two-run homer in the sixth that handed both he and the Red Sox a loss. The Japanese rookie has often fallen victim to poor run support and Wednesday was more of the same as his teammates mustered just one run in his defense. Matsuzaka said afterward that he was disappointed with too many "wasted pitches," but the lone obvious error was the home run ball.

Yankees: When the Yankees need a big win -- say, on days immediately following a loss -- Pettitte has been their guy. There are no bigger games, win or lose, than the hyped contests vs. Boston, and Pettitte draws the assignment to open the Yankees' against the Red Sox. The left-hander has won five straight starts, the last of which coming on Wednesday against the Angels, as he spun seven innings of one-run ball. Pettitte is 1-1 with a 5.01 ERA in five games (four starts) against Boston this year.

Wednesday, August 29 7:05 PM ET

BOS Josh Beckett, RHP (16-5, 3.21)

NYY Roger Clemens, RHP (5-5, 4.34)

Scouting Report:

Red Sox: The right-hander will be going after a career-high win No. 17 in this one. Beckett was far from his best in his last start, giving up seven hits and three runs over 5 2/3 innings. But he still managed to get the win, downing the White Sox by a score of 11-3. This is Beckett's final start in August, a month in which he's gone 3-0 with a 2.25 ERA in four starts. Beckett is 1-0 with a 5.54 ERA in two starts against the Yankees this season. This is Beckett's first start of 2007 at Yankee Stadium, where he's 2-1 with a 7.53 ERA in the regular season.

Yankees: The energy level at Yankee Stadium should be high for this one, as The Rocket takes on his former team for the first time since rejoining the Yankees. Clemens saw a two-start winning streak go by the boards when he allowed six runs in five innings to the Tigers on Friday. In the outing, he battled a blister on his right foot that may have impeded his delivery.

Thursday, August 30 1:05 PM ET

BOS Curt Schilling, RHP (8-5, 4.11)

NYY Chien-Ming Wang, RHP (15-6, 3.95)

Scouting Report:

Red Sox: Schilling has won his last two starts. He downed the White Sox in his last outing, holding them to four hits and a run over six innings. Schilling is 0-1 with a 7.00 ERA in three starts against the Yankees this season. He is 2-3 with a 4.91 ERA lifetime at Yankee Stadium.

Yankees: Citing a mechanical tweak that sped up his delivery some, Wang overcame a so-so start to best the Tigers on Saturday. Trusting his sinker more by throwing to the heart of the plate -- thus letting his natural movement do the work -- Wang went eight strong innings, holding Detroit to two runs. He is 2-1 in three starts against the Red Sox this season, working Boston to a 4.50 ERA.

Wednesday looks like one helluva matchup.... I can see the sox taking at LEAST one but very possibly 2 of these. Thursday will be tough...

 
Red Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:

2004 - WS

1978 -

1946 - AL

1915 - WS

1912 - WS
I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influence

Team K/9

Closer WXRL

Team Defensive Efficiency

NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.

 
Red Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:

2004 - WS

1978 -

1946 - AL

1915 - WS

1912 - WS
I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influence

Team K/9

Closer WXRL

Team Defensive Efficiency

NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
I don't think team K/9 should be a big factor. I would say top 3 starters + top 3 relievers K/9 would be more accurate, as the #5 guy will not see any real action (especially with the new playoff format), and the #4 guy will only see 2-3 games
 
Red Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:

2004 - WS

1978 -

1946 - AL

1915 - WS

1912 - WS
I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influence

Team K/9

Closer WXRL

Team Defensive Efficiency

NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
I don't think team K/9 should be a big factor. I would say top 3 starters + top 3 relievers K/9 would be more accurate, as the #5 guy will not see any real action (especially with the new playoff format), and the #4 guy will only see 2-3 games
I'm just passing along what the guys who wrote Baseball Between the Numbers said. I think they did break out some top 3 starters stuff. i think what winds up happening is a big part of your staff pitches in the playoffs, with #5 starters filling in innings here and there.What it comes down to, is that teams who are able to control their own destiny (don't let batters put balls into play (K/9), turn a high % of balls in play into outs (defensive eff), and close games effectively (WXRL)) are at an advantage in the playoffs.

Regular season wins winds up having a very low correlation to playoff success, as does run scoring ability IIRC.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Red Sox are currently projected at winning 98.6 games, years when they won 98 or more games during the regular season:

2004 - WS

1978 -

1946 - AL

1915 - WS

1912 - WS
I'm pretty sure the 4 factors that have the greatest influence on the playoffs are:random chance, which has the biggest influence

Team K/9

Closer WXRL

Team Defensive Efficiency

NOt sure how the potential playoff teams measure up in those latter three metrics.
Red Sox are currently #4 in defensive efficiency.They are also 5th in total Ks. Don't know k/9 but it stands to reason they'd be up near the top.

And closer? Papelbon is one of the 3 best in the league, and it's not up for debate.

I'd say they rank quite well in all 3 categories.

 
This Boston team has little heart. I know some jackhole will come in here and say that since Bill James can't come up with a formula to measure clutchibility.....clutchibility doesn't exist. The fact remains though that in the last three Yank-Sox series......when the Sox could have nailed the lid on the coffin of their number one division rival...they've lost 2 out of three. I've said it before.....this lineup isn't that good and they have to be winning games in order to fully utilize the key componenets of their vaunted bullpen.

 
This Boston team has little heart. I know some jackhole will come in here and say that since Bill James can't come up with a formula to measure clutchibility.....clutchibility doesn't exist. The fact remains though that in the last three Yank-Sox series......when the Sox could have nailed the lid on the coffin of their number one division rival...they've lost 2 out of three. I've said it before.....this lineup isn't that good and they have to be winning games in order to fully utilize the key componenets of their vaunted bullpen.
I would take it easy with the 'sox offense isn't good enough'. They lost two games to the Yankees by a collective 3 runs. These were very close games...
 
And closer? Papelbon is one of the 3 best in the league, and it's not up for debate.
# NAME TEAM WXRL1. J.j. Putz SEA 6.0622. Takashi Saito LAN 5.7173. Rafael Betancourt CLE 5.2204. Tony Pena ARI 4.6205. Hideki Okajima BOS 4.4546. Jonathan Papelbon BOS 4.316Let the debate begin.
 
So if Manny is really hurt, do they go out and get another OF before the Sept 1?
I am pretty pissed at their half-assed, we have an 8 game lead approach to this thing. They have TWO OFs with an injury yet are doing nothing about it, playing Hinske who sucks as a starter, with no OF on the bench for late game PHit is much too complacent
 
So if Manny is really hurt, do they go out and get another OF before the Sept 1?
I am pretty pissed at their half-assed, we have an 8 game lead approach to this thing. They have TWO OFs with an injury yet are doing nothing about it, playing Hinske who sucks as a starter, with no OF on the bench for late game PHit is much too complacent
Agreed 100%While the sky is HARDLY falling with boston still looking good wtih a 5g lead and a cakewalk down the stretch, I'm failing to see much urgency or intensity during this series. We have the best pen in baseball, yet we leave starters out there too long. What are we saving papelbon/okajima/gagne for? Today? I realize Curt is unlikely to go past the 5th but come on... we have 2 games held close and we let them blow open due to using the grady-leash on the starters. Frustrating. C'est la vie
 
Good Buchholz info---http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/09/02/team_will_be_patient_before_scheduling_date_for_encore/

Epstein said last night that Buchholz, who had not thrown more than 98 pitches in a game this season, would have been pulled from his no-hitter if his pitch count had reached 120 and he had batters left to face.....

"Tito called up a couple of times. We were talking about it. We knew that he hadn't thrown more than 98 pitches in a game . . . If we had taken this guy out, after 120 pitches with one out to go, we would have unwittingly become the poster boys for pitch counts and stuff we don't want to be known for. I'm glad it didn't get to that point.

"We have a plan," Sox general manager Theo Epstein said last night. "We're not necessarily going to articulate it [publicly]. This [no-hitter] can't change that. We've got to do what's right for the team and for Clay for the long term.Last night was the first time this season Buchholz had pitched past the seventh inning. In eight starts with Triple A Pawtucket after being promoted from Double A Portland July 12, he threw as many as seven innings just once, and threw more than 90 pitches just twice. In 15 starts for the Sea Dogs, he threw as many as seven innings just twice. In all, he's thrown 140 1/3 innings on three professional levels, 15 with the Sox, including six in his big league debut Aug. 17.

I thought I read when he 1st came up that the Sox were capping his innings at 160 this season

 
Good Buchholz info---http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/09/02/team_will_be_patient_before_scheduling_date_for_encore/

Epstein said last night that Buchholz, who had not thrown more than 98 pitches in a game this season, would have been pulled from his no-hitter if his pitch count had reached 120 and he had batters left to face.....

"Tito called up a couple of times. We were talking about it. We knew that he hadn't thrown more than 98 pitches in a game . . . If we had taken this guy out, after 120 pitches with one out to go, we would have unwittingly become the poster boys for pitch counts and stuff we don't want to be known for. I'm glad it didn't get to that point.

"We have a plan," Sox general manager Theo Epstein said last night. "We're not necessarily going to articulate it [publicly]. This [no-hitter] can't change that. We've got to do what's right for the team and for Clay for the long term.Last night was the first time this season Buchholz had pitched past the seventh inning. In eight starts with Triple A Pawtucket after being promoted from Double A Portland July 12, he threw as many as seven innings just once, and threw more than 90 pitches just twice. In 15 starts for the Sea Dogs, he threw as many as seven innings just twice. In all, he's thrown 140 1/3 innings on three professional levels, 15 with the Sox, including six in his big league debut Aug. 17.

I thought I read when he 1st came up that the Sox were capping his innings at 160 this season
So we have 100 pitches as the magic number, and now 160 innings as the rookie ceiling? I respect these guys for not riding these guys like government mules, but come on, these are also young, presumbably healthy, men. There to my knowledge, has been no history or threat of injury and when they could contribute, they are getting the hook. And my frustrtion here is born of seeing the Yankees do the same thing. Ian Kennedy hangs a pretty good game up yesterday, nothing elite or dominant, but a workmanlike outing that they've been lacking from that spot in the rotation but there's trepidation given his innings cap. Why are they locking into these seemingly arbitrary figures? If 100 pitches is good, isn't 80 better? If 160 innings is good, isn't 100 bettter? Better yet, if you don't pitch them at all, they'll never get hurt. And before the onslaught of the obvious, I'm not talking about 200 pitches and 300 inning seasons in their early 20's or at any point today realistically, but the market may over corrected.
 
Good Buchholz info---http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2007/09/02/team_will_be_patient_before_scheduling_date_for_encore/

Epstein said last night that Buchholz, who had not thrown more than 98 pitches in a game this season, would have been pulled from his no-hitter if his pitch count had reached 120 and he had batters left to face.....

"Tito called up a couple of times. We were talking about it. We knew that he hadn't thrown more than 98 pitches in a game . . . If we had taken this guy out, after 120 pitches with one out to go, we would have unwittingly become the poster boys for pitch counts and stuff we don't want to be known for. I'm glad it didn't get to that point.

"We have a plan," Sox general manager Theo Epstein said last night. "We're not necessarily going to articulate it [publicly]. This [no-hitter] can't change that. We've got to do what's right for the team and for Clay for the long term.Last night was the first time this season Buchholz had pitched past the seventh inning. In eight starts with Triple A Pawtucket after being promoted from Double A Portland July 12, he threw as many as seven innings just once, and threw more than 90 pitches just twice. In 15 starts for the Sea Dogs, he threw as many as seven innings just twice. In all, he's thrown 140 1/3 innings on three professional levels, 15 with the Sox, including six in his big league debut Aug. 17.

I thought I read when he 1st came up that the Sox were capping his innings at 160 this season
So we have 100 pitches as the magic number, and now 160 innings as the rookie ceiling? I respect these guys for not riding these guys like government mules, but come on, these are also young, presumbably healthy, men. There to my knowledge, has been no history or threat of injury and when they could contribute, they are getting the hook. And my frustrtion here is born of seeing the Yankees do the same thing. Ian Kennedy hangs a pretty good game up yesterday, nothing elite or dominant, but a workmanlike outing that they've been lacking from that spot in the rotation but there's trepidation given his innings cap. Why are they locking into these seemingly arbitrary figures? If 100 pitches is good, isn't 80 better? If 160 innings is good, isn't 100 bettter? Better yet, if you don't pitch them at all, they'll never get hurt. And before the onslaught of the obvious, I'm not talking about 200 pitches and 300 inning seasons in their early 20's or at any point today realistically, but the market may over corrected.
Well the current thinking as it relates to young pitchers and injuries is that you don't want to increase innings and pcs more than 10-15% from year to year. I have no clue if there is any real data to support that thinking, but that's what the vast majority of teams are doing these days. Call it a reaction to Prior and Wood.
 
Does anyone know if Ellsbury is supposed to see regular AB's while Manny is out?
yep, he will be seeing regular time both while Manny is out
I'm not trying to be a smartass, but could you explain the bolded sentence above? What do you mean by "both"? Is he going to see regular AB's both while Manny is injured and when he comes back? TIA
sorry...he will definitely see regular time with Manny out. My speculation is that he continues to see regular time even with Manny back as they give guys rest - speculation only though
 
btw, Ells in tonight

Line up

1. Julio Lugo, SS

2. Dustin Pedroia, 2B

3. David Ortiz, DH

4. Mike Lowell, 3B

5. J.D. Drew, RF

6. Kevin Youkilis, 1B

7. Jason Varitek, C

8. Coco Crisp, CF

9. Jacoby Ellsbury, LF

SP - Josh Beckett

 
Crisp-Ellsbury-Lugo hitting 8-9-1. I don't think the Red Sox have EVER batted three guys in a row with that much speed in their entire team history.

 
Impressive last couple of days for Sox Rookies:

Saturday Bucholz throws a no hitter in his 2nd MLB appearance

Today Ellsbury is a double short of the Cycle in just his 11th MLB Game.... moving his average over .450 and OPS well over 1.000

:goodposting:

Papelbon

Lester

Youkilis

Pedroia

Bucholz

Ellsbury

all homegrown.... and stacked on top of Beckett & Matsuzaka (both in low/mid 20s) at the top of the rotation.

:rolleyes:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top