What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

There is ZERO chance Lebron James returns to Cleveland (1 Viewer)

Rose - James

Noah

Deng - Gibson

Say hello to the next Bulls dynasty.
I'm almost certain this will happen. These guys are young enough for the Bulls to be dominant for a long time. It just makes too much sense. Personally I think it's a better fit than a DWade/Lebron or Lebron/Bosh and nobody squad. That being said, the 5M exception guys would be all over following those pairings.
Ray Allen?
 
Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't think Lebron makes as great a fit in CHI as others. Obviously, that would be a very good team and having Lebron/Rose/Noah would be great. A couple issues with the scenario though:1-I makes sense for Lebron to be on a team with great shooters. Bulls could acquire that, but they certainly don't have it right now. Hinrich would be a nice fit and Deng has a nice mid-range game, but I'm not sure who would be knocking down the 3-point opps that Lebron would create.2-Lebron and Rose would seem like 2 dominant late-game options and obviously, they'd be effective, but it'd be nice if one of the closers on the team could hit FT's at an 80% clip. 3-In general, I just don't see Lebron and Rose as a great fit. I think there's a reason you never see any of the great wing players (like MJ, Kobe, Wade, or Lebron) playing with elite PGs. A great PG needs the ball in his hands and a great wing player will take it out of their hands. I don't think it makes sense for the 2nd best player on Lebron's team to be a PG. Lebron and Rose would cancel each other out more than they'd complement each other, imo.4-I love Noah as a fit with Lebron, but a big that can score a little would be nice. Bulls don't have that.5-Nothing to do with basketball, but I still just can't see Lebron being in a hurry to be in Jordan's shadow (any more than any great player already is).Like pretty much any team that got Lebron, the Bulls would be really good with him. I don't think it's a perfect fit though.
:tfp: Got me re-thinking my stance on this..
 
Rose - James

Noah

Deng - Gibson

Say hello to the next Bulls dynasty.
I'm almost certain this will happen. These guys are young enough for the Bulls to be dominant for a long time. It just makes too much sense. Personally I think it's a better fit than a DWade/Lebron or Lebron/Bosh and nobody squad. That being said, the 5M exception guys would be all over following those pairings.
Ray Allen?
I do not believe you can use the $5million dollar exception when you start the FA period already under the cap. This scenario has been shot down by guys following the Knicks repeatedly. Having said that the Bulls can certainly do a sign a trade with Deng involved for someone like Joe Johnson if they want a shooter.
 
Cleveland has had alot of time to surround Lebron James with talent. But so far, they have failed to do so. I've never heard Lebron complain ONE TIME..but he'll show his displeasure by booking the first flight out of town.
Really? Really??? LeBron is the problem. NOT the city of Cleveland. How can you say he isn't surrounded by a solid cast of players. This is the most ignorant statement people are making. Earth to everybody:THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.The Cavs lost because:1. their coach sucks2. LeBron gave up in game 5 and pouted. He didn't try at all. Maybe I am wrong, but it seemed like he didn't give a crap. He would just jog around, take half assed shots and not even hustle. He did better in game 6, but it was too late.3. LeBron cares more about his "legacy" and "brand" than winning championships, and that rubs me the wrong way. He was "annointed" the "King" is such bullcrap, it makes me sick. HE HAS DONE NOTHING TO DESERVE THAT TITTLE! The NBA and media suck this guys dong and he hasn't done squat.He isn't a pimple on Michael Jordon's butt. At least he shook the hands of the Celtic players this year, unlike last year with the Magic. The fans of Cleveland aren't spoiled, Lebron James is spoiled. He has been spoiled ever since he walked into the league, by the media and the NBA and now it is catching up to him.Why should he care? He has millions of dollars and he didn't even need to play one game? All sports pay the young guys, who haven't accomplished crap, way too much money and it spoils them.
How many games do you think the Cavs would have won this year without Lebron?
 
Chad Ford thinks the Bulls are going to offer Cleveland a sign and trade if LeBron wants to go to Chicago. The Bulls would send Deng and cap filler to Cleveland for LeBron, allowing them to retain the cap space to go after another max-contract player (Wade? Bosh?)Rose - Wade - Noah - James - GibsonRose - Hinrich - Noah - James - Bosh
why would the cavs do this?here lebron, you can leave, and get the extra 30 mil AND we'll help your new team with cap spacescrew thati'd tell him, go to chicago, get 30 mil less, and no they will not sign a max contract player. Or stay here with and make 30 mil more.
 
Chad Ford thinks the Bulls are going to offer Cleveland a sign and trade if LeBron wants to go to Chicago. The Bulls would send Deng and cap filler to Cleveland for LeBron, allowing them to retain the cap space to go after another max-contract player (Wade? Bosh?)Rose - Wade - Noah - James - GibsonRose - Hinrich - Noah - James - Bosh
why would the cavs do this?here lebron, you can leave, and get the extra 30 mil AND we'll help your new team with cap spacescrew thati'd tell him, go to chicago, get 30 mil less, and no they will not sign a max contract player. Or stay here with and make 30 mil more.
What if LeBron decides he's headed to Chicago? Would the Cavs prefer to get Deng back for him, or watch James leave for nothing and hope they can use the cap space to lure free agents to a 15-67 team in Cleveland? If they want something back rather than watching James leave for nothing, they have to agree to a sign and trade, and they have to take enough salary back to make it work under the NBA rules.
 
Rose - JamesNoahDeng - GibsonSay hello to the next Bulls dynasty.
I'm almost certain this will happen. These guys are young enough for the Bulls to be dominant for a long time. It just makes too much sense. Personally I think it's a better fit than a DWade/Lebron or Lebron/Bosh and nobody squad. That being said, the 5M exception guys would be all over following those pairings.
i'll say this again: the coach matters. if the bulls hire some other schlub then i don't think anything major happens. lebron and wade want to win. the money only matters so much.
 
i dont think Cleveland would EVER do a sign and trade for Lebron.

The fan base will never forgive them for "letting" Lebron go.

Management coming out with "See!! We got Luol Deng back!!" would only make things worse.

IMO, they're better off letting him go for nothing. The franchise is dead if he's gone anyway. They're not gonna help him get an additional 30 mil and give his new team the room to sign a 2nd max player as well.

 
Chad Ford thinks the Bulls are going to offer Cleveland a sign and trade if LeBron wants to go to Chicago. The Bulls would send Deng and cap filler to Cleveland for LeBron, allowing them to retain the cap space to go after another max-contract player (Wade? Bosh?)Rose - Wade - Noah - James - GibsonRose - Hinrich - Noah - James - Bosh
why would the cavs do this?here lebron, you can leave, and get the extra 30 mil AND we'll help your new team with cap spacescrew thati'd tell him, go to chicago, get 30 mil less, and no they will not sign a max contract player. Or stay here with and make 30 mil more.
What if LeBron decides he's headed to Chicago? Would the Cavs prefer to get Deng back for him, or watch James leave for nothing and hope they can use the cap space to lure free agents to a 15-67 team in Cleveland? If they want something back rather than watching James leave for nothing, they have to agree to a sign and trade, and they have to take enough salary back to make it work under the NBA rules.
what good will Deng do them? losing lebron is a disasterhey season ticket holders, look, DENG!they need to put all their cards behind keeping lebron, and if it fails they are screwed, deng won't fix that. Their biggest lever is an extra 30 mil, if they surrender that he is gone.
 
i dont think Cleveland would EVER do a sign and trade for Lebron.The fan base will never forgive them for "letting" Lebron go. Management coming out with "See!! We got Luol Deng back!!" would only make things worse.IMO, they're better off letting him go for nothing. The franchise is dead if he's gone anyway. They're not gonna help him get an additional 30 mil and give his new team the room to sign a 2nd max player as well.
that's where i amit looks worse to trade, it looks like they are letting him go and giving him 30mil
 
Chad Ford thinks the Bulls are going to offer Cleveland a sign and trade if LeBron wants to go to Chicago. The Bulls would send Deng and cap filler to Cleveland for LeBron, allowing them to retain the cap space to go after another max-contract player (Wade? Bosh?)
Even if Cleveland would agree to a sign-and-trade, they won't want to take on Deng's contract. I think that has a 0% chance of happening.
 
NJN will also have the cap room to sign a second max player if they want. The bench will have to be mostly minimum guys to fill out the roster, but bench players are easier to find than starters.If NJN draws #1 or #2 in the lottery, they will draft perimeter. If LeBron really does come to NJN, suddenly it's a desirable destination for a big.HarrisWall/TurnerLeBronBosh/Amare/BoozerLopezWith Courtney Lee and Terrence Williams as viable bench players. if NJN draws #3 or #4 in the lottery, the BPAs will be bigs. Then NJN could sign a perimeter player to fill out the starting five.HarrisJoe JohnsonLeBronFavors/CousinsLopezAgain with Lee and Williams as bench players. That first lineup wins the title next year. The second lineup probably needs to PF to mature a year or so to win a title, but it should win a playoff series and will improve.
:lmao: He'd also have a chance to build his own legacy instead of competing with Jordan's (I don't think there's any way he goes to Chicago) in the biggest market in the world. Plus they have a coaching opening, and money will be no object for the owner. Of all the things that have gone down in Cleveland, the owner griping about $100 million and no results is one that will stick in LeBron's craw. This Ruski sounds like the next best thing to Dr. Buss - guys like playing for owners like that.
 
As a mildly interested Lebron fan who has sub-par NBA knowledge, who are the big FA names this summer, aside from Lebron?

 
Cleveland has had alot of time to surround Lebron James with talent. But so far, they have failed to do so. I've never heard Lebron complain ONE TIME..but he'll show his displeasure by booking the first flight out of town.
Really? Really??? LeBron is the problem. NOT the city of Cleveland. How can you say he isn't surrounded by a solid cast of players. This is the most ignorant statement people are making. Earth to everybody:THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.The Cavs lost because:1. their coach sucks2. LeBron gave up in game 5 and pouted. He didn't try at all. Maybe I am wrong, but it seemed like he didn't give a crap. He would just jog around, take half assed shots and not even hustle. He did better in game 6, but it was too late.3. LeBron cares more about his "legacy" and "brand" than winning championships, and that rubs me the wrong way. He was "annointed" the "King" is such bullcrap, it makes me sick. HE HAS DONE NOTHING TO DESERVE THAT TITTLE! The NBA and media suck this guys dong and he hasn't done squat.He isn't a pimple on Michael Jordon's butt. At least he shook the hands of the Celtic players this year, unlike last year with the Magic. The fans of Cleveland aren't spoiled, Lebron James is spoiled. He has been spoiled ever since he walked into the league, by the media and the NBA and now it is catching up to him.Why should he care? He has millions of dollars and he didn't even need to play one game? All sports pay the young guys, who haven't accomplished crap, way too much money and it spoils them.
You are out of your mind. They had the best record the last two seasons because of Lebron. No other reason. You take Lebron away from that cast of misfits and they instantly win 20-25 games. He makes that much of a difference.You are correct that their coach sucks, and Lebron definetely didn't seem himself the last two games. Elbow? Or is he on his way out?And I never said the city of Cleveland was at fault. I said the organization is at fault. They had this guy for 7 years and never once made a serious attempt to surround him with elite talent OR a good coach.
 
It'd be kind of cool if LeBron signed a one year deal and then signed with a new team to a one year deal the next. Especially if it was a young team on the rise that he could vault to a title.

Just keep signing one year deals around the league, and let each year have that "who will LeBron sign with?" mystery.

His big money comes off the court anyway.

 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
 
Since there are some cap experts in here, I have a question regarding the Cavs.

If they were able to re-sign Lebron, can they offer any of the other top free agents?

 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
Because it's not true.In regular season basketball, half the teams are up and down from night to night. Lebron has become Jordan-like in his ferocious play day in and day out. He is so good that the lesser teams don't have a chance at beating the Cavs with James. He just destroys bad teams and bad matchups. The other players benefit from his passing and the attention he gets from the other teams. Parker can hit threes. Can he create his own shot? No. Mo Williams is streaky, but is he a great passer? No. He's an average PG. Shaq and Big Z are both old, slow and basically worthless. Watching Shaq in the playoffs was painful. A complete shell of his former self.Varejao is a lunchpail guy, but provides nothing in the way of an offensive spark.The point is, if you take Lebron off that team..Honestly, how many games do you think they win? If you say anything over 30, I say you are DREAMING. Without Lebron, I honestly don't see how they score over 80 points a night.
 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
Because it's not true.In regular season basketball, half the teams are up and down from night to night. Lebron has become Jordan-like in his ferocious play day in and day out. He is so good that the lesser teams don't have a chance at beating the Cavs with James. He just destroys bad teams and bad matchups. The other players benefit from his passing and the attention he gets from the other teams. Parker can hit threes. Can he create his own shot? No. Mo Williams is streaky, but is he a great passer? No. He's an average PG. Shaq and Big Z are both old, slow and basically worthless. Watching Shaq in the playoffs was painful. A complete shell of his former self.Varejao is a lunchpail guy, but provides nothing in the way of an offensive spark.The point is, if you take Lebron off that team..Honestly, how many games do you think they win? If you say anything over 30, I say you are DREAMING. Without Lebron, I honestly don't see how they score over 80 points a night.
Do you take LeBron off the team and replace him with another big money contract though?
 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
Because it's not true.In regular season basketball, half the teams are up and down from night to night. Lebron has become Jordan-like in his ferocious play day in and day out. He is so good that the lesser teams don't have a chance at beating the Cavs with James. He just destroys bad teams and bad matchups. The other players benefit from his passing and the attention he gets from the other teams. Parker can hit threes. Can he create his own shot? No. Mo Williams is streaky, but is he a great passer? No. He's an average PG. Shaq and Big Z are both old, slow and basically worthless. Watching Shaq in the playoffs was painful. A complete shell of his former self.Varejao is a lunchpail guy, but provides nothing in the way of an offensive spark.The point is, if you take Lebron off that team..Honestly, how many games do you think they win? If you say anything over 30, I say you are DREAMING. Without Lebron, I honestly don't see how they score over 80 points a night.
Do you take LeBron off the team and replace him with another big money contract though?
Via trade? Who signs in Cleveland w/o LeBron there?
 
It's true that, in the final assessment, regular season doesn't matter. Playoffs are the only measuring stick in the NBA. But that doesn't mean that an assessment made now should be diametrically opposed to assessments made during the regular season, or even during the playoffs previously. The fact is this: up until Tuesday night, the majority of NBA players, coaches, and writers asserted that the Cleveland Cavaliers were the best team in the NBA. They were considered a much better team, for example, than the Cavalier team that went to the Finals against the Spurs a few years back. That team, even when it was winning, was considered a one-man squad. This current team was not, and it's only now that they've lost twice in a row in the playoffs that suddenly they also are a one man team. It's revisionism, and I reject it.

The Cleveland Cavaliers are a better team than the Boston Celtics. They are a better team than the Orlando Magic. They are quite possibly a better team than the Lakers. They lost because LeBron played poorly in the 4th quarter of game 4, in all of game 5, and in game 6, and because Mo Williams did not play well in games 4 and 5. They also lost because their coach made awful decisions regarding substitutions. I think that LeBron played poorly due to injury, though we may never know the truth.

If LeBron returns to Cleveland, the Cavaliers will still be one of the 2-3 best teams in basketball, and with the addition of a quality shooter (Joe Johnson? Ray Allen, even?) that might be enough to get him over the top. Because it takes a while, usually, for team chemistry to gel, I am not convinced that if he chooses to leave he will be any closer to a championship anytime soon than he is right now. Therefore, it seems to me that the possibility of him sticking around is still pretty good at this point.

 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
Because it's not true.In regular season basketball, half the teams are up and down from night to night. Lebron has become Jordan-like in his ferocious play day in and day out. He is so good that the lesser teams don't have a chance at beating the Cavs with James. He just destroys bad teams and bad matchups. The other players benefit from his passing and the attention he gets from the other teams. Parker can hit threes. Can he create his own shot? No. Mo Williams is streaky, but is he a great passer? No. He's an average PG. Shaq and Big Z are both old, slow and basically worthless. Watching Shaq in the playoffs was painful. A complete shell of his former self.Varejao is a lunchpail guy, but provides nothing in the way of an offensive spark.The point is, if you take Lebron off that team..Honestly, how many games do you think they win? If you say anything over 30, I say you are DREAMING. Without Lebron, I honestly don't see how they score over 80 points a night.
Do you take LeBron off the team and replace him with another big money contract though?
Via trade? Who signs in Cleveland w/o LeBron there?
No Im asking how much better does LeBron make the Cavs than say someone like Kobe or Wade or Bosh? Cuz you cant just say "imagine the Cavs without LeBron" since most NBA teams have at least one good star (even the Nets had Harris & Lopez).
 
It's true that, in the final assessment, regular season doesn't matter. Playoffs are the only measuring stick in the NBA. But that doesn't mean that an assessment made now should be diametrically opposed to assessments made during the regular season, or even during the playoffs previously. The fact is this: up until Tuesday night, the majority of NBA players, coaches, and writers asserted that the Cleveland Cavaliers were the best team in the NBA. They were considered a much better team, for example, than the Cavalier team that went to the Finals against the Spurs a few years back. That team, even when it was winning, was considered a one-man squad. This current team was not, and it's only now that they've lost twice in a row in the playoffs that suddenly they also are a one man team. It's revisionism, and I reject it.

The Cleveland Cavaliers are a better team than the Boston Celtics. They are a better team than the Orlando Magic. They are quite possibly a better team than the Lakers. They lost because LeBron played poorly in the 4th quarter of game 4, in all of game 5, and in game 6, and because Mo Williams did not play well in games 4 and 5. They also lost because their coach made awful decisions regarding substitutions. I think that LeBron played poorly due to injury, though we may never know the truth.
Dude, you're just ####### wrong. Plenty of people were questioning who the best team was before this series ended. Orlando looks fantastic and has throughout the 2nd half of the season. Besides that there were several people who could see the flaws the Cavs had even during the regular season (go check the NBA season thread for starters) - turns out they (we) were right.
 
No Im asking how much better does LeBron make the Cavs than say someone like Kobe or Wade or Bosh? Cuz you cant just say "imagine the Cavs without LeBron" since most NBA teams have at least one good star (even the Nets had Harris & Lopez).
It just seems like a weird hypothetical - those guys would never be there unless they were drafted by Cle. But to play along the Cavs probably end up in roughly the same place, maybe with 5-10 less wins in the regular season and getting bounced in the 2nd round.
 
THE CAVS HAD THE BEST REGULAR SEASON RECORD THAT LAST 2 SEASONS!!!You do not get that accomplishment by having a sub par supporting cast.
I made this exact same comment last night and was told I should stop talking about hoops because I knew nothing about it.
Because it's not true.In regular season basketball, half the teams are up and down from night to night. Lebron has become Jordan-like in his ferocious play day in and day out. He is so good that the lesser teams don't have a chance at beating the Cavs with James. He just destroys bad teams and bad matchups. The other players benefit from his passing and the attention he gets from the other teams. Parker can hit threes. Can he create his own shot? No. Mo Williams is streaky, but is he a great passer? No. He's an average PG. Shaq and Big Z are both old, slow and basically worthless. Watching Shaq in the playoffs was painful. A complete shell of his former self.Varejao is a lunchpail guy, but provides nothing in the way of an offensive spark.The point is, if you take Lebron off that team..Honestly, how many games do you think they win? If you say anything over 30, I say you are DREAMING. Without Lebron, I honestly don't see how they score over 80 points a night.
My main point is that LeBron is the typical "today's spoiled athlete" that gets spoon fed his "legacy" before he makes anything of himself. He only cares about himself. Just look at his performances in the playoffs. He is not a leader. When things don't go his way, he pouts and doesn't try. You think Jordon did this? Bird? Magic? Hell no. Those guys were leaders. They would get in the face of their teammates and call them out. James just mopes around, like he did in game 5, and not care because "nobody on my team can guard Rondo".LeBron cares about his image first and basketball second. When he can go play for his boyz in Jersey. Is James talented? Heck yeah. He has gotten through his life so far on pure talent, but to win an NBA championship, it takes more than talent, which LeBron does not have right now.His supporting cast was more than good enough to win him a championship this season. Was it the best supporting cast in league history? No. But to win the most regular season games in 2 straight years, it is ridiculous to say he didn't have a solid supporting cast.
 
Do you guys think this will change things?

Wizards fans like myself had to endure years of Cleveland fans ruining every single discussion of Wizards basketball anywhere on the internet with taunts about playoff series and Gilbert's missed free throws and general boasting as if winning the 2003 NBA Draft Lottery was the equivalent of winning the Finals. I mean, these people would go into the comments section of Washington Post discussions of Wiz draft options and talk trash. So last night was so, so, so very sweet for me. But it was enough. I feel bad for them now. I hope he stays.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's true that, in the final assessment, regular season doesn't matter. Playoffs are the only measuring stick in the NBA. But that doesn't mean that an assessment made now should be diametrically opposed to assessments made during the regular season, or even during the playoffs previously. The fact is this: up until Tuesday night, the majority of NBA players, coaches, and writers asserted that the Cleveland Cavaliers were the best team in the NBA. They were considered a much better team, for example, than the Cavalier team that went to the Finals against the Spurs a few years back. That team, even when it was winning, was considered a one-man squad. This current team was not, and it's only now that they've lost twice in a row in the playoffs that suddenly they also are a one man team. It's revisionism, and I reject it.

The Cleveland Cavaliers are a better team than the Boston Celtics. They are a better team than the Orlando Magic. They are quite possibly a better team than the Lakers. They lost because LeBron played poorly in the 4th quarter of game 4, in all of game 5, and in game 6, and because Mo Williams did not play well in games 4 and 5. They also lost because their coach made awful decisions regarding substitutions. I think that LeBron played poorly due to injury, though we may never know the truth.

If LeBron returns to Cleveland, the Cavaliers will still be one of the 2-3 best teams in basketball, and with the addition of a quality shooter (Joe Johnson? Ray Allen, even?) that might be enough to get him over the top. Because it takes a while, usually, for team chemistry to gel, I am not convinced that if he chooses to leave he will be any closer to a championship anytime soon than he is right now. Therefore, it seems to me that the possibility of him sticking around is still pretty good at this point.
A lot of experts like the Celtics over the Cavs if KG was healthy.
 
Since there are some cap experts in here, I have a question regarding the Cavs.If they were able to re-sign Lebron, can they offer any of the other top free agents?
CLE is a little more than $9MM over the 2011 cap right now. I think they can offer the MLE this summer, but the top dogs will command a lot more money than that. Teams can re-sign their own FAs and go over the cap, but a placeholder prevents teams from signing other teams' FAs away before re-signing their own. For example, if LeBron opts out of his contract, CLE's rights to re-sign LeBron (and offer a longer contract and more money) are still a big cap hit against CLE, something in the $15-17MM range. So while CLE would not have LeBron under contract while negotiating with him, the negotiations prevent CLE from signing a player for $8-9MM even though the guaranteed salaries suggest they would have the room.CLE was projected to be under the cap earlier this season. CLE was managing their cap with the plan to offer a big money FA while re-signing LeBron. But when league revenues dropped, the 2011 cap dropped, and the number CLE could offer a FA dropped. So they opted out of the 2010 FA class, and traded for Antawn Jamison instead.
Pretty much what Ferris said. They could sign/trade for a Bosh let's say while keeping Lebron. That's alot more realistic imo than a Cavs/Bulls sign/trade with Lebron, I see zero potential to that.
 
Suppose Cleveland had acquired Amare instead of Jamison, as almost happened. Anyone think it would have made a difference?

 
Suppose Cleveland had acquired Amare instead of Jamison, as almost happened. Anyone think it would have made a difference?
Shaq and Amare is an awful combination. We saw that in Phoenix.That said, it couldn't have hurt. Jamison disappeared in the last few games of the playoffs this year anyway. Sometimes it's better just to have more talent even if it doesn't all fit together real well (See 2006 Miami Heat).But more importantly, Cleveland would've been in a much better long-term position. Amare would've given LeBron a reason to stick around. There's nothing really attractive about the Cavs going forward.
 
Suppose Cleveland had acquired Amare instead of Jamison, as almost happened. Anyone think it would have made a difference?
This year? Maybe, maybe not. However, long term it would have made a HUGE difference. LeBron likely stays in Cleveland with Amare as his sidekick going forward.
 
Chad Ford thinks the Bulls are going to offer Cleveland a sign and trade if LeBron wants to go to Chicago. The Bulls would send Deng and cap filler to Cleveland for LeBron, allowing them to retain the cap space to go after another max-contract player (Wade? Bosh?)Rose - Wade - Noah - James - GibsonRose - Hinrich - Noah - James - Bosh
why would the cavs do this?here lebron, you can leave, and get the extra 30 mil AND we'll help your new team with cap spacescrew thati'd tell him, go to chicago, get 30 mil less, and no they will not sign a max contract player. Or stay here with and make 30 mil more.
The real question is....would CLE want Deng and his bad contract? If I am CLE, I don't want Deng's contract. He's a good player, but not worth 12MM+. You lose Lebron, you're starting from scratch. Can't rebuild quickly if you have a bad contract on the books like Deng.
 
Suppose Cleveland had acquired Amare instead of Jamison, as almost happened. Anyone think it would have made a difference?
Shaq and Amare is an awful combination. We saw that in Phoenix.That said, it couldn't have hurt. Jamison disappeared in the last few games of the playoffs this year anyway. Sometimes it's better just to have more talent even if it doesn't all fit together real well (See 2006 Miami Heat).But more importantly, Cleveland would've been in a much better long-term position. Amare would've given LeBron a reason to stick around. There's nothing really attractive about the Cavs going forward.
did you see the video?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top