Yeah, I agree, that’s why i said this isn’t the same as when the other place went down in flames![]()
I suppose there's always something that could change but I don't anticipate much moving from the current state of the board.
We had two big changes in the last couple of years with the Political Threads removed from the FFA and moved to their own forum and the not allowing the who's hottest / hot pics / yoga pants with the commentary threads. But that was a while ago.
The Political Forum is still kind of rowdy but that's why we keep them "over there". Things seem like they've settled into being pretty "regular" here for a while and I don't anticipate any new changes unless you guys know something I don't know. Entirely possible.
Bottom line - I don't see much changing in the FFA for what it's been the last year or so. You may see that as a good thing or a bad thing. But I think that's pretty much what we have here.
does she post here?Maybe WW has become a silent own.....errr.....general manager.
matuski said:I still get a couple 24 hour timeouts a year like I always have. Same ole same ole.
I guess I never learn.
24 hour time out?Yea, my 24 hours are usually getting into off topic back and forths. I may or may not be guilty of some light trolling.
Never get into an ###-kicking contest.Seemed pretty excessive for my first offense in 12 years but I don't know what punishment fits the crime in here so I've no leg to stand on.
I guess they like me more than I thought they did.24 hour time out?
I've been contributing in here for well over decade. Clean as a whistle and my share of "likes" ...
just came back from my first "time out" .... 3+ months.for some insensitive humor.
Seemed pretty excessive for my first offense in 12 years but I don't know what punishment fits the crime in here so I've no leg to stand on.
I'm reluctant to post at this point.
I had to read it twice, but you did say "boxers". I think you are OK.Watch me wake up to a timeout![]()
Meh, that's nothing. I got a week for calling out members of congress for enabling Trump. I guess it was taken out of context and the mod thought i was calling out Trump defenders here. I was listening to and commenting about a congressional hearing though. It was pretty obvious if you looked at the context of the thread.What's sad is, I meant to type "...you're being an idiot", but in my haste typed "...you're an idiot." Not sure how much it would have mattered, but I might be the first person on this board to get a timeout because of a grammatical error.Water under the bridge and I'm not complaining. I just brought it up because I thought it was funny. If you go back and read what I wrote, it makes much more sense if you have the word 'being' in there.
That 'being' might have at least shaved 6 days off the timeout, now that I know about this 24 hour timeout thingy. Thanks a lot, Trump.![]()
I've seen permanent bans for mentioning that the test forum used to exist. And responding "Yes" to the question, 'Did Robin Williams do drugs?'
That doesn't sound right. When was this?I think it would be a lot cooler/funnier if you changed your avatar from the generic F to a police car with flashing lights.That doesn't sound right. When was this?
How have you "seen" that? Do you have moderator access so you're able to see what people post and are suspended for?
Or better, please let's not turn this into the ancient version of the PSF Moderation thread.
I was listening to Sam Cooke’s Bring It on Home to Me recently. I love that song but a lyric jumped out at me while listening to it that this thread reminded me of:We still use the term slave drive for some of our hardware equipment,... bunch of racists
I don’t believe youI've seen permanent bans for mentioning that the test forum used to exist. And responding "Yes" to the question, 'Did Robin Williams do drugs?'
I guess I'm dead now
I just mentioned the TF a couple days ago but I somehow survived.I don’t believe you
Pretending for a moment that this isn't a one-thread board (I spend all my time in the 10K thread), I'd be happy to jump into a union-bashing thread. Monopoly on labour supply, drives inefficiency, kills companies, etc, etc.I belong to union and remember when unions used to be unmercifully bashed here, now we are rising again with the socialist dems and supported here too.![]()
Something from Police Squad would be nice.I think it would be a lot cooler/funnier if you changed your avatar from the generic F to a police car with flashing lights.
This aint your grandpas board anymore. With new leaders like AOC following the Bernie Sanders mold unions will rise again.Pretending for a moment that this isn't a one-thread board (I spend all my time in the 10K thread), I'd be happy to jump into a union-bashing thread. Monopoly on labour supply, drives inefficiency, kills companies, etc, etc.
Also happy to jump into a corporate governance thread (income inequality, old boys' club, etc, etc).
But for now I'll go back to talking about cadence, poop, and the weather. In the 10K thread.
You got 3 months for excessive humor! Wow I'd love to know what that was but I guess we'll never know since 3 months was given. That's crazy.24 hour time out?
I've been contributing in here for well over decade. Clean as a whistle and my share of "likes" ...
just came back from my first "time out" .... 3+ months.for some insensitive humor.
Seemed pretty excessive for my first offense in 12 years but I don't know what punishment fits the crime in here so I've no leg to stand on.
I'm reluctant to post at this point.
it seems a little hypocritical to allow it to be rowdy "over there".....and yet over in other forums when there is some back and forth, disagreements, and discussion about things that end up calling people out for being wrong (or right in some cases), posts are deleted and suspensions are given.....Joe Bryant said:![]()
I suppose there's always something that could change but I don't anticipate much moving from the current state of the board.
We had two big changes in the last couple of years with the Political Threads removed from the FFA and moved to their own forum and the not allowing the who's hottest / hot pics / yoga pants with the commentary threads. But that was a while ago.
The Political Forum is still kind of rowdy but that's why we keep them "over there". Things seem like they've settled into being pretty "regular" here for a while and I don't anticipate any new changes unless you guys know something I don't know. Entirely possible.
Bottom line - I don't see much changing in the FFA for what it's been the last year or so. You may see that as a good thing or a bad thing. But I think that's pretty much what we have here.
This is a perfect example of the guys who claim how unfair the moderating is and how they were unfairly punished for "just being funny." And usually, there isn't anyone that has the real story.Bossman said:24 hour time out?
I've been contributing in here for well over decade. Clean as a whistle and my share of "likes" ...
just came back from my first "time out" .... 3+ months.for some insensitive humor.
Seemed pretty excessive for my first offense in 12 years but I don't know what punishment fits the crime in here so I've no leg to stand on.
I'm reluctant to post at this point.
what do you tell a woman with 5 black eyes that's blocking your car?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
nothing, .... because you already told her 5 times.
...
(too soon?)
This is a perfect example of the guys who claim how unfair the moderating is and how they were unfairly punished for "just being funny." And usually, there isn't anyone that has the real story.
Looking at the report log, you were suspended back in March.
You posted in a thread where the topic was about a woman who was beaten by a man in a parking lot.
Video shows man violently beating woman for blocking his car in parking lot
You posted:
If you think your suspension was excessive, find a new board.
This is a perfect example of the guys who claim how unfair the moderating is and how they were unfairly punished for "just being funny." And usually, there isn't anyone that has the real story.
Looking at the report log, you were suspended back in March.
You posted in a thread where the topic was about a woman who was beaten by a man in a parking lot.
Video shows man violently beating woman for blocking his car in parking lot
You posted:
If you think your suspension was excessive, find a new board.
Or, just proves a point that this board policies have gotten ridiculously tight and inconsistent.![]()
Literally.
Hi @CGRdrJoeOr, just proves a point that this board policies have gotten ridiculously tight and inconsistent.
what do you tell a woman with 5 black eyes that's blocking your car?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
nothing, .... because you already told her 5 times.
...
(too soon?)
We had a good discussion at work this morning about whether you’d stay in a marathon if you were in the lead when diarrhea struck. Finish the race with race with diarrhea streaming down your legs like Uta Pippig at Boston in ‘96 or leave the race to tend to business?Zasada said:But for now I'll go back to talking about cadence, poop, and the weather. In the 10K thread.
I think the timeout is consistent. Have no idea about how the length of timeouts work, so can't comment there.Hi @CGRdrJoe
Making sure I understand you.
Are you saying a poster seeing a 90 suspension for replying in the video thread where a guy beat a woman with five haymaker style punches after he posted this is ridiculously tight and inconsistent?
Honestly, that discussion sounds the opposite of solid. :XWe had a good discussion at work this morning about whether you’d stay in a marathon if you were in the lead when diarrhea struck. Finish the race with race with diarrhea streaming down your legs like Uta Pippig at Boston in ‘96 or leave the race to tend to business?
Three of my coworkers would immediately drop out, but another lady and myself are finishing that damn race.
Solid workplace discussion.
Do you consider intent when moderating?Hi @CGRdrJoe
Making sure I understand you.
Are you saying a poster seeing a 90 suspension for replying in the video thread where a guy beat a woman with five haymaker style punches after he posted this is ridiculously tight and inconsistent?
yes, as I think the direct insults that people post to each other on this site are far more degrading. This was a poor attempt at humor that has been said countless times by comedians on their multi million dollar Netflix specials. I would think that if something like this warrants a 90 day suspension then the personal insults that get flung here should be worth way more. I'm not saying what he said didn't deserve a timeout just the sentence of the crime seems inconsistent with what else goes on here.Hi @CGRdrJoe
Making sure I understand you.
Are you saying a poster seeing a 90 suspension for replying in the video thread where a guy beat a woman with five haymaker style punches after he posted this is ridiculously tight and inconsistent?
yes, that was my point.Do you consider intent when moderating?
Because, to me, that post was not serious. It was intended as an intentionally bad joke meant to illicit a combo of shock/laughs. Basically like a poor-man’s Louis CK joke.
Please do not post the phrase “used crotch.” TIA.Damn, you just used crotch in a post! A banning is coming!
Hoo, boy. When you find out how people feel about Louis CK now, you’re going to want to revise your example here.Do you consider intent when moderating?
Because, to me, that post was not serious. It was intended as an intentionally bad joke meant to illicit a combo of shock/laughs. Basically like a poor-man’s Louis CK joke.
Liquid workplace discussion.Honestly, that discussion sounds the opposite of solid. :X
This isn't going to be a whatabout.yes, as I think the direct insults that people post to each other on this site are far more degrading. This was a poor attempt at humor that has been said countless times by comedians on their multi million dollar Netflix specials. I would think that if something like this warrants a 90 day suspension then the personal insults that get flung here should be worth way more. I'm not saying what he said didn't deserve a timeout just the sentence of the crime seems inconsistent with what else goes on here.
Right. I would've gone with someone much less controversial. Like a poor-man's Bill Cosby.Hoo, boy. When you find out how people feel about Louis CK now, you’re going to want to revise your example here.
If I thought he was even the slightest bit serious, he'd have been permabanned instantly.Do you consider intent when moderating?
Because, to me, that post was not serious. It was intended as an intentionally bad joke meant to illicit a combo of shock/laughs. Basically like a poor-man’s Louis CK joke.
Maybe a movie reference, like whoever produced Clerks or something.Right. I would've gone with someone much less controversial. Like a poor-man's Bill Cosby.
TheIronShakesI can't believe I had no idea there were timeouts that lasted 3 months. I now understand why people have aliases around here.
I should really think about getting an alias. I was having withdrawal shakes by Day 6.
@Henry Ford are these guys just trolling me?Hoo, boy. When you find out how people feel about Louis CK now, you’re going to want to revise your example here.
I don’t think so. I think they’re just having a lighthearted discussion with punctuated moments of forgetting some famous people have been discovered to be horrible.@Henry Ford are these guys just trolling me?
I dont think so. Intent is everything and it can be jarring to get a long ban for something said tongue in cheek or in jest. A good example is how I often use humor to deal with tragedy and loss. It's as legit a way to deal with tragedy as anything else, but it often comes across as crass or tasteless on the internet. I've learned to rein it in a bit on the internet.@Henry Ford are these guys just trolling me?
I'm too old to troll, I've been here since ole yeller and sometimes I feel like it's my first day here...@Henry Ford are these guys just trolling me?
Guys that can't quite fit into a seat on an airplane seat?Maybe a movie reference, like whoever produced Clerks or something.
I don’t think Weinstein was that big at that point, was he?Guys that can't quite fit into a seat on an airplane?