matuski
Footballguy
I think your explanation of it comes off as a little odd.IvanKaramazov said:Rape exceptions are apparently barbaric. I was unaware of that until a few days ago.PatsWillWin said:Yikes.If it were entirely up to me, I wouldn't allow a "rape exception." I'm offering this to the other side magnanimously in the spirit of compromise. If you'd rather just dispense with that exception, fine with me.That's a barbaric idea. So women would have to prove that they were raped in order to get an abortion?I do have to grant you that this is an interesting consistency-check. My guess is that very few pro-life people really want to see getting-an-abortion prosecuted in the same way that they would want to see murder prosecuted. (For the record, I oppose the death penalty regardless, but I'm setting that aside because I get your point and don't want to derail things).I would hazard a guess that most people who are against abortion and classify it as murder would also believe that murder should be a capital crime.
Yet they probably wouldn't agree that the staggering number of women who have had an abortion should be rounded up and killed after proof of their murder was found. Why not?
My personal views on this are twofold. First, I actually do have a lot of sympathy for some women who find themselves in this spot, and while I would like to prevent them from doing something that I view as evil and inhumane, criminal prosecution seems to be a step too far. Second, I will give quit a bit of ground if we can just agree to outlaw most abortions and leave it at that. So, for example, I will agree not to prosecute women who have abortions, and I will also agree to allow abortions for rape/incest/healthofmother if you agree to outlaw elective abortions and shut down clinics that provide them. Maybe that's not philosophically ideal -- different folks might feel differently about some of those items -- but it would be a big improvement over the status quo from the standpoint of a pro-life person.![]()
I find it pretty awful that abortion is used as birth control in many cases.. but I can't see where you draw the line for many other cases. On the whole I think women should be able to make these choices for themselves, the catch is the obvious fact that many people are incapable of making good choices.
"Outlawing" abortions and shutting down women's health clinics certainly wouldn't help anything. It would really only accomplish making the procedure less safe for the women that will of course still have it done. In addition, you would be denying women the greater good that these clinics provide (abortions represent a small piece of the services offered). The rape/incest/health of mother exception would only make sense if you extend the list by about 3-4 dozen other awful circumstances that encompass all the ways one would argue makes the procedure the right choice. Notice you did not list the health of the baby. Even then you are arbitrarily drawing a line that would hurt many other women and children.