Since he left the Rams:
20 games, 4700 yards, 63% passing, 7.3 YPA, 17 TD's, 13 INT's.
Also, it's much easier to pass when you have a legitimate running game.
I honestly don't know what purpose it serves to include his horrible 2002 season when his thumb was injured.
You have two competing forces here, and usually the forces against the QB win.Against the QB:
Vast improvement of running game = less passing opportunities.
For the QB:
Improvement of the running game = increased efficiency.
Usually what you'd see is a guy passes less, and his efficiency stats like TD: INT ratio and YPA will go up.
So how much passing attempts will he lose and how much improved will his efficiency be?
Arizona was #1 in pass attempts in #32 in rush attempts.
Let's say, for instance, the addition of Edge costs Arizona 100 passing attempts, putting them at 570 (which is still top 3-5 any given year), which puts him right in line with DG's old Minnesota teams.
IF Kurt Warner stays healthy all year, you can say he gets 98% of the passing attempts, which puts him at 559 attempts.
559 attempts * 8.0 YPA = 4472 passing yards = 178 FP. In order for him to rank 3rd in 2005, he'd need another 116 FP or 29 TDs in a 4pt TD league and ZERO interceptions.
Assuming he only threw 10 INTs (3:1 ratio), that would drop him down to 5th last year. In Warner's best years with the Rams, he only exceeded a 2:1 ratio once. If Warner throws 30 TDs in 2006, he's throwing 20 INTs at least, which would drop him to 15th last year.
Of course, if you really think Warner's YPA will go back to his Rams level of 8.8+ and will throw for 4900ish yards he'd ONLY need 25 TDs with no INTs to crack top 3.