Publicity stunt?That was a really weird interview. Everything was going along just fine, and then Shapiro just snapped for apparently no reason. The abortion question that set him off wasn't particularly noteworthy and should have been easy to address if you're fluent on the issue.
Seems like an odd way to do a publicity stunt. He looked like a crybaby, unprepared and uninformed which are totally “offbrand” for him.Publicity stunt?
He doesn’t know it’s a damn show. He thinks it’s a damn fight!From what I've seen the Brits have a higher quality of serious journalism. I think Shapiro has just been made soft by whacking away at far left pincushions and living soft in the far right bubble. the BBC appears to be under the impression they're doing journalism not entertainment.
No. He took off his mike and ended the interview."... Shapiro Storms Out..." a bit of hyperbole, no?
How is it biased to ask him about things he supports and things he wrote in his book? And that guy is basically one of the most conservative people in the UK. The BBC constantly gets flack for having him on their programming due to his right leaning bias. Saying he's biased against conservatives is kind of laughable.I know mostly of Shapiro from an episode when he was on Rogan.
I watched the interview and thought he was fine. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/443138-ben-shapiro-ends-bbc-interview-scolds-host-im-popular-and-no-one-has-ever . Clearly it wasn't intended to be an interview but pulling old stuff out of context and having him defend it.
For sure he'd do better dropping the "I've never heard of you" shtick which can only come off as lame. Same for the BBC host who said the same. (I'm not sure how it would be possible he work in political broadcasting and never have heard of Shapiro but whatever). All in all, I'd call this nothing. If anything, something to rally his fans with how unfairly he's treated in an interview that would hopefully be less biased.![]()
I doubt the name Ben Shapiro is known world wide. Hell, I'd bet most of the people in Mexico or Canada have heard of him. Shapiro is definitely not on the upper echelon of world wide political figures. He has a podcast and a Youtube channel. He is on tv once in a while and get exposure through Youtube views. What British citizen, Mexican citizen or even American is going to seek out Ben Shapiro?I know mostly of Shapiro from an episode when he was on Rogan.
I watched the interview and thought he was fine. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/443138-ben-shapiro-ends-bbc-interview-scolds-host-im-popular-and-no-one-has-ever . Clearly it wasn't intended to be an interview but pulling old stuff out of context and having him defend it.
For sure he'd do better dropping the "I've never heard of you" shtick which can only come off as lame. Same for the BBC host who said the same. (I'm not sure how it would be possible he work in political broadcasting and never have heard of Shapiro but whatever). All in all, I'd call this nothing. If anything, something to rally his fans with how unfairly he's treated in an interview that would hopefully be less biased.![]()
Shapiro came off, to me, as defensive/on-edge through most of that interview.I know mostly of Shapiro from an episode when he was on Rogan.
I watched the interview and thought he was fine. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/443138-ben-shapiro-ends-bbc-interview-scolds-host-im-popular-and-no-one-has-ever . Clearly it wasn't intended to be an interview but pulling old stuff out of context and having him defend it.
For sure he'd do better dropping the "I've never heard of you" shtick which can only come off as lame. Same for the BBC host who said the same. (I'm not sure how it would be possible he work in political broadcasting and never have heard of Shapiro but whatever). All in all, I'd call this nothing. If anything, something to rally his fans with how unfairly he's treated in an interview that would hopefully be less biased.![]()
My guess is that he was being asked about things he said 10-15 years ago vs. what was in the book.How is it biased to ask him about things he supports and things he wrote in his book? And that guy is basically one of the most conservative people in the UK. The BBC constantly gets flack for having him on their programming due to his right leaning bias. Saying he's biased against conservatives is kind of laughable.
Shapiro goes after what he sees as liberal bias. He recently did an interview (can't recall which website) and he was described as part of the alt-right, which made Shapiro loose his head.No. He took off his mike and ended the interview.
Agreed. I just think he wasn't prepared for the questions/debate and reacted poorly.Seems like an odd way to do a publicity stunt. He looked like a crybaby, unprepared and uninformed which are totally “offbrand” for him.
He was asked what were the new plans coming from the right and he couldn't name one. He was asked about the 6 week abortion ban and attached laws like prosecuting women that go to another state that's when the freakout started, he was asked about something in his book and that's when he walked. So as far as I saw your guess wouldn't be accurate. Shapiro is an intellectual lightweight. Even Rogan ran him in circles as I recall. If this is the rights new intelligentsia they're in trouble.My guess is that he was being asked about things he said 10-15 years ago vs. what was in the book.
At what? Having a podcast?Max Power said:I typically like Ben, but he came of as a real wimp today.
He'd still crush AOC though
He's definitely not an intellectual lightweight even taking into account this poor showing. I don't think he liked questions about things he has said in the past, plus his incorrect view that was a liberal doing so. Clearly, the interview started badly for Shapiro and he never recovered. Bad moment, but you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment of his intelligence from my previous times hearing him.He was asked what were the new plans coming from the right and he couldn't name one. He was asked about the 6 week abortion ban and attached laws like prosecuting women that go to another state that's when the freakout started, he was asked about something in his book and that's when he walked. So as far as I saw your guess wouldn't be accurate. Shapiro is an intellectual lightweight. Even Rogan ran him in circles as I recall. If this is the rights new intelligentsia they're in trouble.
All I hear is a guy who talks fast and says little. What I saw was a guy who doesn't get challenged much and couldn't handle it when he was. Not impressed.He's definitely not an intellectual lightweight even taking into account this poor showing. I don't think he liked questions about things he has said in the past, plus his incorrect view that was a liberal doing so. Clearly, the interview started badly for Shapiro and he never recovered. Bad moment, but you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment of his intelligence from my previous times hearing him.
A bit rich from Mr. “Facts don’t care about your feelings”, no?My guess is that he was being asked about things he said 10-15 years ago vs. what was in the book.
Yeah, i don’t get the idea that Shapiro should get a free pass for blatantly racist comments from 10 years ago. He’s obviously free to say what he wants, but he makes his bones as a talking head, and part of that gig is you should have to own your past. At least it should be.How is it biased to ask him about things he supports and things he wrote in his book? And that guy is basically one of the most conservative people in the UK. The BBC constantly gets flack for having him on their programming due to his right leaning bias. Saying he's biased against conservatives is kind of laughable.
The BBC journalist asked him about the brand new Georgia abortion law and said he asks tough questions of his guests regardless of their politics and that’s what caused Shapiro to snap.My guess is that he was being asked about things he said 10-15 years ago vs. what was in the book.
The instant the journalist asked him a challenging question about abortion and used one tough language, Shapiro dismissed the entire interview as a liberal gotcha trap. He seems to have plenty of his own biases he needs to deal with.Shapiro goes after what he sees as liberal bias. He recently did an interview (can't recall which website) and he was described as part of the alt-right, which made Shapiro loose his head.
He also has gone after the media for defending some of the comments made as anti-Jewish, etc.
He’s debated Cenk and it’s readily available on YouTube. Cenk looks like an idiot, mostly because Cenk is an idiot.I haven’t seen him on TV/YT in any context except arguing against air either by himself or with a sympathetic tag team partner. Are there videos where he does debate against opponents?
And he would know ‘gotcha traps’ because that’s his entire brand.The BBC journalist asked him about the brand new Georgia abortion law and said he asks tough questions of his guests regardless of their politics and that’s what caused Shapiro to snap.
The instant the journalist asked him a challenging question about abortion and used one tough language, Shapiro dismissed the entire interview as a liberal gotcha trap. He seems to have plenty of his own biases he needs to deal with.
Not at all really.And he would know ‘gotcha traps’ because that’s his entire brand.
The interview turned when he asked about the Georgia abortion law and referred to it as barbaric. Shapiro refused to believe the interviewer was anything but a liberal.He’s debated Cenk and it’s readily available on YouTube. Cenk looks like an idiot, mostly because Cenk is an idiot.
ETA. I believe that some of the quotes that were brought up were quotes from 10 years ago that Shapiro himself has pointed out as “Dumb things I’ve said” or something like that. He has a running tally of mistakes he’s made over the years. I’d be annoyed if someone brought up a mistake I mad and owned up to years ago. It’s not really relevant to current discussion.
Right I don’t give him a pass on it (and I don’t think he gives himself one either). Just saying, the outburst or whatever was precluded by the interviewer bringing up other quotes that Shapiro himself has publicly stated he regrets saying as much as a decade ago. What is the goal of re-litigating them?The interview turned when he asked about the Georgia abortion law and referred to it as barbaric. Shapiro refused to believe the interviewer was anything but a liberal.
I’ll check out the conversation you referred to.
I am a big fan of Shapiro and thought he came off terrible.I know mostly of Shapiro from an episode when he was on Rogan.
I watched the interview and thought he was fine. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/443138-ben-shapiro-ends-bbc-interview-scolds-host-im-popular-and-no-one-has-ever . Clearly it wasn't intended to be an interview but pulling old stuff out of context and having him defend it.
For sure he'd do better dropping the "I've never heard of you" shtick which can only come off as lame. Same for the BBC host who said the same. (I'm not sure how it would be possible he work in political broadcasting and never have heard of Shapiro but whatever). All in all, I'd call this nothing. If anything, something to rally his fans with how unfairly he's treated in an interview that would hopefully be less biased.![]()
He was on Sam Harris’s podcast. Harris is a pretty tough debate opponent, IMO. (ETA: Harris was also on Shapiro’s show.)I haven’t seen him on TV/YT in any context except arguing against air either by himself or with a sympathetic tag team partner. Are there videos where he does debate against opponents?
The point was that Shapiro just wrote a book calling for more civility and less divisiveness in the public discourse, so the host was asking him about his own past uncivil, divisive statements.Right I don’t give him a pass on it (and I don’t think he gives himself one either). Just saying, the outburst or whatever was precluded by the interviewer bringing up other quotes that Shapiro himself has publicly stated he regrets saying as much as a decade ago. What is the goal of re-litigating them?
Maybe I need to rewatch it, I wasn’t paying full attention. I didn’t think any old statements were brought up before Shapiro shifted into “you are a liberal and the interviewer is politically biased against me”Right I don’t give him a pass on it (and I don’t think he gives himself one either). Just saying, the outburst or whatever was precluded by the interviewer bringing up other quotes that Shapiro himself has publicly stated he regrets saying as much as a decade ago. What is the goal of re-litigating them?
It's less about re-litigating the past and more about questioning and clarifying his current positions and motives.Right I don’t give him a pass on it (and I don’t think he gives himself one either). Just saying, the outburst or whatever was precluded by the interviewer bringing up other quotes that Shapiro himself has publicly stated he regrets saying as much as a decade ago. What is the goal of re-litigating them?
The little of I've seen of this guy hasn't impressed me much. It's certainly posssible he's matured and repented of the bigotry of his youth. If he has , that's good. The guy is famous enough that I know who he is but if I asked the next 10 people I I see if they know who he is, none of them would. He isn't really bringing anything new to the table that the mob of far right pundits in the media haven't already brought up.Yeah, i don’t get the idea that Shapiro should get a free pass for blatantly racist comments from 10 years ago. He’s obviously free to say what he wants, but he makes his bones as a talking head, and part of that gig is you should have to own your past. At least it should be.
No he isn't. If he was, he would have expressed opposition to the anti-BDS bills that have forced state employees to pledge an oath not to boycott Israel, or in Bahia Amawi's case, lose their jobs. It's the most blatant, clearcut first amendment violation going right now. He has said nothing about this because he is not principled on the issue of free speech.Shapiro is a champion of free speech and often pays tribute to the benefits of discussion and dialogue and a robust marketplace of ideas