You really think he would leave us all on the edge of our seats like that???I think he is done advertising asking this hypothetical.
This is why you are not a professional fantasy football player or an esteemed author of such books as "Drafting To Win: The Ultimate Guide To Fantasy Football"...I would take a solid OT or OG as the third option.
Just to reiterate.Hey guys -- all of us -- could we try to stay on topic here? The thread is about clock-management, and possible reasons for letting your allotted time expire.
Z-Men would probably help himself by posting what he actually did and then inviting comments, instead of making everybody guess. But that's up to him.
In the meantime, please keep any jokes you'd like to make over in the FFA.
Thanks.
signed,
The Squasher of Fun
Reiterating is not staying on topic...Just to reiterate.Hey guys -- all of us -- could we try to stay on topic here? The thread is about clock-management, and possible reasons for letting your allotted time expire.
Z-Men would probably help himself by posting what he actually did and then inviting comments, instead of making everybody guess. But that's up to him.
In the meantime, please keep any jokes you'd like to make over in the FFA.
Thanks.
signed,
The Squasher of Fun
I think this guy would probably sell a lot more books if he didn't come off so arrogant and treat everyone else as if they were 5 year olds. Seriously, if he would've followed MT's advice and just posted what he did and why, he might've got some good response and drummed up some interest in his product (assuming what he did made any sense). Instead, he's now being ridiculed all because he wants to stroke his ego, which I'm doubting will help his book sales.
I'll not have this type of drivel cluttering up the collection of poop threads and "who's hottest" polls. Thanks just the same.Time to move this to the FFA where it belongs.
At first, you were mildly amusing. Then I actually got to wonder WTF you were talking about.Hey guys, very sorry for delay, was on the road all day. Okay, so here's the third option every1 has been patiently waiting for -- the one I implemented in the 8th and 9th rounds of the 2003 World Championship of Fantasy Football:
Third Option: Something I call "clock management." Of course! I could pass on my turn to wait and see how several of my opponents draft after me before taking any action. I was under no pressure to draft a WR now because I had several at my disposal. I also felt safe in waiting to draft Garcia, at least until it was Team Two’s turn to pick.
So, my plan was to wait four picks before making any kind of decision, which was right before Team Two's pick. If, by that time, none of my WRs were drafted, then I would opt to pick up Garcia. This put me in a nice position to get one of the three WRs on the wrap-around because there would only be eight picks left before it was my turn again – a much better situation than taking Garcia now and having to wait 12 picks for one of the WRs to wrap around. Should one or more of the WRs be drafted before it was Tm2’s turn, then I’d have to make a judgment call before Tm2 made its selection. I’d have the same three options: I could take a WR, choose Garcia, or continue to stall. This I needed more time to think about, time I happened to have because I’m utilizing clock management.
So what were the results of this crazy strategic maneuver?
After I passed on my pick, the plan was on target, at least for a little while until something happened that I didn't expect. I had to improvise on my enigmatic plan if I were to achieve my ultimate goal of snagging Garcia and one of the receivers - an improvisation that I never knew I had in me until I was put under the pressure to make a quick-witted decision. All this came after one of my opponents did the unthinkable. ...
What happened and how did I counteract my opponents unusual actions??? Did I achieve my ultimate goal of getting Garcia and a WR??? . ...
Sorry, I can't spill all the beans! -z-
Ummm...ok, I'll simplifyo you count seconds in your head or do you rely upon an official "timekeeper"?Now I know exactly what you mean majorizin when you said I got enough trouble figuring out what jwvdcw is always on about. Funny stuff. -z-Z-Men, I've actually read your book(a bootleg copy that I read before the actual book came out actually). I enjoyed the first read so much that I sandpapered the edges down and read it a second time ....I have many thoughts, but I'll start with asking you a simple series of questions:
Would you advocate drafting without paying heed to your innermost timetable when it?
We understand perfectly well; you're trying to drum up interest in your book by pasting excerpts from chapter 12, while trying to disguise it as a discussion thread.Apparently this isn't being understood too well by some folks. Anyone out there with me on this? -z-
I'd suggest quit teasing and spill the beans. Then allow some of the better FF minds around here to critique your decision making. Or, we'll just wait until I get my copy of the book and I'll spill the beans about what you did.Apparently this isn't being understood too well by some folks. Anyone out there with me on this? -z-
Honestly, I think you're potential book sales are starting to head south with the number of people you're alienating with your elitist attitude.We understand perfectly well; you're trying to drum up interest in your book by pasting excerpts from chapter 12, while trying to disguise it as a discussion thread.Apparently this isn't being understood too well by some folks. Anyone out there with me on this? -z-
What? What was that? Who did they draft? Steve McNair! Ohhh, thank you football Gods! Thank you, thank you thank you!
Hindsight is always 20/20. But that's besides the goal I had which was to get one of the WRs and Garcia. -z-Tom Brady NEP 16 317 528 3,620 23 12
Steve McNair TEN 14 250 400 3,246 24 7
Jeff Garcia SFO 13 225 392 2,704 18 13
Chris Chambers MIA 16 64 963 11
Reggie Wayne IND 15 68 838 7
Joey Galloway DAL 13 34 672 2
But you picked the worst guy in both cases?
These situations also enabled me to draft the right players and earn a great deal of money,
Still, the counter argument would be why you didn't just take Jeff Garcia during your 8th round pick. What IF Garcia was picked by teams 3 through 6, then you just automatically lost out on one of the players you were targeting because you waited. There is a lot of downside and not a whole lot of upside if any to this strategy.Fellow footballguys are very tough. I'm up for the challenge. You either understand it or you don't. Let me throw a different perspective on things.
If any of the four teams behind me takes Garcia then there's no more strategizing. I don't lose either because I get one of my receivers. PICK: WIDE RECEIVER.
Suppose the teams directly behind quickly me snag two of my three WRs. Well, then I'd probably take the last remaining WR and hope Garcia falls. PICK: WIDE RECEIVER.
What if neither any of the WRs nor Garcia get taken before Team Two picks? In this case I'd take Garcia before Team Two, and I know there's a good chance one of the three WRs will fall to me being that there's only eight more picks before it's my turn again. PICK: JEFF GARCIA
Now the tricky scenario, the murky gray area, where the group of four teams behind me takes just one of my wide receivers and Garcia remains available. This is exactly what happened! So now I'm back to making a judgment call on whether to take Garcia, a WR, or just pass on my pick again.
Bottom line, I'm here to try and teach folks that sometimes by waiting on a pick it opens up doors and opportunities you otherwise wouldn't have. -z-
Here's your first error. Your receivers are not identical, and to fail to make a decision between them is to let other people run your draft. Predicting that Chambers, an up and coming young WR who was the undisputed #1 on his team, would outscore Galloway, an aging speedster who was the #2 receiver, and getting thrown to by Quincy Carter, should not have been difficult; by delaying your decision, you got stuck with the lesser player.Similarly, Steve McNair was coming off two straight #7 overall finishes, while Garcia had finished #10 in 2002 and had a new, less passing oriented coach that most observers felt was a downgrade. If you had mentioned at the start of this thread that McNair was available, the response would have been to take the best WR and whichever QB came around to you.If any of the four teams behind me takes Garcia then there's no more strategizing. I don't lose either because I get one of my receivers. PICK: WIDE RECEIVER.
You're assuming I valued Garcia more than the WRs -- in which case I would simply draft him in the 8th like you suggest.To make this clear, I valued Garcia equal to that of each of the three WRs. So, I was going to be happy to get any ONE of them but creatively made it a goal of trying to get BOTH QB and WR. Make sense? -z-Still, the counter argument would be why you didn't just take Jeff Garcia during your 8th round pick. What IF Garcia was picked by teams 3 through 6, then you just automatically lost out on one of the players you were targeting because you waited. There is a lot of downside and not a whole lot of upside if any to this strategy.
You make arguments that are in a different subject matter all together -- ranking players.What I'm suggesting is an entirely new point of view. ONe that most of you aren't used to. That is: viewing players as having equal value. If you're not comfortable with that then you couldn't, nor should you, utilize the clock managment strategy I'm suggesting. Rather, you should simply take the player who you rank of most value.Here's your first error. Your receivers are not identical, and to fail to make a decision between them is to let other people run your draft. Predicting that Chambers, an up and coming young WR who was the undisputed #1 on his team, would outscore Galloway, an aging speedster who was the #2 receiver, and getting thrown to by Quincy Carter, should not have been difficult; by delaying your decision, you got stuck with the lesser player.
Similarly, Steve McNair was coming off two straight #7 overall finishes, while Garcia had finished #10 in 2002 and had a new, less passing oriented coach that most observers felt was a downgrade. If you had mentioned at the start of this thread that McNair was available, the response would have been to take the best WR and whichever QB came around to you.
what radballs said. i dont see why you just dont take garcia and then hope one of your 3 wr comes back around. maybe i am dense, but i just dont see how you are controlling this situation by skipping your turn. you have to value garcia a little higher than any one of the 3 wr's because at this point you dont have a qb. guess you had to be there.You're assuming I valued Garcia more than the WRs -- in which case I would simply draft him in the 8th like you suggest.To make this clear, I valued Garcia equal to that of each of the three WRs. So, I was going to be happy to get any ONE of them but creatively made it a goal of trying to get BOTH QB and WR. Make sense? -z-Still, the counter argument would be why you didn't just take Jeff Garcia during your 8th round pick. What IF Garcia was picked by teams 3 through 6, then you just automatically lost out on one of the players you were targeting because you waited. There is a lot of downside and not a whole lot of upside if any to this strategy.
Not really. Who's to say teams 3 through 6 wouldn't take their QB2 while you are "waiting". Team 2 did with back to back QB picks in the 8th and 9th. Also, considering that you had three at one position and only one at another position that were equally ranked, it's a no brainer there to take the QB, especially since you didn't have one yet. The only reason you got your player in the 9th was because other people in the league didn't have Garcia ranked as high as you did.You're assuming I valued Garcia more than the WRs -- in which case I would simply draft him in the 8th like you suggest.To make this clear, I valued Garcia equal to that of each of the three WRs. So, I was going to be happy to get any ONE of them but creatively made it a goal of trying to get BOTH QB and WR. Make sense? -z-Still, the counter argument would be why you didn't just take Jeff Garcia during your 8th round pick. What IF Garcia was picked by teams 3 through 6, then you just automatically lost out on one of the players you were targeting because you waited. There is a lot of downside and not a whole lot of upside if any to this strategy.
They could have, albeit unlikely, taken a QB and if it so happened to be Garcia then I would take a WR, and the strategizing would end immediately. I wouldnt consider that a loss because, again, I'd be happy to get just either Garcia or one of my WRs in the first place. But I creatively made it my goal to increase my chances, even if the increase is slight, of getting both Garcia and one WR. -z-Who's to say teams 3 through 6 wouldn't take their QB2 while you are "waiting".
Congratulations. From where I stand, your 'creativity' had nothing to do with it. Garcia lasted past team 2 twice and Wayne didn't go to the 10th. What exactly did your 'creativity' accomplish?They could have, albeit unlikely, taken a QB and if it so happened to be Garcia then I would take a WR, and the strategizing would end immediately. I wouldnt consider that a loss because, again, I'd be happy to get just either Garcia or one of my WRs in the first place. But I creatively made it my goal to increase my chances, even if the increase is slight, of getting both Garcia and one WR. -z-Who's to say teams 3 through 6 wouldn't take their QB2 while you are "waiting".
There is great strategy and there is out thinking yourself. This is the out thinking yourself. By your own admission, you almost fired out Garcia but held your tongue. This is not a strategy, this is indecision. So you couldn't decide who to pick. Big deal, that isn't a great strategy.Guinness yummy. BRILLIANT!
Okay, now that I'm buzzed let's throw a drunken perspective on things: WRONG PICKS.
As you know, I value all four players equally so I'll be happy to get just one of the WRs or Garcia. I do not consider that a loss. But I creatively made it a goal to at least try and get both players. That you also know but since I'm buzzed I'm not only seeing double but writing it twice.
How does waiting improve my chances of accomplishing this goal? Lemme offer you this:
Let's say I take Garcia in the 8th round without waiting. If the next group of teams quickly pounce on my three WRs then obviously I failed my goal, and the better pick would have been to take a WR and hope Garcia fell. GARCIA = WRONG PICK.
Let's say I take a WR in the 8th round without waiting. If the four teams behind me don't take any of my WRs and Team Two takes Garcia then I'd be wishing I had taken Garcia instead. WIDE RECIEVER = WRONG PICK.
So you should see now that waiting does in fact improve my chances because it lets me avoid the "wrong pick" by reevaluating certain potential situations, should they occur.
Making any sense yet my friends? -z-
I think you might be having a hard time grasping what I'm saying here because, as many other fellow footballguys are wrongly assuming: I DID NOT VALUE GARCIA HIGHER THAN EACH OF THE WIDE RECEIVERS.He was guaranteed Garcia by drafting him. The second he waited, he could have lost Garcia.
*cough* indecision *cough* not strategy *cough*Sorry, I will stop my heckling and go to sleep now. I just want to know how his indecision = good strategy.I think you might be having a hard time grasping what I'm saying here because, as many other fellow footballguys are wrongly assuming: I DID NOT VALUE GARCIA HIGHER THAN EACH OF THE WIDE RECEIVERS.He was guaranteed Garcia by drafting him. The second he waited, he could have lost Garcia.
-z-
I think I threw too much at some people. I'm going to let the dust settle and let you guys sleep on my brilliance for a while. Haha.
No seriously, ponder what I did and why I did it for a week or so. The bulb will either light up or it won't. -z-
Ponder this: you could have just taken Garcia, and you haven't offered even a line of reasoning, let alone any evidence, that you taking Garcia would have made it less likely that one of the WRs would fall to you in the next round. Why would it make any difference at all whether you passed your pick or chose Garcia? Did the guy picking after you think "gee, I was going to take Joey Galloway, but now that this doofus passed, I'd better grab Ron Dayne instead"? Your line of reasoning makes no sense at all.Probably in the end, the likelihood that you get two of those four players is equivalent whether or not you pass your pick, since the same number of picks will happen before your second choice. But the likelihood that you get Garcia and one of the WRs is maximized only by taking Garcia at your pick. It's certainly not maximized by waiting until after someone who needs a QB gets to pick. You gave yourself a number of ways to screw it up.I think I threw too much at some people. I'm going to let the dust settle and let you guys sleep on my brilliance for a while. Haha.
No seriously, ponder what I did and why I did it for a week or so. The bulb will either light up or it won't. -z-