What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

TNF - MIN vs TB (1 Viewer)

I'm going to skip looking it up and just go with my sketchy memory in that Ponder's struggles have coincided with the return of Simpson to the starting lineup.

 
I'm a Panthers fan, but in terms of pure enjoyment of watching a single player, Percy Harvin is at the top of the list. He's just so damn fun to watch.
Wonder if Todd McShay still thinks he's a team killing cancer.
McShay had good reasons to believe this. Harvin was an absolute punk in HS.
yeah, I love the guy but that was a red flag. Todd McShay is not the kind of guy to ruffle things up over questionable character concerns.
 
I'm a Panthers fan, but in terms of pure enjoyment of watching a single player, Percy Harvin is at the top of the list. He's just so damn fun to watch.
Wonder if Todd McShay still thinks he's a team killing cancer.
McShay had good reasons to believe this. Harvin was an absolute punk in HS.
yeah, I love the guy but that was a red flag. Todd McShay is not the kind of guy to ruffle things up over questionable character concerns.
I just thought it was odd that he would think that a guy who just won two BCS titles was still a team-killing cancer because he got into a fight and had a problem with a coach in high school.
 
Martin turning into a stud here. Vikes D doesn't seem so scary anymore what with Larod tearing them up last week.

 
I'm not so sure that wasn't a pick. I can't believe they didn't even look at it.
We never saw another angle live...that doesn't mean that the booth guys didn't look at one.If the player was clearly OOB on another angle, there's no reason to buzz the officials since they would have made the RIGHT call. The view we had on TV left things less than clear, but the official had a perfect viewing angle...no reason to believe or suspect he got that wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Defender there needed to push Williams while he was in the air.. there is no more forced out rule. :kicksrock:
Are we still talking about this? The QB was outside the pocket. Totally different, and allowed.
I think he was stating that the Viking needed to push the receiver out of bounds after catching the ball before getting his second foot down thus making it a non-catch.I was thinking the same thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.

 
I'm not so sure that wasn't a pick. I can't believe they didn't even look at it.
We never saw another angle live...that doesn't mean that the booth guys didn't look at one.If the player was clearly OOB on another angle, there's no reason to buzz the officials since they would have made the RIGHT call. The view we had on TV left things less than clear, but the official had a perfect viewing angle...no reason to believe or suspect he got that wrong.
:confused: You could see everything on TV. Feet, ball, etc. What else was there to see? The only question was a judgment call as to what point he had "possession".
 
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.
Harvin was wide open and would have ran out of bounds. There was nobody within 10 yards of him. Only would have gained about 8 yds, but it would have been a better decision
 
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.
Mayock's just an idiot. And now we have LT on the halftime show, lol. just lol.
 
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.
Harvin was wide open and would have ran out of bounds. There was nobody within 10 yards of him. Only would have gained about 8 yds, but it would have been a better decision
Wasn't he in the middle of the field?
 
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.
Harvin was wide open and would have ran out of bounds. There was nobody within 10 yards of him. Only would have gained about 8 yds, but it would have been a better decision
Wasn't he in the middle of the field?
Running underneath route from left to right and with Harvin there was nobody close enough to keep him from reaching the sidelines.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mayock is being overly critical of Ponder. He threw toward the sideline because Minnesota only had one timeout. Sure he could have threw it to Harvin but that would have forced to take their last timeout.
Harvin was wide open and would have ran out of bounds. There was nobody within 10 yards of him. Only would have gained about 8 yds, but it would have been a better decision
Wasn't he in the middle of the field?
Running underneath route from left to right and with Harvin there was nobody close enough to keep him from reaching the sidelines.
There was only had 30 or something seconds left before the half. You have to threw the ball down field and used the sidelines in that situation. I don't think it was a horrible decision by Ponder.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top